The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has become the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant and exhibits immune escape to current COVID-19 vaccines, the further boosting strategies are required.
We have conducted a non-randomized, open-label and parallel-controlled phase 4 trial to evaluate the magnitude and longevity of immune responses to booster vaccination with intramuscular adenovirus vectored vaccine (Ad5-nCoV), aerosolized Ad5-nCoV, a recombinant protein subunit vaccine (ZF2001) or homologous inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) in those who received two doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines.
The aerosolized Ad5-nCoV induced the most robust and long-lasting neutralizing activity against Omicron variant and IFNg T-cell response among all the boosters, with a distinct mucosal immune response. SARS-CoV-2-specific mucosal IgA response was substantially generated in subjects boosted with the aerosolized Ad5-nCoV at day 14 post-vaccination. At month 6, participants boosted with the aerosolized Ad5-nCoV had remarkably higher median titer and seroconversion of the Omicron BA.4/5-specific neutralizing antibody than those who received other boosters.
Our findings suggest that aerosolized Ad5-nCoV may provide an efficient alternative in response to the spread of the Omicron BA.4/5 variant.
https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=152729, identifier ChiCTR2200057278.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major cause of hypoxemic respiratory failure in adults, leading to the requirement for mechanical ventilation and poorer outcomes. Dysregulated surfactant metabolism and function are characteristic of ARDS. A combination of alveolar epithelial damage leading to altered surfactant synthesis, secretion, and breakdown with increased functional inhibition from overt alveolar inflammation contributes to the clinical features of poor alveolar compliance and alveolar collapse. Quantitative and qualitative alterations in the bronchoalveolar lavage and tracheal aspirate surfactant composition contribute to ARDS pathogenesis. Compared to neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (nRDS), replacement studies of exogenous surfactants in adult ARDS suggest no survival benefit. However, these studies are limited by disease heterogeneity, variations in surfactant preparations, doses, and delivery methods. More importantly, the lack of mechanistic understanding of the exact reasons for dysregulated surfactant remains a significant issue. Moreover, studies suggest an extremely short half-life of replaced surfactant, implying increased catabolism. Refining surfactant preparations and delivery methods with additional co-interventions to counteract surfactant inhibition and degradation has the potential to enhance the biophysical characteristics of surfactant in vivo.

Respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Less invasive methods of surfactant administration, along with the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), have improved outcomes of preterm infants. Aerosolized surfactant can be given without the need for airway instrumentation and may be employed in areas where these skills are scarce. Recent trials from high-resourced countries utilising aerosolized surfactant have had a low quality of evidence and varying outcomes.
The Neo-INSPIRe trial is an unblinded, multicentre, randomised trial of a novel aerosolized surfactant drug/device combination. Inclusion criteria include preterm infants of 27-34+6 weeks\' gestational age who weigh 900-1999g and who require CPAP with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 0.25-0.35 in the first 2-24 h of age. Infants are randomised 1:1 to control (CPAP alone) or intervention (CPAP with aerosolized surfactant). The primary outcome is the need for intratracheal bolus surfactant instillation within 72 h of age. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of reaching failure criteria (persistent FiO2 of > 0.40, severe apnoea or severe work of breathing), the need for and duration of ventilation and respiratory support, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and selected co-morbidities of prematurity. Assuming a 40% relative risk reduction to reduce the proportion of infants requiring intratracheal bolus surfactant from 45 to 27%, the study will aim to enrol 232 infants for the study to have a power of 80% to detect a significant difference with a type 1 error of 0.05.
Ethical approval has been granted by the relevant human research ethics committees at University of Cape Town (HREC 681/2022), University of the Witwatersrand HREC (221112) and Stellenbosch University (M23/02/004).
PACTR202307490670785.

OBJECTIVE: Patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) frequently present with a febrile illness that may progress to pneumonia and hypoxic respiratory failure. Aerosolized epoprostenol (aEPO) has been evaluated in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and refractory hypoxemia. A paucity of literature has assessed the impact of aEPO in patients with SARS-CoV-2 receiving oxygen support with high flow nasal cannula (HFNC). The objective of this study was to evaluate whether aEPO added to HFNC prevents intubation and/or prolong time to intubation compared to controls only treated with HFNC, guided by oxygen saturation goals.
METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study of adult patients infected with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) and admitted to the medical intensive care unit. A total of 60 patients were included. Thirty patients were included in the treatment, and 30 in the control group, respectively. Among patients included in the treatment group, response to therapy was assessed. The need for mechanical ventilation and hospital mortality between responders vs. non-responders was evaluated.
RESULTS: The primary outcome of mechanical ventilation was not statistically different between groups. Time from HFNC initiation to intubation was significantly prolonged in the treatment group compared to the control group (5.7 days vs. 2.3 days, P = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in mortality or length of stay. Patients deemed responders to aEPO had a lower rate of mechanical ventilation (50% vs 88%, P = 0.025) and mortality (21% vs 63%, P = 0.024), compared with non-responders.
CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of aEPO in COVID-19 patients treated with HFNC is not associated with a reduction in the rate of mechanical ventilation. Nevertheless, the application of this strategy may prolong the time to invasive mechanical ventilation, without affecting other clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of aerosolized midazolam, introduced through buccal versus intranasal mucosa in managing uncooperative children undergoing dental treatment.
METHODS: A crossover randomized controlled clinical trial included 36 children aged 3 to 5 years, rated I or II according to the Frankl scale and ASA I or II. Each child fulfilled the requirement of having a dental condition that needed treatment in two dental settings. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups; either buccal or intranasal aerosolized midazolam was administered at the first visit. The alternate route was implemented with a 1-week washout period in the second visit. Drug acceptance and time until optimum sedation were measured. Crying, sleeping, head resistance, and child overall behavior were assessed using modified Houpt scale.
RESULTS: In total, 34 patients (95 %) were drowsy on optimum sedation. There was a statistically higher acceptance of buccal midazolam (P < .001). Onset of optimum sedation was more rapid for the intranasal group, with a mean of 15.50 ± 4.226 minutes (P < .001), while in the buccal group the mean was 22.97 ± 4.582 minutes. No statistical differences were recorded between the two groups in all behavior rating scales, except for crying where the intranasal group was statistically higher (P = .010). Regarding the overall behavior, there was no significant difference recorded between the two groups (P = .204).
CONCLUSIONS: Aerosolized buccal midazolam was more tolerated by the patients. However, intranasal aerosolized midazolam had a more rapid onset of sedation. Both buccal and intranasal administrations of aerosolized midazolam are safe and effective.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of aerosolized (AER) plus intravenous (IV) colistin with IV colistin alone in patients with nosocomial pneumonia (NP) due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with NP who received IV colistin alone or in combination with AER colistin. The primary endpoint was clinical cure at end of therapy. Secondary endpoints included microbiological eradication, in-hospital mortality and nephrotoxicity.
RESULTS: In total, 135 patients were included in this study: 65 patients received AER plus IV colistin and 70 patients received IV colistin alone. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Clinical cure was achieved in 42 (65%) patients who received AER plus IV colistin and 26 (37%) patients who received IV colistin alone (P = 0.01). Among a total of 88 patients who were microbiologically evaluable, 27 (42%) patients who received AER plus IV colistin and 12 (17%) patients who received IV colistin alone attained favourable microbiological outcomes (P = 0.022). In-hospital mortality (43% vs 59%, P = 0.072) was higher in patients who received IV colistin alone, but the difference was not significant. Renal injury occurred in 31% of patients who received AER plus IV colistin and in 41% of patients who received IV colistin alone (P = 0.198).
CONCLUSIONS: AER colistin can be considered as salvage therapy as an adjunct to IV administration for the treatment of patients with NP due to MDR Gram-negative pathogens.

Radiation induced lung fibrosis (RILF) is a common late complication after radiotherapy without effective treatment. Thyroid hormone (TH) is known to reverse bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in recent study. We therefore sought to examine TH effect in RILF. Aerosolized TH delivery prevented pulmonary fibrosis according to either micro-computed tomography scans or histological evaluations, without significant changes in serum THs in a murine model of RILF by attenuating TGF-β1 and phosphorylated Smad2/3 expressions and reducing the accumulation of M2-like macrophages. Furthermore, hypothyroidism was significantly correlated with RILF in a retrospectively analyzed data from nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a median follow-up time of 25.5 months. Together, aerosolized TH may prevent RILF by inhibiting the TGF-β1/SMADs signaling pathway.

Tularemia is a rare zoonotic disease caused by Francisella tularensis. It can often present with varied clinical presentations, but meningitis is extremely rare. In this case study, we describe a patient who presented to our emergency department with a Tularemic infection coupled with acute atypical meningitis, after he was exposed to aerosolized rabbit hair from lawn mowing. Prompt diagnosis of tularemic meningitis may be difficult without a known history of animal exposure. Despite what is taught in medical school, numerous studies have shown Kernig\'s sign, Brudzinski\'s sign, and nuchal rigidity do not have much diagnostic value in adults with meningitis. Yet, almost all patients with meningitis present with at least 2 of the 4 symptoms of fever, headache, altered mental status, and neck stiffness. For this reason, it is essential to stop using Kernig\'s sign and Brudzinski\'s sign as the only basis for diagnosing meningitis in every case. With the rampant population increase of rabbits in states like Colorado, Missouri, and Illinois, and a growing number of tularemic patients from lawn mowing incidents popping up across the country, it is also vital to consider the diagnosis of tularemia in your differential diagnosis and send for a cerebrospinal fluid culture, based on a more detailed historytaking of your patient, specifically noting his/her outdoor activities during the initial assessment in the emergency department (ED). This would immensely speed up the process of diagnosing the patient and would ensure a timely start of antibiotics for a full recovery.

This review summarizes the literature on inhaled amphotericin B for invasive aspergillosis prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia secondary to hematologic malignancy treatment or stem cell transplant. Six trials, 2 randomized controlled and 4 with historical controls, were identified. Three inhaled amphotericin B deoxycholate trials found a reduced invasive aspergillosis incidence, 1 reaching statistical significance. Three inhaled liposomal amphotericin B trials demonstrated similar reductions with 2 finding statistical significance. Relative risk reductions for invasive aspergillosis were routinely 40-60%. Both formulations were without reported systemic or severe adverse effects. The most common adverse events were cough, bad taste, and nausea. Discontinuation rates ranged from 0-45%. The only randomized, placebo-controlled trial utilized inhaled liposomal amphotericin B reported a nearly 60% relative risk reduction. Inhaled liposomal amphotericin B 12.5 mg twice weekly is an alternative for invasive aspergillosis prophylaxis in high risk neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies and stem cell transplant recipients when recommended azole agents are contraindicated or should not be used.

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to either multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms or infections with limited treatment options (i.e. susceptible to only aminoglycosides or colisitin) coupled with a dearth of new antimicrobials has led clinicians to pursue alternative management strategies including the use of inhaled antibiotics (IA).
OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence surrounding the use of IA in the treatment of VAP with a focus on establishing a path whereby adjunctive IA could become a standard therapy for the treatment of specific VAP patient populations.
METHODS: A meta-analysis performed by the 2016 IDSA/ATS Hospital-acquired Pneumonia Guideline Committee; a PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov search for subsequent trials of IA for the treatment of VAP.
BACKGROUND: Based on a meta-analysis of nine studies (RR 1.29; 95% CI 1.13-1.47), the 2016 IDSA/ATS Hospital-acquired Pneumonia Guideline Committee recommended that adjunctive IA be used to treat VAP due to Gram-negative bacilli that are susceptible to only aminoglycosides or polymyxins. Two subsequent randomized trials of adjunctive IA for the treatment of mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia failed to demonstrate a benefit. Despite these results, an updated meta-analysis (n = 11) including these two recent trials suggests a benefit of adjunctive IA for the treatment of VAP due to MDR and difficult-to-treat infections (RR 1.2; 95% CI 1.05-1.57).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with VAP and limited intravenous antibiotic options are the individuals most likely to benefit from adjunctive IA and should be the focus of future investigative studies. Although vibrating mesh nebulizers predominate in pharmaceutical company-sponsored trials, these devices have not been directly compared with the traditional jet nebulizers in terms of efficacy or safety.