ambulance

救护车
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自2019年开始以来,COVID-19大流行大大延长了全球医疗保健规定。从一开始,英国的救护车服务必须适应和改变他们的工作习惯,以满足距离要求,增加员工人数,缓解员工因自我隔离和疾病而无法工作的影响。一种策略是将临床医生从急诊手术中心(EOC)转移到在家工作。像许多国际服务一样,英国的救护车服务机构使用护理人员和护士对拨打999紧急服务热线的患者进行电话和视频评估,这种模式被称为虚拟护理或远程临床决策。虚拟护理是患者与临床医生或临床医生之间的任何互动,通过信息技术远程发生。越来越多的证据表明,大流行对医护人员的福祉造成了损害,主要是由于经常接触死亡和人类痛苦的严重压力。然而,仍然缺乏关注远程和虚拟临床医生福祉的文献,特别是那些在COVID-19大流行期间从在EOC工作转向在家工作的人。因此,本研究报告了从临床医生的角度对这些影响进行定性分析的结果。作者希望这项研究的结果能够为手术提供信息,提供此类服务的人的福祉和领导实践。
    联系了英国一家实施家庭工作的救护车服务的电话护士和护理人员的便利样本。在可能的31名(48%)中,有15名具有最近在家工作经验的临床医生对参加邀请做出了回应。所有参与者以前都曾在平等机会委员会内进行过远程评估。半结构化访谈通过视频会议软件进行,并进行了记录,转录和主题分析。采用归纳的方法来生成代码,两位研究人员在重新阅读之前分别阅读了成绩单,分配初始主题并确定频率。
    发现了五个主要主题,与进一步相关的子主题。主要主题是:安全;财务影响;工作关系;家庭工作环境;和焦虑。
    很少有研究探讨远程临床医生的健康和福祉。这项研究发现,在家工作的临床医生认为,在COVID-19大流行的初始阶段,在家工作对他们的健康和福祉没有不利影响。虽然有人提出了一些担忧,通过临床医生在家中从家庭成员那里获得的支持,这些都得到了缓解,以及同事们,他们中的一些人发展了新的工作关系。最初,财务影响似乎导致了参与者的一些担忧,但是,尽管需要进一步探索在家工作的真正财务影响,但这些问题很快得到了缓解。
    UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly stretched global healthcare provisions since its commencement in 2019. From the outset, ambulance services in the UK had to adapt and change their working practices to meet distancing requirements, to increase staff numbers and to ease the effects of staff becoming unavailable for work due to self-isolation and illness. One strategy was moving clinicians from emergency operation centres (EOCs) to working from home. Like many international services, UK ambulance services use paramedics and nurses to undertake telephone and video assessments of patients calling the 999 emergency services line in a model known as virtual care or remote clinical decision making. Virtual care is any interaction between a patient and a clinician or clinicians, occurring remotely via information technologies.Increasing evidence is becoming available to suggest that the pandemic caused harm to the well-being of healthcare workers, primarily due to the severe stress of regular exposure to death and human suffering. However, there remains a dearth of literature focusing on the well-being of remote and virtual clinicians, especially those who moved from working in EOCs to working at home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this study reports the findings of a qualitative analysis of these effects from the clinician\'s perspective. The authors hope that the findings from this study will inform the operating, well-being and leadership practices of those delivering such services.
    UNASSIGNED: A convenience sample of telephone nurses and paramedics from one UK ambulance service where home working had been implemented were contacted. Fifteen clinicians with recent home-working experience responded to the invitation to participate out of a possible 31 (48%). All participants had previously practised remote assessment from within an EOC. Semi-structured interviews took place via video-conferencing software and were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. An inductive approach was taken to generating codes, and both researchers separately read the transcripts before re-reading them, assigning initial themes and determining frequency.
    UNASSIGNED: Five main themes were discovered, with further associated sub-themes. The main themes were: safety; financial implications; working relationships; home-working environment; and anxiety.
    UNASSIGNED: Few studies explore remote clinicians\' health and well-being. This study identified that home-working clinicians felt that there had been no detrimental impact on their health and well-being because of working from home during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. While some concerns were raised, these were mitigated through the support that clinicians received at home from family members, as well as from colleagues, some of whom had developed new working relationships. Financial implications appeared to have contributed to some concerns for participants initially, but these had been alleviated quickly despite requiring further exploration of the true financial impact of working from home.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管救护车中的计划外分娩并不常见,紧急医疗服务(EMS)提供者在到达医院之前可能会遇到这种情况。这项研究旨在收集紧急医疗技术人员(EMT)的见解,助产士,和孕妇检查救护车分娩的原因和EMT面临的挑战,孕妇,和助产士在分娩时的脸。
    方法:进行了定性研究,和28名急救人员,助产士,和在救护车中有院前分娩经验的孕妇接受了采访。使用主题内容分析对数据进行分析。采用MAXQDA/10软件进行数据分析和代码提取。
    结果:对访谈的分析揭示了两个主要类别:导致救护车交付的因素及其挑战。这些因素包括文化问题,管理薄弱,设施无法进入。挑战包括恐惧和焦虑,本土文化,缺乏资源。
    结论:应该采取几种方法来减少救护车和院前急救医疗服务(PEMS)的分娩人数。其中包括长期的社区文化活动,公共教育,提高认识运动,对孕妇的教育和随访,改善获得保健设施的机会。此外,EMTS需要接受有关救护车交付的适当教育和培训。加强救护车服务和支持EMT处理诉讼索赔也至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Although unplanned deliveries in ambulances are uncommon, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers may encounter this situation before reaching the hospital. This research aims to gather insights from Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs), midwives, and expectant mothers to examine the causes of giving birth in ambulances and the challenges EMTs, pregnant women, and midwives face during delivery.
    METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted, and 28 EMTs, midwives, and pregnant women who had experience with pre-hospital births in the ambulance were interviewed. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. The MAXQDA/10 software was employed for data analysis and code extraction.
    RESULTS: The analysis of the interviews revealed two main categories: factors that cause delivery in the ambulance and its challenges. The factors include cultural problems, weak management, and inaccessibility to facilities. The challenges consist of fear and anxiety, native culture, and lack of resources.
    CONCLUSIONS: Several approaches should be implemented to reduce the number of births in ambulances and Pre-hospital Emergency Medical Services (PEMS). These include long-term community cultural activities, public education, awareness campaigns, education and follow-up for pregnant women, and improved accessibility to health facilities. Additionally, EMTS need to receive proper education and training for ambulance deliveries. Enhancing ambulance services and supporting EMTs in dealing with litigation claims are also critical.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在紧急情况下,使用甲氧氟烷治疗疼痛变得越来越普遍,部分原因是其易于管理。然而,对儿童和青少年发生严重不良事件的风险知之甚少.这项研究的目的是检查儿童人群中甲氧基氟烷的安全性。
    该研究是一项使用概率相关健康数据对儿科院前事件进行的回顾性队列研究。确定了1990年至2016年间西澳大利亚州所有涉及儿童和青少年患者的救护车转移。根据给予的镇痛对患者进行分类:甲氧氟烷,阿片类镇痛药,甲氧基氟烷和阿片类镇痛药,或者没有止痛剂.医院和死亡率数据与转移患者相关联,以确定死亡,药物不良反应,肝肾毒性,救护车转院后再入院。广义线性模型,根据社会人口统计学和救护车转移特征进行调整,用于比较暴露于甲氧氟醚的儿童和其他三组的结局。
    该研究队列由37,211名儿童组成,包括9,472例患者(25.5%)单独使用甲氧氟烷治疗,2,764(7.4%)用阿片类镇痛药治疗,1,235(3.3%)用甲氧基氟烷和阿片类镇痛药治疗,和23,740(63.8%)未使用镇痛药治疗。儿童和青少年的死亡并不常见,在使用甲氧氟烷治疗后的12个月内观察到少于5例死亡(<0.1%),在使用甲氧氟烷和阿片类镇痛药治疗的患者中没有死亡。在使用甲氧氟烷治疗的患者中,药物不良反应很少见(<0.1%)。肝脏和肾脏毒性也是如此,没有观察到病例。在90天的随访中,甲氧氟烷治疗与甲氧氟烷和阿片类镇痛药治疗患者的住院率无显著差异(校正OR:1.01,95CI:0.85~1.21).与甲氧氟烷治疗的患者相比,接受阿片类镇痛药治疗的患者更有可能住院(aOR:1.23,95CI:1.09-1.39),而未使用镇痛药治疗的患者住院的可能性较小(aOR:0.85,95CI:0.79~0.92).
    在由救护车运送的儿童和青少年中,使用甲氧氟烷与住院风险增加无关,死亡,严重的药物不良反应或肝肾毒性。
    UNASSIGNED: The use of methoxyflurane is becoming increasingly popular in the treatment of pain in an emergency setting, in part due to its ease of administration. However, little is known about the risk of serious adverse events in children and adolescents. The aim of this study was to examine the safety of methoxyflurane in a pediatric population.
    UNASSIGNED: The study was a retrospective cohort study of pediatric prehospital events using probabilistic linked health data. All ambulance transfers in Western Australia between 1990 and 2016 involving children and adolescent patients were identified. Patients were categorised based on administered analgesia: methoxyflurane, an opioid analgesic, both methoxyflurane and an opioid analgesic, or no analgesic. Hospital and mortality data were linked to transferred patients to identify deaths, adverse drug reactions, liver and kidney toxicity, and re-admissions to hospital following ambulance transfer. Generalized linear models, adjusting for sociodemographic and ambulance transfer characteristics, were used to compare outcomes between children exposed to methoxyflurane and the other three groups.
    UNASSIGNED: The study cohort consisted of 37,211 children, including 9,472 patients (25.5%) treated with methoxyflurane alone, 2,764 (7.4%) treated with an opioid analgesic, 1,235 (3.3%) treated with both methoxyflurane and an opioid analgesic, and 23,740 (63.8%) treated with no analgesic. Death in children and adolescents was uncommon, with less than five deaths (<0.1%) observed in the 12 months following treatment with methoxyflurane and no deaths in those treated with both methoxyflurane and an opioid analgesic. Adverse drug reaction was rare (<0.1%) in patients treated with methoxyflurane, as was liver and kidney toxicity with no case observed. At 90-days follow-up, there was no significant difference in hospitalization in patients treated with methoxyflurane and those treated with methoxyflurane and an opioid analgesic (adjusted OR:1.01, 95%CI:0.85-1.21). Compared with methoxyflurane treated patients, patients treated with an opioid analgesic were more likely to be hospitalized (aOR:1.23, 95%CI:1.09-1.39), while patients treated with no analgesic were less likely to be hospitalized (aOR:0.85, 95%CI:0.79-0.92).
    UNASSIGNED: In children and adolescents transported by ambulance, the use of methoxyflurane was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization, death, serious adverse drug reactions or liver and kidney toxicity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已经呼吁护理人员拥有某种形式的护理途径,他们可以用来安全地将患有癫痫的成年人从急诊科转移出去,并促进门诊护理的改善。不同的配置是可能的。要知道实施/评估的优先顺序,有必要确定哪些是服务用户可以接受的,并且可能是国民健康服务可行的。
    (1)确定正在考虑的配置,(2)了解服务用户对他们的看法和当前的规定,(3)确定什么样的护理服务用户想要和(4)确定哪些配置(S)被认为是在满足用户的偏好和是国民健康服务可行的最佳平衡。
    对服务提供商进行了调查,以实现目标1。与服务用户的访谈涉及目标2。通过完成离散选择实验来解决目标3。这些确定了用户对不同癫痫发作情况的护理偏好。通过完成“知识交流”讲习班来解决目标4。在这些,利益相关者考虑了用户陈述偏好的调查结果,并根据Michie的可接受性判断了不同的途径配置,实用性,有效性,负担能力,副作用和公平可行性标准。
    这个项目发生在英国。该调查招募了神经病学和神经科学中心以及紧急和紧急护理提供者的代表。对于采访,招募是通过第三部门支持小组进行的。通过西北救护车服务NHS信托基金和公共广告进行了离散选择实验的招募。研讨会参与者从神经病学和神经科学中心招募,紧急和紧急护理提供者,支持小组和调试网络。
    72个服务部门完成了调查。对25名癫痫患者(和5名亲属)进行了采访,他们在过去12个月内曾与紧急服务联系。离散选择实验由427名患有癫痫的成年人(和167名亲属)完成,他们在过去12个月内与救护车服务联系。与27个利益攸关方完成了讲习班。
    调查确定了一系列途径配置。他们在将患者带到何处以及促进门诊护理改善的潜力方面有所不同。在设计它们时很少咨询用户。离散选择实验发现,用户想要的护理配置与所提供的配置明显不同。在整个癫痫发作情况下,用户希望他们的护理人员能够访问他们的医疗记录;对于癫痫专家(例如癫痫护士,神经科医生)可以提供建议;让他们的全科医生收到报告;事件与癫痫专家预约;护理事件持续<6小时;并且有一种偏好模式,以避免运送到急诊室并留在原地。利益相关者认为这种配置在5-10年内是国家卫生服务可行的,一些元素可以立即部署。
    离散选择实验样本具有广泛代表性,但是那些报告最近与癫痫专家接触的人代表过多。
    用户表示他们想要的护理配置与当前配置明显不同。他们喜欢的配置是,在支持和投资下,被认为可能是国家卫生服务可行的。现在应开发和评估首选配置,以确定其实际可输送性和有效性。
    该研究注册为researchregistry4723。
    该奖项由美国国家卫生与护理研究所(NIHR)卫生与社会护理提供研究计划(NIHR奖参考:17/05/62)资助,并在《健康与社会护理提供研究》中全文发表。12号24.有关更多奖项信息,请参阅NIHR资助和奖励网站。
    救护车经常照顾癫痫患者。他们中的大多数被送往医院的事故和急诊科。这通常几乎没有益处,因为大多数患者已经被诊断并且在非紧急状态下访问事故和急诊科。为了改变事物,国家卫生服务组织希望护理人员使用“替代护理途径”。这可能意味着该人不会被带到事故和急诊室,而是在其他地方得到照顾。我们的项目将利益相关者聚集在一起,以开发替代护理途径,其中包括对患者和护理人员重要的事情,但也是国家卫生服务可行的。70个国家卫生服务组织首先通过调查和研讨会告诉我们,他们正在考虑哪些途径以及哪些途径可能可行。然后采访了30名癫痫患者及其家人和朋友。他们解释了癫痫发作后的需求以及当前护理的问题。一个问题是,去事故和急诊科不会导致他们与癫痫专家进行后续预约,以检查他们的治疗是否正确。使用“离散选择实验”,大约430名癫痫患者最近联系了救护车服务,他们的170名家人和朋友被要求在替代护理方案之间做出选择,说出他们在不同的癫痫发作情况下更喜欢哪种途径。结果很清楚。人们想要的护理与国家卫生服务组织告诉我们的不同。选择实验表明,每个人都更喜欢护理人员可以访问其医疗记录的途径,癫痫专家可以为护理人员提供建议,全科医生会收到一份报告,他们将来会预约癫痫专家。每个人都希望避免长时间的护理(6小时),并且在典型的癫痫发作后,癫痫患者希望呆在家里。有三个车间和护理人员一起开,癫痫专家和经理。他们说,用户想要的替代护理途径可能是国家卫生服务机构可行的。现在有必要实施和评估它。
    UNASSIGNED: Calls have been made for paramedics to have some form of care pathway that they could use to safely divert adults with epilepsy away from emergency departments and instigate ambulatory care improvements. Different configurations are possible. To know which to prioritise for implementation/evaluation, there is a need to determine which are acceptable to service users and likely National Health Service-feasible.
    UNASSIGNED: (1) Identify configurations being considered, (2) understand service users\' views of them and current provision, (3) identify what sort of care service users want and (4) determine which configuration(s) is considered to achieve optimal balance in meeting users\' preference and being National Health Service-feasible.
    UNASSIGNED: Service providers were surveyed to address objective 1. Interviews with service users addressed objective 2. Objective 3 was addressed by completing discrete choice experiments. These determined users\' care preferences for different seizure scenarios. Objective 4 was addressed by completing \'knowledge exchange\' workshops. At these, stakeholders considered the findings on users\' stated preferences and judged different pathway configurations against Michie\'s \'acceptability, practicability, effectiveness, affordability, side-effects and equity\' feasibility criteria.
    UNASSIGNED: This project took place in England. The survey recruited representatives from neurology and neuroscience centres and from urgent and emergency care providers. For the interviews, recruitment occurred via third-sector support groups. Recruitment for discrete choice experiments occurred via the North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust and public advert. Workshop participants were recruited from neurology and neuroscience centres, urgent and emergency care providers, support groups and commissioning networks.
    UNASSIGNED: Seventy-two services completed the survey. Interviews were conducted with 25 adults with epilepsy (and 5 relatives) who had emergency service contact in the prior 12 months. Discrete choice experiments were completed by 427 adults with epilepsy (and 167 relatives) who had ambulance service contact in the prior 12 months. Workshops were completed with 27 stakeholders.
    UNASSIGNED: The survey identified a range of pathway configurations. They differed in where they would take the patient and their potential to instigate ambulatory care improvements. Users had been rarely consulted in designing them. The discrete choice experiments found that users want a configuration of care markedly different to that offered. Across the seizure scenarios, users wanted their paramedic to have access to their medical records; for an epilepsy specialist (e.g. an epilepsy nurse, neurologist) to be available to advise; for their general practitioner to receive a report; for the incident to generate an appointment with an epilepsy specialist; for the care episode to last < 6 hours; and there was a pattern of preference to avoid conveyance to emergency departments and stay where they were. Stakeholders judged this configuration to be National Health Service-feasible within 5-10 years, with some elements being immediately deployable.
    UNASSIGNED: The discrete choice experiment sample was broadly representative, but those reporting recent contact with an epilepsy specialist were over-represented.
    UNASSIGNED: Users state they want a configuration of care that is markedly different to current provision. The configuration they prefer was, with support and investment, judged to likely be National Health Service-feasible. The preferred configuration should now be developed and evaluated to determine its actual deliverability and efficacy.
    UNASSIGNED: The study is registered as researchregistry4723.
    UNASSIGNED: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/05/62) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 24. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
    Ambulances often attend to people with epilepsy. Most of them are taken to the hospital’s accident and emergency department. This typically has little benefit since most patients are already diagnosed and visit the accident and emergency department with non-emergency states. To change things, National Health Service organisations want an ‘alternative care pathway’ for paramedics to use. It could mean the person is not taken to the accident and emergency department but cared for elsewhere. Our project brought stakeholders together to develop an alternative care pathway that includes things important to patients and carers but is also National Health Service-feasible. Seventy National Health Service organisations first told us via a survey and a workshop which pathways they were considering and which might be feasible. Thirty people with epilepsy and their family members and friends were then interviewed. They explained what is wanted after a seizure and problems with current care. One problem was that going to the accident and emergency department does not lead to them getting a follow-up appointment with an epilepsy specialist to check their treatment is right. Using ‘discrete choice experiments’, around 430 people with epilepsy who recently contacted the ambulance service and 170 of their family and friends were asked to make a choice between alternative packages of care, to say which pathway they would prefer in different seizure situations. The results were clear. People wanted care different from what National Health Service organisations told us was available. The choice experiment showed everyone prefers pathways where paramedics have access to their medical records, an epilepsy specialist is available to advise the paramedic, the general practitioner gets a report and they get an appointment with an epilepsy specialist in the future. Everyone wants to avoid long episodes of care (6 hours) and after a typical seizure people with epilepsy want to stay at home. Three workshops were run with paramedics, epilepsy specialists and managers. They said the alternative care pathway wanted by users could be National Health Service-feasible. There is a need to implement and evaluate it now.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究通过从医疗保健专业人员的角度探索初级保健(非工作时间初级保健和疗养院)和专业医疗保健(救护车服务和急诊科)组织的当前实践,确定了疗养院和急诊科之间健康过渡的障碍。目的是突出最需要改进这些过渡的领域。NH居民经常使用急性医疗服务。许多人都有复杂的医疗保健需求,需要跨多个提供者和不同医疗保健环境进行协调。AfafMeleis的过渡理论启发了这项研究,并帮助确定了养老院和急诊科之间健康过渡的障碍。对疗养院的医疗保健专业人员进行了18次定性采访,救护车服务,非工作时间初级保健,和急诊室。从访谈中确定了三个主题:1:工作人员负担,2:护理的不连续性,3:过渡对居民的福祉造成损害。这项研究确定了改善疗养院和急诊科之间过渡所需的关键领域。健康转型的许多障碍是系统性的,这表明微型,meso,需要宏观层面的努力。
    This study identifies barriers to healthy transitions between nursing homes and emergency departments by exploring current practices in both primary care (out-of-hours primary care and nursing homes) and specialist healthcare (ambulance services and emergency departments) organizations from the perspectives of healthcare professionals. The objective is to highlight areas where improvements to these transitions are most needed. NH residents frequently use acute healthcare services. Many have complex healthcare needs, requiring coordination across multiple providers and different healthcare settings. Transitions theory by Afaf Meleis inspired this study and helped identify barriers to healthy transitions between nursing homes and emergency departments. Eighteen qualitative interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals from nursing homes, ambulance services, out-of-hours primary care, and emergency departments. Three themes were identified from the interviews: 1: staff burden, 2: discontinuity of care, and 3: transitions taking a toll on the well-being of residents. This study identifies critical areas needed to improve transitions between nursing homes and emergency departments. Many of the barriers to healthy transitions are systemic, suggesting that micro, meso, and macro-level efforts are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前对ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的研究大多局限于门到球囊(D-to-B)时间。本研究旨在比较不同入院模式对直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)患者时间指标的影响。它还研究了这些模式对住院死亡率和其他影响因素的影响。目标是促进各级医疗机构的发展,包括胸部医院,疾病控制和预防中心(CDC),和社区采取措施提高STEMI患者的治疗效果。选取2016年12月至2023年12月天津市胸科医院收治的1053例成功行PPCI的STEMI患者为研究对象。根据入院方式分为3组:救护车组(363例),自我呈现组(305例),转移组(385例)。采用多因素logistic回归分析不同入院方式对关键治疗时间指标达标率的影响。结果表明,转移患者的S-至FMC时间(OR=0.434,95%CI0.316-0.596,P<0.001)和自我陈述患者(OR=0.489,95%CI0.363-0.659,P<0.001)比救护车患者更可能超过标准;自我陈述患者的cath实验室预激活时间也比救护车患者更不可能达到标准0.6323,P-0.695自我表现患者的FMC至ECG时间比救护车患者更容易达到标准(OR=2.601,95%CI1.326-5.100,P=0.005)。Cox比例风险模型分析显示,对于救护车患者,在每个关键治疗时间点花费的时间较短,与通过其他方式入院的患者相比,导致住院死亡率较低(HR0.512,95%CI0.302-0.868,P=0.013)。我们发现STEMI患者在疾病发作时通过救护车直接到达PCI医院显着减少了S到FMC的时间,FMC-ECG时间,D到W时间,和导管插入室激活时间与自我在场的患者相比。此准入模式增强了满足每个时间度量的基准标准的可能性,从而提高患者的治疗效果。
    The current research on ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients has been mostly limited to Door-to-Balloon (D-to-B) time. This study aimed to compare the effects of different hospital admission modes to on the time metrics of patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). It also examined the effects of these modes on in-hospital mortality and other influencing factors. The goal was to prompt healthcare facilities at all levels, including chest hospitals, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and communities to take measures to enhance the treatment outcomes for patients with STEMI. A total of 1053 cases of STEMI patients admitted to Tianjin Chest Hospital from December 2016 to December 2023 and successfully underwent PPCI were selected for this study. They were divided into three groups based on the admission modes: the ambulances group (363 cases), the self-presentation group (305 cases), and the transferred group (385 cases). Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the impact of different modes of hospital admission on the standard-reaching rate of key treatment time metrics. The results showed that the S-to-FMC time of transferred patients (OR = 0.434, 95% CI 0.316-0.596, P < 0.001) and self-presentation patients (OR = 0.489, 95% CI 0.363-0.659, P < 0.001) were more likely to exceed the standard than that of ambulance patients; The cath lab pre-activation time of self-presented patients was also less likely to meet the standard than that of ambulance patients (OR = 0.695, 95% CI 0.499-0.967, P = 0.031); D-to-W time of self-presentation patients was less likely to reach the standard than that of ambulance patients (OR = 0.323, 95% CI 0.234-0.446, P < 0.001);However, the FMC-to-ECG time of self-presentation patients was more likely to reach the standard than that of ambulance patients (OR = 2.601, 95% CI 1.326-5.100, P = 0.005). The Cox proportional hazards model analysis revealed that for ambulance patients, the time spent at each key treatment time point is shorter, leading to lower in-hospital mortality rate (HR0.512, 95% CI 0.302-0.868, P = 0.013) compared to patients admitted by other means. We found that direct arrival of STEMI patients to the PCI hospital via ambulance at the onset of the disease significantly reduces the S-to-FMC time, FMC-to-ECG time, D-to-W time, and catheterization room activation time compared to patients who self-present. This admission mode enhances the likelihood of meeting the benchmark standards for each time metric, consequently enhancing patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:远程辅助家庭姑息治疗(THPC)通常可以满足绝症患者在家中去世的愿望。这种服务的总成本值得评估。目的:本研究旨在确定癌症患者临终时的医疗保健利用率和成本,按THPC服务分层。设计:接受THPC的患者根据年龄1:1进行匹配,性别,死亡的一年,以及未接受THPC的倾向评分。背景/对象:在2012-2020年期间,共有773名癌症患者在台湾的区域医院中去世,其中293人接受THPC。测量:我们测量了门诊就诊率和费用,急诊科(ED)访问,住院治疗,和重症监护病房(ICU)在上周的入院,在死前的最后两周和最后一个月.此外,我们使用谷歌地图估计了从每个癌症患者家中到医院的交通所需的驾驶时间和费用。还计算了国民健康保险(NHI)的报销和自付费用。结果:与没有THPC的患者相比,那些接受THPC的人去急诊室或住院的可能性降低了50%,入住ICU的机会减少了90%以上,但是从门诊获得药物的可能性要高出四倍。THPC患者的自付支出相似,大约一半的NHI成本,并降低救护车运输到ED的费率和成本。结论:THPC在上周降低了晚期癌症患者的医疗保健成本,在过去的两周里,死亡前的最后一个月,同时也增加了患者能够在家休息和去世的可能性。
    Background: Tele-assisted home-based palliative care (THPC) usually fulfills the desire of terminal patients to pass away at home. The overall costs of such a service deserve evaluation. Objectives: This study aims to determine health care utilization and costs for cancer patients at the end of life, stratified by THPC service. Design: Patients who received THPC were matched 1:1 based on age, gender, year of death, and propensity score with those who did not receive THPC. Setting/Subjects: A total of 773 cancer patients passed away in a regional hospital in Taiwan during the period of 2012-2020, of which 293 received THPC. Measurements: We measured the rates and costs of outpatient clinic visits, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions during the last week, the last two weeks and the last month before death. In addition, we estimated the driving times and expenses required for transportation from each cancer patient\'s home to the hospital using Google Maps. National Health Insurance (NHI) reimbursements and out-of-pocket expenses were also calculated. Results: In comparison with patients without THPC, those who received THPC had a 50% lower likelihood of visiting the ED or being hospitalized, a more than 90% reduced chance of ICU admission, but were four times more likely to obtain their medicines from outpatient clinics. THPC patients had similar out-of-pocket expenditures, approximately half of the NHI costs, and lower rates and costs for ambulance transportation to the ED. Conclusions: THPC reduced health care costs for terminal cancer patients in the last week, the last two weeks, and the last month before death, while also increasing the likelihood of patients being able to rest and pass away at home.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着救护人员应对不断变化的疾病负担以及暴力和不平等等社会压力源,紧急医疗服务(EMS)的作用正在全球发生变化。需要考虑如何提供紧急护理的新方法,以将EMS从主要专注于临床护理和将患者运送到医院的角色转变为主要角色。在本文中,我们介绍了Philippi项目(PP)的经验,一种创新的基于社区的护理模式,由开普敦低收入社区的一线救护人员开发,南非。我们的见解是通过观察,面试和文件审查工作,在整体嵌入式研究方法中。我们的分析借鉴了日常卫生系统弹性框架,它认为弹性是一个新兴的过程,可以通过对压力和冲击的反应来刺激。反应采取吸收的形式,适应性或变革性策略,并以系统能力(认知,行为和上下文)。我们认为PP是一种潜在的变革性弹性策略,定义为一种新的工作方式,提供了长期卫生系统收益的承诺。我们发现PP的初始开发受到一系列系统容量属性的支持(例如关系的有意开发,一种集体目标感,并为建设性的感官创造空间)。然而,随着时间的推移,PP很难维持,因为新兴的工作方式被根植于预先存在的组织惯例中的其他能力属性所破坏,和两个背景冲击(新冠肺炎和一起暴力事件)。本文为仍然很小的EHSR文献增加了新的经验贡献。此外,PP经验为开发基于社区的EMS护理模式提供了全球相关的经验教训。它表明一线员工可以为他们紧张的日常现实开发创造性的解决方案,但前提是空间被创造和保护。
    The role of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is changing globally as ambulance crews respond to a shifting burden of disease as well as societal stressors such as violence and inequality. New ways of thinking about how to provide emergency care are required to shift EMS from a role primarily focused on clinical care and transporting patients to hospital. In this paper, we present the experience of the Philippi Project (PP), an innovative community-based model of care developed by front-line ambulance crews in a low-income neighborhood in Cape Town, South Africa. Our insights were developed through observational, interview and document review work, within an overall embedded research approach. Our analysis draws on the Everyday Health Systems Resilience framework, which sees resilience as an emergent process that may be stimulated through response to stress and shock. Responses take the form of absorptive, adaptive or transformative strategies and are underpinned by system capacities (cognitive, behavioral and contextual). We consider the PP as a potentially transformative resilience strategy, defined as a new way of working that offered the promise of long-term health system gains. We found that the PP\'s initial development was supported by a range of system capacity attributes (such as the intentional development of relationships, a sense of collective purpose, and creating spaces for constructive sensemaking). However, the PP was hard to sustain over time because emergent ways of working were undermined both by other capacity attributes rooted in pre-existing organizational routines, and two contextual shocks (Covid-19 and a violent incident). The paper adds a new empirical contribution to the still-small EHSR literature. In addition, the PP experience offers globally relevant lessons for developing community-based models of EMS care. It demonstrates that frontline staff can develop creative solutions to their stressful daily realities, but only if space is created and protected.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    \'Ramping\'是当代澳大利亚医疗保健中的常用术语。它也是公共和政治时代精神的一部分。然而,它的精确定义因来源而异。在已发表的文献中,相关术语之间有区别,例如\'条目过载\'和\'患者关闭担架时间延迟\'。如何定义斜坡以及如何定义斜坡对于与所描述的现象有关的政策和程序具有重要意义。通过对该术语历史的考察,深入了解有助于提升的潜在问题,因此,相关的可能的解决方案。
    \'Ramping\' is a commonly used term in contemporary Australian healthcare. It is also a part of the public and political zeitgeist. However, its precise definition varies among sources. In the published literature, there are distinctions between related terms, such as \'entry overload\' and \'Patient Off Stretcher Time Delay\'. How ramping is defined and how it came to be defined have significance for policies and procedures relating to the described phenomenon. Through examination of the history of the term, insights are obtained into the underlying issues contributing to ramping and, accordingly, associated possible solutions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:迄今为止,家庭对急诊医疗技术人员(EMT)的满意度仅通过主观评价中的叙述性陈述报告.尽管对医疗保健专业人员的满意度进行定量评估是可取的,没有制定具体措施来评估家庭对EMT提供的医疗保健和护理的满意度.
    目的:本研究旨在开发和验证EMT护理家庭满意度量表,以衡量患者对院前急救护理的满意度。
    方法:研究人群包括在2020年11月至2021年5月期间在日本一个地区使用救护车的216名家庭成员(N=216)。问卷分发给提供知情同意书的参与者。进行了结构效度的探索性因子分析以验证家庭满意度量表。使用Cronbachα来验证量表的内部一致性可靠性。
    结果:探索性因素分析结果揭示了一个四因素结构:\'解释和交流,\'\'物理治疗,\'\'心理支持,\'和\'救护车中的环境。这四个因素的总分的Cronbach范围(0.80-0.93)和总体总分证实了本研究的良好内部可靠性。
    结论:本研究中开发的家庭满意度量表经过构建和验证,以突出EMT的作用和家庭在院前护理环境中的需求。此外,该量表可用于评估和考虑干预措施,以提高家庭对EMT的满意度.
    BACKGROUND: To date, family satisfaction with emergency medical technicians (EMTs) has only been reported through narrative statements in subjective evaluations. Although a quantitative assessment of healthcare professional satisfaction is desirable, no specific measures have been devised to assess family satisfaction with the healthcare and care provided by EMTs.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and validate an EMT care family satisfaction scale to measure patient satisfaction with prehospital emergency care.
    METHODS: The study population comprised 216 family members (N = 216) of patients who used ambulances between November 2020 and May 2021 in a single region in Japan. Questionnaires were distributed to the participants who provided informed consent. An exploratory factor analysis of construct validity was performed to validate the Family Satisfaction Scale. The Cronbach\'s alpha was used to validate the internal consistency reliability of the scale.
    RESULTS: The exploratory factor analysis results revealed a four-factor structure: \'explanation and communication,\' \'physical treatment,\' \'psychological support,\' and \'environment in the ambulance.\' The Cronbach\'s range (0.80-0.93) for the total score for each of these four factors and the overall total score confirmed favorable internal reliability of this study.
    CONCLUSIONS: The family satisfaction scale developed in this study was constructed and validated to highlight the role of EMTs and needs of the families in the prehospital care settings. Moreover, this scale can be applied in the evaluation and consideration of interventions to improve family satisfaction with EMTs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号