UNASSIGNED: Reperfusion therapy, such as intravenous tissue-plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke, may increase the incidence of acute symptomatic seizure (ASS) and post-stroke epilepsy (PSE). This study aimed to analyze the effect and predictors of reperfusion therapy for ASS and PSE limited to large-vessel occlusions (LVOs).
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study classified 237 subjects with LVO into four groups: (1) IV-tPA + MT+ (n = 74 cases, (2) MT only (n = 82), (3) tissue-plasminogen activator (tPA) only (n = 28), and (4) IV-tPA - MT- (n = 53). The incidences of ASS and PSE were assessed. Potential predictors, such as etiology, functional disability, neuroimaging findings, and the SeLECT score, were statistically analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: There were 12 (5.1%) subjects with ASS and 10 subjects (4.2%) with PSE. The IV-tPA and MT groups had significantly high reperfusion rates, with a Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2c (p = 0.01) but there were no significant differences in the increases of hemorrhagic transformation, ASS, and PSE. An Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score <6 was a significant predictor of ASS (p = 0.01), and an infarct volume >60 ml was a significant predictor of PSE (p = 0.01).
UNASSIGNED: Reperfusion therapy for acute LVO was not found to increase the risk of ASS and PSE. Large-sized infarctions should be treated with care in PSE.

The majority of people with epilepsy achieves long-term seizure-freedom and may consider withdrawal of their anti-seizure medications (ASMs). Withdrawal of ASMs can yield substantial benefits but may be associated with potential risks. This review critically examines the existing literature on ASM withdrawal, emphasizing evidence-based recommendations, where available. Our focus encompasses deprescribing strategies for individuals who have attained seizure freedom through medical treatment, those who have undergone successful epilepsy surgery, and individuals initiated on ASMs following acute symptomatic seizures. We explore state-of-the-art prognostic models in these scenarios that could guide the decision-making process. The review underscores the importance of a collaborative shared-decision approach between patients, caregivers, and physicians. We describe the subjective and objective factors influencing these decisions and illustrate how trade-offs may be effectively managed in practice.

Multiple medications are known to increase epileptogenicity in patients with and without an underlying seizure disorder. Paradoxically, some of these medications include anti-seizure medications (ASMs) and other medications, such as psychotropics, that act on the central nervous system (CNS). This article aims to discuss 3 clinical cases that highlight the gamut of epileptogenic reactivity secondary to CNS drugs ranging from increased epileptogenicity in the form of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) without seizures, increased epileptogenicity on electroencephalogram (EEG) with associated non-epileptic movement disorders, and frank, de novo seizures. We also analyze the relevant literature on the impact of CNS medications on epileptogenicity.

OBJECTIVE: The risk factors for seizure recurrence after acute symptomatic seizure due to a structural brain lesion are not well established. The aim of this study was to analyze possible associations between demographic, clinical, and electroencephalographic variables and epilepsy development in patients with acute symptomatic seizure due to an acute structural brain lesion.
METHODS: We designed an observational prospective study of patients with acute symptomatic seizure due to an acute structural brain lesion (hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke, traumatic brain injury, or meningoencephalitis) who underwent EEG during their initial admission between January 2015 and January 2020. We analyzed prospectively recorded demographic, clinical, electroencephalographic (EEG), and treatment-related variables. All variables were compared between patients with and without seizure recurrence during 2 years of follow up.
RESULTS: We included 194 patients (41.2 % women; mean [SD] age, 57.3 [15.8] years) with acute symptomatic seizure due to an acute structural brain lesion. They all underwent EEG during admission and were followed for at least 2 years. The identifiable causes were hemorrhagic stroke (44.8 %), ischemic stroke (19.5 %), traumatic brain injury (18.5 %), and meningoencephalitis (17 %). Fifty-six patients (29 %) experienced a second seizure during follow-up. Seizure recurrence was associated with epileptiform discharges on EEG (52% vs 32 %; OR 2.3 [95 % CI, 1.2-4.3], p = 0.008) and onset with status epilepticus (17% vs 0.05 %, OR 4.03 [95 % CI 1.45-11.2], p = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: Epileptiform discharges on EEG and status epilepticus in patients with acute symptomatic seizure due to an acute structural brain lesion are associated with a higher risk of epilepsy development.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Seizures occurring at the immediate onset of a stroke, abbreviated \"seizures at onset\" (SaO), pose a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for physicians. In this study, we report on the current clinical practice in managing stroke patients with SaO from a large tertiary stroke center in Germany.
METHODS: We selected all patients with SaO and acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke admitted to the Department of Neurology at the University Hospital of Cologne between 2019 and 01-01 and 2020-12-31. SaO patients were then compared to patients with acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke without SaO from the local stroke registry. Further, we compared SaO patients who received intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and/or mechanical thrombectomy with matched controls.
RESULTS: Overall, 54 out of 2312 stroke patients (2.3 %) in the examined period presented with SaO. The most prevalent SaO semiology was focal to bilateral tonic-clonic (42.6 %). SaO was associated with hemorrhagic strokes and higher in-hospital mortality in all stroke patients. The rate of acute stroke therapy was not influenced by the occurrence of SaO. In patients that received acute stroke therapy, patients with SaO had higher scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at admission, and longer door-to-needle times for the administration of rt-PA, while none of the examined outcome parameters revealed a difference between patients with and without SaO after adjusting for potential confounders.
CONCLUSIONS: Data show that SaO is rare in stroke patients but associated with more extensive strokes.

BACKGROUND: Acute symptomatic epileptic seizures are frequently seen in neurocritical care. To prevent subsequent unprovoked seizures, long-term treatments with antiseizure medications are often initiated although supporting evidence is lacking. This study aimed at prospectively assessing the risk of unprovoked seizure relapse with respect to the use of antiseizure medications. It was hypothesized that after a first acute symptomatic seizure of structural etiology, the cumulative 12-month risk of unprovoked seizure relapse is ≤ 25%.
METHODS: Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 and acute symptomatic first-ever epileptic seizure; patients with status epilepticus were excluded. Using telephone and mail interviews, participants were followed for 12 months after the acute symptomatic first seizure. Primary endpoint was the occurrence and timing of a first unprovoked seizure relapse. In addition, neuro-intensivists in Germany were interviewed about their antiseizure treatment strategies through an anonymous online survey.
RESULTS: Eleven of 122 participants with structural etiology had an unprovoked seizure relapse, resulting in a cumulative 12-month risk of 10.7% (95%CI, 4.7%-16.7%). None of 19 participants with a non-structural etiology had a subsequent unprovoked seizure. Compared to structural etiology alone, combined infectious and structural etiology was independently associated with unprovoked seizure relapse (OR 11.1; 95%CI, 1.8-69.7). Median duration of antiseizure treatment was 3.4 months (IQR 0-9.3). Seven out of 11 participants had their unprovoked seizure relapse while taking antiseizure medication; longer treatment durations were not associated with decreased risk of unprovoked seizure relapse. Following the non-representative online survey, most neuro-intensivists consider 3 months or less of antiseizure medication to be adequate.
CONCLUSIONS: Even in case of structural etiology, acute symptomatic seizures bear a low risk of subsequent unprovoked seizures. There is still no evidence favoring long-term treatments with antiseizure medications. Hence, individual constellations with an increased risk of unprovoked seizure relapse should be identified, such as central nervous system infections causing structural brain damage. However, in the absence of high-risk features, antiseizure medications should be discontinued early to avoid overtreatment.

OBJECTIVE: The management of patients after a first unprovoked seizure (FUS) can benefit from stratification of the average 50% risk for further seizures. We characterized subjects with FUSs, out of a large generally healthy homogenous population of soldiers recruited by law to the Israeli Defense Forces, to investigate the role of the type of service, as a trigger burden surrogate, in the risk for additional seizures.
METHODS: Soldiers recruited between 2005 and 2014, who experienced an FUS during their service, were identified from military records. Subjects with a history of epilepsy or lack of documentation of FUS characteristics were excluded from the study. Data on demographics and military service and medical details were extracted for the eligible soldiers.
RESULTS: Of 816 252 newly recruited soldiers, representing 2 138 000 person-years, 346 had an FUS, indicating an incidence rate of 16.2 per 100 000 person-years. The FUS incidence rate was higher in combat versus noncombat male and female soldiers (p < .0001). Most subjects (75.7%) were prescribed antiseizure medications (ASMs), and 29.2% had additional seizures after the FUS. Service in combat units, abnormal magnetic resonance imaging, and being prescribed ASMs were correlated with a lower risk of having multiple seizures (95% confidence interval [CI] = .48-.97, .09-.86, .15-.28, respectively). On multivariate analysis, service in combat units (odds ratio [OR] = .48 for seizure recurrence, 95% CI = .26-.88) and taking medications (OR = .46, 95% CI = .24-.9) independently predicted not having additional seizures.
CONCLUSIONS: FUS incidence rate was higher in combat soldiers, but they had a twofold lower risk of additional seizures than noncombat soldiers, emphasizing the value of strenuous triggers as negative predictors for developing epilepsy. This suggests a shift in the perception of epilepsy from a \"yes or no\" condition to a continuous trend of predisposition to seizures, warranting changes in the ways etiologies of epilepsy are weighted and treatments are delivered.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to retrospectively research the semiology of neonatal seizures (NSs) based on the 2021 classification scheme of the International League Against Epilepsy, and the relationship between etiology and electroclinical features.
METHODS: Patients admitted to Children\'s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from May 1, 2020 to March 30, 2022 and diagnosed with NSs were included to retrospectively investigate the etiology, seizure characteristics, prognosis, and ictal and interictal video electroencephalography (EEG) characteristics.
RESULTS: Of the 45 patients, 73.3% had definite etiology. Twenty-seven patients had electro-clinical seizures, of which two had both electro-clinical and electrographic-only seizures. Electrographic-only seizures were reported in 18 patients. The tonic, clonic, and electrographic-only seizures were associated with various etiologies. Both tonic and clonic seizures occurred in acute symptomatic seizures and were associated with neonatal epilepsy. 50% of tonic seizures were related to genetic factors. Among the clonic seizures, 50.0% occurred in acute symptomatic seizures. Epileptic spasms always indicated neonatal epilepsy. There were few patients who experienced automatisms and sequential seizures, and these two seizure types were associated with brain malformation and genetic factors, respectively. Patients with a normal interictal EEG had acute symptomatic seizures. whereas the interictal EEG of patients with neonatal epilepsy mainly showed burst-suppression or multifocal discharges. The ictal EEG recordings were related to seizure semiology.
CONCLUSIONS: Seizure semiology and video EEG are suggestive of potential causes but do not provide a definite etiology.

暂无摘要。