BACKGROUND: PF-06952229 is a selective small-molecule inhibitor of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) receptor 1. We evaluated its antitumor activity in preclinical studies and its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics in a phase I study (NCT03685591).
METHODS: In vitro and in vivo preclinical studies were conducted. Patients (aged ≥18 years) received PF-06952229 monotherapy [20-500 mg, oral b.i.d., 7 days on/7 days off, 28-day cycles, Part 1A (P1A)] for advanced/metastatic solid tumors and combination therapy [250/375 mg with enzalutamide, Part 1B (P1B)] for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), adverse events (AEs), and laboratory abnormalities. Efficacy, pharmacokinetic parameters, and biomarker modulation were assessed.
RESULTS: PF-06952229 showed activity in preclinical murine tumor models including pSMAD2 modulation in tumors. The study (NCT03685591) enrolled 49 patients (P1A, n = 42; P1B, n = 7). DLTs were reported in 3/35 (8.6%) P1A patients receiving PF-06952229 375 mg (anemia, intracranial tumor hemorrhage, and anemia and hypertension, all grade 3, n = 1 each). The most frequent grade 3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were alanine aminotransferase increased and anemia (9.5% each). There were no grade 4-5 TRAEs. Plasma PF-06952229 exposures were dose proportional between 80 and 375 mg. Pharmacodynamic studies confirmed target modulation of pSMAD2/3 (peripheral monocytes). One P1A patient with prostate cancer receiving PF-06952229 375 mg monotherapy achieved confirmed partial response (31-month duration of response). A total of 8 patients (P1A, n = 6; P1B, n = 2) achieved stable disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Antitumor activity of PF-06952229 was observed in preclinical studies. PF-06952229 was generally well tolerated with manageable toxicity; a small group of patients achieved durable responses and/or disease stabilization.

BACKGROUND: LHC165 is a Toll-like receptor (TLR)-7 agonist that generates an effective tumor antigen-specific T-cell adaptive immune response as well as durable antitumor responses. We aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, dose-limiting toxicities, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of LHC165 single agent (SA) ± spartalizumab [PDR001; anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)] in adult patients with advanced solid tumors.
METHODS: In this phase I/Ib, open-label, dose-escalation/expansion study, patients received LHC165 SA 100-600 μg biweekly through intratumoral (IT) injection and LHC165 600 μg biweekly + spartalizumab 400 mg Q4W through intravenous (IV) infusion.
RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled: 21 patients received LHC165 SA, and 24 patients received LHC165 + spartalizumab. The median duration of exposure was 8 weeks (range 2-129 weeks). No maximum tolerated dose was reached. Recommended dose expansion was established as LHC165 600 μg biweekly as SA and in combination with spartalizumab 400 mg Q4W. The most common drug-related adverse events (AEs) were pyrexia (22.2%), pruritus (13.3%), chills (11.1%), and asthenia (4.4%). The only serious AE (SAE) suspected to be related to the study drug was grade 3 pancreatitis (n = 1). Across all tumor types, overall response rate and disease control were 6.7% and 17.8%, respectively. Overall median progression-free survival (PFS) and immune-related PFS was 1.7 months. LHC165 serum PK demonstrated an initial rapid release followed by a slower release due to continued release of LHC165 from the injection site.
CONCLUSIONS: LHC165 demonstrated acceptable safety and tolerability both as SA and in combination with spartalizumab, and evidence of limited antitumor activity was seen in adult patients with relapsed/refractory or metastatic solid tumors.

UNASSIGNED: This phase Ib study was performed to determine the safety of combination capecitabine with alpleisib (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit p110α blockade) and determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase ll dose (RP2D) of this combination regimen in patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy. The synergistic anti-tumor activity and pharmacokinetics (PK) were investigated.
UNASSIGNED: Dose escalation phases were conducted in patients with advanced solid cancers who were refractory to standard therapy regardless of PIK3CA mutation. Patients were administered orally once daily alpelisib (200mg and 300mg) and twice daily capecitabine (850mg, 1000mg, 1250mg orally, days 1-14) every 3 weeks. Standard \"3 + 3\" dose escalation was used to define the MTD. The effect of alpelisib on the PK of capecitabine was assessed.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with 6 colorectal cancer (three PIK3CA mutation) and 6 breast cancer (all PIK3CA mutation) were enrolled. The first three patients in dose level 0 (alpelisib 200mg daily, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily) had no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). In dose level 1 (alpelisib increased to 300 mg daily, capecitabine 1,000mg twice daily), one of six patients had DLT (grade (Gr) 3 hyperglycemia). When dose level 2 (alpelisib 300mg daily, capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily) was expanded to 3 patients, no patients had DLTs. The combination of alpelisib 300mg daily and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily was declared as the MTD/RP2D in patients with advanced solid tumors. The most common AEs were Gr 1-3 hyperglycemia (75.0%). Frequent all-grade, treatment-related AEs included Gr 2-3 nausea (75.0%), Gr 1-2 diarrhea (50.0%), Gr 1-2 hand-foot syndrome (41.7%), Gr 1-2 anorexia (41.7%), Gr 2 mucositis (33.3%). Antitumor activity was observed in patients with PIK3CA mutant breast cancer (3 partial response and 3 stable disease of total 6 patients). Alpelisib exposure (Cmax and AUC0-12) was unaffected by concomitant capecitabine. There were no clinically relevant drug-drug interactions observed between alpelisib and capecitabine.
UNASSIGNED: The combination of alpelisib and capecitabine is generally tolerated, without pharmacokinetic interactions, and shows antitumor activity in patients with PIK3CA mutant advanced cancers.

This phase 1b study aimed to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of HR070803, a novel nanoliposomal formulation of irinotecan, in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with pretreated advanced solid tumors. This study consisted of dose-escalation and expansion stages. Dose escalation was performed with a traditional 3 + 3 design; patients received intravenous infusion of HR070803 from 60 to 80 mg/m2, followed by leucovorin (200 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (2000 mg/m2) every 2 weeks. In the expansion stage, patients received treatments at selected tolerable dose. Fifteen patients received treatments at 60 mg/m2 (n = 12) and 80 mg/m2 (n = 3). DLTs occurred in 2 patients at 80 mg/m2 (grade 2 neutropenia that resulted in a dose delay of ≥ 7 days, n = 1; grade 3 febrile neutropenia, n = 1). The MTD was determined to be 60 mg/m2. The most frequent HR070803related adverse events included anorexia, leukopenia, neutropenia, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea. SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, exhibited lower maximum plasma concentrations and a prolonged terminal half-life when irinotecan was administered via nanoliposome compared to conventional injection. Overall, 4 patients achieved a partial response (confirmed, n = 2), and 9 had stable disease. The MTD of HR070803 was 60 mg/m2 when infused with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. Nanoliposomal encapsulation modified the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and SN-38. HR070803 with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin demonstrated a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor efficacy in advanced solid tumors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05086848. Retrospectively registered on Oct. 12, 2021.

BACKGROUND: Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors transformed management of various malignancies. This study preclinically characterized TQ-B3525 (dual PI3Kα/δ inhibitor) and assessed the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics in relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphoma or advanced solid tumors (STs).
METHODS: Oral TQ-B3525 was given at eight dose levels on a 28-day cycle. Primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and safety.
RESULTS: TQ-B3525 showed high selectivity and suppressed tumor growth. Between June 12, 2018, and November 18, 2020, 80 patients were enrolled (63 in dose-escalation cohort; 17 in dose-expansion cohort). Two DLTs occurred in two (two of 63, 3.2%) DLT-evaluable patients; MTD was not identified. TQ-B3525 at 20 mg once daily was selected as RP2D. Grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events mainly included hyperglycemia (16.3%), neutrophil count decreased (15.0%), and diarrhea (10.0%). Two (2.5%) treatment-related deaths were reported. Sixty patients with R/R lymphoma and 11 advanced STs demonstrated objective response rates of 68.3% and 9.1%, disease control rates of 91.7% and 54.6%, median progression-free survivals of 12.1 and 1.1 months; median overall survivals were not reached.
CONCLUSIONS: TQ-B3525 exhibited rapid absorption and a nearly proportional increase in exposure. Acceptable safety and promising efficacy support further investigation of TQ-B3525 (20 mg once daily) for R/R lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The study evaluates the first-line application of pembrolizumab in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC), gastric cancer, and renal cell carcinoma. Utilizing the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework (ASCO-VF), the analysis incorporates data from pivotal KEYNOTE trials.
METHODS: The study systematically assessed the clinical benefit of pembrolizumab in advanced solid malignancies through nine randomized controlled trials, one of which comprised two experimental arms. Data extraction from primary sources was conducted from PubMed, ASCO, and ESMO publications. Utilizing ESMO-MCBS and ASCO-VF forms, the evaluation focused on clinical benefit, toxicity, and bonus points, with discrepancies resolved through consensus discussions.
RESULTS: Nine first-line indications for pembrolizumab received Food and Drug Administration approval for metastatic solid tumors between 2018 and 2023. Notable distinctions in ESMO-MCBS grades revealed seven trials with substantial clinical benefit (grades 5 to 4) and three with moderate to negligible benefit (grades 3 to 1). Bonus points, primarily based on the tail of the curve, were allocated to three trials for overall survival, one for progression-free survival, and one for a significant improvement in quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation of pembrolizumab across diverse cancers, especially in mNSCLC and HNSCC, revealed varied outcomes and challenges in clinical benefit interpretation. The assessment of clinical benefit, incorporating quantitative and qualitative endpoints, underscores the need to consider survivorship outcomes and patient perspectives for a comprehensive understanding.

This study aims to explore the relationship between serum iron by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and potential mechanism. Totally 113 patients from 233 patients with advanced metastatic lung cancer, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer and colorectal cancer who treated with immunotherapy in Shandong Provincial Hospital were divided into training group (n=68) and validation group (n=45), whose patients were divided into clinical benefit response (CBR) and non-clinical benefit (NCB) by RECIST (v1.1) respectively. We found for the first time that high serum iron level (>1036 μg/L) was a novel biomarker of better PFS (10.13 months vs 7.37 months; p = 0.0015) and OS(16.00 months vs 11.00 months; p = 0.0235) by ROC curve (sensitivity: 78.13 %; Specificity: 80.56 %; p < 0.0001) of CBR (n=32) and NCB (n=36) patients in training group. Interestingly, consistently stable and high serum iron level predicted better efficacy during immunotherapy. Noteworthy, the predictive efficacy of PD-L1 expression was significantly inferior than serum iron (accuracy:63.49% vs 79.41%, p=0.0432), while serum iron detected by spectrophotometry did not predict the efficacy of immunotherapy (p=0.0671) indicating higher sensitivity of ICP-MS. Bioinformatics analysis showed that serum iron could enhance innate immunity and cytokine release and was verified by proteomics that KEGG and GO analysis enriched innate immune and cytokine signaling pathways. Flow cytometry showed that IL-17 (p=0.0002) increased and IL-6 (p=0.0112) decreased after immunotherapy. Based on this, Nomogram with better prediction was constructed by multiple clinical and independent factors. Our results revealed that serum iron is positively associated with ICIs efficacy by enhancing innate immunity and cytokine release in advanced metastatic cancers, and can be a biomarker for predicting ICIs response.

The benefits of recombinant interleukin-12 (rIL-12) as a multifunctional cytokine and potential immunotherapy for cancer have been sought for decades based on its efficacy in multiple mouse models. Unexpected toxicity in the first phase 2 study required careful attention to revised dosing strategies. Despite some signs of efficacy since then, most rIL-12 clinical trials have encountered hurdles such as short terminal elimination half-life (T½), limited tumor microenvironment targeting, and substantial systemic toxicity. We developed a strategy to extend the rIL-12 T½ that depends on binding albumin in vivo to target tumor tissue, using single-chain rIL-12 linked to a fully human albumin binding (FHAB) domain (SON-1010). After initiating a dose-escalation trial in patients with cancer (SB101), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose (SAD) phase 1 trial in healthy volunteers (SB102) was conducted.
SB102 (NCT05408572) focused on safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoints. SON-1010 at 50-300 ng/kg or placebo administered subcutaneously on day 1 was studied at a ratio of 6:2, starting with two sentinels; participants were followed through day 29. Safety was reviewed after day 22, before enrolling the next cohort. A non-compartmental analysis of PK was performed and correlations with the PD results were explored, along with a comparison of the SON-1010 PK profile in SB101.
Participants receiving SON-1010 at 100 ng/kg or higher tolerated the injection but generally experienced more treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) than those receiving the lowest dose. All TEAEs were transient and no other dose relationship was noted. As expected with rIL-12, initial decreases in neutrophils and lymphocytes returned to baseline by days 9-11. PK analysis showed two-compartment elimination in SB102 with mean T½ of 104 h, compared with one-compartment elimination in SB101, which correlated with prolonged but controlled and dose-related increases in interferon-gamma (IFNγ). There was no evidence of cytokine release syndrome based on minimal participant symptoms and responses observed with other cytokines.
SON-1010, a novel presentation for rIL-12, was safe and well-tolerated in healthy volunteers up to 300 ng/kg. Its extended half-life leads to a prolonged but controlled IFNγ response, which may be important for tumor control in patients.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05408572, identifier NCT05408572.

OBJECTIVE: Tiragolumab is an immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody targeting the immune checkpoint T cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor ITIM domains. Targeting multiple immune pathways may improve anti-tumor responses. The phase I YP42514 study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and preliminary efficacy of tiragolumab plus atezolizumab in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors.
METHODS: Adult patients from mainland China with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score 0/1, life expectancy of ≥ 12 weeks, and adequate hematologic/end organ function were eligible. Patients received tiragolumab 600 mg and atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenous every 3 weeks. Key endpoints were PK (serum concentrations of tiragolumab and atezolizumab) and safety. Results from this study were compared with the global phase I study, GO30103 (NCT02794571).
RESULTS: In this study, 20 patients received a median of five doses of tiragolumab plus atezolizumab. Median age was 57.5 years, 85.0% of patients were male and the most common tumor type was non-small cell lung cancer. Exposures in Chinese patients were comparable to the global GO30103 population: geometric mean ratio was 1.07 for Cycle 1 tiragolumab area under the concentration-time curve0-21 and 0.92 and 0.93 for Cycle 1 peak and trough atezolizumab exposure, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were consistent across the Chinese and global populations. Two patients (10.0%) in this study achieved a partial response.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, tiragolumab plus atezolizumab was tolerable and demonstrated preliminary anti-tumor activity. There were no meaningful differences in the PK or safety of tiragolumab plus atezolizumab between the Chinese and global populations.
BACKGROUND: China Clinical Trial Registry Identifier CTR20210219/YP42514. Date of registration 16 March 2021.

BACKGROUND: Penpulimab, a new-generation antiprogrammed cell death-1 immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody, was engineered to optimize receptor occupancy and eliminate fragment crystallizable γ-mediated effector function. In this multicenter, phase 1b/2, multicohort study, the objective was to investigate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of penpulimab in advanced solid tumors.
METHODS: Patients who had unresectable, advanced solid tumors were enrolled from six centers and received 200 mg penpulimab on day 1 every 2 weeks for up to 24 months. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version criteria 1.1.
RESULTS: Between September 2, 2019, and January 1, 2020, 65 patients were enrolled and received penpulimab. At the time of data cutoff (May 11, 2022), the median follow-up was 12.6 months (range, 1.1-28.6 months). The ORR was 12.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5%-22.8%), with three (4.6%) complete responses and five (7.7%) partial responses. Twelve patients (18.5%) achieved stable disease, resulting in a disease control rate of 30.8% (95% CI, 19.9%-43.4%). The median duration of response was not reached (95% CI, 6.70 months to not estimable). In all cohorts, the median progression-free survival was 1.74 months (95% CI, 1.41-2.69 months), and the median overall survival was 16.59 months (95% CI, 7.82-22.18 months). Grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events and immune-related adverse events occurred in 9.2% and 27.7% of patients, respectively. Positive antidrug antibody responses to penpulimab were observed in one patient (1.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: Penpulimab showed promising antitumor activity with an acceptable safety profile, offering a potential new treatment approach for solid tumors. These findings supported the evaluation of penpulimab\'s durable activity and safety, as monotherapy or in combination therapy, in specific malignancies.