Adjacent segment degeneration is commonly observed in patients after fusion surgery. Among the associated risk factors is the preoperative presence of adjacent disc degeneration (ADD). The risk factors and other spine phenotypes associated with preoperative ADD is critical to understand the pathological process and better prognosis postsurgery. Current study aims to assess and compare the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) spinal phenotype of herniated level with and without ADD. Preoperative T2W sagittal lumbar MRI images of 155 lumbar disc herniated patients were analyzed for the presence of ADD (Pfirrmann grade III and above). The herniated disc level was assessed for the presence and absence of vertebral endplate (VEP) defects, Modic changes, and high intensity zone (HIZ). Mean age of patients was 38 ± 2 years, almost 62% were males. ADD was found in 57%, VEP defects were seen in 62% of the herniated level, 24.5% showed Modic changes, 3.8% showed spondylolishthesis, and 15.5% revealed HIZ. Age and other demographic factors did not have any significant effect on the presence of ADD, the patients with extruded and sequestered discs had more ADD (p = 0.02). VEP defects were significantly higher in levels with ADD (p = 0.02). Patients with ADD had significantly VEP defect scores (p = 0.01), Modic score (p = 0.002), HIZ score (0.02), and posterior bulge score (p < 0.001). Findings suggest that affected levels with VEP defects and severe grade of disc herniation have the greater likelihood of having ADD. Once developed this ADD may also affect the other spinal levels, and also can affect postoperative prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Advancing age and degeneration frequently lead to low back pain, which is the most prevalent musculoskeletal disorder worldwide. Degenerative changes in intervertebral discs and musculo-ligamentous incapacity to compensate sagittal imbalance are typically amongst the sources of instability, with spinal fusion techniques being the main treatment options to relieve pain. The aims of this work were to: (i) assess the link between ligament degeneration and spinal instability by determining the role of each ligament per movement, (ii) evaluate the impact of disc height reduction in degenerative changes, and (iii) unveil the most advantageous type of posterior fixation in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion to prevent adjacent disc degeneration.
METHODS: Two L3-L5 finite element models were developed, being the first in healthy condition and the second having reduced L4-L5 height. Different degrees of degeneration were tested, combined with different fixation configurations for Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
RESULTS: Facet capsular ligament and anterior longitudinal ligament were the most influential ligaments for spinal stability, particularly with increasing degeneration and disc height reduction. Pre-existent degeneration had lower influence than the fusion procedure for the risk of adjacent disc degeneration, being the highest stability and minimal degeneration achieved with bilateral fixation. Right unilateral fixation was more suited to reduce disc stress than left unilateral fixation.
CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral fixation is the best option to stabilize the spinal segment, but unilateral right fixation may suffice. This has direct implications for clinical practice, and the extension to a population-based study will allow for more efficient fusion surgeries.

OBJECTIVE: To study effects (stress loads) of lumbar fusion on the remaining segments (adjacent or not) of the lumbar spine in the setting of degenerated adjacent discs.
METHODS: A lumbar spine finite element model was built and validated. The full model of the lumbar spine was a parametric finite element model of segments L 1-5 . Numerous hypothetical combinations of one-level lumbar spine fusion and one-level disc degeneration were created. These models were subjected to 10 Nm flexion and extension moments and the stresses on the endplates and consequently on the intervertebral lumbar discs measured. These values were compared to the stresses on healthy lumbar spine discs under the same load and fusion scenarios.
RESULTS: Increased stress at endplates was observed only in the settings of L4-5 fusion and L3-4 disc degeneration (8% stress elevation at L2,3 in flexion or extension, and 25% elevation at L3,4 in flexion only). All other combinations showed less endplate stress than did the control model. For fusion at L3-4 and degeneration at L4-5 , the stresses in the endplates at the adjacent level inferior to the fused disc decreased for both loading disc height reductions. Stresses in flexion decreased after fusion by 29.5% and 25.8% for degeneration I and II, respectively. Results for extension were similar. For fusion at L2-3 and degeneration at L4-5 , stresses in the endplates decreased more markedly at the degenerated (30%), than at the fused level (14%) in the presence of 25% disc height reduction and 10 Nm flexion, whereas in extension stresses decreased more at the fused (24.3%) than the degenerated level (5.86%). For fusion at L3-4 and degeneration at L2-3 , there were no increases in endplate stress in any scenario. For fusion at L4-5 and degeneration at L3-4 , progression of degeneration from I to II had a significant effect only in flexion. A dramatic increase in stress was noted in the endplates of the degenerated disc (L3-4 ) in flexion for degeneration II.
CONCLUSIONS: Stresses are greater in flexion at the endplates of L3-4 and in flexion and extension at L2-3 in the presence of L3-4 disc disease and L4-5 fusion than in the control group. In all other combinations of fusion and disc disease, endplate stress was less for all levels tested than in the control model.