advanced care planning

高级护理计划
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有帕金森病(PD)的成年人住院率高于年龄匹配的对照组,这些住院与显著的发病率相关。然而,对于需要重症监护病房(ICU)级别护理的PD患者的危重病后果知之甚少.这项研究的目的是确定入住ICU的成人PD的特征和结局。
    方法:我们使用医学信息集市进行了一项针对重症监护IV数据集的回顾性巢式病例对照研究。确定了患有PD的成年人,这些受试者的ICU入院指数与没有根据年龄进行PD诊断的ICU入院指数1:4相匹配,性别,合并症,疾病严重程度,ICU类型,需要机械通气.主要结果是住院死亡率和出院地点。次要结果是住院时间和预设的并发症。
    结果:共鉴定出630名患有PD的成年人。PD患者年龄较大,更可能是男性,有更多的合并症,并有较高的疾病严重程度在介绍。一项匹配分析显示,患有PD的成年人在住院死亡率方面没有显着差异,但更有可能出院接受更高水平的护理。患有PD的成年人住院时间更长,谵妄的几率增加,压疮,和肠梗阻。
    结论:在危重病期间,与对照组相比,PD患者住院时间更长和并发症的风险增加,出院时需要更高水平的护理.这些发现揭示了改善PD患者预后的干预目标,并可能为有关该人群的护理目标的讨论提供信息。
    BACKGROUND: Adults with Parkinson disease (PD) are hospitalized at higher rates than age-matched controls, and these hospitalizations are associated with significant morbidity. However, little is known about the consequences of critical illness requiring intensive care unit (ICU)-level care in patients with PD. The aim of this study was to define the characteristics and outcomes of adults with PD admitted to the ICU.
    METHODS: We performed a retrospective nested case-control study using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV data set. Adults with PD were identified, and the index ICU admission for these subjects was matched 1:4 with index ICU admissions without a PD diagnosis based on age, sex, comorbidities, illness severity, ICU type, and need for mechanical ventilation. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and discharge location. Secondary outcomes were length of stay and prespecified complications.
    RESULTS: A total of 630 adults with PD were identified. Patients with PD were older and were more likely to be male, have more comorbidities, and have higher illness severity at presentation. A matched analysis revealed adults with PD did not have a significant difference in in-hospital mortality but were more likely to be discharged to a higher level of care. Adults with PD had longer hospital lengths of stay and increased odds of delirium, pressure ulcers, and ileus.
    CONCLUSIONS: During critical illness, patients with PD are at increased risk for longer hospital lengths of stay and complications and require a higher level of care at discharge than matched controls. These findings reveal targets for interventions to improve outcomes for patients with PD and may inform discussions about goals of care in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:复苏命令描述个人偏好和干预类型,例如心肺复苏(CPR)的适用性,这可能会在严重恶化的情况下提供好处。本研究的目的是检查中风住院患者的复苏顺序完成情况和内容。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究检查了在21个月期间进入三级卒中中心的连续个体的复苏顺序。使用多变量逻辑回归来确定与复苏顺序完成和内容相关的因素。
    结果:1924名个体被纳入研究。完成复苏命令的个体比例为37.4%。几个因素与完成复苏顺序的可能性增加相关,包括接受血管内血栓切除术(p=0.013)和脑出血(p=0.001)。女性更有可能进行非CPR的复苏顺序(p=0.021,OR95CI1.080-2.542)。脑出血患者也更有可能不进行CPR(p=0.037,OR95CI1.039-3.353)。
    结论:根据人口统计学和卒中特征,复苏顺序完成和内容存在差异。需要进一步的研究来确定这些差异的原因并优化复苏命令的完成。
    OBJECTIVE: Resuscitation orders describe individual preferences and types of intervention, such as suitability for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), that may provide benefit in the event of critical deterioration. The purpose of this study was to examine stroke inpatient resuscitation order completion and content.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined resuscitation orders in consecutive individuals admitted to a tertiary stroke centre over a 21-month period. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with resuscitation order completion and content.
    RESULTS: 1924 individuals were included in the study. The proportion of individuals who had resuscitation orders completed was 37.4%. Several factors were associated with an increased likelihood of resuscitation order completion including having received endovascular thrombectomy (p=0.013) and having intracerebral haemorrhage (p=0.001). Females were more likely to have a resuscitation order that is not for CPR (p=0.021, OR 95%CI 1.080-2.542). Patients with intracerebral haemorrhage were also more likely to be not for CPR (p=0.037, OR 95%CI 1.039-3.353).
    CONCLUSIONS: Disparities exist in resuscitation order completion and content based on demographic and stroke characteristics. Further research is required to identify the reasons for these differences and to optimise resuscitation order completion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:终末期肝病(ESLD)提出了一个多方面的挑战,不仅包括身体,而且还包括情感,心理,和社会维度。本研究旨在探索美国医疗保健系统中ESLD患者的经验。
    方法:利用方便的抽样方法,在2023年4月至2024年1月之间,来自美国三级医院的15名ESLD患者参加了半结构化访谈。数据分析使用MAXQDA2023进行,采用现象学方法确定共同主题。
    结果:该研究确定了六个主要主题:沟通风格在诊断交付中的重要性,家庭和社会支持的关键作用,对姑息治疗的不同理解和偏好,对高级护理计划的不同态度,对协调医疗保健体验的偏好,以及ESLD的情绪和心理影响。
    结论:我们的研究强调了药物治疗以外的ESLD患者护理的复杂性,强调明确沟通的重要性,移情护理,以及家庭和姑息治疗服务的整合。
    BACKGROUND: End-stage liver disease (ESLD) presents a multifaceted challenge that encompasses not only physical but also emotional, psychological, and social dimensions. This study aims to explore the experiences of ESLD patients within the United States healthcare system.
    METHODS: Utilizing a convenience sampling methodology, 15 ESLD patients from a tertiary care hospital in the USA participated in semi-structured interviews between April 2023 and January 2024. Data analysis was conducted using MAXQDA 2023, employing a phenomenological approach to identify common themes.
    RESULTS: The study identified six primary themes: the significance of communication style in diagnosis delivery, the crucial role of family and social support, varied understanding and preferences for palliative care, diverse attitudes towards advanced care planning, preferences for coordinated healthcare experiences, and the emotional and psychological impact of ESLD.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study underscores the complexity of ESLD patient care beyond medical treatment, highlighting the importance of clear communication, empathetic care, and the integration of family and palliative care services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在中国文化中,家庭成员是晚期癌症患者临终(EoL)问题的主要决策者.然而,人们对中国家庭做出EoL决定的信心及其相关因素知之甚少。本研究旨在调查中国家庭成员对晚期癌症患者做出EoL决策的信心状况及其相关因素。
    方法:这项横断面研究使用了来自广州三级癌症中心的147名III期或IV期癌症患者家庭成员的便利样本,中国。问卷包括患者及其家庭成员的人口统计信息,患者的EoL偏好,和中文版的家庭决策自我效能感量表(FDMSE)。
    结果:共有145名家庭成员(98.64%)完成了问卷。FDMSE平均得分为3.92±0.53。多元回归分析显示,与FDMSE相关的因素包括患者的病程,健康保险,参与EoL决策,表达未完成的愿望,和家庭成员的就业状况。
    结论:中国家庭成员对晚期癌症患者做出EoL决定的信心不足。建议开发文化定制的高级护理计划模型,以明确患者的偏好,并提高家庭成员在对晚期癌症患者或晚期癌症患者做出EoL决定时的自我效能。
    OBJECTIVE: In Chinese culture, family members are the main decision maker on end-of-life (EoL) issues for patients with advanced cancer. Yet little is known about Chinese families\' confidence in making EoL decisions and its associated factors. This study aims to investigate the status and associated factors of Chinese family members\' confidence in making EoL decisions for patients with advanced cancer.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a convenience sample of 147 family members of patients with stage III or stage IV cancer from a tertiary cancer center in Guangzhou, China. The questionnaires included demographic information of patients and their family members, patients\' EoL preferences, and the Chinese version of the Family Decision-Making Self-Efficacy (FDMSE) Scale.
    RESULTS: A total of145 family members (98.64%) completed the questionnaires. The average score of FDMSE was 3.92 ± 0.53. A multiple regression analysis showed that the factors associated with FDMSE included patients\' duration of disease, health insurance, participation in EoL decision-making, the expression of unfilled wishes, and family members\' employment status.
    CONCLUSIONS: Chinese family members were not confident enough in making EoL decisions for patients with advanced cancer. It is recommended to develop cultural-tailored advanced care planning models to clarify patient preferences and to enhance the family members\' self-efficacy in making EoL decisions with or for patients with advanced cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:高龄与生命末期的危及生命的状况有关。这些人中的许多人在生命的尽头无法做出决定,因为可变的意识。他们能够做出决定并确定他们的护理重点,在一个叫做高级护理计划的过程中。所以,需要一种仪器来调查老年人群的ACP。进行这项研究是为了确定波斯版本的高级护理计划问卷(ACPQ)在涉及德黑兰的老年人口中的心理测量特性。
    方法:这项方法学研究于2021-2022年在五家医院进行。总共包括390名合格的老人。包括翻译在内的心理测量评估,面部有效性,进行内容效度并进行探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析。通过评估Cronbachα的内部一致性来实现可靠性,并使用测试重测进行稳定性。
    结果:仪器的表面有效性进行了微小的变化。所有项目的内容有效性指数均大于0.79。在EFA中还提取了四个因素,CFA表明,四因素模型对数据具有良好的拟合性(RMSEA:0.04;NFI:0.97;FI:0.99;FI:0.96;AGFI:0.87;GFI0/90;标准化RMR:0.02)。Cronbachα和ICC分别为0.72-0.94和0.85-0.96。
    结论:波斯版本的高级护理计划问卷具有理想的心理测量特性,可用于测量老年人群的高级护理计划。此外,伊朗的医疗保健提供者可以在他们的实践和研究中使用这份问卷。
    BACKGROUND: Advanced age is associated with life-threatening conditions at the end of life. Many of these persons at the end of their lives cannot make decisions because of the variable consciousness. They are able to make decisions and identify their care priorities, in a process called advanced care planning. So, an instrument is required for investigating ACP of the elderly population. This study was performed to determine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the advanced care planning questionnaire(ACPQ) in elderly population referring to Tehran.
    METHODS: This methodological study was performed in five hospitals in 2021-2022. A total of 390 eligible elderlies were included. The psychometric assessment including translation, face validity, content validity were performed Alsothe exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were assessed. Reliability were done by internal consistency by assessing Cronbach alpha and stability was performed using test-retest.
    RESULTS: The face validity of the instrument was performed with minor changes. The content validity index for all of the items was above 0.79. In EFA four factors was extracted also CFA showed that the four-factor model has a good fit of the data (RMSEA: 0.04; NFI: 0.97 CFI: 0.99; IFI: 0.99; RFI: 0.96; AGFI: 0.87; GFI 0/90; standardized RMR: 0.02). Cronbach alpha and ICC were 0.72-0.94 and 0.85-0.96, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Persian version of the advance care planning questionnaire has desirable psychometric properties for measuring the advanced care planning of the elderly population. In addition, healthcare providers in Iran can employ this questionnaire in their practice and research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:一年死亡率对于转诊至专科姑息治疗或预先护理计划(ACP)很重要。这有助于为那些无法治愈或预期寿命较低的人优化舒适度。很少有研究调查胃癌(GC)胃切除术后1年死亡率的危险因素。
    方法:纳入了在2005年至2020年期间接受胃切除术的1415例胃癌患者(I-IV期)。患者以3:2的比例随机分配到研究组(n=850)和验证组(n=565)。在调查组里,确定了预测1年生存率的重要独立预后因素.开发了预测1年死亡率的评分系统,并在验证组中进行了验证。
    结果:多变量分析显示,以下七个变量是1年生存率的重要独立因素:年龄≥78,术前合并症,全胃切除术,术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo分类CD≥3a),第三阶段和第四阶段,和R2切除。在制定1年死亡率评分(OMS)时,年龄≥78分为2,术前合并症,全胃切除术,术后并发症(CD≥3a)评分为1分,Ⅲ期,IV,和R2切除分别得分为2、3和3。OMS3预测1年内死亡的敏感性为91%,特异性为66%。在验证组中,OMS5对预测1年内死亡的敏感性为55%,特异性为93%。
    结论:OMS可能提供重要信息,并帮助外科医生选择GC患者的ACP时机。
    One-year mortality is important for referrals to specialist palliative care or advance care planning (ACP). This helps optimize comfort for those who cannot be cured or have a lower life expectancy. Few studies have investigated the risk factors for 1-year mortality after gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC).
    A total of 1415 patients with gastric cancer (stages I-IV) who underwent gastrectomy between 2005 and 2020 were included. The patients were randomly assigned to the investigation group (n = 850) and validation group (n = 565) in a 3:2 ratio. In the investigation group, significant independent prognostic factors for predicting 1-year survival were identified. A scoring system for predicting 1-year mortality was developed which was validated in the validation group.
    Multivariate analysis revealed that the following seven variables were significant independent factors for 1-year survival: age ≧78, preoperative comorbidity, total gastrectomy, postoperative complication (Clavien-Dindo classification CD ≧ 3a), stage III and IV, and R2 resection. While developing a 1-year mortality score (OMS), an age ≧78 was scored 2, preoperative comorbidity, total gastrectomy, and postoperative complication (CD ≧ 3a) were scored 1, and stage III, IV, and R2-resection were scored 2, 3, and 3, respectively. OMS 3 had a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 66% for predicting death within 1 year. In the validation group, OMS 5 had a sensitivity of 55% and a specificity of 93% for predicting death within 1 year.
    OMS may provide important information and help surgeons select the timing of ACP in patients with GC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心力衰竭(HF)是一种进行性,姑息治疗(PC)被认为是标准治疗的限制生命的疾病。在接受PC的患者中,咨询往往在病程后期进行。目的:我们的主要目的是检查与HF接受PC相关的患者因素。其次,我们试图确定与早期PC接触相关的因素。设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究,对在2011年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间死亡的美国退伍军人进行了回顾性队列研究。设置/受试者:受试者是患有HF的退伍军人,其先前在美国的退伍军人事务医院入院时死亡。测量:我们计算了从PC遭遇到死亡的时间。我们对没有PC死亡的HF患者进行了表征,晚期PC(≤死亡前90天),和早期PC(>死亡前90天)。结果:我们确定了232,079名退伍军人,平均年龄为(76.5±10.7)岁。在队列中,56.5%(n=131,122)的退伍军人在没有PC的情况下死亡,22.5%(n=52,114)死亡前PC<90天,21.0%(n=48,843)在死亡前90天PC>。没有PC死亡的退伍军人往往更年轻,合并症更少。结论:虽然我们队列中超过20%的HF患者在死亡之前有PC,超过一半的人在没有PC的情况下死亡。PC参与似乎是由合并症而不是HF驱动的。需要与心脏病学进行有效的合作,以确定将从早期PC参与中受益的患者。
    Background: Heart failure (HF) is a progressive, life-limiting illness for which palliative care (PC) is considered standard of care. Among patients that do receive PC, consultation tends to occur late in the illness course. Objective: Our primary aim was to examine patient factors associated with receiving PC in HF. Secondarily, we sought to determine factors associated with early PC encounters. Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of U.S. Veterans with prior hospitalization who died between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2020. Setting/Subjects: Subjects were Veterans with HF who died with a prior admission to a Veterans Affairs hospital in the United States. Measurements: We calculated the time from PC encounter to death. We characterized HF patients who died without PC, with late PC (≤90 days before death), and with early PC (>90 days before death). Results: We identified 232,079 Veterans with a mean age of (76.5 ± 10.7) years. Within the cohort, 56.5% (n = 131,122) of Veterans died with no PC, 22.5% (n = 52,114) had PC <90 days before death, and 21.0% (n = 48,843) had PC >90 days before death. Veterans who died without PC tended to be younger with fewer comorbidities. Conclusions: While more than 20% of HF patients in our cohort had PC well in advance of death, more than half died without PC. PC involvement seemed to be driven by comorbidities rather than HF. Effective collaboration with Cardiology is needed to identify patients who would benefit from earlier PC involvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    被认为是最致命的癌症之一,胰腺癌凸显了姑息治疗的迫切需要。我们调查了所有65个国家癌症研究所(NCI)癌症中心的姑息治疗主任,以评估胰腺癌患者姑息治疗的利用情况和时间。1)您的姑息治疗团队是否有与每个胰腺癌患者接触的政策?a.是b.否2)当胰腺癌患者涉及姑息治疗时,您通常/主要是在什么情况下首先被要求参与?a.在患者治疗旅程的早期(关注症状管理)b.在患者治疗旅程的后期(关注临终讨论和解释临终关怀)所有65个NCI指定的中心都做出了回应,实现100%的目标样本。在这些中心中,64缺乏对每位胰腺癌患者进行姑息治疗的政策。此外,38个中心提前开始干预,专注于症状管理,虽然15个中心在治疗过程中很晚才开始姑息治疗,强调生命终结的讨论。此外,12个中心在治疗胰腺癌时开始早期和晚期干预。有越来越多的医疗中心的姑息治疗的必要性的胰腺癌的认识,随着早期整合的上升趋势。姑息治疗参与的时间和重点仍然存在差异。未来的研究应该探索获得姑息治疗的障碍,并比较早期和晚期干预的结果。通过解决这些领域,医疗保健提供者可能会改善胰腺癌患者的预后.
    Recognized as one of the deadliest cancers, pancreatic cancer underscores an urgent need for palliative care. We surveyed palliative care directors at all 65 National Cancer Institute (NCI) cancer centers to assess the utilization and timing of palliative care involvement in pancreatic cancer patients. 1) Does your palliative care team have a policy to get involved with every pancreatic cancer patient? a. Yes b. No 2) When palliative care is involved with pancreatic cancer patients, in what setting are you typically/primarily first asked to be involved? a. Early in the patient\'s treatment journey (focusing on symptom management) b. Later in the patient\'s treatment journey (focusing on end-of-life discussions and explaining hospice) All 65 NCI-designated centers responded, achieving 100% of the targeted sample. Among these centers, 64 lacked a policy for palliative care involvement with every pancreatic cancer patient. Additionally, 38 centers initiated intervention early, focusing on symptom management, while 15 centers started palliative care late in the treatment journey, emphasizing end-of-life discussions. Furthermore, 12 centers initiated intervention both early and late when treating pancreatic cancer. There is an increasing recognition among medical centers of palliative care\'s necessity for pancreatic cancer, with a rising trend toward early integration. Variation in the timing and emphasis of palliative care involvement remains. Future research should explore barriers to accessing palliative care and compare outcomes of early versus late intervention. By addressing these areas, healthcare providers can potentially improve outcomes for pancreatic cancer patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:需要住院治疗的生命限制性疾病(LLI)患者有很高的恶化和12个月死亡率的可能性。为了避免不一致的护理,我们需要了解我们的病人的目标和价值观。
    目的:描述实施共享决策(SDM)计划与住院LLI患者的护理目标(GoC)记录之间的关联。
    方法:对澳大利亚三级医院急性普通内科病房住院患者进行了5年的前瞻性纵向介入研究。具有新GoC表单的SDM计划,实施了沟通培训和临床支持。主要结果是有记录的以人为中心的GoC讨论(PCD)的患者比例。临床结果包括医院利用率和90天死亡率。
    结果:纳入1343例患者。PCDs患者的比例从0%增加到35.4%(调整后比值比(aOR),2.38;95%置信区间(CI),2.01-2.82;P<0.001)。在此期间,中位住院时间从8天减少(四分位数间距(IQR),4-14)至6天(IQR,3-11)(调整后的估计效果,-0.38;95%CI,-0.64至-0.11;P=0.005)和快速反应团队激活从28%到13%(aOR,0.87;95%CI,0.78-0.97;P值=0.01)。记录的高依赖性病房护理的治疗偏好从39.7%下降到24.4%(aOR,0.81;95%CI,0.73-0.89;P值<0.001),病房护理从31.9%增加到55.1%(aOR,1.24;95%CI,1.14-1.36;P值<0.001)。
    结论:SDM计划的实施与以人为中心的GoC的文档增加有关,改变了患者的治疗偏好,降低了护理强度,降低了医院利用率。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with a life-limiting illness (LLI) requiring hospitalisation have a high likelihood of deterioration and 12-month mortality. To avoid non-aligned care, we need to understand our patients\' goals and values.
    OBJECTIVE: To describe the association between the implementation of a shared decision-making (SDM) programme and documentation of goals of care (GoC) for hospitalised patients with LLI.
    METHODS: A prospective longitudinal interventional study of patients admitted to acute general medicine wards in an Australian tertiary hospital over 5 years was conducted. A SDM programme with a new GoC form, communication training and clinical support was implemented. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a documented person-centred GoC discussion (PCD). Clinical outcomes included hospital utilisation and 90-day mortality.
    RESULTS: 1343 patients were included. The proportion of patients with PCDs increased from 0% to 35.4% (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.01-2.82; P < 0.001). During this time, median hospital length of stay decreased from 8 days (interquartile range (IQR), 4-14) to 6 days (IQR, 3-11) (adjusted estimate effect, -0.38; 95% CI, -0.64 to -0.11; P = 0.005) and rapid response team activation from 28% to 13% (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.97; P value = 0.01). Documented treatment preference of high-dependency unit care decreased from 39.7% to 24.4% (aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.89; P value < 0.001), and ward-based care increased from 31.9% to 55.1% (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.14-1.36; P value < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a SDM programme was associated with increased documentation of person-centred GoC, changed patient treatment preference to lower intensity care and reduced hospital utilisation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:衰弱干预措施如老年综合评估(CGA)可以为衰弱的老年人提供显著的益处。然而,将这种主动干预措施纳入初级保健仍然是一个挑战.我们开发了一种IT辅助CGA(i-CGA)流程,其中包括提前护理计划(ACP)。我们评估了,在老年养老院居民中,尤其是那些严重虚弱的人,i-CGA可以改善提前护理计划讨论的机会,并减少计划外住院。
    方法:作为质量改进项目,我们逐步将i-CGA流程纳入老年护理院居民的常规初级保健中,并使用准实验方法来评估其临时影响。全科医生对居民的身体虚弱进行了评估。主动i-CGA完成,包括考虑传统的CGA域,开处方和ACP讨论。中期分析在1年进行:记录完成,对ACP的偏好和坚持,计划外入院,并比较了i-CGA组和对照组(常规护理)的死亡率,分别为i-CGA后1年或衰弱后诊断。使用卡方检验比较记录的ACP偏好和死亡地点。使用Mann-WhitneyU检验分析了计划外住院和卧床天数。使用Kaplan-Meier存活曲线估计存活率。
    结果:一年后,i-CGA组有196名居民(重度虚弱111,57%);对照组有100名居民(重度虚弱56,56%).ACP记录在i-CGA组的100%,vs.对照组72%,p<0.0001。85%(94/111)严重虚弱的i-CGA居民如果严重不适,则不愿住院。对于那些严重虚弱的人,对照组(常规治疗)的平均非计划入院率从0.87(95%置信区间±0.25)/人年活期增加至2.05±1.37,而i-CGA组的平均非计划入院率从0.86±0.24降至0.68±0.37,p=0.22.两组都坚持首选的死亡地点,记录的地方。那些严重虚弱的人,55%(62/111)的i-CGA组死亡,vs.对照组的77%(43/56),p=0.0013。
    结论:积极主动,基于社区的i-CGA可以改善养老院居民ACP偏好的记录,并可能减少计划外住院。在严重虚弱的居民中,在接受i-CGA的患者中发现死亡率降低.
    BACKGROUND: Frailty interventions such as Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) can provide significant benefits for older adults living with frailty. However, incorporating such proactive interventions into primary care remains a challenge. We developed an IT-assisted CGA (i-CGA) process, which includes advance care planning (ACP). We assessed if, in older care home residents, particularly those with severe frailty, i-CGA could improve access to advance care planning discussions and reduce unplanned hospitalisations.
    METHODS: As a quality improvement project we progressively incorporated our i-CGA process into routine primary care for older care home residents, and used a quasi-experimental approach to assess its interim impact. Residents were assessed for frailty by General Practitioners. Proactive i-CGAs were completed, including consideration of traditional CGA domains, deprescribing and ACP discussions. Interim analysis was conducted at 1 year: documented completion, preferences and adherence to ACPs, unplanned hospital admissions, and mortality rates were compared for i-CGA and control (usual care) groups, 1-year post-i-CGA or post-frailty diagnosis respectively. Documented ACP preferences and place of death were compared using the Chi-Square Test. Unplanned hospital admissions and bed days were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.
    RESULTS: At one year, the i-CGA group comprised 196 residents (severe frailty 111, 57%); the control group 100 (severe frailty 56, 56%). ACP was documented in 100% of the i-CGA group, vs. 72% of control group, p < 0.0001. 85% (94/111) of severely frail i-CGA residents preferred not to be hospitalised if they became acutely unwell. For those with severe frailty, mean unplanned admissions in the control (usual care) group increased from 0.87 (95% confidence interval ± 0.25) per person year alive to 2.05 ± 1.37, while in the i-CGA group they fell from 0.86 ± 0.24 to 0.68 ± 0.37, p = 0.22. Preferred place of death was largely adhered to in both groups, where documented. Of those with severe frailty, 55% (62/111) of the i-CGA group died, vs. 77% (43/56) of the control group, p = 0.0013.
    CONCLUSIONS: Proactive, community-based i-CGA can improve documentation of care home residents\' ACP preferences, and may reduce unplanned hospital admissions. In severely frail residents, a mortality reduction was seen in those who received an i-CGA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号