ageing health

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:杂种SARS-CoV-2免疫可能比单纯的疫苗来源的免疫提供针对严重SARS-CoV-2感染和住院的更长持续时间的保护。老年人是严重疾病的高危人群,然而,现有数据偏向年轻人。
    方法:于2020年3月至2022年4月在伦敦一家大型长期护理机构(LTCF)进行了一项前瞻性纵向研究,以评估混合免疫与仅疫苗免疫对SARS-CoV-2感染的影响。通过每周SARS-CoV-2聚合酶链反应测试(无症状筛查)和必要时(症状测试)的组合来评估混合免疫,以及系列SARS-CoV-2血清学。
    结果:280名参与者(平均年龄82岁,IQR76-88岁;男性占95.4%)随访。168/280(60%)在Omicron变异波之前有混合免疫的证据。与仅有疫苗免疫的参与者相比,具有混合免疫的参与者在Omicron波期间获得COVID-19感染的几率大大降低(未调整的优势比0.26,95%CI0.14-0.47,卡方P<.0001)。混合免疫的参与者无症状感染的比值比为0.40(0.19-0.79),有症状感染的比值比为0.15(0.06-0.34)(似然比测试,P<.0001)。
    结论:我们的数据强调了针对严重感染风险最高的人群正在进行的加强疫苗接种活动的潜在机会。随着新的变异不断出现和疫苗接种策略的发展,报告老年人的数据对于检查混合免疫的影响将具有特别的价值。
    BACKGROUND: Hybrid SARS-CoV-2 immunity may provide longer duration protection against severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation than purely vaccine-derived immunity. Older adults represent a high-risk group for severe disease, yet available data is skewed towards younger adults.
    METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study at a large London long-term care facility (LTCF) was conducted from March 2020 to April 2022 to assess the effect of hybrid versus vaccine-only immunity on SARS-CoV-2 infection in older adults during Omicron variant dominance. Hybrid immunity was assessed by a combination of SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction testing weekly (asymptomatic screening) and as required (symptomatic testing), as well as serial SARS-CoV-2 serology.
    RESULTS: 280 participants (median age 82 yrs, IQR 76-88 yrs; 95.4% male) were followed up. 168/280 (60%) had evidence of hybrid immunity prior to the Omicron variant wave. Participants with hybrid immunity had substantially lower odds of acquiring COVID-19 infection during the Omicron wave compared to those with vaccine-only immunity (unadjusted odds ratio 0.26, 95% CI 0.14-0.47, chi-squared P < .0001). Participants with hybrid immunity had an odds ratio of 0.40 (0.19-0.79) for asymptomatic infection and 0.15 (0.06-0.34) for symptomatic infection (Likelihood ratio test, P < .0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our data highlight potential opportunities to target ongoing booster vaccination campaigns for those most at risk of severe infection. Reporting of data in older adults will be of particular value to examine the effect of hybrid immunity as new variants continue to emerge and vaccination strategies evolve.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    印度目前正在经历快速的人口转变,并经历人口老龄化的逐步增加。因此,这些家庭不断遭受灾难性的经济影响,最终影响老年人的医疗保健利用。该研究使用Andersen的健康行为模型研究了印度老年人在选择住院私人和公共住院方面的性别差异。该数据库是从全国代表性横断面调查(NSSO,2017-18)。使用双变量卡方和二项逻辑回归技术来实现目标。此外,我们使用穷人-富人比率和集中度指数来了解医疗保健偏好中固有的社会经济不平等.调查结果表明,老年男性比老年女性更容易利用私人医疗设施。Further,老年人,谁结婚了,属于上层种姓,受过高等教育并接受了手术,主要居住在富裕社会的人更有可能更喜欢私人住院。这代表了老年妇女在获得更好的医疗保健方面的疏忽,这些妇女有经济压力和经济依赖。该研究可用于重组现有的公共卫生政策和计划,特别关注老年妇女,利用具有成本效益的治疗。
    India is presently undergoing a rapid demographic transition and experiencing a gradual increase in an ageing population. As a result, the households were continuously exposed to catastrophic economic impacts, ultimately influencing the healthcare utilisation of older people. The study examined the gender differentials in the choice of in-patient private and public hospitalisation among Indian elderly using Andersen\'s Health Behaviour Model. The database was acquired from the nationally representative cross-sectional survey (NSSO, 2017-18). Bivariate chi-square and binomial logistic regression techniques were used to fulfill the objective. In addition, the poor-rich ratio and concentration index was used to understand the inherent socioeconomic inequalities in healthcare preferences. The findings suggest that aged men were 27 percent more prone to avail private healthcare facilities than aged women. Further, older adults, who are married, belong to the upper caste, have higher education and gone through surgery, and primarily reside in an affluent society were more likely to prefer private in-patient hospitalisation. It represents negligence of older women in access to better healthcare who had financial strain and economically dependent. The study can be used to reframe existing public health policies and programs, particularly focusing on the older women, to avail cost-effective treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号