The study by P. D. Yuan et al. titled \"Adalimumab Dose Reduction and Withdrawal in Stable Non-Infectious Pediatric Uveitis: An Open-Label, Prospective, Pilot Study\" examines dose reduction and withdrawal strategies in managing pediatric uveitis with adalimumab (ADA). The study aims to optimize treatment protocols by minimizing drug exposure while maintaining disease control. However, the open-label design introduces potential bias, and the absence of a control group limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions. The small sample size and short follow-up period further constrain the study\'s robustness. Methodological refinements, including a randomized controlled trial design with a larger sample size, extended follow-up, detailed adverse event data, standardized tapering protocols, and incorporation of objective outcome measures, are recommended to enhance the reliability and generalizability of the findings. These improvements could significantly inform clinical practice and contribute to the evidence base for pediatric uveitis management.

OBJECTIVE: Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are known to increase the risk of tuberculosis (TB) reactivation, though cases involving Mycobacterium bovis are rarely reported.
UNASSIGNED: We describe a case of disseminated TB with M. bovis in a 78-year-old woman with a negative Interferon-Gamma-Release Assay (IGRA), taking adalimumab due to rheumatoid polyarthritis, which resulted in a fatal outcome. The atypical clinical and histopathological features were initially interpreted as sarcoidosis. The case occurred in Switzerland, an officially bovine tuberculosis-free country. The whole genome sequence of the patient\'s cultured M. bovis isolate was identified as belonging to the animal lineage La1.2, the main genotype in continental Europe, but showed significant genetic distance from previously sequenced Swiss cattle strains. In a literature review, four cases of bovine tuberculosis reactivation under TNFi treatment were identified, with pulmonal, oral and intestinal manifestations. Similar to our patient, two cases presented a negative IGRA before TNFi initiation, which later converted to positive upon symptomatic presentation of M. bovis infection.
CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of TB in immunosuppressed patients, the limited sensitivity of IGRA, and the importance of considering TB reactivation even in regions declared free of bovine tuberculosis. Detailed patient histories, including potential exposure to unpasteurized dairy products, are essential for guiding preventive TB treatment before TNFi initiation.

BACKGROUND: Persistence on advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) is a useful real-world treatment performance measure. This study compared real-world persistence during the maintenance phase among advanced therapy-naïve and -experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab.
METHODS: Claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015-06/30/2022) were used to select adult patients with UC treated with ustekinumab or adalimumab based on the agent first initiated (index date) after 10/21/2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance cohorts on baseline characteristics. Persistence on the index agent (no gaps in days of supply of > 120 days for ustekinumab or > 60 days for adalimumab), persistence while corticosteroid-free, while on monotherapy, and persistence on the US labeled dose were described and compared during the 12-month period post-index using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes were analyzed separately among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients.
RESULTS: At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-naïve patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 371) had higher persistence on the index agent [83.8% vs. 57.6%, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 3.09 (2.29-4.16); p < 0.001), persistence while corticosteroid-free [2.00 (1.63-2.45); p < 0.001], persistence while on monotherapy [2.67 (2.07-3.44); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.21 (2.76-6.44); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 1726). At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-experienced patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 693) had higher persistence on the index agent [78.1% vs. 59.2%, 2.44 (1.82-3.26); p < 0.001], persistence while corticosteroid-free [1.24 (1.01-1.54); p = 0.0447], persistence while on monotherapy [2.53 (2.00-3.21); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.77 (3.09-7.35); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 254).
CONCLUSIONS: This claims-based analysis demonstrated significantly higher treatment persistence, including persistence while corticosteroid-free, persistence while on monotherapy, and persistence on the labeled dose, among both advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab compared to adalimumab.

In recent years Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have joined tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (IL-17i) as approved disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) for moderate to severe forms of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Drug survival in axSpA patients has not been well studied in a real-world outpatient scenario since the approval of JAKi. We aimed to analyze the three drug classes based on modes of actions (MoA) for their persistence rates among German axSpA outpatients. A retrospective analysis of the RHADAR database for axSpA patients with a new initiation of TNFi, IL-17i, or JAKi treatment between January 2015 and October 2023 was conducted. Analyses included Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted Cox regressions for drug discontinuation. 1222 new biological DMARD (TNFi [n = 954], IL-17i [n = 190]) or JAKi (n = 78) treatments were reported. The median drug survival was 31 months for TNFi, 25 for IL-17i, and 18 for JAKi. The corresponding 2-year drug survival rate was 79.6%, 72.6%, and 62.8% for TNFi, IL-17i, and JAKi, respectively. The probability for discontinuation for JAKi was significantly higher compared with TNFi (HR 1.91 [95% CI 1.22-2.99]) as well as for IL-17i compared with TNFi (HR 1.43 [95% CI 1.02-2.01]), possibly related to more frequent use of TNFis as first-line therapy. IL-17i and JAKi discontinuation probabilities were similar. Primary non-response was the reason for drug discontinuation in most cases across all MoA. TNFi treatment might persist longer than JAKi and IL-17i in German axSpA outpatients, possibly related to more severe or refractory disease in patients with JAKi-treated or IL-17i-treated axSpA.

UNASSIGNED: Adalimumab (ADA) transport across the placenta increases with gestational age advances. We evaluated child-mother health outcomes related to the timing of the last ADA dose before delivery.
UNASSIGNED: Using IBM MarketScan data, we collected records for all children exposed to ADA during intrauterine life. We compared milestone achievements, congenital malformations, and respiratory infections rates in children from mothers of 2 groups: (1) a late ADA group, which continued therapy until 90 days or fewer before delivery; and (2) an early ADA group, which discontinued therapy more than 90 days before delivery. We also assessed the risk of flaring for mothers in the early group.
UNASSIGNED: There were no significant differences in growth (P = .48), developmental delays (P = .25), or congenital malformations (P = .61) in the 427 children of the late group vs 70 children of early ADA group. Continuing ADA late in pregnancy did not increase the respiratory infection rate (P = .38). No differences occurred between groups in cesarean and premature delivery, intrauterine growth retardation, and stillbirths. ADA discontinuation was the only predictor of flaring in the third trimester of pregnancy (odds ratio = 6.04, 95% confidence interval 2.66-13.7). In the late group, mothers\' risk of flaring decreased (16/447 vs 13/73, P < .001). Mothers with active disease were more likely to deliver prematurely vs mothers with quiet disease (6/29 vs 31/491, P = .003).
UNASSIGNED: Continuation of ADA in pregnancy close to delivery is of low risk for children. Early discontinuation, however, increases the risk of flaring in mothers and the likelihood of premature deliveries.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of adalimumab versus methotrexate for psoriasis remained controversial. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of adalimumab versus methotrexate on treatment efficacy for psoriasis patients.
METHODS: We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases through August 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of adalimumab versus methotrexate for psoriasis. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect or fixed-effect model based on the heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Four RCTs and 733 patients with psoriasis were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, compared with methotrexate treatment, adalimumab treatment was associated with improved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75, odd ratio [OR] = 4.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.81-7.22; P < .00001), physician global assessment (PGA) 0/1 response (OR = 4.86; 95% CI = 3.02-7.82; P < .00001), PASI 100 (OR = 3.01; 95% CI = 1.33-6.80; P = .008) and decreased Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI, standard mean difference [SMD] = -0.60; 95% CI = -0.84 to -0.36; P < .00001), but exhibited no impact on PASI 90 (OR = 3.30; 95% CI = 0.77-14.20; P = .11), adverse events (OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 0.26-5.87; P = .79) or serious adverse events (OR = 2.59; 95% CI = 0.49-13.79; P = .26).
CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab was superior to methotrexate for the treatment of psoriasis.

This Summary of Research overviews the results of a study that looked at patient-reported outcomes in the VOLTAIRE-RA trial (NCT02137226), originally published in Rheumatology and Therapy. A biosimilar is a biologic medicine made to be very similar to the original biologic medicine (also known as the reference product). The VOLTAIRE-RA trial compared the efficacy and safety of an adalimumab biosimilar (Cyltezo®, adalimumab-admb) with the adalimumab reference product, Humira®, in people with rheumatoid arthritis. As part of the VOLTAIRE-RA study, participants took either adalimumab-adbm or adalimumab reference product for 24 weeks. Patient-reported outcomes were captured after 12 weeks and after 24 weeks of treatment to assess the effects of treatment on each participant\'s health-related quality of life. People with rheumatoid arthritis who were given adalimumab-adbm or adalimumab reference product experienced similar clinically meaningful improvements in their health-related quality of life after 12 weeks of treatment. A high proportion of people in this trial who were given adalimumab-adbm or adalimumab reference product reported greater improvement versus a reference US population matched by age and sex. This is notable, as it represents a treatment goal that was difficult to achieve in earlier rheumatoid arthritis trials of non-biologic treatments.

BACKGROUND: This post hoc analysis of VOLTAIRE-RA compared patient-reported outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) before and after treatment with biosimilar adalimumab-adbm or adalimumab reference product.
METHODS: HRQoL was assessed by 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS, respectively) and domain scores at baseline and weeks 12/24. Results were considered clinically meaningful if improvements were greater than or equal to minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) of 2.5 for PCS and MCS and 5.0 for domain scores. Comparisons with age- and sex-matched norms and treatment-associated changes in domain scores from baseline were quantified using spydergrams and the health utility SF-6D measure. All comparisons between treatment groups were descriptive in nature.
RESULTS: No differences in PCS scores were reported between treatment groups at baseline or weeks 12/24. MCS scores slightly favored the reference product group at baseline, and differences in scores at weeks 12/24 generally reflected those differences. Improvements in PCS scores greater than or equal to MCID at weeks 12/24 were reported by over 65% of patients in both treatment groups, while over 56% experienced improvements in MCS scores greater than or equal to MCID at weeks 12/24. Similar proportions receiving reference product and adalimumab-adbm reported scores greater than or equal to US age- and sex-matched normative values at week 24: 14-39% versus 15-36%, respectively, compared with baseline (1-17%).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate to severely active RA, adalimumab-adbm and adalimumab reference product were both associated with clinically meaningful improvements in SF-36 PCS, MCS, and domain scores that were highly similar at weeks 12/24. The high proportion of patients reporting scores greater than or equal to normative values in both treatment groups is notable, as this represents a treatment goal that was difficult to achieve in earlier RA trials. Video abstract available for this article.
BACKGROUND: VOLTAIRE-RA (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02137226; EudraCT number, 2012-002945-40). Video abstract (MP4 29755 KB).

UNASSIGNED: Several adalimumab preparations are now available for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Comparative satisfaction and tolerability are unknown.
UNASSIGNED: This study investigated IBD patient satisfaction with approved adalimumab biosimilars and their originator.
UNASSIGNED: In this cross-sectional study, we included 941 consecutive adalimumab-treated patients with IBD across 45 centres affiliated with the Groupe d\'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires du tube Digestif who completed a satisfaction questionnaire comprising four items each rated by a 10-point scale.
UNASSIGNED: The differences in responses were performed using a one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey\'s honest significant difference test.
UNASSIGNED: The most commonly used drugs at inclusion were Humira® (436/941, 46.3%), Amgevita® (177/941, 18.8%) and Hulio® (105/941, 11.2%). The mean overall satisfaction rate with adalimumab was 8.5 (standard deviation 1.8). Overall satisfaction was significantly higher in patients treated with Humira (8.6 (1.5)), Hulio (8.6 (1.8)) or Amgevita (8.5 (1.4)) (p < 0.05). Satisfaction with the subcutaneous injection form was higher for patients treated with Yuflyma® (9.0 (1.4)), Humira (8.9 (1.3)) and Hulio (8.9 (1.7)) (p < 0.05). A total of 299 patients (31.8%) described injection site reactions. In all, 223 patients (23.7%) reported being previously treated with another adalimumab of which (32/223, 14.3%) discontinued treatment due to side effects.
UNASSIGNED: In this real-world setting, patients with IBD had a high level of satisfaction with adalimumab treatment, with some differences in terms of overall satisfaction and satisfaction with the injection device.

Biologics have expanded the armamentarium for psoriasis, but there has been a growing concern about the risk of lymphoma in patients under tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor and methotrexate. Besides, the mRNA-based coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination was known to stimulate the proliferation of T-follicular helper cells. We report a case of a patient with psoriasis under adalimumab developing nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic-type following the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine. We suspect that adalimumab, methotrexate, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation, previous reactive lymphoid hyperplasia and psoriasis per se predispose our patient to a lymphoma-prone condition, and the two doses of the mRNA vaccine act as the last straw.