adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    B1类G蛋白偶联受体(GPCRs)是临床相关药物靶标的重要家族,难以通过高通量筛选和动物模型进行研究。这里,我们设计了PAClight1P78A,一种基于B1类GPCR(人类PAC1受体,hmPAC1R)具有高动态范围(ΔF/F0=1100%),优异的配体选择性,和快速活化动力学(τON=1.15s)。为了展示该工具在体外应用的实用性,我们彻底表征和比较了它的表达,PAClight1P78A转染和稳定表达细胞之间的亮度和性能。证明其在动物模型中的用途,我们显示了强大的表达和荧光反应的外源配体应用离体和体内小鼠,以及斑马鱼幼虫。因此,这种基于GPCR的新型传感器可用于生命科学领域的广泛应用,为基础研究和药物开发工作提供了动力。
    Class-B1 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are an important family of clinically relevant drug targets that remain difficult to investigate via high-throughput screening and in animal models. Here, we engineered PAClight1P78A, a novel genetically encoded sensor based on a class-B1 GPCR (the human PAC1 receptor, hmPAC1R) endowed with high dynamic range (ΔF/F0 = 1100%), excellent ligand selectivity, and rapid activation kinetics (τON = 1.15 s). To showcase the utility of this tool for in vitro applications, we thoroughly characterized and compared its expression, brightness and performance between PAClight1P78A-transfected and stably expressing cells. Demonstrating its use in animal models, we show robust expression and fluorescence responses upon exogenous ligand application ex vivo and in vivo in mice, as well as in living zebrafish larvae. Thus, the new GPCR-based sensor can be used for a wide range of applications across the life sciences empowering both basic research and drug development efforts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人们对垂体腺苷酸环化酶激活多肽(PACAP)及其特异性PAC1受体在偏头痛中的作用及其作为偏头痛预防策略的拮抗作用越来越感兴趣。
    我们讨论并严格评估(i)PACAP在偏头痛病理生理学中的作用的证据,以及(ii)使用单克隆抗体AMG301和ALD1910预防偏头痛的首次临床试验,分别针对PAC1和PACAP38。我们检查了PubMed,Scopus,和ClinicalTrials.gov电子数据库来检查相关材料。
    有很多证据证明PACAP能够引起偏头痛,但阻断PACAP或PAC1受体可预防偏头痛的证据有限.然而,抗PACAP抗体在偏头痛预防中的潜力很高.理论上,如果这些抗体阻断三叉神经血管系统的激活,它们将防止偏头痛发作。PACAP在偏头痛中的作用仍然存在知识空白,必须仔细研究抗PACAP抗体的风险/收益比。
    BACKGROUND: Interest is growing in the role of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and its specific PAC1 receptor in migraine and in their antagonism as a strategy for migraine prevention.
    UNASSIGNED: We discuss and critically evaluate (i) the evidence of the role of PACAP in migraine pathophysiology and (ii) the first clinical trials in migraine prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies AMG 301 and ALD1910 which act against PAC1 and PACAP38 respectively. We examined PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov electronic databases to examine the relevant material.
    UNASSIGNED: There is much proof of the ability of PACAP to cause migraine, but there is limited evidence that blocking PACAP or PAC1 receptor can prevent migraine. However, the potential of anti-PACAP antibodies in migraine prophylaxis is high. Theoretically, if these antibodies block the activation of the trigeminovascular system, they will prevent the onset of migraine attacks. There are still knowledge gaps in the role of PACAP in migraine and the risk/benefit ratio of anti-PACAP antibodies must be carefully studied.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号