OBJECTIVE: Sodium channel blockers (SCBs) have traditionally been utilized as anti-seizure medications by primarily targeting the inactivation process. In a drug discovery project aiming at finding potential anticonvulsants, we have identified arbidol, originally an antiviral drug, as a potent SCB. In order to evaluate its anticonvulsant potential, we have thoroughly examined its biophysical properties as well as its effects on animal seizure models.
METHODS: Patch clamp recording was used to investigate the electrophysiological properties of arbidol, as well as the binding and unbinding kinetics of arbidol, carbamazepine and lacosamide. Furthermore, we evaluated the anticonvulsant effects of arbidol using three different seizure models in male mice.
RESULTS: Arbidol effectively suppressed neuronal epileptiform activity by blocking sodium channels. Arbidol demonstrated a distinct mode of action by interacting with both the fast and slow inactivation of Nav1.2 channels compared with carbamazepine and lacosamide. A kinetic study suggested that the binding and unbinding rates might be associated with the specific characteristics of these three drugs. Arbidol targeted the classical binding site of local anaesthetics, effectively inhibited the gain-of-function effects of Nav1.2 epileptic mutations and exhibited varying degrees of anticonvulsant effects in the maximal electroshock model and subcutaneous pentylenetetrazol model but had no effect in the pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus model.
CONCLUSIONS: Arbidol shows promising potential as an anticonvulsant agent, providing a unique mode of action that sets it apart from existing SCBs.

OBJECTIVE: Inhibitors of voltage-gated sodium channels (NaVs) are important anti-epileptic drugs, but the contribution of specific channel isoforms is unknown since available inhibitors are non-selective. We aimed to create novel, isoform selective inhibitors of Nav channels as a means of informing the development of improved antiseizure drugs.
METHODS: We created a series of compounds with diverse selectivity profiles enabling block of NaV1.6 alone or together with NaV1.2. These novel NaV inhibitors were evaluated for their ability to inhibit electrically evoked seizures in mice with a heterozygous gain-of-function mutation (N1768D/+) in Scn8a (encoding NaV1.6) and in wild-type mice.
RESULTS: Pharmacologic inhibition of NaV1.6 in Scn8aN1768D/+ mice prevented seizures evoked by a 6-Hz shock. Inhibitors were also effective in a direct current maximal electroshock seizure assay in wild-type mice. NaV1.6 inhibition correlated with efficacy in both models, even without inhibition of other CNS NaV isoforms.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest NaV1.6 inhibition is a driver of efficacy for NaV inhibitor anti-seizure medicines. Sparing the NaV1.1 channels of inhibitory interneurons did not compromise efficacy. Selective NaV1.6 inhibitors may provide targeted therapies for human Scn8a developmental and epileptic encephalopathies and improved treatments for idiopathic epilepsies.