Background While several studies have suggested that anesthesia and surgical care episodes provide an opportunity to improve the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension, few studies have implemented and tested pragmatic care coordination efforts for this population. The present study aimed to examine the effects of same-day primary care referral vs. usual care on outpatient hypertension treatment among patients with elevated preoperative clinic blood pressure (BP). Methodology With institutional review board approval of the project as a quality improvement (QI) initiative not requiring consent, we conducted a prospective QI project comparing same-day preoperative primary care referral vs. usual care within comparable cohorts of US Veterans presenting to a preoperative evaluation clinic with elevated BP for whom treatment assignment was based on prior primary care clinic affiliation. Outpatient BP, antihypertensive medications, and antihypertensive dosages at the initial visit and for one year after the initial preoperative clinic visit were followed in the electronic health record. Results Between June 1, 2018, and June 1, 2019, one of the two on-site primary care groups (Firm A) at our facility agreed to accommodate same-day BP referrals. Patients in the second primary care group received standard preoperative care (Firm B). Charts for the pseudo-randomized cohort of Firm A and B patients were compared after 12 months to assess for changes in BP and hypertension treatment. Firm A and B patients were similar in demographics. Overall, 68 (91%) Firm A patients were correctly referred for primary care appointments. Moreover, 28 of 68 (41.2%) patients adhered to the same-day referral recommendation, with the remainder declining to attend the primary care visit. BPs were similar between Firm A and Firm B groups at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-intervention. Firm A adherent patients (i.e., those attending the referral) received hypertension treatment intensification sooner than Firm A non-adherent and Firm B patients (median (interquartile range) days to intensification = 21 (0.5-103.5) vs. 154 (45.5-239) and 170 (48-220), respectively; p = 0.038 and p = 0.048, respectively). Conclusions Our protocol achieved a high degree of same-day primary care referral (91%) in hypertensive patients presenting at the preoperative clinic. Although this limited study did not demonstrate improved BP control in patients who received same-day primary care, this group did show increased rates of rapid treatment intensification which may infer improved long-term health outcomes. Further work examining logistical barriers to patients attending same-day referrals is warranted.

Quality improvement (QI) projects are essential components of graduate medical education and healthcare organizations to improve patient outcomes. We systematically reviewed the literature on QI projects in anesthesiology graduate medical education programs to assess whether these projects are leading to publications. A literature search was conducted in July 2023, using PubMed, Embase, and the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for articles describing QI initiatives originating within the United States and applicable to anesthesiology residency training programs. The following data were collected: intervention(s), sample size (number of participants or events), outcome metric(s), result(s), and conclusion(s). One hundred and fifty publications were identified, and 31 articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2,259 residents and 72,889 events were included in this review. Educational modalities, such as simulation, training sessions, or online curricula, were the most prevalent interventions in the included studies. Pre-intervention and post-intervention assessments were the most common outcome metrics reported. Our review of the literature demonstrates that few QI projects performed within anesthesiology training programs lead to published manuscripts. Further research should aim at increasing the impact of required QI projects within the sponsoring institution and specialty.

Patients with severe cardiopulmonary morbidity present a unique challenge to peri- and intraoperative providers. Inducing general anesthesia in this patient population poses the risk of adverse events that could lead to poor surgical outcomes, prolonged debilitation, or death. Therefore, it is important that anesthesiologists become comfortable with preoperative evaluation as well as alternative strategies to providing surgical anesthesia. This case report details the clinical course of a patient with severe cardiopulmonary morbidity who underwent open inguinal hernia repair without oral or intravenous sedation after receiving multi-level paravertebral blocks in addition to isolated ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve blocks. This medically challenging case provides educational value regarding preoperative evaluation, pertinent anatomy and innervation, and the importance of patient-centered care and communication.

Introduction There are projected workforce shortages within anesthesiology exacerbated by an increase in demand for anesthesia services and an aging anesthesia workforce. Given this mismatch, it is critical for the specialty to recruit the next generation of anesthesiologists and understand the factors affecting medical students\' decision to apply to anesthesiology. This study aims to evaluate the impact of establishing a new anesthesiology residency program at a single institution on the number of medical students that match into anesthesiology in the subsequent years. Methods A single-center, retrospective longitudinal study examined the number of medical students matching into anesthesiology at a single institution between 2013 and 2023, five years before and after the establishment of an accredited anesthesiology residency program. The data were compared to aggregated data on all US medical student applicants through the National Resident Matching Program. Results The pre-anesthesiology residency match rate (2013-2018) of medical students from Alpert Medical School (AMS) was 2.47% while the post-anesthesiology residency match rate (2019-2023) was 4.30%. This represents a 74% increase in the average proportion of medical students matching into anesthesiology after the start of the residency program compared to a 20% increase nationally over the same time period. The rate of change of AMS matched applicants after the implementation of the AMS anesthesia residency program increased compared to the national applicant pool (p= 0.002). Conclusion The establishment of a new accredited anesthesiology residency program increased the proportion of medical students matching into anesthesiology at the affiliated medical school in the subsequent five years. Exposure to an academic anesthesiology program improves medical student interest and ultimately matches rates in anesthesiology, a vital tool to address the projected shortages in the anesthesiology workforce.

Background The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic substantially altered operations at hospitals that support graduate medical education. We examined the impact of the pandemic on an anesthesiology training program with respect to overall case volume, subspecialty exposure, procedural skill experience, and approaches to airway management. Methods Data for this single center, retrospective cohort study came from an Institutional Review Board approved repository for clinical data. Date ranges were divided into the following phases in 2020: Pre-Pandemic (PP), Early Pandemic (EP), Recovery 1 (R1), and Recovery 2 (R2). All periods were compared to the same period from 2019 for case volume, anesthesia provider type, trainee exposure to Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) index case categories, airway technique, and patient variables. Results 15,087 cases were identified, with 5,598 (37.6%) in the PP phase, 1,570 (10.5%) in the EP phase, 1,451 (9.7%) in the R1 phase, and 6,269 (42.1%) in the R2 phase. There was a significant reduction in case volume during the EP phase compared to the corresponding period in 2019 (-55.3%; P < .001) that improved but did not return to baseline by the R2 phase (-17.6%; P < .001). ACGME required minimum cases were reduced during the EP phase compared to 2019 data for pediatric cases (age < 12 y, -72.1%; P < .001 and age < 3 y, -53.5%; P < .006) and cardiopulmonary bypass cases (52.3%, P < .003). Surgical subspecialty case volumes were significantly reduced in the EP phase except for transplant surgery. By the R2 phase, all subspecialty volumes had recovered except for plastic surgery (14.9 vs. 10.5 cases/week; P < .006) and surgical endoscopy (59.2 vs. 40 cases/week; P < .001). Use of video laryngoscopy (VL) and rapid sequence induction and intubation (RSII) also increased from the PP to the EP phase (24.6 vs. 79.6%; P < .001 and 10.3 vs. 52.3%; P < .001, respectively) and remained elevated into the R2 phase (35.2%; P < 0.001 and 23.1%; P < .001, respectively). Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic produced significant changes in surgical case exposure for a relatively short period. The impact was short-lived, with sufficient remaining time to meet the annual ACGME program minimum case requirements and procedural experiences. The longer-term impact may be a shift towards the increased use of VL and RSII, which became more prevalent during the early phase of the pandemic.

This case report highlights some of the anesthetic challenges of an airway foreign body removal. We present a case report of foreign body removal in a 50-year-old male with an oxtail bone lodged between the vocal cords. We used face mask general anesthesia with sevoflurane.

The extent of endotracheal tube (ETT) migration was studied in 25 adult female patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic surgery while in a steep Trendelenburg position secured with the Estape TrenMAX positioning system (Innovative Medical Products, Plainville, CT, USA). In four patients, the distance from the tip of the ETT to the carina did not change. In three patients, the distance from the tip of the ETT to the carina decreased by 1 centimeter (cm). In other patients, the distance from the tip of the ETT to the carina decreased by 0.2 to 0.5 cm. We concluded that the tip of the ETT moves closer to the carina in patients put in the extreme Trendelenburg position. These results were in alignment with the evidence base created by other researchers.

Brief description of the primary research objective Among healthcare workers, anesthesiologists are regarded as frequently exposed frontline providers in the fight against COVID-19 due to their proximity to patient airways and involvement in aerosolized procedures. As such, the risk of contracting the COVID-19 virus as an occupational hazard is presumed to be higher. To date, in most published studies, all healthcare workers were grouped together, independent of specialty or profession. At the time that this survey was distributed, we did not find any peer-reviewed articles that differentiated COVID-19 infection rates among frontline, such as anesthesiologists vs. non-frontline healthcare workers. This retrospective survey\'s primary research objective was to report the rate of COVID-19 infection among anesthesiologists compared to the general population of healthcare workers. Methodology A survey was sent among anesthesiology attendings and residents in Northern New Jersey and Brooklyn, New York hospitals on duty during the peak pandemic from March 2020 to May 2020. Questions in the survey focused on infection rates and adherence to standards of infection precaution and personal protective equipment (PPE) utilization. Main Findings This retrospective study highlights the rate of infection among anesthesiologists as a particularly vulnerable subgroup of frontline residents and physicians, as they are called to duty when emergent airway management is required. In our study, the reported rate of contracting COVID-19 among anesthesiologists was 16.7%. This statistic is higher than the infection rates published by studies by New York State and the CDC. Conclusion The survey sent to anesthesiologists is useful to understand the impact of COVID-19 on this subgroup of frontline providers and the importance of adhering to standards of infection protocol and the role of PPE.

BACKGROUND: Crisis management is difficult to practice and evaluate for resident learners and leadership given the rarity of these events in clinical practice. However, simulation provides a medium to bridge this gap. We identified a need for simulation in our anesthesiology residency program to help residents learn to treat perioperative emergencies.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the process of curriculum development, content, and early outcomes of a simulation-based curriculum for the management of perioperative emergencies for all levels of anesthesiology learners.
METHODS: Curriculum development began in the Spring of 2019 and simulations began in August 2019. All anesthesiology residents rotating at a single center through December 2020 were eligible. Each resident was given their own simulation scenario detailing a specific perioperative emergency and then debriefed as a group afterward. All residents participating in the scenario were given a post-simulation survey assessing the value of the educational experience, relevance to their level of training, and quality of learning environment.
RESULTS: Out of 90 eligible residents, 79 participated in the study (87%). Overall, 100% of participants completed the post-simulation survey; 100% of residents reported that the curriculum was useful to their education; 98% of residents reported that the curriculum was relevant to their training level; 99% of residents reported that the simulation was an engaging learning experience.
CONCLUSIONS: A simulation-based curriculum of perioperative emergencies for anesthesiology residents is feasible to implement, viewed as worthwhile by trainees, and can foster education in a different learning environment.

Purpose Despite increasing numbers of women entering anesthesiology training, women remain underrepresented in senior academic positions and leadership roles. This study aims to determine the extent of gender disparity in Canadian departments of anesthesiology. In addition, we explore the correlation between publication productivity and academic rank in this cohort. Methods The Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS) was queried to identify 17 training programs for anesthesiology. Department websites were searched to determine the names of faculty members, as well as gender, leadership roles, and academic ranks. The SCOPUS© database was used to generate the number of publications, number of citations, publication range, and h-index of each faculty member. Results In our study cohort of 1404 academic anesthesiologists, 30.1% were women. Women held a minority of 130 leadership positions (27%, n = 35). With increasing academic rank female representation decreased (p = 0.009), such that 21% of full professors were women. Overall, male anesthesiologists had a higher h-index, number of publications, and number of citations (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, and p = <0.001, respectively) than women. Conclusion Despite growing numbers of women entering the academic workforce, women are underrepresented in senior academic ranks and leadership positions. In addition, men and women have significant differences in measures of publication productivity. This study underscores the importance of directed efforts to promote equity in career outcomes.