BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear relies on clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Direct and indirect signs of ACL tear have been described with MRI evaluation. Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) buckling has been described as an indirect radiographic sign of an ACL tear.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the variations in PCL buckling angles in patients with ACL tears and in patients with isolated lesions in the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. In addition, the influence of different patterns of medial meniscus tears in ACL-deficient knees was investigated. Finally, the influences of risk factors such as tibial slope, delay from injury to surgery, absence of medial meniscus tear, degree of Lachman and pivot shift testing were also assessed.
METHODS: This was a cohort study.
METHODS: A total of 154 patients (78 in the group with ACL tear and 76 in the control group) were assessed with MRI and lateral weight-bearing X-ray to assess PCL buckling angle and tibial slope by two independent observers. The presence of a medial meniscus bucket handle or ramp lesion of the medial meniscus was assessed and recorded at the time of surgery.
RESULTS: PCL buckling angle measurement was highly reliable, with an ICC of 0.866 and 0.894, respectively, in the study group and the control group for interobserver reliability. The intrarater reliability was found to be high in PCL buckling angle for the study group [ICC = 0.955] and the control group [ICC = 0.943]. The mean angle in patients with ACL tear was 110.7 ± 15.2° and 115.3 ± 16.2° (for the two examiners) and 111.4 ± 12° and 114 ± 14.5° (for the two examiners) in patients with an intact, healthy ACL. An association emerged between bucket handle tears of the medial meniscus (p = 0.010) and a decreased PCL buckling angle and between ramp lesions of the medial meniscus and increased PCL buckling angle both (p = 0.024).
CONCLUSIONS: Good inter- and intraobserver reliability for the measurement of the PCL buckling angle was observed. Increased PCL buckling angle values were observed in patients with concomitant ACL and bucket handle tears of the medial meniscus, while decreased angle values were observed in those who had ACL tear and ramp lesion of the medial meniscus. No statistically significant difference in the PCL buckling angle emerged between patients with ACL tears and those who had a healthy, intact ACL.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare tibial soft tissue and bony slopes in patients with failed and non-failed ACL reconstructions (ACLR). We hypothesized that patients with failed ACLR have increased slopes compared to non-failed ACLR, and unexplained failures have higher slopes than failures with clear technical errors and failed synthetic ligaments.
METHODS: Between 2015 and 2022, 130 patients with failed ACLR were retrospectively identified; 79 knees with adequate MRI scans were analyzed. These were compared to 57 non-failed ACLRs. MRI measurements included lateral and medial tibial bony slope (LBS, MBS) and lateral and medial meniscal slope (LMS, MMS). Subgroup analysis assessed for failures with technical errors and failed synthetic ligaments.
RESULTS: In all patients, the LMS and MMS reduced the bony slope towards the horizontal without reaching statistical significance. Failed ACLR had significantly higher MBS (7.1° ± 2.9 vs. 4.6° ± 2.5, p < 0.001) and MMS (5.6° ± 3.5 vs. 3.4° ± 2.8, p < 0.001). The area under the curve for MBS was 0.721 (CI: 0.628-0.813). The Youden optimal threshold value of MBS ≥ 5.1° (sensitivity 80 %, specificity 56.1 %) yielded an odd\'s ratio for failure of 5.1 (CI:2.3-11.6; p < 0.001). Revisions with technical errors had slopes that were not significantly different to non-failed ACLR. Revisions with synthetic grafts had MBS (7.3° ± 3.2 vs. 4.6° ± 2.5; p = 0.007) and MMS (6° ± 3.8 vs. 3.4° ± 2.8; p = 0.021) that were significantly higher to non-failed ACLR.
CONCLUSIONS: Medial bony and meniscal slopes are higher in patients with unexplained failed ACLRs and revisions with synthetic grafts, but ACLR with technical errors failed with slopes similar to non-failed ACLRs. Increased medial slope values are a risk factor for surgical failure.
METHODS: III.

UNASSIGNED: Recently the peroneus longus tendon (PLT) gained popularity in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and has been utilized with satisfactory outcomes. However, there are concerns regarding donor site morbidity. This study aims to compare the functional outcome of ACL reconstruction using hamstring (HT) and PLT autografts and evaluate the donor site morbidity.
UNASSIGNED: Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were allocated to two groups (HT and PLT). Graft diameter was measured intraoperatively. Knee functional outcome was evaluated with IKDC and Tegner-Lysholm scores preoperatively, and postoperatively after 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Donor site morbidities were assessed with thigh circumference measurements, subjective evaluation of sensory disturbances, and ankle scoring with AOFAS and FADI scores.
UNASSIGNED: At 1-year follow-up, the PLT group showed comparable IKDC (p = 0.925) and Tegner-Lysholm (p = 0.600) scores with those of the HT group. The mean graft diameter in the PLT group (7.93 ± 0.52 mm) was larger compared with the HT group (7.43 ± 0.50 mm) (p < 0.001). The incidence of thigh atrophy (HT-16.7%, PLT-10%) and sensory disturbances (HT-73.3%, PLT-10%) was greater in the HT group. There was no significant ankle donor site morbidity in the PLT group (AOFAS-98.67 ± 3.45, FADI-99.23 ± 1.69).
UNASSIGNED: ACL reconstruction with PLT had comparable functional outcome with that of HT at 1 year. However, PLT demonstrated larger graft diameter, less donor site morbidity, and enhanced muscle recovery without significantly affecting the ankle function. PLT can be safely used as an acceptable alternative graft choice harvested from outside the knee for ACL reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The knee joint assessment to detect anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after trauma involves clinical examination and radiography. The gold standard method is doing arthroscopy. We did this study seeking to evaluate the effectiveness of other non-invasive diagnostic methods, including the Anterior Drawer test, Lachman test and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting ACL tears after trauma, compared to the reference standard method (the arthroscopy).
METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Orthopaedic Department of the Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, for six months. A total of 86 participants with knee injuries fulfilling the inclusion criteria were recruited for the study. Mechanism of injury, side of injury and body weight were recorded. The Anterior Drawer test and Lachman test for ACL injury were performed by orthopaedic surgeons with at least five years of post-fellowship experience in orthopaedic surgery. Sensitivities, specificities and accuracy of the clinical tests and MRI were calculated.
RESULTS: The statistical analysis revealed that the mean age of participants was 35.73 (SD 12.7) years, with a range from 18 to 55 years. Among the participants, 67 (77.91%) were male and 19 (22.09%) were female. The side of injury was predominantly right in 50 (58.14%) and left in 36 (41.86%) participants. Road traffic accidents (RTAs) were the leading cause of knee injury, accounting for 63.95% (55) of cases, followed by sports injuries at 23.26% (20). Regarding diagnostic accuracy, MRI showed a sensitivity of 98.57%, specificity of 87.50% and diagnostic accuracy of 96.51% in detecting ACL tears. The Lachman test demonstrated a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 87.5% and diagnostic accuracy of 89.53% compared to arthroscopy. Similarly, the anterior Drawer test exhibited a sensitivity of 88.57%, specificity of 87.50% and diagnostic accuracy of 88.37% against the gold standard of arthroscopy. These findings underscore the effectiveness of these diagnostic modalities in identifying ACL injuries.
CONCLUSIONS: All three tests (MRI, Lachman test and anterior Drawer test) can be used for the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injury with optimal results.

Introduction Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears occur frequently in young athletes, and ligament repair and reconstruction are surgical treatments. Although there are suggested benefits for both approaches, there is a lack of direct comparisons between ACL repair and reconstruction.This study aims to compare the mid-term functional outcomes and quality of life measures between patients that have undergone ACL repair versus reconstruction. Methods A retrospective review was conducted for demographic and operative report data of patients who underwent an ACL repair or reconstruction between 2012 and 2018. Patients were contacted over the phone and underwent a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) survey evaluating pain interference, mobility, and function. Patients were excluded from the study if there was an incomplete operative note, missing contact information, or failure to answer phone calls. Results A total of 74 eligible patients were included, with n = 54 in the ACL reconstruction group (73.0%) and n = 20 in the ACL repair group (27.0%). Reconstruction patients had a PROMIS (median (IQR)) physical function score of 22.50 (16.00-59.00), as compared to repair patients\' physical function score of 60.00 (21.50-60.00). There was a significant difference favoring repair (p = 0.040). In addition, ACL reconstruction patients had a significantly higher rate of additional procedures, with 63.0% of reconstruction patients receiving an additional operation as compared to 30.0% of repair patients (p = 0.017). The surgery type did not show a significant effect on physical function scores, while additional procedures remained significant in the linear regression analysis. Conclusion Although ACL repair is associated with improved physical function scores as compared to reconstruction in the univariate analysis, surgery type did not show significance when controlling for other variables. Further studies are necessary to compare patients with similar injuries to account for differences in additional procedures, but the results remain promising in assisting with patient-driven treatment decisions.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are a common occurrence among athletes and active individuals, often necessitating surgical intervention for optimal recovery. The choice of graft material for ACL reconstruction remains a topic of debate, with various options available, including quadriceps tendon (QT), patellar tendon bone allograft (PTBA), and cadaver graft (CG). This paper aims to provide an extensive review and comparison of the efficacy, outcomes, and complications associated with these graft types based on recent research. A systematic literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted to identify relevant studies published in the past six years. The findings suggest that while each graft type has its advantages and limitations, there is no definitive superior choice. Factors such as patient age, activity level, comorbidities, and surgeon preference should be considered when selecting the most appropriate graft for ACL repair surgery. QT grafts are associated with lower donor-site morbidity compared to patellar tendon grafts. However, QT grafts may have a higher risk of graft rupture and decreased knee flexion strength. PTBA grafts, compared to QT grafts, have a higher risk of donor-site morbidity but a lower risk of graft rupture and improved knee stability. CG grafts have lower donor-site morbidity compared to PTBA grafts but may have a higher risk of graft rupture and decreased knee flexion strength compared to PTBA grafts. In conclusion, the choice of graft material for ACL reconstruction is a complex decision that requires careful consideration of various factors, including patient age, activity level, comorbidities, and surgeon preference. While each graft type has its advantages and limitations, there is no definitive superior choice. Therefore, it is essential to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of each graft type to ensure optimal outcomes for patients undergoing ACL repair surgery.

The purpose of this study is to compare failure rates among different techniques of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair for the treatment of proximal ACL ruptures. Meta-analysis and systematic review were completed, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Studies from Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed published between June 2011 and June 2022 reporting outcomes of primary ACL repair on proximal tears with a minimum two-year follow-up were included. Primary ACL repair was divided into dynamic, static, and non-augmented repair. The primary outcome was failure rates, and the secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and anterior tibial stability (ATT). Eighteen studies on primary ACL repair were included, with a total of 614 patients (ages ranging from 6 to 65, 60% male). Only two studies were level 1 randomized controlled clinical trials. The static repair had a failure rate of 33 out of 261 (12.6%), non-augmented was 17 out of 179 (9.4%), and dynamic repair was 31 out of 174 (17.8%); no statistically significant difference was found comparing the failure rates (p = 0.090). PROs using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores had weighted averages of 91.7 (95% confidence interval (CI): 89.6-93.8) and 94.7 (95% CI: 92.7-96.7), respectively. ATT had a weighted average of 1.668 mm (95% CI: 1.002-2.334). The primary findings of this paper include a 12.6% combined failure rate for primary proximal ACL repair with no significant difference in failure rate or PROs when accounting for the methodology of repair at a minimum two-year follow-up. It is important to note the lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials, the heterogeneity of included studies, and the lack of long-term data. Despite these limitations, the findings of the current analysis suggest that primary repair may be a useful treatment option for indicated candidates with proximal ACL ruptures. Further long-term and higher-quality comparative studies on ACL reconstruction are warranted.

A prevalent condition that is frequently linked to joint trauma is joint hyper-laxity. The knee joint is one of the most complex and injury-prone joints in sports. The most commonly injured is the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The case presented below is of a 24-year-old athlete with a past history of many sports-related injuries who is now presented with a complete tear of the ACL with hyper-laxity as a risk factor. The patient has a Beighton score of six out of nine without any other symptoms, which is suggestive of benign hyper-laxity of the joints and not hyper-laxity syndrome. Here, we emphasize that medical professionals must know the fundamental connection between hyper-laxity and musculoskeletal injuries and their proper management and rehabilitation for future prevention.

Background Over time, there has been a noticeable increase in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The current imperative is to anticipate predisposing factors and proactively prevent ACL injuries. The occurrence of ACL injuries has been linked to diverse factors associated with the morphology of the distal femur. Objectives Through this study, we aim to compare the anatomic variables of distal femur morphology such as notch width (NW), bicondylar width (BW), notch entrance width (NEW), and notch width index (NWI) between patients with ACL injuries and non-injured patients using MRI. We also aim to make a comparison of these factors between male and female genders to assess the gender variability. Material and methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted amongst patients who underwent MRI Knee scan for clinical suspicion of internal derangement during the study period. We selected the first 125 individuals who were found to have ACL injury in the MRI scans and selected another 125 individuals who had an intact ACL in the scans, to serve as controls in the study. Demographic information was retrieved from the hospital\'s electronic records, and the assessment of NW, NWI, BW, and NEW was conducted through a review of MRI sequences. They were then compared between the cases and control groups, as well as between male and female genders. Results The ACL-injured group exhibited statistically significant reductions in NW and NWI. While 17.39 mm was the mean NW among cases, 17.86 was the mean value among controls. Similarly, the mean NWI was 0.25 among patients with ACL injuries and 0.27 among controls. Gender-based comparisons also revealed statistically significant differences in NW and NWI measurements, where females were reported to have comparatively lower measurements. The mean NW for males and females in the injured group were 18.26 mm and 15.40 mm, respectively, while it was 18.71 mm and 16.90 mm, respectively, in the control group. In the case of NEW, males in the injured group had a slightly higher value (21.33 mm) than the controls (20.65). Females on the other hand exhibited a lower mean value of NEW in ACL-injured group (18.51 mm) in comparison to the non-injured (18.79 mm). BW did not seem to show a significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions In the studied population, ACL injuries demonstrated a higher occurrence in individuals with a narrow femoral intercondylar NWI. If any of these characteristics are identified in an MRI, it may be helpful to identify individuals who are at a higher risk of developing ACL injuries and may thereby help in planning preventative strategies.

UNASSIGNED: While current literature has explored the outcomes of athletes who return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, less is known about the outcomes of those who are unsuccessful in returning to sport.
UNASSIGNED: To determine the rate of athletes who did not RTS after primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and to identify the specific subjective reasons for failure to RTS.
UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted through April 2021.
UNASSIGNED: Eligible studies included those explicitly reporting the rate of failure for RTS after ACLR as well as providing details on reasons for athletes\' inability to return; 31 studies met the inclusion criteria.
UNASSIGNED: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Level 2 to 4.
UNASSIGNED: The reasons for failure to RTS referred to in our study are derived from those established previously in the studies included. Data were collected on the number of athletes, mean age, mean follow-up time, type of sport played, failure to RTS rate, and specific reasons for failure to return.
UNASSIGNED: The weighted rate of failure to RTS after ACLR was 25.5% (95% CI, 19.88-31.66). The estimated proportion of psychosocial-related reasons cited for failure to RTS was significantly greater than knee-related reasons for failure RTS (55.4% vs 44.6%, P < 0.01). The most cited reason for failure to RTS was fear of reinjury (33.0%).
UNASSIGNED: This study estimates the rate of failure to RTS after ACLR to be 25.5%, with the majority of athletes citing fear of reinjury as the major deterrent for returning to sports. We highlight how factors independent of surgical outcomes may impact an athlete\'s ability to return to play given that the predominant reason for no RTS after ACLR was unrelated to the knee.