目的:左心房后壁隔离术(PWI)加传统肺静脉隔离术(PVI)已被认为是减少房颤(AF)复发的有希望的干预措施。我们的目的是研究在房颤患者的传统PVI中添加PWI的有效性和安全性。
方法:使用综合随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统综述和荟萃分析,通过系统搜索PubMed,WebofScience,Scopus,EMBASE,和科克伦到2023年6月14日。我们使用Stata版本17,使用风险比(RR)汇集二分数据,使用平均差(MD)汇集连续数据,95%置信区间(CI)(PROSPEROID:CRD42023446227)。
结果:我们纳入了11项RCTs,总人数为1534例患者。PWI+PVI联合消融术与PVI相比仅在临床房颤复发方面没有任何显著差异(RR:0.86,95%CI[0.70-1.06]),所有房性心律失常(RR:0.93,95%CI[0.82-1.07]),非心房颤动心律失常(RR:1.22,95%CI[0.97-1.53]),早期房颤(RR:0.89,95%CI[0.62-1.27]),出院时抗心律失常药物(RR:0.83,95%CI[0.67-1.04])。然而,它与总消融持续时间(分钟)(MD:12.58,95%CI[6.80-18.37])和总手术持续时间(分钟)(MD:16.77,95%CI[9.63-23.91])相关,在不良事件方面无任何显着差异(RR:1.05,95%CI[0.63-1.74])。
结论:虽然使用逐点射频的PWI+PVI的汇总数据显示,与单独使用PVI相比,在各种房性心律失常的复发中没有益处,使用直接后壁消融的PWI+PVI,尤其是冷冻球囊,显示房颤/房性心律失常的复发显着减少。此外,PWI+PVI显著增加了消融和总手术持续时间。
OBJECTIVE: Posterior left atrial wall isolation (PWI) plus traditional pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been proposed as a promising intervention to decrease atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of adding PWI to the traditional PVI in patients with AF.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved by systematically searching PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Cochrane through June 14, 2023. We used Stata version 17 to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023446227).
RESULTS: We included 11 RCTs with a total number of 1534 patients. Combined
ablation with PWI + PVI was not associated with any significant difference over PVI only regarding the recurrence of clinical AF (RR: 0.86 with 95% CI [0.70-1.06]), all atrial arrhythmia (RR: 0.93 with 95% CI [0.82-1.07]), nonatrial fibrillation arrhythmia (RR: 1.22 with 95% CI [0.97-1.53]), early AF (RR: 0.89 with 95% CI [0.62-1.27]), and antiarrhythmic drugs at discharge (RR: 0.83 with 95% CI [0.67-1.04]). However, it was associated with increased total
ablation duration (minutes) (MD: 12.58 with 95% CI [6.80-18.37]) and total procedure duration (minutes) (MD: 16.77 with 95% CI [9.63-23.91]), without any significant difference regarding adverse events (RR: 1.05 with 95% CI [0.63-1.74]).
CONCLUSIONS: While the pooled data from PWI + PVI using point-by-point radiofrequency did not suggest a benefit in the recurrence of various atrial arrhythmias compared to PVI alone, PWI+PVI using direct posterior wall
ablation, especially with cryoballoon, demonstrated a significant reduction in recurrence of AF/atrial arrhythmias. Also, PWI + PVI significantly increased the
ablation and total procedure durations.