BACKGROUND: Growing evidence suggests that immunotherapy has a positive effect on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BMs). However, it remains unclear which type of immunotherapy is more efficient. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and safety of different immunotherapy types and determine the optimal option.
METHODS: Four databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, Embase, and Web of Science) and ClinicalTrial.gov were searched from inception until January 26, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective nonrandomized trials, or observational studies investigating NSCLC patients with BMs treated by immunotherapy were included. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The efficacy of immunotherapy on NSCLC patients with BMs was evaluated using frequentist random-effects NMA.
RESULTS: Eleven studies from 1560 citations, encompassing 1437 participants, were included in this NMA. Statistical analysis showed that pembrolizumab (SMD = 4.35, 95% CI [2.21, 6.60]) and nivolumab+ipilimumab (SMD = 3.81, 95% CI [1.21, 6.40]) could improve overall survival (OS). Pembrolizumab (SMD = 3.32, 95% CI [2.75, 3.90]) demonstrated better effects in improving the overall response rate (ORR). No significant difference in adverse event (AE) was observed between immunotherapy and chemotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that pembrolizumab was the most promising immunotherapy for NSCLC patients with BMs. Nivolumab+ipilimumab might be an alternative choice to improve OS.
CONCLUSIONS: Inconsistency tests were not performed because of the scarcity of direct comparison. Besides, high heterogeneity was observed in our NMA.

Linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD) is an acquired autoimmune subepidermal blistering disorder. Diagnosis always relies on skin pathology and direct immunofluorescence (DIF), with typical linear deposits of IgA along the basement membrane zone (BMZ). The typical clinical manifestation is tense bullae arranged like the \"string of pearls\" companied with severe pruritus. Dapsone is often considered first-line therapy for LABD, and it is necessary to test the HLA-B*1301 gene to prevent the occurrence of dapsone-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DHS). Here we report a case of LABD resistant to corticosteroid and sulfasalazine, while waiting for HLA-B*1301 gene test results, dupilumab was used to control severe pruritus.

Eosinophilic otitis media, first reported in Japan, is a viscous, intractable otitis media often linked to bronchial asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis, characterized by highly viscous middle ear effusion. Its pathological mechanism remains unclear and the condition occasionally does not respond to steroids. It is now recognized as a rare type 2 inflammatory disease and should be treated specifically to enhance quality of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacies of biologic treatments. We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to September 2023. We retrieved ear examination findings, otitis media-related and symptom scores, air-bone gaps and hearing thresholds, serum eosinophil, and immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels before and after biologic treatments. Biologics treatment significantly improved subjective otitis media-related scores, compared with control group (standard mean difference (SMD) -1.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) [-2.24; -1.01], I2=54%). Additionally, the serum eosinophil counts and IgE levels significantly decreased (SMD -1.40; 95% CI [-1.99; -0.81], I 2=0%) after 6-12 months of biologic treatments, but the hearing thresholds did not significantly change. There were no significant differences between groups treated with dupilumab and groups treated with other biologics. Biologics treatment for eosinophilic otitis media significantly improved subjective otitis media-related scores and decreased serum eosinophil and IgE levels, but no significant changes in hearing threshold. More randomized cohort studies are needed to confirm the efficacies of biologics in patients with refractory eosinophilic otitis media.

BACKGROUND: The selection of appropriate second-line therapy for liver cancer after first-line treatment failure poses a significant clinical challenge due to the lack of direct comparative studies and standard treatment protocols. A network meta-analysis (NMA) provides a robust method to systematically evaluate the clinical outcomes and adverse effects of various second-line treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library to identify phase III/IV randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to March 11, 2024. The outcomes extracted were median overall survival (OS), median progression-free survival (PFS), time to disease progression (TTP), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse reactions. This study was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023427843) to ensure transparency, novelty, and reliability.
RESULTS: We included 16 RCTs involving 7,005 patients and 10 second-line treatments. For advanced HCC patients, regorafenib (HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.53-0.73) and cabozantinib (HR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.63-0.85) provided the best OS benefits compared to placebo. Cabozantinib (HR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.32-0.55) and regorafenib (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.31-0.68) also offered the most significant PFS benefits. For TTP, apatinib (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33-0.57), ramucirumab (HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.34-0.57), and regorafenib (HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.38-0.51) showed significant benefits over placebo. Regarding ORR, ramucirumab (OR = 9.90, 95% CI: 3.40-42.98) and S-1 (OR = 8.68, 95% CI: 1.4-154.68) showed the most significant increases over placebo. Apatinib (OR = 3.88, 95% CI: 2.48-6.10) and cabozantinib (OR = 3.53, 95% CI: 2.54-4.90) provided the best DCR benefits compared to placebo. Tivantinib showed the most significant advantages in terms of three different safety outcome measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that, in terms of overall efficacy and safety, regorafenib and cabozantinib are the optimal second-line treatment options for patients with advanced HCC.

OBJECTIVE: Standard-dose immune checkpoint inhibitors (SD-ICIs) are the standard of care as initial therapy in microsatellite instable-high (MSI-H) advanced/metastatic colorectal adenocarcinomas (mCRC), but there are preclinical data to suggest that low-dose ICIs (LD-ICI) might also have similar efficacy.
METHODS: A retrospective study of patients with MSI-H mCRC receiving ICIs between June 2017 and January 2023 was conducted. The primary end point of the study was 12-month progression-free survival (PFS), which was computed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were available for analysis during the study period. Sixty patients (92%) received nivolumab, whereas the remaining received pembrolizumab. First-line ICIs were received by 18 patients (28%), whereas 47 patients (72%) received ICIs during later lines. Thirty patients (47%) received LD-ICIs (all received nivolumab), with the remaining receiving SD-ICIs (53%). At a median follow-up of 16.5 (95% CI, 11.8 to 21.2) months, median PFS was not reached in the entire cohort. The 12-month PFS rate in the LD-ICI cohort was 90%, whereas it was 75.8% in the SD-ICI cohort. There were no statistical differences in patients receiving ICIs as first-line therapy (12 months PFS-94.4%) or during later lines of therapy (12-month PFS-77.9%; P = .56).
CONCLUSIONS: ICIs in the current study show survivals which are similar to those seen in seminal trials in patients with MSI-H mCRC. Low-dose ICIs appear to work in MSI-H mCRC and should be explored prospectively in clinical trials. Patients with MSI-H status should be exposed to ICIs, whether initially or later during treatment, whenever feasible.

BACKGROUND: Sacituzumab govitecan (sacituzumab) emerged as an important agent in metastatic and locally recurrent HER2-negative breast cancer treatment. UGT1A1 polymorphisms have also been shown to predict sacituzumab toxicity.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, we sought to evaluate the associations between UGT1A1 status, toxicity, and therapeutic outcomes in sacituzumab recipients with advanced breast cancer who underwent genotype testing for UGT1A1 alleles (N = 68).
RESULTS: We found 17 (25%) of our patients to be homozygous for UGT1A1*28 and 24 (35.3%) were heterozygous. Of seven African American patients with triple-negative breast cancer, five were homozygous for UGT1A1*28 and two were heterozygous. Patients with a homozygous UGT1A1*28 genotype were significantly more likely to have treatment terminated because of adverse effects. However, the polymorphism was not associated with treatment discontinuation because of disease progression.
CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective, real-world analysis suggests potential clinical utility in UGT1A1 testing for patients receiving sacituzumab, but future trials are needed to confirm the association between genotypes and treatment outcomes.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。