abnormally invasive placenta

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是说明黎巴嫩三个主要中心管理的异常侵袭性胎盘(AIP)病例的结局。
    方法:我们进行了一项回顾性多中心队列研究。保守治疗(剖宫产成功胎盘分离)或彻底治疗(剖宫产子宫切除术)的患者被纳入研究。数据包括患者特征,手术结果(失血,手术时间,输血,膀胱部分切除术),产妇结局(死亡,逗留时间,入住ICU,术后血红蛋白水平)和新生儿结局(Apgar评分,新生儿体重,入住新生儿重症监护室,新生儿死亡)。
    结果:该研究包括189名患者。在根治性治疗亚组(141/189)中,患者为第3段,平均在344/7周分娩,放血1.5L,并输入三个红细胞,手术时间平均160分钟。尽管有19%的病例进行了部分膀胱切除术,但总共有36%的患者被送入ICU,患者平均停留了1周。计划外的彻底分娩发生在较低的胎龄,与更多的失血有关,更高的输血率和输血量,以及孕产妇和新生儿死亡的风险。此外,以计划外方式分娩的患者膀胱部分切除术率较高,干预时间较长.在保守治疗亚组中,患者平均为第2段,并在36周时分娩,平均出血800mL,输血率(35%)和ICU入院率(22.9%)较低。关于新生儿结局,激进亚组新生儿出生体重平均为2.4kg,保守亚组新生儿出生体重平均为2.5kg.需要根治性治疗的病例中有5.4%的新生儿死亡,而保守治疗的患者中有2%的新生儿死亡。
    结论:通过他们的多学科方法,这三个中心表明,黎巴嫩AIP的管理取得了良好的结果,在预定的根治性治疗中没有发生孕产妇死亡.通过三个领导中心的比较,确定并解决了每个中心的陷阱。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to illustrate the outcomes of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) cases managed in three leading centers in Lebanon.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study. Patients managed conservatively (cesarean delivery with successful placental separation) or radically (cesarean hysterectomy) were included in the study. Data included patient characteristics, surgical outcomes (blood loss, operative time, transfusion, partial bladder resection), maternal outcomes (death, length of stay, ICU admission, postoperative hemoglobin level) and neonatal outcomes (Apgar score, neonatal weight, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, neonatal death).
    RESULTS: The study included 189 patients. In the radical treatment subgroup (141/189), patients were para 3 and delivered at 34 4/7 weeks in average, bled 1.5 L and were transfused with three packed red blood cells, with operative time averaging 160 min. A total of 36% were admitted to the ICU and patients stayed on average for 1 week despite partial bladder resection in 19% of cases. Unscheduled radical delivery occurred at a lower gestational age, was associated with more blood loss, higher rate and volume of transfusion, and risk of maternal and neonatal death. In addition, patients delivered in an unscheduled fashion experienced higher rates of partial bladder resection and longer interventions. In the conservative treatment subgroup, on average patients were para 2 and delivered at 36 weeks, bled 800 mL on average with low rates of transfusion (35%) and ICU admission (22.9%). With regard to neonatal outcomes, the average neonatal birth weight was 2.4 kg in the radical subgroup and 2.5 kg in the conservative subgroup. Neonatal death occurred in 5.4% of cases requiring radical management while it occurred in 2% of patients treated conservatively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Through their multidisciplinary approach, the three centers demonstrated that management of AIP in Lebanon has led to excellent outcomes with no maternal mortality occurring in scheduled radical treatment. By comparison of the three leading centers, pitfalls in each center were identified and addressed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胎盘植入谱(PAS)可导致主要的围产期发病率。适当的管理方法取决于临床严重程度,每个人的偏好,和治疗团队的专业知识。围产期子宫切除术是最常用的治疗选择。然而,它会影响心理健康和生育能力。我们调查了在国际胎盘植入谱(IS-PAS)的卓越中心中,采用局部切除术或将胎盘留在原位的保守治疗是否与子宫切除术的产妇发病率相当或更低。此外,本研究进行了一项调查,以探讨在产前咨询和术中决策中保守管理的潜在障碍.
    方法:分析包括2020年1月至2022年6月来自22个注册中心的前瞻性IS-PAS数据库中确认的PAS病例。IS-PAS中心专家就适应症回答了另一项包含21个问题的在线调查,诊断标准,病人咨询,外科手术,术前治疗计划的变化,以及为什么不提供保守的管理。
    结果:共234例纳入分析:186例妇女接受了子宫切除术,38例妇女接受了局部切除术,10把胎盘留在原位。与子宫切除术组相比,局灶性切除组和胎盘原位组的失血量较低(p=0.04)。46.4%的女性最初计划进行局灶性切除术,最初计划将胎盘留在原位的患者中,有35.7%最终通过子宫切除术治疗。我们的调查显示,IS-PAS中心根据女性的意愿(64%)以及预期失血和发病率较低的情况(41%)首选子宫切除术。由于缺乏这种技术的经验,18%的中心根本没有提供局灶性切除术。不提供离开胎盘原位的原因是避免意外的再次手术(36%),产褥期感染(32%),或对该方法持怀疑态度(23%)。
    结论:保留子宫的治疗策略如局灶性切除术似乎是围产期子宫切除术的安全替代方案。然而,不到一半的IS-PAS中心执行这些操作。通过标准化的实施标准和对PAS专家的系统培训,可以增加对保守治疗的接受度。
    BACKGROUND: Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) can lead to major peripartum morbidity. Appropriate management approaches depend on the clinical severity, each individual\'s preference, and the treating team\'s expertise. Peripartum hysterectomy is the most frequently used treatment option. However, it can impact psychological well-being and fertility. We investigated whether conservative treatment with focal resection or leaving the placenta in situ is associated with comparable or lower maternal morbidity than hysterectomy in centers of excellence within the International Society for placenta accreta spectrum (IS-PAS). Furthermore, a survey was conducted to explore potential barriers to conservative management in antenatal counseling and intraoperative decision-making.
    METHODS: Confirmed PAS cases in the prospective IS-PAS database from 22 registered centers between January 2020 and June 2022 were included in the analysis. A separate online survey with 21 questions was answered by the IS-PAS center experts about indications, diagnostic criteria, patient counseling, surgical practice, changes from the preoperative treatment plan, and why conservative management may not be offered.
    RESULTS: A total of 234 cases were included in the analysis: 186 women received hysterectomy and 38 women were treated by focal resection, and 10 by leaving the placenta in situ. Blood loss was lower in the focal resection group and in the placenta in situ group compared to the hysterectomy group (p = 0.04). 46.4% of the women initially planned for focal resection, and 35.7% of those initially planned for leaving the placenta in situ were ultimately treated by hysterectomy. Our survey showed that the IS-PAS centers preferred hysterectomy according to a woman\'s wishes (64%) and when they expected less blood loss and morbidity (41%). Eighteen percent of centers did not offer focal resection at all due to a lack of experience with this technique. Reasons for not offering to leave the placenta in situ were avoidance of unexpected reoperation (36%), puerperal infection (32%), or skepticism about the method (23%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Uterus-preserving treatment strategies such as focal resection appear to be safe alternatives to peripartum hysterectomy. However, less than half of the IS-PAS centers perform them. Acceptance of conservative treatments could be increased by standardized criteria for their implementation and by systematic training for PAS experts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胎盘植入谱系障碍与严重的产妇发病率和死亡率相关。胎盘植入谱系障碍涉及胎盘过度粘附,防止出生时分离。传统上,这种情况被归因于过度的滋养层入侵;然而,另一种观点是蜕膜生物学的根本缺陷。
    目的:本研究旨在通过使用单细胞和空间分辨转录组学来表征胎盘植入谱系障碍中母胎界面的细胞异质性,从而深入了解对胎盘植入谱系障碍的理解。
    方法:为了评估细胞异质性和细胞类型的功能,使用单细胞RNA测序和空间分辨转录组学。总共包括12个胎盘,6个胎盘伴胎盘植入谱系障碍和6个对照。对于每个胎盘植入谱系障碍,在以下部位进行了多次活检:同一胎盘中的胎盘植入谱贴壁和非贴壁部位。值得注意的是,2个平台用于生成库:用于单细胞和空间分辨转录组的10×Chromium和NanoStringGeoMX数字空间分析器,分别。使用一套生物信息学工具(Seurat和GeoMxToolsR包)进行差异基因表达分析。使用Clipper进行多次测试的校正。用RNAscope进行原位杂交,和免疫组织化学用于评估蛋白质表达。
    结果:在创建胎盘植入细胞图谱时,在胎盘植入谱和对照组之间,活检部位的转录谱有显著差异。大多数差异是在遵守现场注意到的;然而,胎盘植入中同一胎盘的贴壁和非贴壁部位之间存在差异。在所有细胞类型中,内皮基质群体表现出最大的基因表达差异,由胶原蛋白基因的变化驱动,即III型胶原α1链(COL3A1),生长因子,表皮生长因子样蛋白6(EGFL6),和肝细胞生长因子(HGF),和血管生成相关基因,即δ样非规范Notch配体1(DLK1)和血小板内皮细胞粘附分子1(PECAM1)。胎盘内嗜性(同一胎盘中的粘附与非粘附位点)是由内皮基质细胞的差异驱动的,在胎盘植入谱的粘附与非粘附位点中,骨形态发生蛋白5(BMP5)和骨桥蛋白(SPP1)存在显着差异。
    结论:以单细胞分辨率表征胎盘植入谱系障碍,以深入了解该疾病的病理生理学。植入中单细胞分辨率的胎盘图集可以理解母体和胎儿亲密相互作用的生物学。基质和内皮细胞的贡献通过细胞外基质的改变得到证实,生长因子,和血管生成。胎盘植入光谱基质的转录和蛋白质变化将病因解释从“侵入性滋养层”转移到蜕膜中的“边界界限丧失”。本研究中确定的基因靶标可用于改善妊娠早期的诊断测定,跟踪疾病随时间的进展,并告知治疗发现。
    Placenta accreta spectrum disorders are associated with severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Placenta accreta spectrum disorders involve excessive adherence of the placenta preventing separation at birth. Traditionally, this condition has been attributed to excessive trophoblast invasion; however, an alternative view is a fundamental defect in decidual biology.
    This study aimed to gain insights into the understanding of placenta accreta spectrum disorder by using single-cell and spatially resolved transcriptomics to characterize cellular heterogeneity at the maternal-fetal interface in placenta accreta spectrum disorders.
    To assess cellular heterogeneity and the function of cell types, single-cell RNA sequencing and spatially resolved transcriptomics were used. A total of 12 placentas were included, 6 placentas with placenta accreta spectrum disorder and 6 controls. For each placenta with placenta accreta spectrum disorder, multiple biopsies were taken at the following sites: placenta accreta spectrum adherent and nonadherent sites in the same placenta. Of note, 2 platforms were used to generate libraries: the 10× Chromium and NanoString GeoMX Digital Spatial Profiler for single-cell and spatially resolved transcriptomes, respectively. Differential gene expression analysis was performed using a suite of bioinformatic tools (Seurat and GeoMxTools R packages). Correction for multiple testing was performed using Clipper. In situ hybridization was performed with RNAscope, and immunohistochemistry was used to assess protein expression.
    In creating a placenta accreta cell atlas, there were dramatic difference in the transcriptional profile by site of biopsy between placenta accreta spectrum and controls. Most of the differences were noted at the site of adherence; however, differences existed within the placenta between the adherent and nonadherent site of the same placenta in placenta accreta. Among all cell types, the endothelial-stromal populations exhibited the greatest difference in gene expression, driven by changes in collagen genes, namely collagen type III alpha 1 chain (COL3A1), growth factors, epidermal growth factor-like protein 6 (EGFL6), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and angiogenesis-related genes, namely delta-like noncanonical Notch ligand 1 (DLK1) and platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM1). Intraplacental tropism (adherent versus non-adherent sites in the same placenta) was driven by differences in endothelial-stromal cells with notable differences in bone morphogenic protein 5 (BMP5) and osteopontin (SPP1) in the adherent vs nonadherent site of placenta accreta spectrum.
    Placenta accreta spectrum disorders were characterized at single-cell resolution to gain insight into the pathophysiology of the disease. An atlas of the placenta at single cell resolution in accreta allows for understanding in the biology of the intimate maternal and fetal interaction. The contributions of stromal and endothelial cells were demonstrated through alterations in the extracellular matrix, growth factors, and angiogenesis. Transcriptional and protein changes in the stroma of placenta accreta spectrum shift the etiologic explanation away from \"invasive trophoblast\" to \"loss of boundary limits\" in the decidua. Gene targets identified in this study may be used to refine diagnostic assays in early pregnancy, track disease progression over time, and inform therapeutic discoveries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们旨在研究前置胎盘孕妇血清中期因子水平与胎盘侵袭之间的关系。研究组由43名被诊断为前置胎盘的孕妇组成,而对照组由60名健康孕妇组成。本研究的第一部分比较了前置胎盘孕妇和对照组的血清中期因子水平。此后,研究中期因子在异常侵入性胎盘(AIP)预测中的效用,并计算最佳截断值.在前置胎盘病例中观察到血清中期因子水平明显高于对照组(1.16ng/mLvs.0.18ng/mL,P<0.001)。在前置胎盘病例中,AIP组的血清中期因子水平也显着升高(P=0.004)。在接收机工作特性分析中,中期因子水平预测AIP的临界值为1.19ng/mL.这项研究表明,AIP孕妇的血清中期因子水平较高。母体血清中期因子水平可用作放射学和临床发现的补充生物标志物,以预测前置胎盘病例中的AIP。
    We aimed to examine the relationship between serum midkine levels and placental invasion in pregnant women with placenta previa. The study group consisted of 43 pregnant women diagnosed with placenta previa, whereas the control group consisted of 60 healthy pregnant women. Serum midkine levels were compared between pregnant women with placenta previa and the control group in this study\'s first part. Thereafter, the utility of midkine in the prediction of the abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) was investigated and optimal cutoff values were calculated. Significantly higher serum midkine level was observed in placenta previa cases than in the controls (1.16 ng/mL vs. 0.18 ng/mL, P < 0.001). Serum midkine level was also significantly higher in the AIP group among the placenta previa cases (P = 0.004). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the cutoff value of the midkine level in predicting AIP was 1.19 ng/mL. This study revealed that the serum midkine level is higher in pregnant women with AIP. Maternal serum midkine level may be used as a complementary biomarker to the radiological and clinical findings for the prediction of the AIP in placenta previa cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为了开发胎盘植入频谱(PAS)的超声评分系统,评估其诊断价值,为PAS的产前诊断提供了一种实用的方法。
    方法:共有532名孕妇(n=184名无PAS,n=120胎盘植入,n=189胎盘植入,n=39胎盘植入)高危胎盘植入患者于2021年1月至2022年12月在郑州大学第三附属医院分娩,接受产前超声检查以评估胎盘浸润。建立了包括胎盘和宫颈形态以及剖宫产史的超声评分系统。每个特征根据严重程度分配0~2分。区分无PAS的超声总评分阈值,胎盘植入,胎盘植入,并计算了胎盘穿孔。
    结果:单变量和多变量回归分析确定了超声评分系统中包含的PAS的七个指标,包括胎盘位置,胎盘厚度,胎盘后间隙的存在/不存在,胎盘后子宫肌层厚度,存在/不存在胎盘腔隙,胎盘后肌层血流和剖宫产史。使用最终的超声评分系统,在总分<5时没有诊断出PAS,在总分5~10时诊断出胎盘植入或胎盘植入,在总分≥10时诊断出胎盘植入.
    结论:这项研究确定了PAS的七个指标,并将其纳入具有良好诊断功效和临床实用性的超声评分系统中。
    背景:ChiCTR2300069261(回顾性注册于10/03/2023)。
    BACKGROUND: To develop an ultrasound scoring system for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), evaluate its diagnostic value, and provide a practical approach to prenatal diagnosis of PAS.
    METHODS: A total of 532 pregnant women (n = 184 no PAS, n = 120 placenta accreta, n = 189 placenta increta, n = 39 placenta percreta) at high-risk for placenta accreta who delivered in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2021 and December 2022 underwent prenatal ultrasound to evaluate placental invasion. An ultrasound scoring system that included placental and cervical morphology and history of cesarean section was created. Each feature was assigned a score of 0 ~ 2, according to severity. Thresholds for the total ultrasound score that discriminated between no PAS, placenta accreta, placenta increta, and placenta percreta were calculated.
    RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate regression analysis identified seven indicators of PAS that were included in the ultrasound scoring system, including placental location, placental thickness, presence/absence of the retroplacental space, thickness of the retroplacental myometrium, presence/absence of placental lacunae, retroplacental myometrial blood flow and history of cesarean section. Using the final ultrasound scoring system, no PAS is diagnosed at a total score < 5, placenta accreta or placenta increta is diagnosed at a total score 5-10, and placenta percreta is diagnosed at a total score ≥ 10.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study identified seven indicators of PAS and included them in an ultrasound scoring system that has good diagnostic efficacy and clinical utility.
    BACKGROUND: ChiCTR2300069261 (retrospectively registered on 10/03/2023).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:报告在临床诊断为异常侵入性胎盘的患者中预防性使用Bulldog钳夹术中暂时性髂内动脉闭塞的结果。
    方法:这项回顾性研究包括2018年1月至2022年3月期间诊断为FIGO3级异常侵入性胎盘的61例患者。经底切口和胎儿分娩后,所有患者均通过Bulldog钳进行双侧暂时性髂内动脉闭塞。3b级和3c级组接受了剖宫产子宫切除术,而部分3a级异常侵入性胎盘病例接受了保留生育能力的手术。比较术前和术后结果。
    结果:50例(82%)患者行剖宫产子宫切除术,11例(18%)患者行剖宫产加保守手术。83.6%的患者未进行术中血液置换。所有患者的平均失血量为1.37±0.53L(范围0.5-2.5)。剖宫产子宫切除术组的估计失血量明显较高。两组在围手术期血液置换方面的差异无统计学意义。膀胱,和输尿管损伤。
    结论:对于3级异常侵入性胎盘,应通过Bulldog钳进行预防性双侧暂时性髂内动脉闭塞。在某些情况下,可以使用这种方法安全地采取保持生育力的步骤。
    OBJECTIVE: To report the results of prophylactic use of intraoperative temporary internal iliac arterial occlusion by Bulldog clamps in patients clinically diagnosed with abnormally invasive placenta.
    METHODS: This retrospective study included 61 patients diagnosed with FIGO grade 3 abnormally invasive placenta between January 2018 and March 2022. After transfundal incision and fetal delivery, bilateral temporary internal iliac arterial occlusion by Bulldog clamps was performed in all patients. The grades 3b and 3c group underwent cesarean hysterectomy whereas selected cases of grade 3a abnormally invasive placenta underwent fertility-preserving procedures. Preoperative and postoperative findings were compared.
    RESULTS: Cesarean hysterectomy was performed in 50 (82%) patients and cesarean plus conservative procedures were performed in 11 (18%) patients. Intraoperative blood replacement was not performed in 83.6% of all patients. Mean blood loss was 1.37 ± 0.53 L (range 0.5-2.5) in all patients. Estimated blood loss was significantly higher in cesarean hysterectomy group. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of peroperative blood replacement, bladder, and ureteral injury.
    CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic bilateral temporary internal iliac arterial occlusion by Bulldog clamps should be performed in cases of grade 3 abnormally invasive placenta. Fertility-preserving steps may be undertaken safely in selected cases with this approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:异常侵入性胎盘(AIP)患者产后大出血的风险很高。复苏性血管内球囊闭塞主动脉(REBOA),作为止血的辅助治疗策略,为产科医生提供治疗AIP患者的替代方案。本研究旨在评估REBOA在AIP患者出血控制中的作用。
    方法:这是一项历史队列研究,前瞻性收集了2014年1月至2021年7月在单个三级中心的数据。根据交付管理,将364例希望保留子宫的单胎妊娠AIP患者分为两组。研究组(气球组,n=278)在剖宫产期间接受了REBOA,而参考组(n=86)没有接受REBOA。收集手术细节和产妇结局。主要结果是估计的失血量和子宫保存率。
    结果:共有278名(76.4%)参与者在剖宫产期间经历了REBOA。球囊组患者剖宫产术中失血较少。(1370.5[752.0]毫升vs.3536.8[1383.2]ml;P<.001),并且子宫被挽救的频率更高(264[95.0%]vs.23[26.7%];P<.001)。这些患者分娩后进入重症监护病房的可能性也较小(168[60.4%]vs.67[77.9%];P=.003),并且操作时间较短(96.3[37.6]minvs.160.6[45.5]min;P<.001)。新生儿重症监护病房入院率(176[63.3%]vs.52[60.4%];P=.70)和产妇医疗总费用($4925.4[1740.7]与$5083.2[1705.1];P=.13)两组之间没有差异。
    结论:作为一种强有力的出血控制技术,REBOA可以减少AIP患者术中出血。下一步是确定相关的危险因素,并确定REBOA纳入标准,以确定可能受益更多的AIP患者亚组。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) are at high risk of massive postpartum hemorrhage. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), as an adjunct therapeutic strategy for hemostasis, offers the obstetrician an alternative for treating patients with AIP. This study aimed to evaluate the role of REBOA in hemorrhage control in patients with AIP.
    METHODS: This was a historical cohort study with prospectively collected data between January 2014 to July 2021 at a single tertiary center. According to delivery management, 364 singleton pregnant AIP patients desiring uterus preservation were separated into two groups. The study group (balloon group, n = 278) underwent REBOA during cesarean section, whereas the reference group (n = 86) did not undergo REBOA. Surgical details and maternal outcomes were collected. The primary outcome was estimated blood loss and the rate of uterine preservation.
    RESULTS: A total of 278 (76.4%) participants experienced REBOA during cesarean section. The patients in the balloon group had a smaller blood loss during cesarean Sect. (1370.5 [752.0] ml vs. 3536.8 [1383.2] ml; P < .001) and had their uterus salvaged more often (264 [95.0%] vs. 23 [26.7%]; P < .001). These patients were also less likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit after delivery (168 [60.4%] vs. 67 [77.9%]; P = .003) and had a shorter operating time (96.3 [37.6] min vs. 160.6 [45.5] min; P < .001). The rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission (176 [63.3%] vs. 52 [60.4%]; P = .70) and total maternal medical costs ($4925.4 [1740.7] vs. $5083.2 [1705.1]; P = .13) did not differ between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: As a robust hemorrhage-control technique, REBOA can reduce intraoperative hemorrhage in patients with AIP. The next step is identifying associated risk factors and defining REBOA inclusion criteria to identify the subgroups of AIP patients who may benefit more.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:由于全球剖宫产率激增,胎盘植入谱(PAS)的发生率正在迅速上升。它与显著的产妇发病率和死亡率相关。通常采用剖腹产子宫切除术。然而,与剖宫产子宫切除术和有意保留胎盘技术相比,保留子宫手术具有优势。
    方法:我们提出了一种改良的保留子宫手术技术,该技术使用安全的方法进行胎盘床手术断流术。然后切除受累的子宫段并重建子宫壁。
    结果:该技术用于20例剖腹手术证实的产前疑似PAS患者的治疗。在18/20(90%)的女性中成功保留了子宫。术中平均失血量为1305CC(SD:361.6),平均手术时间为123分钟(SD:±38.7)。只有一次膀胱损伤,没有其他产妇发病率。
    结论:我们的手术技术是安全的,可能对PAS的保守手术治疗有用,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家,在那里获得复杂的资源,比如介入放射学,是有限的。
    OBJECTIVE: The incidence of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is rising rapidly due to the global surge in Caesarean delivery. It is associated with significant maternal morbidity and mortality. It is usually managed with Caesarean hysterectomy. However, uterine preserving surgeries can have advantages over Caesarean hysterectomy and intentional placental retention techniques.
    METHODS: We present a modified technique of uterine preserving surgery that uses a safe approach for placental bed surgical devascularization. This is followed by resection of the invaded uterine segment and uterine wall reconstruction.
    RESULTS: The technique was used in the management of 20 patients with antenatally suspected PAS that were confirmed at laparotomy. It was successful in preserving the uterus in 18/20 (90 %) women. The mean intraoperative blood loss in was 1305 CC (SD: +361.6) with a mean operative time of 123 min (SD: ±38.7). There was only one urinary bladder injury and no other maternal morbidity.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our surgical technique is safe and may be useful for conservative surgical management of PAS, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where access to complex resources, such as interventional radiology, is limited.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    “胎盘植入谱”(PAS)是一种罕见但严重的妊娠疾病,胎盘异常粘附在子宫壁上,分娩后无法自发释放。当它发生时,PAS与高孕产妇发病率和死亡率相关,因为PAS管理可能特别具有挑战性。这篇由两部分组成的综述总结了当前PAS管理中的证据,找出它最具挑战性的方面,并提供基于证据的建议,以改善管理策略和PAS结果。这两部分综述的第一部分强调了全身麻醉方法,外科和介入管理策略,专门的“卓越中心”,“和多学科PAS治疗团队。PAS的高发病率和死亡率通常是由PAS相关的凝血功能障碍和房周性出血(PPH)引起的。麻醉师需要为大量失血做好准备,输血,并管理潜在的凝血功能障碍。在这两部分回顾的第二部分中,我们特别回顾了目前有关止血变化的文献,失血,输血管理,PAS患者产后静脉血栓栓塞的预防。一起来看,本综述的两部分对麻醉医师PAS管理中的挑战性方面进行了全面调查.
    \"Placenta Accreta Spectrum\" (PAS) is a rare but serious pregnancy condition where the placenta abnormally adheres to the uterine wall and fails to spontaneously release after delivery. When it occurs, PAS is associated with high maternal morbidity and mortality - as PAS management can be particularly challenging. This two-part review summarizes current evidence in PAS management, identifies its most challenging aspects, and offers evidence-based recommendations to improve management strategies and PAS outcomes. The first part of this two-part review highlighted the general anesthetic approach, surgical and interventional management strategies, specialized \"centers of excellence,\" and multidisciplinary PAS treatment teams. The high rates of PAS morbidity and mortality are often provoked by PAS-associated coagulopathies and peripartal hemorrhage (PPH). Anesthesiologists need to be prepared for massive blood loss, transfusion, and to manage potential coagulopathies. In this second part of this two-part review, we specifically reviewed the current literature pertaining to hemostatic changes, blood loss, transfusion management, and postpartum venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in PAS patients. Taken together, the two parts of this review provide a comprehensive survey of challenging aspects in PAS management for anesthesiologists.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    “胎盘植入谱”(PAS)描述了胎盘对子宫壁的异常粘附,而在分娩时没有自发分离。虽然相对罕见,PAS对麻醉师提出了特别的挑战,因为它与大量的围产期出血和高产妇发病率和死亡率有关。标准化的基于证据的PAS管理策略目前正在发展,并强调:“PAS卓越中心”,多学科团队,新型诊断/药物(特别是关于止血,止血剂,即时诊断),和新颖的手术/介入方法(预期管理,球囊闭塞,栓塞)。尽管可用数据是异构的,这些进展影响了麻醉管理,在计划的麻醉方法中必须考虑。这篇由两部分组成的综述提供了对当前证据的重要概述,并提供了基于证据的结构化建议,以帮助麻醉医师改善PAS女性的预后。第一部分讨论卓越中心的PAS管理,多学科护理团队,麻醉方法和监测,手术方法,患者安全检查表,温度管理,介入放射学,术后护理和疼痛治疗。止血障碍和术前贫血的诊断和治疗,失血,输血管理和产后静脉血栓栓塞症将在本系列的第二部分讨论.
    \"Placenta Accreta Spectrum\" (PAS) describes abnormal placental adherence to the uterine wall without spontaneous separation at delivery. Though relatively rare, PAS presents a particular challenge to anesthesiologists, as it is associated with massive peripartum hemorrhage and high maternal morbidity and mortality. Standardized evidence-based PAS management strategies are currently evolving and emphasize: \"PAS centers of excellence\", multidisciplinary teams, novel diagnostics/pharmaceuticals (especially regarding hemostasis, hemostatic agents, point-of-care diagnostics), and novel operative/interventional approaches (expectant management, balloon occlusion, embolization). Though available data are heterogeneous, these developments affect anesthetic management and must be considered in planed anesthetic approaches. This two-part review provides a critical overview of the current evidence and offers structured evidence-based recommendations to help anesthesiologists improve outcomes for women with PAS. This first part discusses PAS management in centers of excellence, multidisciplinary care team, anesthetic approach and monitoring, surgical approaches, patient safety checklists, temperature management, interventional radiology, postoperative care and pain therapy. The diagnosis and treatment of hemostatic disturbances and preoperative prepartum anemia, blood loss, transfusion management and postpartum venous thromboembolism will be addressed in the second part of this series.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号