adrenergic beta-antagonists

肾上腺素能 β - 拮抗剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)仍然是重症监护的重大挑战,尽管在治疗方面取得了进展,但死亡率仍然很高。静脉体外膜氧合(VV-ECMO)被用作难治性病例的抢救治疗。然而,尽管接受了VV-ECMO治疗,一些患者仍可能持续出现严重低氧血症.为了实现这一点,已提出中度低温和短效选择性β1受体阻滞剂.
    方法:使用VV-ECMO治疗的严重ARDS猪模型,这项研究调查了中度低温或β受体阻滞剂在VV-ECMO开始后3小时改善动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)的疗效.主要终点包括VV-ECMO开始前(H0)和ECMO开始后3小时(H3)的VV-ECMO流量与心输出量的比率和动脉血氧饱和度。次要安全标准包括血液动力学和氧合参数。
    结果:将22只雄性猪随机分为三组:对照组(n=6),低体温(n=9)和β受体阻滞(n=7)。在H0时,所有组表现出相似的血液动力学和呼吸参数。中度低温和β-阻断组均表现出H3时VV-ECMO流量与心输出量之比的显着增加,从而改善了SaO2。在H3时,尽管与对照组相比,干预组的氧气输送和消耗减少,各组的氧提取率保持不变,乳酸水平正常.
    结论:在用VV-ECMO治疗的严重ARDS的猪模型中,中度低温和β受体阻滞均导致VV-ECMO流量与心输出量之比增加,从而改善动脉血氧饱和度,对组织灌注无任何影响.
    BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a significant challenge in critical care, with high mortality rates despite advancements in treatment. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is employed as salvage therapy for refractory cases. However, some patients may continue to experience persistent severe hypoxemia despite being treated with VV-ECMO. To achieve this, moderate hypothermia and short-acting selective β1-blockers have been proposed.
    METHODS: Using a swine model of severe ARDS treated with VV-ECMO, this study investigated the efficacy of moderate hypothermia or β-blockade in improving arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) three hours after VV-ECMO initiation. Primary endpoints included the ratio of VV-ECMO flow to cardiac output and arterial oxygen saturation before VV-ECMO start (H0) and three hours after ECMO start (H3). Secondary safety criteria encompassed hemodynamics and oxygenation parameters.
    RESULTS: Twenty-two male pigs were randomized into three groups: control (n = 6), hypothermia (n = 9) and β-blockade (n = 7). At H0, all groups demonstrated similar hemodynamic and respiratory parameters. Both moderate hypothermia and β-blockade groups exhibited a significant increase in the ratio of VV-ECMO flow to cardiac output at H3, resulting in improved SaO2. At H3, despite a decrease in oxygen delivery and consumption in the intervention groups compared to the control group, oxygen extraction ratios across groups remained unchanged and lactate levels were normal.
    CONCLUSIONS: In a swine model of severe ARDS treated with VV-ECMO, both moderate hypothermia and β-blockade led to an increase in the ratio of VV-ECMO flow to cardiac output resulting in improved arterial oxygen saturation without any impact on tissue perfusion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在比较包括血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽抑制剂(ARNI)和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)在内的现代治疗方法与现实世界中常规心力衰竭治疗的有效性。
    背景:由于ARNI和SGLT2i被用于治疗心力衰竭(HF),其治疗方案从以前的β-受体阻滞剂(BB)和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)/血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)和盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)的治疗基础上进行了现代化改造,如在射血分数降低(HFrEF)的HF中加用.然而,常规治疗策略和现代治疗策略联合用药的比较尚未进行.
    方法:本观察性研究(2013-2020年),使用瑞典HF注册表,涉及20,849例HF患者。患者接受了常规(BB,ACEi/ARB,有/没有MRA,n=20,140)或现代(BB,ACEi/ARB,MRA,SGLT2i或BB,阿尼,带/不带SGLT2i的MRA,n=709)在索引访问时进行治疗。终点是全因和心血管(CV)死亡率。
    结果:现代HF治疗与全因死亡率显着降低28%相关(校正HR[aHR],0.72(0.54-0.96);p=0.024)和心血管死亡率显着降低62%(aHR,与常规HF治疗相比,为0.38(0.21-0.68);p=0.0013)。在使用倾向得分匹配的敏感性分析中出现了类似的结果。交互作用分析没有显示EF的任何趋势(<40%和≥40%),性别,年龄(<70岁和≥70岁),eGFR(<60和≥60ml/min/1.73m2),和HF亚组的病因。
    结论:在这项全国性的研究中,现代HF治疗可显著降低全因死亡率和CV死亡率,不管EF,性别,年龄,eGFR,和HF的病因。
    OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed to compare the effectiveness of modern therapy including angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) with conventional heart failure treatment in the real world.
    BACKGROUND: Since ARNI and SGLT2i were introduced to treat heart failure (HF), its therapeutic regimen has modernized from previous treatment with beta-blocker (BB) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) as added-on in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, a comparison between conventional and modern treatment strategies with drugs in combination has not been performed.
    METHODS: This observational study (2013-2020), using the Swedish HF Registry, involved 20,849 HF patients. Patients received either conventional (BB, ACEi/ARB, with/without MRA, n = 20,140) or modern (BB, ACEi/ARB, MRA, SGLT2i or BB, ARNI, MRA with/without SGLT2i, n = 709) treatment at the index visit. The endpoints were all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality.
    RESULTS: Modern HF therapy was associated with a significant 28% reduction in all-cause mortality (adjusted HR [aHR], 0.72 (0.54-0.96); p = 0.024) and a significant 62% reduction in CV mortality (aHR, 0.38 (0.21-0.68); p = 0.0013) compared to conventional HF treatment. Similar results emerged in a sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching. The interaction analyses did not reveal any trends for EF (< 40% and ≥ 40%), sex, age (< 70 and ≥ 70 years), eGFR (< 60 and ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2), and etiology of HF subgroups.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide study, modern HF therapy was associated with significantly reduced all-cause and CV mortality, regardless of EF, sex, age, eGFR, and etiology of HF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抑郁症是全球疾病负担的主要贡献者。使用抗高血压药物与抑郁症之间的潜在因果关系引起了人们的极大兴趣。尽管进行了广泛的调查,这种关系的性质仍然是一个正在进行辩论的主题。因此,本研究旨在通过一项针对药物靶点的孟德尔随机化研究,评估抗高血压药物对抑郁症的影响.
    我们专注于五种抗高血压药物的靶标:ACE抑制剂(ACEI),血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂(ARBs),钙通道阻滞剂(CCB),β-阻滞剂(BBs),和噻嗪类利尿剂(TD)。我们从全基因组关联研究(GWAS)统计中收集了与这些药物靶标相关的单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)。用它们作为药物的代理。随后,我们针对这些药物进行了孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,以探讨其对抑郁症的潜在影响.
    我们的研究结果表明,β受体阻滞剂(BBs)的遗传代理与抑郁症风险升高有关(OR[95CI]=1.027[1.013,1.040],p<0.001)。同样,钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs)的遗传代理与抑郁症的风险增加有关(OR[95CI]=1.030[1.009,1.051],p=0.006)。其他抗高血压药物的遗传标记与抑郁风险之间没有显着关联。
    该研究表明,与β受体阻滞剂(BBs)和钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs)相关的遗传代理可能潜在地增加患者患抑郁症的风险。这些发现强调了在处方这些药物时考虑遗传易感性的重要性,提供预防易感个体抑郁的战略方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Depression ranks as a leading contributor to the global disease burden. The potential causal relationship between the use of antihypertensive medications and depression has garnered significant interest. Despite extensive investigation, the nature of this relationship remains a subject of ongoing debate. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the influence of antihypertensive medications on depression by conducting a Mendelian randomization study focused on drug targets.
    UNASSIGNED: We focused on the targets of five antihypertensive drug categories: ACE Inhibitors (ACEIs), Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists (ARBs), Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs), Beta-Blockers (BBs), and Thiazide Diuretics (TDs). We collected single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with these drug targets from genome-wide association study (GWAS) statistics, using them as proxies for the drugs. Subsequently, we conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis targeting these drugs to explore their potential impact on depression.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings revealed that genetic proxies for Beta-Blockers (BBs) were associated with an elevated risk of depression (OR [95%CI] = 1.027 [1.013, 1.040], p < 0.001). Similarly, genetic proxies for Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs) were linked to an increased risk of depression (OR [95%CI] = 1.030 [1.009, 1.051], p = 0.006). No significant associations were identified between the genetic markers of other antihypertensive medications and depression risk.
    UNASSIGNED: The study suggests that genetic proxies associated with Beta-Blockers (BBs) and Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs) could potentially elevate the risk of depression among patients. These findings underscore the importance of considering genetic predispositions when prescribing these medications, offering a strategic approach to preventing depression in susceptible individuals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究的目的是描述患有心力衰竭(HF)的老年人群,随着时间的推移,分析心血管药物的使用情况,探讨影响本组心血管药物治疗的因素。
    方法:从于默奥85+/老年学区域数据库(GERDA)中选择所有有关于HF诊断信息的参与者。GERDA的人都≥85岁。经过培训的调查人员进行了结构化访谈和评估。有关药物和诊断的信息是从参与者和医疗记录中获得的。医学诊断由经验丰富的老年病学家审查并确认。
    结果:在这个非常老的人群中,HF的患病率在女性中为29.6%,在男性中为30.7%.在2000年至2017年期间,肾素-血管紧张素(RAS)抑制剂(比值比[OR]1.107,95%置信区间[CI]1.072-1.144)和β受体阻滞剂(BBs)(OR1.123,95%CI1.086-1.161)的使用在HF患者中有所增加,而loop利尿剂(OR0.899,95%CI0.868-0.931)和洋地黄(OR0.864,95%CI0.828-0.901)的患病率降低(所有药物类别p<0.001)。较高的年龄与较低的RAS抑制剂和BBs的使用有关。
    结论:在该HF人群中,对HF的循证药物的使用随着时间的推移而增加.这可能是处方者对指南推荐的老年人治疗处方不足的认识更好的标志。较高的年龄与较低的RAS抑制剂和BBs患病率相关。这可能表明,进一步的改善是可能的,但也可能代表一个更谨慎的处方中,体弱的非常老的人。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe a population of very old people with heart failure (HF), to analyse the use of cardiovascular drugs over time, and to explore factors influencing cardiovascular drug treatment for this group.
    METHODS: All participants with information regarding HF diagnosis were selected from the Umeå 85+/Gerontological Regional Database (GERDA). The people in GERDA are all ≥85 years old. Trained investigators performed structured interviews and assessments. Information regarding medications and diagnoses was obtained from the participants and from medical records. Medical diagnoses were reviewed and confirmed by an experienced geriatrician.
    RESULTS: In this very old population, the prevalence of HF was 29.6% among women and 30.7% among men. Between 2000 and 2017, there was an increase in the use of renin-angiotensin (RAS) inhibitors (odds ratio [OR] 1.107, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.072-1.144) and beta-blockers (BBs) (OR 1.123, 95% CI 1.086-1.161) among persons with HF, whereas the prevalence of loop diuretics (OR 0.899, 95% CI 0.868-0.931) and digitalis (OR 0.864, 95% CI 0.828-0.901) decreased (p < 0.001 for all drug classes). Higher age was associated with lower use of RAS inhibitors and BBs.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this HF population, the use of evidence-based medications for HF increased over time. This may be a sign of better awareness among prescribers regarding the under-prescribing of guidelines-recommended treatment to old people. Higher age associated with a lower prevalence of RAS inhibitors and BBs. This might indicate that further improvement is possible but could also represent a more cautious prescribing among frail very old individuals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这是基于高敏肌钙蛋白状态(BBTBBT)研究的外伤性脑损伤(TBI)中使用β受体阻滞剂(普萘洛尔)的中期分析。BBTBBT是一项正在进行的双盲安慰剂对照随机临床试验,目标样本量为771例TBI患者。我们寻求,在达到50%的样本量后,探讨早期服用β受体阻滞剂(BBs)对肾上腺素能激增的影响,促炎细胞因子,以及与高敏肌钙蛋白T(HsTnT)状态相关的TBI生物标志物。在随机化之前,使用格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)和HsTnT状态(阳性与阴性)根据TBI的严重程度对患者进行分层。HsTnT阳性患者(非随机)接受普萘洛尔(第1组;n=110),试验阴性的患者被随机分配接受普萘洛尔(第2组;n=129)或安慰剂(第3组;n=111).在损伤后24小时内给予普萘洛尔6天,以心率(>60bpm)为导向,收缩压(≥100mmHg),或平均动脉压(>70mmHg)。Luminex和基于ELISA的免疫测定用于定量血清促炎细胞因子(白细胞介素(IL)-1β,IL-6、IL-8和IL-18),TBI生物标志物[S100B,神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE),和肾上腺素]。在中期分析中,纳入了年龄(平均34.8±9.9岁)和性别相当的三百五十例患者。第1组有显著较高的基线水平的IL-6,IL-1B,S100B,乳酸,和基差高于随机组(p=0.001)。第1组血清IL-6、IL-1β显著降低,肾上腺素,从基线到受伤后48小时的NSE水平(p=0.001)。严重颅脑损伤患者的基线IL-6、IL-1B水平较高,S100B,HsTnT比轻度和中度TBI高(p=0.01)。HsTnT水平与损伤严重程度评分(ISS)显着相关(r=0.275,p=0.001),GCS(r=-0.125,p=0.02),血清S100B(r=0.205,p=0.001)。普萘洛尔早期给药显示,从基线到损伤后48小时,细胞因子水平和TBI生物标志物显着降低,特别是在HsTnT阳性的患者中,表明在调节TBI后炎症中的潜在作用。试用注册:ClinicalTrials.govNCT04508244。它于2020年11月8日首次注册。招聘于2020年12月29日开始,目前正在进行中。该研究部分发表在第23届欧洲创伤和急诊外科大会(ECTES)上,2024年4月28日至30日,埃斯托里尔,里斯本,葡萄牙。
    This is an interim analysis of the Beta-blocker (Propranolol) use in traumatic brain injury (TBI) based on the high-sensitive troponin status (BBTBBT) study. The BBTBBT is an ongoing double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial with a target sample size of 771 patients with TBI. We sought, after attaining 50% of the sample size, to explore the impact of early administration of beta-blockers (BBs) on the adrenergic surge, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and the TBI biomarkers linked to the status of high-sensitivity troponin T (HsTnT). Patients were stratified based on the severity of TBI using the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and HsTnT status (positive vs negative) before randomization. Patients with positive HsTnT (non-randomized) received propranolol (Group-1; n = 110), and those with negative test were randomized to receive propranolol (Group-2; n = 129) or placebo (Group-3; n = 111). Propranolol was administered within 24 h of injury for 6 days, guided by the heart rate (> 60 bpm), systolic blood pressure (≥ 100 mmHg), or mean arterial pressure (> 70 mmHg). Luminex and ELISA-based immunoassays were used to quantify the serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-18), TBI biomarkers [S100B, Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE), and epinephrine]. Three hundred and fifty patients with comparable age (mean 34.8 ± 9.9 years) and gender were enrolled in the interim analysis. Group 1 had significantly higher baseline levels of IL-6, IL-1B, S100B, lactate, and base deficit than the randomized groups (p = 0.001). Group 1 showed a significant temporal reduction in serum IL-6, IL-1β, epinephrine, and NSE levels from baseline to 48 h post-injury (p = 0.001). Patients with severe head injuries had higher baseline levels of IL-6, IL-1B, S100B, and HsTnT than mild and moderate TBI (p = 0.01). HsTnT levels significantly correlated with the Injury Severity Score (ISS) (r = 0.275, p = 0.001), GCS (r = - 0.125, p = 0.02), and serum S100B (r = 0.205, p = 0.001). Early Propranolol administration showed a significant reduction in cytokine levels and TBI biomarkers from baseline to 48 h post-injury, particularly among patients with positive HsTnT, indicating the potential role in modulating inflammation post-TBI.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04508244. It was registered first on 11/08/2020. Recruitment started on 29 December 2020 and is ongoing. The study was partly presented at the 23rd European Congress of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ECTES), April 28-30, 2024, in Estoril, Lisbon, Portugal.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    利培酮是第二代抗精神病药物,用于治疗精神分裂症和双相情感障碍。它可以有效抑制IKr,但被CredibleMeds®分类为尖端扭转型房性心动过速(TdP)的条件风险。我们以前使用慢性房室传导阻滞犬的研究表明,利培酮单独不诱导TdP,dl-索他洛尔(β-肾上腺素受体阻断加IKr抑制)诱导TdP的频率是d-索他洛尔(单独IKr抑制)的三倍。由于利培酮可以阻断α1-肾上腺素受体并降低血压,由此产生的反射介导的β-肾上腺素受体交感神经紧张的增加可能保护心脏免受IKr抑制相关TdP的影响。为了验证这个假设,在β-肾上腺素受体阻滞剂阿替洛尔输注后,对慢性房室传导阻滞犬给予利培酮,同时监测J-Tpeak和Tpeak-Tend,它们是对TdP的“底物”和“触发剂”的心律失常替代标记,分别。阿替洛尔单独在5只狗中的1只中诱导TdP;此外,在4只狗中的3只中额外输注利培酮诱导TdP。利培酮延长QT间期,在诱导TdP的动物中的J-Tpeak和Tpeak-Tend。这些发现表明,β-肾上腺素受体阻断可以减少复极储备,以增加利培酮的触痛潜能。因此建议在IKr抑制相关不稳定复极患者中使用β-肾上腺素受体阻滞剂时要谨慎。
    Risperidone is a second-generation antipsychotic for treating schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. It can potently inhibit IKr, but is classified into conditional risk for torsade de pointes (TdP) by CredibleMeds®. Our previous studies using chronic atrioventricular block dogs showed that risperidone alone did not induce TdP, and that dl-sotalol (β-adrenoceptor blockade plus IKr inhibition) induced TdP three times more frequently than d-sotalol (IKr inhibition alone). Since risperidone can block α1-adrenoceptor and decrease blood pressure, the resulting reflex-mediated increase of sympathetic tone on β-adrenoceptor might protect the heart from its IKr inhibition-associated TdP. To validate this hypothesis, risperidone was administered to chronic atrioventricular block dogs after β-adrenoceptor blocker atenolol infusion with monitoring J-Tpeak and Tpeak-Tend, which are proarrhythmic surrogate markers of \"substrate\" and \"trigger\" toward TdP, respectively. Atenolol alone induced TdP in 1 out of 5 dogs; moreover, an additional infusion of risperidone induced TdP in 3 out of 4 dogs. Risperidone prolonged QT interval, J-Tpeak and Tpeak-Tend in animals that induced TdP. These findings indicate that β-adrenoceptor blockade can diminish repolarization reserve to augment risperidone\'s torsadogenic potential, thus advising caution when using β-adrenoceptor blockers in patients with IKr inhibition-linked labile repolarization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管使用了行为干预和精神药物,许多患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的人进行严重的攻击仍然难以接受常规治疗。普萘洛尔,β受体阻滞剂,已经积累了很多轶事证据作为一个有希望的选择。然而,精心设计的研究很少见,并且对大剂量心血管副作用的担忧继续存在。
    目的:本研究的目的是(1)通过远程健康研究访问证明用大剂量普萘洛尔治疗侵略的可行性,以及(2)记录心脏安全性。
    方法:本研究采用随机,双盲,安慰剂对照,交叉设计。剂量以灵活但逐步的方式滴定,直到获得治疗反应或高达200mgtid。冲洗后,那些被分配给普萘洛尔的人被交叉使用安慰剂,反之亦然.六名年龄在12-19岁之间的参与者参加了会议。主要结果指标是最终临床总体印象改善量表(CGI-I)和200mgtid时的ABC-C/I评分。
    结果:CGI-I表明在普萘洛尔阶段症状减少了50%,而ABC-I表明与安慰剂相比减少了37%。CGI-I和ABC-C/I的效应大小(r)很大,-分别为0.74和0.64。安慰剂阶段的平均血压为122/68,普萘洛尔阶段的平均血压为109/72。所有Holter监护仪的考试都不引人注目。
    结论:这些结果表明,普萘洛尔是降低ASD患者攻击性的有效选择。因为这是一个小研究,需要进行更大规模的临床试验.
    BACKGROUND: Despite the use of behavioral interventions and psychotropic medications, many individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who engage in severe aggression remain refractory to conventional treatment. Propranolol, a beta-blocker, has accumulated much anecdotal evidence as a promising option. However, well-designed studies are rare, and the apprehension about cardiovascular side effects from large doses continues to exist.
    OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were (1) to demonstrate the feasibility of treating aggression with high-dose propranolol using telehealth study visits and (2) to document cardiac safety.
    METHODS: This study utilized a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. Dosing was titrated up in a flexible but stepwise fashion until therapeutic response was obtained or up to 200 mg tid. Following washout, those who were assigned propranolol were crossed over to placebo and vice versa. Six participants between the ages 12-19 participated. The primary outcome measures were the final Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I) and the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community Irritability (ABC-C/I) scores at 200 mg tid.
    RESULTS: The CGI-I indicated a 50% reduction in symptoms in the propranolol phase, while the ABC-I indicated a 37% reduction in comparison to placebo. The effect sizes ( r ) for the CGI-I and the ABC-C/I were large, -0.74 and -0.64, respectively. The average blood pressure was 122/68 during the placebo phase and 109/72 during the propranolol phase. All Holter monitor exams were unremarkable.
    CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that propranolol is an effective option in decreasing aggression in individuals with ASD. As this was a small study, a larger clinical trial is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    甲状腺毒性周期性麻痹是甲状腺功能亢进的一种罕见且严重的并发症。
    一个三十多岁的亚裔男子,患有不合规的格雷夫斯病,出现四肢轻瘫.紧急血液检查显示严重低钾血症,导致甲状腺毒性周期性麻痹的诊断。不受控制的甲状腺功能亢进的组合,亚洲种族,瘫痪没有其他原因的严重低钾血症定义了诊断。急性治疗涉及非选择性β受体阻滞剂,解决甲状腺功能亢进,和钾补充剂。
    迅速识别甲状腺毒性周期性麻痹对于及时和挽救生命的治疗至关重要。如果是由甲状腺功能亢进引发的,就像格雷夫斯病一样,手术或放射性碘强烈用于明确治疗。值得注意的是,甲状腺功能正常的患者不能发展为甲状腺毒性周期性麻痹。
    UNASSIGNED: Thyrotoxic periodic paralysis is a rare and serious complication of hyperthyroidism.
    UNASSIGNED: A man in his thirties of Asian descent, with non-compliant Graves\' disease, presented with extremity paresis. Emergency blood tests revealed severe hypokalaemia, leading to a diagnosis of thyrotoxic periodic paralysis. The combination of uncontrolled hyperthyroidism, Asian ethnicity, paralysis, and severe hypokalaemia without other causes defined the diagnosis. Acute treatment involves non-selective beta-blockers, addressing hyperthyroidism, and potassium supplements.
    UNASSIGNED: Swift recognition of thyrotoxic periodic paralysis is crucial for timely and life-saving treatment. If triggered by hyperthyroidism, as in Graves\' disease, surgery or radioiodine is strongly indicated for definitive treatment. It is noteworthy that euthyroid patients cannot develop thyrotoxic periodic paralysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)是家庭医生实践中常见的临床实体。本临床综述着重于慢性HFrEF的药物管理。特别注意心力衰竭的分类以及美国心脏协会关于使用指南指导的药物治疗的最新建议。β受体阻滞剂,ACE抑制剂,ARBs,盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂进行了详细讨论。综述了沙库必曲-缬沙坦和SGLT2i作为HFrEF疗法的新重点,随后简要讨论了更先进的治疗方法和合并症管理。
    Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a commonly seen clinical entity in the family physician\'s practice. This clinical review focuses on the pharmacologic management of chronic HFrEF. Special attention is paid to the classification of heart failure and the newest recommendations from the American Heart Association concerning the use of guideline-directed medical therapy. β blockers, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are discussed in detail. The new emphasis on sacubitril-valsartan and SGLT2i\'s as therapies for HFrEF are reviewed, followed by a brief discussion of more advanced therapies and comorbidity management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社交焦虑症(SAD)是一种焦虑症,其特征是过度害怕社交场合的审查。健康学生更容易受到SAD由于学术要求。他们可能会求助于自我药物治疗,特别是β受体阻滞剂(BBs)用于管理SAD的身体症状。该研究旨在调查UmmAl-Qura大学健康学生使用β受体阻滞剂的患病率及其与社交焦虑障碍的关系。
    方法:在这项横断面研究中,461名本科健康学生参加了一份问卷,其中30个问题分为三个部分:社交恐惧症清单(SPIN),BBs使用行为问卷,和人口特征。
    结果:研究发现56.2%患有SAD。总共有7.8%的样本使用BB报告,BBs的使用与SAD评分无显著相关性(P=0.085)。
    结论:该研究揭示了SAD的存在与性别之间的显着关系,精神病史,以及使用BBs与精神病史之间的相关性。虽然健康学生的BB使用率很低,SAD的患病率令人担忧。该结果可以提高健康学生对早期发现SAD的必要性的认识。
    BACKGROUND: Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is an anxiety disorder characterized by excessive fear of scrutiny in social situations. Health students are more susceptible to SAD due to academic demands. They may resort to self-medication, particularly beta-blockers (BBs) for managing physical symptoms of SAD. The study aims to investigate the prevalence of beta-blocker use and its relationship with social anxiety disorder among health students at Umm Al-Qura University.
    METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 461 undergraduate health students participated in a questionnaire with 30 questions divided into three sections: The Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN), BBs usage behavior questionnaire, and demographic characteristics.
    RESULTS: The study found 56.2% had SAD. A total of 7.8% of the sample reported using BBs, and no significant correlation was found between the usage of BBs and the SAD score (P = 0.085).
    CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed significant relationships between the presence of SAD with gender, history of mental conditions, and correlation between the use of BBs with history of mental conditions. Although BBs usage is low among health students, the prevalence of SAD is alarming. The results could raise awareness about the need for early detection of SAD among health students.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号