aid

援助
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究的目的是开发一份问卷,以检查未来对自动胰岛素给药系统(AIDs)的接受程度,他们感知的有用性,易用性,并信任1型糖尿病(T1D)受试者的设备。
    方法:意大利语问卷,基于技术接受模型,是为了检查使用艾滋病的意图,被认为是未来接受度的衡量标准,以及使用该系统的决定因素。共包括43个儿童问题和46个家长问题,使用5点Likert量表。
    结果:239名使用每日多次注射(MDI)或传感器增强泵(SAP)的T1D受试者及其父母完成了问卷调查。完成率很好,几乎100%的项目回答。儿童和青少年的Cronbach系数为0.92,父母为0.93,表明两组的内部一致性都很好。亲青协议为0.699(95%置信区间:0.689-0.709),表明两个评价之间有很好的一致性。因素分析确定了人工胰腺(AP)接受标记为艾滋病的益处和麻烦的测量因素,T1D受试者的总量表内部一致性为α=0.94,父母为0.95。青少年和父母接受AP的水平超过中性:3.91±0.47和3.99±0.43(p=0.07),分别(可能的分数范围为1到5,中性分数为3.0)。父母报告的福利项目得分高于儿童青少年(p=0.04)。
    结论:我们根据文献中可用的项目开发了一份新的问卷,我们证明了“AP-接受度”揭示了一个有意义的因素结构,良好的内部可靠性,以及父母与年轻人之间的评估协议。这项措施可能是临床医生和研究人员评估儿科T1D患者及其父母接受AP的宝贵资源。这种患者分析方法可以帮助招募具有适当期望的AID候选人,并且最有可能从该系统中受益。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire to examine the future acceptance of Automatic insulin delivery systems (AIDs), their perceived usefulness, ease of use, and trust in the device in subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D).
    METHODS: A questionnaire in Italian, based on the Technology Acceptance Model, was developed to examine intention to use AIDs, considered as a measure of future acceptance, and its determinants to use the system. A total of 43 questions for children and 46 for parents were included, and a 5-point Likert scale was used.
    RESULTS: 239 subjects with T1D using multiple daily injections (MDI) or sensor-augmented pump (SAP) and their parents completed the questionnaire. The completion rate was excellent, with almost 100% of items answered. The overall Cronbach\'s coefficient for children and adolescents was 0.92 and 0.93 for parents, indicating excellent internal consistency in both groups. Parent-youth agreement was 0.699 (95% confidence interval: 0.689-0.709), indicating a good agreement between the two evaluations. Factor analysis identified measurement factors for the \"artificial pancreas (AP)-acceptance labeled benefits and hassles of AIDs, and the internal consistency of the total scale was alpha = 0.94 for subjects with T1D and 0.95 for parents. The level of AP acceptance was more than neutral: 3.91 ± 0.47 and 3.99 ± 0.43 (p = 0.07) for youths and parents, respectively (possible score range 1 to 5, neutral score is 3.0). Parents reported higher scores in the benefit items than children-adolescents (p = 0.04).
    CONCLUSIONS: We developed a new questionnaire based on the items available in the literature, and we demonstrated that the \"AP-acceptance\" reveals a meaningful factor structure, good internal reliability, and agreement between parent-young people evaluations. This measure could be a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers to assess AP acceptance in pediatric patients with T1D and their parents. This patient profiling approach could help to enroll candidates for AIDs with proper expectations and who most likely will benefit from the system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗体多样化对于有效的免疫反应至关重要,体细胞超突变(SHM)是这种适应中的关键分子过程。激活诱导的胞苷脱氨酶(AID)通过诱导DNA损伤启动SHM,最终分解为点突变,以及小的插入和删除(indel)。这些突变结果有助于抗体亲和力成熟。产生点突变和indel的机制涉及碱基切除修复(BER)和错配修复(MMR)途径,它们很好地协调以保持基因组完整性,同时允许发生有益的突变。在这方面,跨损伤合成(TLS)聚合酶通过绕过DNA损伤,有助于抗体基因突变结果的多样性。这篇综述总结了我们目前对SHM期间产生点突变和indel的不同分子机制的理解。了解这些机制对于阐明广泛中和抗体(bnAbs)和自身抗体的发展至关重要。并对疫苗设计和治疗有影响。
    Antibody diversification is essential for an effective immune response, with somatic hypermutation (SHM) serving as a key molecular process in this adaptation. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) initiates SHM by inducing DNA lesions, which are ultimately resolved into point mutations, as well as small insertions and deletions (indels). These mutational outcomes contribute to antibody affinity maturation. The mechanisms responsible for generating point mutations and indels involve the base excision repair (BER) and mismatch repair (MMR) pathways, which are well coordinated to maintain genomic integrity while allowing for beneficial mutations to occur. In this regard, translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases contribute to the diversity of mutational outcomes in antibody genes by enabling the bypass of DNA lesions. This review summarizes our current understanding of the distinct molecular mechanisms that generate point mutations and indels during SHM. Understanding these mechanisms is critical for elucidating the development of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) and autoantibodies, and has implications for vaccine design and therapeutics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    个性化的癌症疗法根据患者肿瘤的遗传特征为患者提供定向治疗选择。不幸的是,肿瘤基因组非常适应,通过基因突变获得的抗性经常发生。在接受药物治疗的患者群体中识别促进耐药性的突变可能是有成本的,资源,和时间密集。因此,基本编辑,通过Cas9-脱氨酶结构域融合实现,已经成为一种有前途的方法,大规模的基因变异原位筛选。这里,我们适应和优化条件激活诱导的胞苷脱氨酶(AID)-死Cas9(dCas9)系统,这表明,与最常用的胞嘧啶碱基编辑器相比,具有扩展足迹的编辑具有更大的异质性,BE4.结合自定义单向导RNA(sgRNA)文库,我们在表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)和v-raf鼠肉瘤病毒癌基因同源物B1(BRAF)中鉴定了对已确定的EGFR抑制剂产生耐药性的个体和复合变体.这个系统和分析管道提供了一个简单的,高度可扩展的平台,用于发现顺式或反式药物修饰变体,并揭示对蛋白质结构-功能关系的有价值的见解。
    Personalized cancer therapeutics bring directed treatment options to patients based on their tumor\'s genetic signature. Unfortunately, tumor genomes are remarkably adaptable, and acquired resistance through gene mutation frequently occurs. Identifying mutations that promote resistance within drug-treated patient populations can be cost, resource, and time intensive. Accordingly, base editing, enabled by Cas9-deaminase domain fusions, has emerged as a promising approach for rapid, large-scale gene variant screening in situ. Here, we adapt and optimize a conditional activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID)-dead Cas9 (dCas9) system, which demonstrates greater heterogeneity of edits with an expanded footprint compared to the most commonly utilized cytosine base editor, BE4. In combination with a custom single guide RNA (sgRNA) library, we identify individual and compound variants in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) that confer resistance to established EGFR inhibitors. This system and analytical pipeline provide a simple, highly scalable platform for cis or trans drug-modifying variant discovery and for uncovering valuable insights into protein structure-function relationships.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    激活诱导的胞苷脱氨酶(AID)通过将碱基置换引入抗体基因来启动体细胞超变(SHM),免疫反应中抗体亲和力成熟的过程。如何在生理过程中精确而安全地驯服变元以产生可编程的DNA损伤仍未解决,因为它的失调会驱动淋巴管生成。最近的研究揭示了AID引发的诱变的几个隐藏特征:对柔性DNA底物的优先活性,染色质环域内的抑制活性,独特的DNA修复因子来区别解码AID引起的病变,以及异常脱氨的不同后果。这里,我们描述了AID活性的多方面调控,重点关注新出现的概念/因素,并讨论了它们对碱基编辑器(BE)设计的影响,这些碱基编辑器安装体细胞突变以纠正有害的基因组变异.
    Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) initiates somatic hypermutation (SHM) by introducing base substitutions into antibody genes, a process enabling antibody affinity maturation in immune response. How a mutator is tamed to precisely and safely generate programmed DNA lesions in a physiological process remains unsettled, as its dysregulation drives lymphomagenesis. Recent research has revealed several hidden features of AID-initiated mutagenesis: preferential activity on flexible DNA substrates, restrained activity within chromatin loop domains, unique DNA repair factors to differentially decode AID-caused lesions, and diverse consequences of aberrant deamination. Here, we depict the multifaceted regulation of AID activity with a focus on emerging concepts/factors and discuss their implications for the design of base editors (BEs) that install somatic mutations to correct deleterious genomic variants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:调查2至6岁儿童3个月自动胰岛素给药(AID)对血糖结局的积极影响是否持续了很长时间,以及AID治疗如何影响紧范围内的时间(TITR)。定义为3.9-7.8mmol/L
    方法:我们分析了18个月的非随机随访数据,prospective,2021年至2023年进行的单臂临床试验(n=35)。主要结果指标是时间范围(TIR)的变化,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c),高于范围的时间(TAR),TITR,和平均传感器葡萄糖(SG)值在随访期间(0,6,12和18个月)。SmartGuard模式下的MiniMed780GAID系统使用了18个月。父母的糖尿病困扰在3个月和18个月与糖尿病父母的验证问题区域进行评估,修订(PAID-PR)调查。
    结果:在0到6个月之间,TIR和TITR增加,和HbA1c,平均SG值和TAR显著下降(p<0.001);随访18个月后,该良好效果持续.在3到18个月之间,PAID-PR评分显著下降(0个月:平均评分37.5;3个月:平均评分28.6[p=0.06];18个月:平均评分24.6[p<0.001])。
    结论:AID治疗可显著增加幼儿的TITR和TIR。6个月后观察到的AID对血糖控制的积极作用持续了18个月的随访。同样,在18个月的随访期间,父母的糖尿病困扰仍然减轻.这些发现令人放心,并表明在延长的18个月随访中,AID治疗可以改善幼儿的血糖控制并减少父母的糖尿病困扰。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the positive effects on glycaemic outcomes of 3-month automated insulin delivery (AID) achieved in 2- to 6-year-old children endure over an extended duration and how AID treatment affects time in tight range (TITR), defined as 3.9-7.8 mmol/L.
    METHODS: We analysed 18 months of follow-up data from a non-randomized, prospective, single-arm clinical trial (n = 35) conducted between 2021 and 2023. The main outcome measures were changes in time in range (TIR), glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), time above range (TAR), TITR, and mean sensor glucose (SG) value during follow-up visits (at 0, 6, 12 and 18 months). The MiniMed 780G AID system in SmartGuard Mode was used for 18 months. Parental diabetes distress was evaluated at 3 and 18 months with the validated Problem Areas in Diabetes-Parent, revised (PAID-PR) survey.
    RESULTS: Between 0 and 6 months, TIR and TITR increased, and HbA1c, mean SG value and TAR decreased significantly (p < 0.001); the favourable effect persisted through 18 months of follow-up. Between 3 and 18 months, PAID-PR score declined significantly (0 months: mean score 37.5; 3 months: mean score 28.6 [p = 0.06]; 18 months: mean score 24.6 [p < 0.001]).
    CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with AID significantly increased TITR and TIR in young children. The positive effect of AID on glycaemic control observed after 6 months persisted throughout the 18 months of follow-up. Similarly, parental diabetes distress remained reduced during 18 months follow-up. These findings are reassuring and suggest that AID treatment improves glycaemic control and reduces parental diabetes distress in young children over an extended 18-month follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Aid relations in protracted displacement comprise a diversity of actors with different influence and involvement over time. Building on the case of Sri Lanka\'s northern Muslim\'s expulsion from the north of the country in 1990, this paper investigates the dynamic space of aid relations in their drawn-out internal displacement. The study draws on 38 key informant interviews and 10 focus-group discussions, conducted in Sri Lanka (Jaffna, Mannar, Puttalam, and Colombo) in 2022. The paper contributes new knowledge of the local dynamics of assistance in protracted displacement, by analysing the roles of a wide set of actors within this dynamic space of aid relations over time. The analysis incorporates angles and voices often overlooked in mainstream humanitarian studies, including internally displaced persons, hosts, and Middle Eastern aid funders. The study argues that a long-term perspective and a variety of voices provide foundations for more productive engagement with localisation in humanitarian action in protracted displacement crises.
    تتشكل علاقات تقديم المعونة في حالات النزوح الممتد بمجموعة متنوعة من الجهات الفاعلة التي يختلف تأثيرها ومشاركتها بمرور الوقت، واستنادًا إلى حالة طرد مسلمي شمال سري لانكا من شمال البلاد في عام 1990، نبحث في الحيز الديناميكي لعلاقات تقديم المعونة في نزوحهم الداخلي الممتد، ونعتمد في ذلك على 38 مقابلة مع المخبرين الرئيسيين وعشر مناقشات جماعية مركزة أُجريت في سري لانكا (جافنا، ومانار، وبوتالام، وكولومبو) عام 2022، وتساهم المقالة بمعرفة جديدة حول الديناميكيات المحلية لتقديم المعونة في حالات النزوح الممتد من خلال تحليل أدوار مجموعة واسعة من الجهات الفاعلة في هذا الحيز الديناميكي لعلاقات تقديم المعونة على مر الوقت، ويتضمن التحليل زوايا وأصوات غالبًا ما يتم تجاهلها في الدراسات الإنسانية السائدة، بما في ذلك النازحين الداخلين، والمضيفين، وممولي المعونة من الشرق الأوسط، ونحن نحتج بأن المنظور طويل الأمد وتنوع الأصوات يوفران أسسًا لمشاركة أكثر إنتاجية في التوطين في العمل الإنساني في أزمات النزوح الممتدة.
    长期流离失所的援助关系是由长期具有不同影响和参与的多种行为者构成的。在1990年斯里兰卡北部穆斯林被从北部驱逐的案例的基础上,我们研究援助关系在旷日持久的境内流离失所中的动态空间。我们借鉴了2022年在斯里兰卡(贾夫纳、马纳尔、普塔勒姆和科伦坡)进行的38次关键知情者访谈和10次焦点小组讨论。本文通过分析长期援助关系的这个动态空间中广泛的一组行为者的作用,为长期流离失所的当地援助动态提供了新的认知。该分析包括主流人道主义学中经常被忽视的角度和声音,包括IDP(国内流离失所者)、东道国和中东援助资助者。我们认为,长期的视角和声音的多样性为在旷日持久的流离失所危机中更富有成效地参与人道行动的本地化奠定了基础。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    医疗保健成本效益分析越来越多地用于为低收入和中等收入国家以及全球卫生捐助者确定优先事项提供信息。作为此类分析的一部分,成本效益阈值通常用于确定什么是,或者不是,成本效益。近年来,最佳实践从经验法则1倍或3倍人均GDP阈值转向使用阈值,理论上,反映特定国家内新投资的机会成本。在本文中,我们观察到,与国家决策者相比,国际捐助者面临着不同的资源限制和机会成本。因此,他们对成本效益阈值的看法必须不同。我们讨论了区分国家和捐助者阈值的潜在含义,并概述了如何设置捐助者观点阈值的广泛选择。需要进一步的工作来澄清国际援助背景下的医疗保健成本效益阈值理论,并制定切实可行的实施政策框架。
    Healthcare cost-effectiveness analysis is increasingly used to inform priority-setting in low- and middle-income countries and by global health donors. As part of such analyses, cost-effectiveness thresholds are commonly used to determine what is, or is not, cost-effective. Recent years have seen a shift in best practice from a rule-of-thumb 1x or 3x per capita GDP threshold towards using thresholds that, in theory, reflect the opportunity cost of new investments within a given country. In this paper, we observe that international donors face both different resource constraints and opportunity costs compared to national decision-makers. Hence, their perspective on cost-effectiveness thresholds must be different. We discuss the potential implications of distinguishing between national and donor thresholds and outline broad options for how to approach setting a donor-perspective threshold. Further work is needed to clarify healthcare cost-effectiveness threshold theory in the context of international aid and to develop practical policy frameworks for implementation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Preprint
    作为对抗原的反应,B细胞在次级淋巴器官的生发中心(GC)中通过激活诱导的胞苷脱氨酶(AID)介导的亲和力成熟和类别转换,但不受控制的AID活性会导致自身免疫和癌症。GC抗体多样化的调节具有根本重要性,但尚未得到充分理解。我们发现自身免疫调节剂(AIRE),T细胞耐受所必需的分子,在GCB细胞中以CD40依赖性方式表达,与AID相互作用,并通过抑制AID功能负调节抗体亲和力成熟和类别转换。B细胞AIRE缺乏导致抗体库改变,增加的体细胞超突变,T辅助细胞17效应细胞因子自身抗体升高和皮肤白色念珠菌控制缺陷。这些结果定义了体液免疫的GCB细胞检查点,并阐明了产生用于免疫疗法的高亲和力中和抗体的新方法。
    In response to antigens, B cells undergo affinity maturation and class switching mediated by activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) in germinal centers (GCs) of secondary lymphoid organs, but uncontrolled AID activity can precipitate autoimmunity and cancer. The regulation of GC antibody diversification is of fundamental importance but not well understood. We found that autoimmune regulator (AIRE), the molecule essential for T cell tolerance, is expressed in GC B cells in a CD40-dependent manner, interacts with AID and negatively regulates antibody affinity maturation and class switching by inhibiting AID function. AIRE deficiency in B cells caused altered antibody repertoire, increased somatic hypermutations, elevated autoantibodies to T helper 17 effector cytokines and defective control of skin Candida albicans. These results define a GC B cell checkpoint of humoral immunity and illuminate new approaches of generating high-affinity neutralizing antibodies for immunotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阻断白细胞介素-1(anakinra和canakinumab)是众所周知的单基因自身炎性疾病(AIDs)的高效工具,比如家族性地中海热,肿瘤坏死因子受体相关周期性综合征,高免疫球蛋白血症D综合征,和冷冻比林相关的周期性综合征,但尚未对未分化AIDs(uAIDs)患者进行评估.我们的研究旨在评估canakinumab对uAIDs患者的安全性和有效性。
    回顾性收集并分析了32例uAIDs患者的信息。下一代测序和Federici标准用于排除已知的单基因AID。
    第一次发作的中位年龄为2.5岁(IQR:1.3;5.5),疾病诊断为5.7年(IQR:2.5;12.7),诊断延迟为1.1年(IQR:0.4;6.1)。患者有以下基因的变异:IL10,NLRP12,STAT2,C8B,LPIN2,NLRC4,PSMB8,PRF1,CARD14,IFIH1,LYST,NFAT5,PLCG2,COPA,IL23R,STXBP2,IL36RN,JAK1,DDX58,LACC1,LRBA,TNFRSF11A,PTHR1,STAT4,TNFRSF1B,TNFAIP3、TREX1和SLC7A7。主要临床特征为发热(100%),皮疹(91%;主要是斑丘疹),关节参与(72%),脾肿大(66%),肝肿大(59%),淋巴结肿大(50%),肌痛(28%),心脏受累(31%),肠道受累(19%);眼睛受累(9%),胸膜炎(16%),腹水(6%),耳聋,脑积水(3%),未能茁壮成长(25%)。canakinumab之前的初始治疗包括非生物疗法:非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)(91%),皮质类固醇(88%),甲氨蝶呤(38%),静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)(34%),环孢菌素A(25%),秋水仙碱(6%)环磷酰胺(6%),柳氮磺吡啶(3%),霉酚酸酯(3%),羟氯喹(3%),和生物药物:托珠单抗(62%),sarilumab,依那西普,阿达木单抗,利妥昔单抗,英夫利昔单抗(均为3%)。Canakinumab在27例患者(84%)中引起完全缓解,在1例患者(3%)中引起部分缓解。两名患者(6%)是主要的无应答者,两名患者(6%)进一步发展为继发性无效。所有部分疗效或无效的患者均改用托珠单抗(n=4)和sarilumab(n=1)。canakinumab治疗的总持续时间为3.6(0.1;8.7)年。在研究期间,没有报告严重不良事件(SAE)。患者经历了不常见的轻度呼吸道感染,其发生率与施用canakinumab之前相似。此外,一名患者出现白细胞减少症,但该患者没有必要停止canakinumab。
    使用canakinumab治疗uAIDs患者是安全有效的。需要进一步的随机临床试验来确认疗效和安全性。
    UNASSIGNED: The blockade of interleukine-1 (anakinra and canakinumab) is a well-known highly effective tool for monogenic autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs), such as familial Mediterranean fever, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome, hyperimmunoglobulinaemia D syndrome, and cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome, but this treatment has not been assessed for patients with undifferentiated AIDs (uAIDs). Our study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of canakinumab for patients with uAIDs.
    UNASSIGNED: Information on 32 patients with uAIDs was retrospectively collected and analyzed. Next-generation sequencing and Federici criteria were used for the exclusion of the known monogenic AID.
    UNASSIGNED: The median age of the first episode was 2.5 years (IQR: 1.3; 5.5), that of the disease diagnosis was 5.7 years (IQR: 2.5;12.7), and that of diagnostic delay was 1.1 years (IQR: 0.4; 6.1). Patients had variations in the following genes: IL10, NLRP12, STAT2, C8B, LPIN2, NLRC4, PSMB8, PRF1, CARD14, IFIH1, LYST, NFAT5, PLCG2, COPA, IL23R, STXBP2, IL36RN, JAK1, DDX58, LACC1, LRBA, TNFRSF11A, PTHR1, STAT4, TNFRSF1B, TNFAIP3, TREX1, and SLC7A7. The main clinical features were fever (100%), rash (91%; maculopapular predominantly), joint involvement (72%), splenomegaly (66%), hepatomegaly (59%), lymphadenopathy (50%), myalgia (28%), heart involvement (31%), intestinal involvement (19%); eye involvement (9%), pleuritis (16%), ascites (6%), deafness, hydrocephalia (3%), and failure to thrive (25%). Initial treatment before canakinumab consisted of non-biologic therapies: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (91%), corticosteroids (88%), methotrexate (38%), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (34%), cyclosporine A (25%), colchicine (6%) cyclophosphamide (6%), sulfasalazine (3%), mycophenolate mofetil (3%), hydroxychloroquine (3%), and biologic drugs: tocilizumab (62%), sarilumab, etanercept, adalimumab, rituximab, and infliximab (all 3%). Canakinumab induced complete remission in 27 patients (84%) and partial remission in one patient (3%). Two patients (6%) were primary non-responders, and two patients (6%) further developed secondary inefficacy. All patients with partial efficacy or inefficacy were switched to tocilizumab (n = 4) and sarilumab (n = 1). The total duration of canakinumab treatment was 3.6 (0.1; 8.7) years. During the study, there were no reported Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). The patients experienced non-frequent mild respiratory infections at a rate that is similar as before canakinumab is administered. Additionally, one patient developed leucopenia, but it was not necessary to stop canakinumab for this patient.
    UNASSIGNED: The treatment of patients with uAIDs using canakinumab was safe and effective. Further randomized clinical trials are required to confirm the efficacy and safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号