UNASSIGNED: Chandler syndrome (CS) is one of the iridocorneal endothelial syndromes (ICEs) with proliferation of abnormal corneal endothelial cells over the anterior chamber (AC) angle and iris, resulting in complications, for example, secondary angle closure glaucoma (SACG). We report an association between CS and nanophthalmos, highlighting diagnostic and therapeutic challenges and pathological insights.
UNASSIGNED: A 46-year-old female patient presented with bilateral progressive blurring of vision. Examination revealed bilateral (OU) small corneal diameter, shallow AC, closed AC angle, beaten-bronze appearance of corneal endothelium, and mild iris atrophy in the right eye (OD). Intraocular pressure was 48 mm Hg and 22 mm Hg in the OD and left eye (OS), respectively. Fundus examination revealed optic nerve head cupping. Biometry showed short axial length and microcornea OU, that is, nanophthalmos. Optical coherence tomography and visual field revealed structural and functional evidence of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Specular microscopy demonstrated reduction of corneal endothelial cell density and the light-dark reversal characteristic of ICE. Therefore, a diagnosis of CS with SACG and nanophthalmos was made. The patient was referred to a specialized glaucoma center with recommendation of clear lens extraction and a glaucoma drainage device with retropupillary tube placement.
UNASSIGNED: This is the first report of an association between CS and nanophthalmos. It highlights the possibility of SACG despite evident risk factors for primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG). Furthermore, it provides a hypothesis about the etiology of ICE. The concurrence of CS and nanophthalmos suggests that a common developmental mechanism could be implicated since periocular mesenchyme, the embryological precursor of corneal endothelium, plays a role in the development of optic cup and stalk.
UNASSIGNED: SACG should be considered even in the presence of evident risk factors for PACG, such as nanophthalmos. Additionally, the association of nanophthalmos and CS warrants revisiting the yet inconclusive etiology of CS, where a developmental mechanism could be considered.
UNASSIGNED: Ameen Ismail A, El-Ruby SA. Bilateral Chandler Syndrome, Nanophthalmos, and Angle Closure Glaucoma: A Complex Presentation, Challenging Diagnosis, and Pathological Insight-A Case Report. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2024;18(2):68-73.

In the first issue of Graefe\'s Archive from 1854, Albrecht von Graefe wrote about glaucoma. Glaucoma comes from the Greek word \"glaukos,\" gleaming, which was first used by Homer around 800 BCE. Since then, glaukos and glaucoma have taken on many different meanings. The terms blindness, cataract and glaucoma were used interchangeably and twisted together in incomprehensible contexts. Over 2500 years of glaucoma theories were upset by the discovery of the ophthalmoscope in 1851. The first reports of increased intraocular pressure appeared in the mid-seventeenth century, but it took over 200 years for this elevated pressure to be accepted by the ophthalmological community. The discovery of glaucoma simplex in 1861 was an important step forward. What did doctors know about glaucoma before 1850 and why did it take so long to classify glaucoma in its various categories? And why is it that we still do not know what the cause is for primary open angle glaucoma? I will try to answer some of these questions after a historical overview.

UNASSIGNED: To describe the clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of pupillary block glaucoma (PBG) following vitreoretinal surgery (VR surgery).
UNASSIGNED: Retrospective observational study of 6941 patients, who underwent VR surgery at a tertiary eye care centre in South India between January 2015 and December 2019. Amongst them, clinical data of 61 patients who developed PBG were taken for statistical analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Mean (SD) age was 53.90 (13.4) years and the incidence of PBG was .87%. Median (IQR) time of onset of PBG following VR surgery was 3.33 (1.1-6.6) months and majority were pseudophakic (75%). PBG resolved with Nd:YAG laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) alone in 50 (82%) patients, whereas 11(18%) patients required additional interventions like surgical iridectomy, trabeculectomy or diode laser cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) either as a stand-alone procedure or in combination with silicone oil removal (SOR). Mean (SD) intraocular pressure at the onset of PBG was 41.61 (14.5) mmHg, which reduced drastically following LPI to 24.28 (14.9) mmHg which further dropped significantly at 6 months follow up to 20.34 (13.9) mmHg.
UNASSIGNED: Incidence of secondary PBG after VR surgery was .87%, and we observed diabetes mellitus, combined cataract and VR surgery, use of 1000cs SO endotamponade, intraoperative endolaser and multiple VR surgical interventions as common associations. Majority of the patients with PBG after VR procedures resolved with LPI and medical management. Few individuals (18%) required additional laser or surgical intervention for IOP control.

BACKGROUND: This case report is applicable to the field of ophthalmology because there is a paucity of medical literature related to the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of uveal effusion syndrome. This is an urgent concern because there are severe complications associated with this disease, including non-rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, angle closure glaucoma, and possible blindness. This report will fill clinical knowledge gaps using a patient example.
METHODS: A 68-year-old white male with multiple cardiovascular risk factors initially presented to the Eye Institute Urgent Care Clinic with new onset visual symptoms, including eye pain, eye lid swelling, redness, and tearing of his left eye. He had experienced a foreign body sensation in the left eye and bilateral floaters weeks prior to his presentation. The patient was examined, and vision was 20/30 in both eyes, and intraocular pressure was 46 in the right eye and 36 in the left eye. After initial assessment, including compression gonioscopy, intermittent angle closure glaucoma was suspected. He received oral diamox 500 mg, one drop of alphagan in both eyes, one drop of latanoprost in both eyes, one drop of dorzolamide in both eyes, and one drop of 2% pilocarpine in both eyes. There was only slight response in intraocular pressure. Owing to the bilateral angle closure, he underwent laser peripheral iridotomy to decrease intraocular pressure and open the angle that was found closed on gonioscopy. The patient was discharged on oral and topical glaucoma drops and scheduled for the glaucoma clinic. When he presented for follow-up in the glaucoma clinic, he was evaluated and noted to have bilateral narrow angles and intraocular pressure in the mid-twenties. A brightness scan (B-scan) was performed and was noted to have bilateral choroidal effusions, confirmed by Optos fundus photos. He was started on prednisone at 60 mg once per day (QD) with taper, continuation of oral and topical glaucoma medications, and a retina evaluation. Evaluation with a retina specialist showed resolving choroidal effusion in the left eye. He continued the prednisone taper as well as glaucoma drops as prescribed. Follow-up in the glaucoma clinic revealed a grade 3 open angle. He continued the prednisone taper, cosopt twice per day in both eyes, and discontinued brimonidine. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that was performed showed results that were remarkable. No hemorrhage or mass was present. Follow-up with the retina specialist found that the choroidal effusions had resolved completely.
CONCLUSIONS: This case report emphasizes the value in early detection, keen diagnostic evaluation, and cross-collaboration between multiple ophthalmology specialists to optimize healthcare outcomes for patients with uveal effusion syndrome.

Hypertensive anterior uveitis poses diagnostic challenges owing to its multiple potential etiologies. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an under-recognized cause that exhibits diverse clinical presentations. This case report focuses on the intricate diagnostic challenge encountered in a 66-year-old immunocompetent patient with CMV-induced hypertensive anterior uveitis. The patient\'s history, encompassing angle closure glaucoma and topiramate use, contributed to the hypertensive crisis. Initial management included intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medication, topiramate discontinuation, and bilateral phacoemulsification, successfully normalizing IOP. However, a subsequent recurrence prompted a detailed investigation. The identification of keratic precipitates and a synechial closed angle led to aqueous humor sampling and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, unveiling the presence of CMV-DNA. Treatment led to a favorable response, resolving ocular inflammation and effectively controlling IOP. This case underscores the complexity of diagnosing and managing CMV-induced hypertensive anterior uveitis, emphasizing the critical role of a comprehensive approach in achieving successful outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of cataract extraction on intraocular pressure at 6, 12, and 24 months and their difference compared to the baseline in diverse glaucoma subtypes.
METHODS: We carried out research in the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases, as of April 2022 for relevant papers, filtered according to established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The meta-analysis evaluated the Mean Reduction and relative Standard Error in these subpopulations at predetermined times. A total of 41 groups (2302 eyes) were included in the systematic review. Due to the significant heterogeneity, they were analysed through a Random Effects Model.
RESULTS: We obtained these differences from baseline: (1) Open Angle Glaucoma at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively: -2.44 mmHg, -2.71 mmHg and -3.13 mmHg; (2) Angle Closure Glaucoma at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively: -6.81 mmHg, -7.03 mmHg and -6.52 mmHg; (3) Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma at 12 months: -5.30 mmHg; (4) Ocular Hypertension at 24 months: -2.27 mmHg.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a certain variability, the reduction in ocular pressure was statistically significant at 6, 12 and 24 months in both Open Angle Glaucoma and Angle Closure Glaucoma, the latter being superior. Data for Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma and for Ocular Hypertension are available, respectively, only at 12 months and at 24 months, both being significant.

OBJECTIVE: To assess treatment and visit patterns among patients with newly diagnosed anatomical narrow angle (ANA) and identify sociodemographic factors associated with disparities in care.
METHODS: Retrospective practice pattern evaluation study.
METHODS: A total of 263,422 patients diagnosed with ANA between 2007 and 2019 were identified in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart. Inclusion was limited to newly diagnosed ANA, defined as (1) continuous enrollment during a 2-year lookback period and 1-year study period from first diagnosis; (2) diagnosis by an ophthalmologist or optometrist; and (3) no history of pseudophakia, ANA treatments, or prior primary angle closure glaucoma diagnosis. Outcome measures were treatment with laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI), cataract surgery, or intraocular pressure-lowering medications and number of eye care visits. Logistic and Poisson regression were performed to assess factors associated with treatment and eye care visits, respectively.
RESULTS: Among 52,405 eligible cases, 27.7% received LPI, 13.9% received drops, and 15.1% received cataract surgery. Odds of LPI were higher in Asians and Hispanics (odds ratio [OR] ≥ 1.16, P < .001). Non-Whites had higher odds of drops (OR ≥ 1.19, P < .001), but Hispanics had lower odds of cataract surgery (OR = 0.79, P < .001). The mean number of eye care visits was 2.6±2.1 including the day of diagnosis. Older age and treatment were associated with higher rates of eye care visits (rate ratio > 1.15, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: More than a quarter of patients with newly diagnosed ANA receive treatment with LPI. Racial minorities are more likely to receive ANA-specific treatments but less likely to receive cataract surgery. These differences may reflect racial differences in disease severity and the need for clearer practice guidelines in ANA care.

OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) findings in a patient with bilateral iridoschisis and unilateral angle closure glaucoma (ACG) associated with abnormal visibility of iris vessels.
METHODS: A 67-year-old male patient with a history of red and painful left eye (LE) one year earlier, presented to our ophthalmology department for a routine examination.Ophthalmic examination of the right eye revealed narrow anterior chamber with sectorial iris atrophy associated to abnormal visibility of an iris vessel. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was 12 mmHg with normal optic disc appearance. LE anterior chamber was narrow with diffuse iris atrophy and abnormal vessels visibility. IOP was 28 mmHg with an important optic disc excavation. On gonioscopy, angle was narrow without neovessels nor synechiae. AS-OCT of both eyes revealed shallow angles, iris splitting with material release in the anterior chamber, while pigmented epithelium was preservedAnti-glaucoma eye drops were prescribed and peripheral laser iridotomy was performed in both eyes with decreased IOP at 14 mmHg in the LE.
CONCLUSIONS: Iridoschisis is a rare ocular condition characterized by a separation between the anterior and posterior layers of iris stroma with several clinical presentations, and may be associated with abnormal visibility of iris vessels in some cases. The diagnosis of iridoschisis may be challenging and AS-OCT can be a very useful tool to confirm the diagnosis in atypical presentations and to detect associated angle closure.

Suprachoroidal hemorrhage (SCH) is an uncommon sight-threatening pathology, most often encountered intraoperatively. However, spontaneous presentation of SCH is even rarer. We report the case of a 69-year-old diabetic patient with spontaneous SCH (SSCH) in her left eye masquerading as a vitreous hemorrhage. She developed treatment-resistant secondary angle-closure glaucoma. She was referred to the vitreoretinal team for intraocular exploration to identify the source of the hemorrhage. Pars plana vitrectomy identified extensive SCH intraoperatively. As far as the authors are aware, this is the first case in which the patient had such severe SSCH that the characteristic kissing choroidal sign was not visualized on repeated examinations and multimodal imaging. All initial evidence pointed towards a diagnosis of vitreous hemorrhage. This case demonstrates that if a patient has angle-closure glaucoma and persistently raised intra-ocular pressure that is treatment-resistant, then SCH is an important differential diagnosis to consider. Clinicians need to be aware of the risk factors of SCH, and early recognition with a timely intervention of SCH is important to optimize visual outcomes.

UNASSIGNED: Bilateral secondary angle closure glaucoma is a presenting symptom of microspherophakia and ectopia lentis. Characterizing the associated syndrome and confirmation by genetic testing can identify associated systemic abnormalities and provide appropriate genetic counseling.
UNASSIGNED: A 42-year-old woman with severe intellectual disability presented with light perception visual acuity and glaucoma, with intraocular pressure (IOP) in her right and left eyes of 69 and 70 mmHg, respectively. She underwent two sessions of 270-degree laser diode transscleral cytophotocoagulation treatment at a 6-month interval and was prescribed topical anti-glaucoma medication. Her family noticed a progressive decrease in her vision while on treatment for 2 years. She was diagnosed with apparent Weill-Marchesani syndrome, accompanied by angle closure glaucoma and microspherophakia. Cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation were successful in both eyes and post-operative IOP was controlled with anti-glaucoma medication but her vision did not improve from severe glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Her underlying syndrome was investigated genetically by whole exome sequencing.
UNASSIGNED: Sequencing showed a pathogenic variant in ARID1B, c.3955dupC (p.Gln1319Profs*14), diagnostic of Coffin-Siris syndrome. This is the first report of Coffin-Siris syndrome associated with microspherophakia and angle closure glaucoma.
UNASSIGNED: Bilateral angle closure glaucoma from ectopia lentis in patients with genetic syndromes could be an indicator of microspherophakia in adulthood. Ophthalmological surveillance is important in patients with Coffin-Siris syndrome.