Posttraumatic and postsurgical sensory disturbance is a known complication of almost all zygomaticomaxillary (ZMC) complex fractures involving the infraorbital nerve, for which few treatments are effective. Our study used neurosensory assessments to evaluate the efficacy of melatonin on pain and nerve healing following ZMC surgery. Sixty-four randomly allocated ZMC fracture patients were prophylactically administered either oral melatonin or an identical placebo for 15 consecutive days. Pre- and postsurgical clinical parameters included subjective pain, numbness, and objective neurosensory function. Melatonin significantly reduced subjective pain perception in the early postoperative days, with a significant difference in VAS scores between the groups from postoperative day 3 (p = 0.048) until day 7 (p = 0.002). The VAS assessment of subjective numbness perception showed significantly lower self-perceived neurosensory disturbance for patients in the interventional group from the first month (p = 0.039) until the third month (p = 0.005). Objective neurosensory assessment using the pinprick test and two-point discrimination showed statistically significant improvement to almost normal sensation by the first month (p = 0.014) to fully normal sensation by the third month (p = 0.001). The study findings suggest that the prophylactic administration of melatonin confers significant clinical benefits in terms of reduced postoperative pain and improved sensory recovery.

UNASSIGNED: The ZMC has a prominent shape compared to other parts in the midfacial region, thus small injuries will generate fractures in the ZMC. The management of ZMC fracture depends on the fracture deformity and the surgeon\'s considerations. Various studies have revealed the success of ZMC reconstruction with one fixation point to 4 fixation points fitting to the tetrapod shape.
UNASSIGNED: We report two cases of ZMC fractures which comparing the efficacy of 3- and 2-point internal fixations for improving clinical outcomes The first patient underwent ORIF which placed at 2 fixation points, the first point in the left ZF suture and the second point in the left ZMB. The second patient underwent ORIF reconstruction at 3 fixation points, the first point in the right inferior orbital rim, the second point in the right ZF suture, and the third point in the right ZMB.
UNASSIGNED: The most common surgical approach for ZMC fractures is through a gingivobuccal groin incision. This approach is for body exposure of the ZMB, which is the main buttress. The 3-point internal fixation improved the postoperative clinical outcome of fracture fragment stability compared to two-point fixation, but the mean malar height projection, vertical dystopia, and enophthalmos were not different between the two fixation methods.
UNASSIGNED: Three-point internal fixation can improve the clinical outcome of fracture fragment stability compared to 2-point fixation; however, it has a mean operative duration 22.2 minutes longer than 2-point fixation, so its application must be considered during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Orbital apex syndrome (OAS) is a rare ocular complication following craniomaxillofacial trauma. This traumatic syndrome is a combination of features seen in both superior orbital fissure syndrome and traumatic orbital neuropathy due to nerve impingement. Due in part to the rarity of this disorder, the optimal treatment of traumatic OAS has yet to be determined. We present a case in which traumatic OAS was caused by direct compression due to a displaced fracture segment from the superior orbit. The patient was successfully treated with a combination of emergent decompression and urgent reconstruction suggesting that this may be an effective strategy in OAS resulting from direct nerve compression as a result of craniomaxillofacial fracture.

BACKGROUND: Although some studies addressed the differences between subciliary and transconjunctival approaches, no previous prospective comparative study on displaced zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fracture that repaired by three-point internal fixation using also upper gingivolabial incision and upper eye lid incision. So, the effect of these incisions on the comparison was not investigated.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare transconjunctival and subciliary approaches for open reduction and internal rigid fixation (OR/IF) of ZMC fractures.
METHODS: This prospective study was carried out on 40 patients had displaced ZMC fractures repaired by OR/IF. Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups (20 patients for each); subciliary group subjected to subciliary approach and transconjunctival group subjected to transconjunctival approach for inferior orbital rim repair. In both groups, frontozygomatic and zygomaticomaxillary buttresses were also approached by lateral eye brow and superior gingivolabial incision, respectively. Primary outcome measures include accessibility (need for lateral canthotomy), the exposure duration, postoperative pain, early postoperative edema, and operative complications. Secondary outcome measures include dental occlusion, average intrinsic vertical mouth opening, post subciliary scar assessment, late postoperative complication, and opthalmological assessment concerning ectropion, entropion, scleral show, and eye globe affection (enophthalmos or diplopia).
RESULTS: The mean duration from incisions to fracture exposure was 13.7 ± 2.17 min in subciliary approach and 14.6 ± 2.31 min in transconjunctival approach with nonsignificant difference (p = 0.1284). Lateral canthotomy was required for proper exposure of the fracture and OR/IF using transconjunctival approach while not needed with subciliary approach. Ectropion and scleral show occurred in 10 and 15% respectively in subciliary group and were not encountered in transconjunctival group. Although postoperative periorbital edema was significantly more sever in transconjunctival group within the first postoperative week (p = 0.028), no persistent periorbital edema was reported. Infection, hematoma, and globe complication were not detected in any patient. All authors characterized all scars of the subciliary group as unnoticeable.
CONCLUSIONS: Transconjunctival approach mostly needs lateral canthotomy that was not needed with subciliary approach. Transient postoperative edema is more in transconjunctival approach while postoperative ectropion and sclera show was detected only with subciliary approach. So, building up of experience in transconjunctival approach will be beneficial for maxillofacial surgeons and more measures to avoid ectropion are needed with subciliary approach.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how rates of operative facial fractures may have changed between 1996 and 2006 and to determine the potential impact of such change on otolaryngology residency surgical key indicator cases.
METHODS: Historical cohort study.
METHODS: Academic medical center.
METHODS: The National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) and National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery (NSAS) 1996 and 2006 cases were reviewed, extracting all cases of adult nasal, malar/zygomatic, maxillary, and mandibular fracture reductions in inpatient and outpatient settings, respectively. Procedure rates for each facial fracture were tabulated and compared between 1996 and 2006.
RESULTS: Overall in 1996, there were an estimated 113,041 ± 3740 operative facial fracture repairs performed. Among the 3 key indicator fracture repairs most relevant to otolaryngologists, there were 15,810 ± 2143 open nasal fracture reductions, 9360 ± 1742 open zygomaticomaxillary (ZMC) fracture reductions, and 20,214 ± 2585 open mandibular fracture repairs. Overall in 2006, there were 120,463 ± 7554 total facial fracture procedures, with 11,613 ± 2846 open nasal fracture reductions, 10,216 ± 2881 open ZMC fracture reductions, and 17,965 ± 3171 open mandibular repairs. Comparing cohorts, there was no significant change in number of open nasal, ZMC, or mandibular fracture repairs (P = .24, P = .58, P = .80, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Facial fracture procedure rates have remained largely stable over the past 10 years. These data have implications for otolaryngology training programs and could help guide resident education in facial trauma.