We systematically reviewed radiological abnormalities in patients with prolonged SARS-CoV-2 infection, defined as persistently positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results for SARS-CoV-2 for > 21 days, with either persistent or relapsed symptoms. We extracted data from 24 patients (median age, 54.5 [interquartile range, 44-64 years]) reported in the literature and analyzed their representative CT images based on the timing of the CT scan relative to the initial PCR positivity. Our analysis focused on the patterns and distribution of CT findings, severity scores of lung involvement on a scale of 0-4, and the presence of migration. All patients were immunocompromised, including 62.5% (15/24) with underlying lymphoma and 83.3% (20/24) who had received anti-CD20 therapy within one year. Median duration of infection was 90 days. Most patients exhibited typical CT appearance of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), including ground-glass opacities with or without consolidation, throughout the follow-up period. Notably, CT severity scores were significantly lower during ≤ 21 days than during > 21 days (P < 0.001). Migration was observed on CT in 22.7% (5/22) of patients at ≤ 21 days and in 68.2% (15/22) to 87.5% (14/16) of patients at > 21 days, with rare instances of parenchymal bands in previously affected areas. Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 infection usually presents as migrating typical COVID-19 pneumonia in immunocompromised patients, especially those with impaired B-cell immunity.

暂无摘要。

Immunocompromised patients with B-cell depletion agents are at risk for persistence and/or severe SARS-COV-2 infection. We describe a case series of 21 COVID-19 patients under B cell depletion therapy, mostly treated with a combined therapy based on intravenous remdesevir (RDV) and steroid associated with SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies against Spike glycoprotein and/or hyper-immune convalescent plasma.
This is a single-center longitudinal study. We retrospectively enrolled a total number of 21 B-cell depleted consecutive hospitalized patients with COVID-19 at the Lazzaro Spallanzani National Institute for Infectious Diseases, Rome, Italy, from November 2020 to December 2021. Demographic characteristics, medical history, clinical presentation, treatment, adverse drug reactions, and clinical and virological outcome were collected for all patients. In a subgroup, we explore immune T cells activation, T cells specific anti-SARS-COV-2 response, and neutralizing antibodies.
Twenty-one inpatients with B-cell depletion and SARS-COV-2 infection were enrolled. A median of 1 B cells/mm3 was detected. Eighteen patients presented hypogammaglobulinemia. All patients presented interstitial pneumonia treated with intravenous RDV and steroids. Sixteen patients were treated with monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein, four patients were treated with SARS-CoV-2 hyper-immune convalescent plasma infusion, and three patients received both treatments. A variable kinetic of T cell activation returning to normal levels at Day 30 after immunotherapy infusion was observed. All treated patients recovered.
In COVID-19 immunosuppressed subjects, it is mandatory to establish a prompt, effective, and combined multi-target therapy including oxygen, antiviral, steroid, and antibody-based therapeutics, tailored to the patient\'s clinical needs.

暂无摘要。

Several clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of lytic therapies targeting B cells in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). More modest efficacy has been noted in the primary progressive subtype of MS. Clinical success has increased interest in the role of B cells in the pathogenesis of MS and in ways to potentially improve upon current B cell therapies. In this mini review, we will critically review previous and ongoing clinical trials of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in MS, including rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab. Side effects and adverse event profiles will be discussed. Studies examining the proposed mechanisms of action of B cell depleting therapies will also be reviewed.

BACKGROUND: Idiosyncratic drug-induced neutropenia and agranulocytosis is seldom discussed in the literature, especially for new drugs such as biotherapies outside the context of oncology. In the present paper, we report and discuss the clinical data and management of this relatively rare disorder, with a focus on biotherapies used in autoimmune and auto-inflammatory diseases.
METHODS: A review of the literature was carried out using the PubMed database of the US National Library of Medicine. We searched for articles published between January 2010 and May 2019 using the following key words or associations: \"drug-induced neutropenia\", \"drug-induced agranulocytosis\", and \"idiosyncratic agranulocytosis\". We included specific searches on several biotherapies used outside the context of oncology, including: tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors, anti-CD20 agents, anti-C52 agents, interleukin (IL) 6 inhibitors, IL 1 inhibitors, and B-cell activating factor inhibitor.
RESULTS: Idiosyncratic neutropenia remains a potentially serious adverse event due to the frequency of severe sepsis with severe deep tissue infections (e.g., pneumonia), septicemia, and septic shock in approximately two-thirds of all hospitalized patients with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (neutrophil count (NC) ≤ 0.5 × 109/L and ≤ 0.1 × 109/L, respectively). Over the last 20 years, several drugs have been strongly associated with the occurrence of idiosyncratic neutropenia, including antithyroid drugs, ticlopidine, clozapine, sulfasalazine, antibiotics such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and deferiprone. Transient grade 1-2 neutropenia (absolute blood NC between 1.5 and 0.5 × 109/L) related to biotherapy is relatively common with these drugs. An approximate 10% prevalence of such neutropenia has been reported with several of these biotherapies (e.g., TNF-alpha inhibitors, IL6 inhibitors, and anti-CD52 agents). Grade 3-4 neutropenia or agranulocytosis and clinical manifestations related to sepsis are less common, with only a few case reports to date for most biotherapies. Special mention should be made of late onset and potentially severe neutropenia, especially following anti-CD52 agent therapy. During drug therapy, several prognostic factors have been identified that may be helpful when identifying \'susceptible\' patients. Older age (>65 years), septicemia or shock, renal failure, and a neutrophil count ≤0.1 × 109/L have been identified as poor prognostic factors. Idiosyncratic neutropenia should be managed depending on clinical severity, with permanent/transient discontinuation or a lower dose of the drug, switching from one drug to another of the same or another class, broad-spectrum antibiotics in cases of sepsis, and hematopoietic growth factors (particularly G-CSF).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant progress has been made in recent years in the field of idiosyncratic drug-induced neutropenia, leading to an improvement in their prognosis (currently, mortality rate between 5 and 10%). Clinicians must continue their efforts to improve their knowledge of these adverse events with new drugs as biotherapies.