Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) remains a clinical challenge associated with considerable morbidity, including colectomy. Upadacitinib (UPA), a selective Janus kinase (JAK)-1 inhibitor, is approved for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis in patients intolerant or not responding to tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors. It has also increasingly been used off-label for ASUC. We performed a systematic review of all available literature on UPA in ASUC. We identified 11 studies, with a pooled total of 55 patients. Most patients experienced rapid and sustained improvement. Colectomy rate at 90 days was 16.3%. Among those who did not get colectomy, 80% were in steroid-free remission at follow-up. The reported adverse events were low, including 2 venous thromboembolic events. Overall, UPA appears to represent a safe and effective therapy for ASUC.
This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in treating acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). Results indicate that upadacitinib is a promising option for ASUC patients, with a low colectomy rate and high rates of steroid-free clinical remission.

UNASSIGNED: Approximately 1 in 4 patients with ulcerative colitis experiences a severe exacerbation of disease requiring hospitalization, termed acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). These episodes pose a major burden on patients with ulcerative colitis and early prediction of their outcomes based on clinical data is crucial to optimize therapy.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic review was performed using Embase and Medline for articles between 2000 and 2023. Studies obtained from the databases were uploaded on Covidence for screening by 2 independent reviewers. Quality appraisal for each study was done using the Critical Appraisals Skills Program depending on study design.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 48 eligible studies were included in the review. The key predictors of ASUC identified in this review included clinical, endoscopic, and radiographic biomarkers, which were summarized. The main outcomes assessed in the studies were intravenous corticosteroid failure, need for rescue therapy, and need for colectomy. Score-based predictions and some novel markers were also included in the results.
UNASSIGNED: Utilization of evidence-based predictors of outcome in ASUC could serve as a powerful tool in customizing therapeutic measures and a step forward toward personalized patient care. Despite promising candidates, there remains a significant opportunity to identify and test additional clinical and laboratory-based predictors, especially early in the hospitalization and as the clinical practice and medical therapies evolve.

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 40% of patients with steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (steroid-refractory (SR) ASUC) requires colectomies. Advanced therapies may reduce the short-term colectomy rates in patients with SR ASUC. However, comparative clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of these rescue therapies are lacking. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis to study the effectiveness of rescue therapies for SR ASUC.
METHODS: Six randomized controlled trials and 15 cohort studies including 2,004 patients were analyzed. Rescue drugs included tofacitinib, infliximab with a 5 or 10 mg/kg induction dose at 0, 2, and 6 weeks (IFX and IFX10, respectively), IFX with an accelerated regimen of three 5 mg/kg induction doses timed according to clinical need (accelerated IFX), tacrolimus, cyclosporine (CyA), ustekinumab, and adalimumab. Treatments were compared with a placebo.
RESULTS: Tofacitinib (odds ratio [OR]: 0.09 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-0.52]), accelerated IFX (OR: 0.16 [95% CI: 0.03-0.94]), IFX (OR: 0.2 [95% CI: 0.07-0.58]), and tacrolimus (OR: 0.24 [95% CI: 0.06-0.96]) significantly reduced the short-term colectomy rates compared with placebo. IFX10 and CyA tended to prevent colectomies. However, ustekinumab and adalimumab did not significantly affect the colectomy rates.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first network meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of advanced therapies in reducing short-term colectomy rates in patients with SR ASUC. Tofacitinib, accelerated IFX, standard IFX, and tacrolimus significantly reduced the colectomy rates in SR ASUC patients compared with placebo. Thus, advanced therapies should be considered for rescue therapies in patients with SR ASUC.

OBJECTIVE: Reliable and easily accessible objective markers of disease activity to predict long-term treatment outcomes in severe ulcerative colitis (UC) are missing. We aimed to investigate if intestinal ultrasound (IUS) might predict long-term outcomes in hospitalized patients with severe UC treated with intravenous corticosteroids.
METHODS: Hospitalized patients with severe UC and IUS inflammation (bowel wall thickness (BWT)>3.0mm) starting IV corticosteroids were recruited at three university hospitals in Denmark. IUS was performed before treatment, 48±24 hours (h), 6±1 days, and 3 months after treatment initiation. Time until colectomy or need for new interventions was registered together with Mayo score at 3 months and partial Mayo score (pMayo) at 12-months. Follow-up time was 12 months.
RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included in the final analysis. Forty-five (80%) patients needed intervention, including 9 colectomies, during the 12-month follow-up. After 48±24h: No patient with a BWT<3mm needed a colectomy, p=0.04. BWT≥4mm showed an increased risk of colectomy (odds ratio 9.5 (95%CI 1.5-186), p=0.03), while a BWT≥3mm showed an increased risk of intervention (3.6 (1.1-12.5), p=0.03). A BWT≥4mm resulted in a significantly shorter time until both colectomy, p=0.03, and treatment intensification (mean days 75 (95%CI24-127) vs. 176 (119-233), p=0.005. However, neither IUS parameters nor pMayo score, CRP, hemoglobin, or p-albumin could predict remission at 3- and 12-months.
CONCLUSIONS: BWT assessed at 48h post intravenous corticosteroid initiation in patients hospitalized with severe UC may identify patients with an increased risk of short- and long-term colectomy and predict a more aggressive short-term disease course.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-threatening medical emergency with considerable morbidity. Despite recent advances in medical IBD therapy, colectomy rates for ASUC remain high. A scoping review of published articles on ASUC was performed. We collected data, such as general information of the disease, diagnosis and initial assessment, and available medical and surgical treatments focusing on technical aspects of surgical approaches. The most relevant articles were considered in this scoping review. The management of ASUC is challenging; currently, personalized treatment for it is unavailable. Sequential medical therapy should be administrated, preferably in high-volume IBD centers with close patient monitoring and indication for surgery in those cases with persistent symptoms despite medical treatment, complications, and clinical worsening. A total colectomy with end ileostomy is typically performed in the acute setting. Managing rectal stump is challenging, and all individual and technical aspects should be considered. Conversely, when performing elective colectomy for ASUC, a staged surgical procedure is usually preferred, thus optimizing the patients\' status preoperatively and minimizing postoperative complications. The minimally invasive approach should be selected whenever technically feasible. Robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has shown similar outcomes in terms of safety and postoperative morbidity. The transanal approach to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (Ta-IPAA) is a recent technique for creating an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis via a transanal route. Early experiences suggest comparable short- and medium-term functional results of the transanal technique to those of traditional approaches. However, there is a need for additional comparative outcomes data and a better understanding of the ideal training and implementation pathways for this procedure. This manuscript predominantly explores the surgical treatment of ASUC. Additionally, it provides an overview of currently available medical treatment options that the surgeon should reasonably consider in a multidisciplinary setting.

UNASSIGNED: The optimal regimen of infliximab salvage in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) patients remains controversial. This study aimed to compare accelerated and standard infliximab induction in Chinese ASUC patients, and to explore risk factors and concrete accelerated regimens for them.
UNASSIGNED: Data were retrospectively collected from steroid-refractory ASUC patients receiving infliximab as rescue therapy at seven tertiary centers across China. Outcomes including colectomy and clinical remission (Mayo score ≤ 2 and every subscore ≤ 1 at Day 14) rates were compared between patients receiving accelerated and standard infliximab induction using propensity score adjustment for potential confounders. The dose-response relationship was explored by plotting restricted cubic splines. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for adverse outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis was also performed.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 76 patients were analysed: 29 received standard and 47 received accelerated induction. The accelerated group had a higher 90-day colectomy rate (17.8% vs 0%, P = 0.019) and lower clinical remission rate (27.7% vs 65.5%, P = 0.001). After adjusting for propensity score and institution, there was no significant difference in colectomy or clinical remission rates (both P > 0.05). Dose-effect curves showed decreased colectomy hazard with higher cumulative infliximab dosage within 5 days, with no improvement observed for increasing cumulative infliximab dosage within 28 days. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed C-reactive protein of >10 mg/L at infliximab initiation (odds ratio = 5.00, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-24.34) as an independent risk factor for no clinical remission. Meta-analysis also revealed no significant difference in colectomy rates at 3 months (P = 0.54).
UNASSIGNED: After adjusting for confounders, there were no significant differences in colectomy or clinical remission rates between accelerated and standard infliximab induction among ASUC patients. Early administration of an intensified dosage within 5 days may be beneficial. Elevated C-reactive protein at infliximab initiation indicated need for intensive treatment.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency that affects approximately 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis at some point in time in their lives. Outcomes of ASUC are highly variable. Approximately 30% of patients do not respond to corticosteroids and up to 50% of patients do not respond to rescue therapy (infliximab or cyclosporin) and require emergency colectomy. Data are emerging on infliximab dosing strategies, use of cyclosporin as a bridge to slower acting biologic agents and Janus kinase inhibition as primary and sequential therapy. In this review, we outline contemporary approaches to clinical management of ASUC in the setting of failure to respond to traditional rescue therapies.

UNASSIGNED: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized in part by a dysregulated response to tissue hypoxia. While intravenous (IV) steroids are the mainstay of treatment for acute severe UC (ASUC), up to one-third of patients are refractory to steroids alone and require rescue therapy.
UNASSIGNED: A 71-year-old female with extensive UC on infliximab presented with abdominal pain and more than 10 bloody bowel movements per day. Her infliximab concentration was undetectable with a positive antibody level. Flexible sigmoidoscopy on hospital day (HD)1 showed Mayo 3 colitis; biopsies for CMV were negative. She was started on hydrocortisone IV with improvement in her CRP from 56 to 40 mg/L. She also received 1 dose of vedolizumab. Hyperbaric treatments were offered but declined. By HD5, she was clinically improved, with a CRP of 9 mg/L. She was transitioned from IV to oral steroids. After starting oral steroids her symptoms relapsed, her CRP increased from 9 to 48 mg/L, and IV steroids were reinitiated on HD6. Hyperbaric medicine was reconsulted and she completed 5 hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) treatments (HD 7-11) with prompt reduction in CRP, stool frequency, and bleeding. After 3 HBO2 treatments, she transitioned successfully from IV to oral steroids on HD9.
UNASSIGNED: This case demonstrates the potential of HBO2 therapy to help UC patients transition successfully from IV to oral steroids who were previously refractory to de-escalation. HBO2 therapy may be considered as an adjunctive treatment for patients with ASUC to potentiate the effects of standard therapies and avoid progression to colectomy.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is one of life-threatening complications that occur in one-fifth of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with significant morbidity and an estimated mortality rate up to 1%. There are no validated clinical scoring systems for ASUC. Intravenous corticosteroids remain the cornerstone for the management of ASUC patients However, one-third of patients are steroid refractory and require colectomy in the pre-biologic era or salvage therapy in the post-biologic era. The currently available predictors of non-response to steroids and salvages therapy are sub-optimal. Furthermore, there is a need for the development of clear outcome measures for ASUC patients. Although infliximab and cyclosporin are both effective as salvage therapy, they still carry a rate of treatment failure. Hence, there is an unmet need to explore alternative therapeutic options before colectomy particularly in prior infliximab-exposed patients. This may include the introduction of small molecules with rapid onset of action as a salvage or sequential therapy and the use of slow-onset other biological therapy after \"bridging\" with cyclosporine. In this article, we explore the current best evidence-based practice and detail the gaps in knowledge in the management of ASUC.

Recent data, indicating that inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be a risk factor for future chronic kidney disease, highlight the need to study the safety and clinical effectiveness of advanced IBD therapies in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD), defined as an eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73m2. Upadacitinib, a selective oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in the management of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. There is also emerging data indicating that JAK inhibition may be clinically effective in the setting of steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). There is, however, a lack of \"real-world\" data documenting the use of JAK inhibitors in patients with ESRD. Here, we report the use of upadacitinib in a patient with ESRD for the management of steroid-refractory ASUC, demonstrating, for the first time, the safe and clinically effective use of upadacitinib in this population.