Xiyanping injection

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:抗生素耐药性已成为全球关注的问题。喜炎平注射液(XYP),中药注射剂,在中国已广泛用于化脓性急性扁桃体炎(SAT)的治疗,表现出临床疗效。因此,有必要进一步评估这种治疗的潜在有效性和安全性.这项荟萃分析整合了多项独立研究的数据,以评估XYP作为SAT患者辅助治疗的整体治疗效果。方法:对随机对照试验(RCT)的搜索涵盖了从开始到2024年4月1日的数据库,包括Cochrane图书馆,PubMed,Embase,SinoMed,CNKI,万方,VIP,和CBM。数据提取,方法学质量评估,和荟萃分析由两名研究人员独立进行。ReviewManager5.4用于数据分析。采用了各种工具进行评估,包括森林地块以可视化结果,漏斗图检测出版偏差,试验序贯分析来估计样本量,和等级来评估证据质量。结果:对32例RCTs4265例进行综合分析。与常规治疗(CT;β-内酰胺/盐酸克林霉素注射液/利巴韦林)相比,XYP联合CTs显示症状持续时间显著缩短.这包括喉咙痛(MD=-21.08,95%CI:-24.86至-17.29,p<0.00001),扁桃体红肿消失(平均差[MD]=-20.28,95%置信区间[CI]:-30.05至-10.52,p<0.0001),扁桃体脓性分泌物(MD=-22.40,95%CI:-28.04至-16.75,p<0.00001),和温度正常化(MD=-19.48,95%CI:-22.49至-16.47,p<0.00001)。此外,与单纯接受XYP的患者相比,接受CTs联合XYP的患者的白细胞介素-6(MD=-7.64,95%CI:8.41~-6.87,p<0.00001)和白细胞介素-8(MD=-5.23,95%CI:-5.60~-4.86,p<0.00001)水平较低.此外,联合治疗显着提高了恢复率(相对风险[RR]=1.55,95%CI:1.37至1.77,p<0.00001),白细胞计数恢复率(RR=1.13,95%CI:1.04~1.23,p=0.004),扁桃体红肿消失率(RR=0.51,95%CI:1.14~1.38,p<0.00001),不良事件无显著增加(RR=0.47,95%CI:0.20~1.10,p=0.08)。结论:目前的系统评价和荟萃分析初步表明,与单独的CTs相比,XYP和CTs的组合对SAT患者产生更好的临床结果。具有良好的安全性。尽管如此,这些发现需要通过更严格的RCT进一步证实,鉴于纳入研究中观察到的显著异质性和发表偏倚.系统审查注册:https://www。crd.约克。AC.uk/PROSPERO/display_record。php?RecordID=296118,标识符CRD42022296118。
    Background: Antibiotic resistance has emerged as a global concern. Xiyanping injection (XYP), a traditional Chinese medicine injection, has been extensively utilized for the treatment of suppurative acute tonsillitis (SAT) in China, exhibiting clinical efficacy. Consequently, there is a need for further evaluation of the potential effectiveness and safety of this treatment. This meta-analysis consolidated data from multiple independent studies to assess the overall treatment efficacy of XYP as adjuvant therapy in patients with SAT. Methods: The search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassed databases from their inception to 1 April 2024, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM. Data extraction, methodological quality assessment, and meta-analysis were performed independently by two researchers. Review Manager 5.4 was used for data analysis. Various tools were employed for assessment, including forest plots to visualize results, funnel plots to detect publication bias, trial sequential analysis to estimate sample size, and GRADE to evaluate evidence quality. Results: A comprehensive analysis of 32 RCTs involving 4,265 cases was conducted. When compared to conventional treatments (CTs; β-lactams/clindamycin hydrochloride injection/ribavirin) alone, the combination of XYP with CTs demonstrated significant reductions in symptom duration. This included sore throat (MD = -21.08, 95% CI: -24.86 to -17.29, p < 0.00001), disappearance of tonsillar redness and swelling (mean difference [MD] = -20.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -30.05 to -10.52, p < 0.0001), tonsil purulent discharge (MD = -22.40, 95% CI: -28.04 to -16.75, p < 0.00001), and normalization of temperature (MD = -19.48, 95% CI: -22.49 to -16.47, p < 0.00001). Furthermore, patients receiving CTs combined with XYP exhibited lower levels of interleukin-6 (MD = -7.64, 95% CI: 8.41 to -6.87, p < 0.00001) and interleukin-8 (MD = -5.23, 95% CI: -5.60 to -4.86, p < 0.00001) than those receiving CTs alone. Additionally, the combination therapy significantly improved the recovery rate (relative risk [RR] = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.37 to 1.77, p < 0.00001), white blood cell count recovery rate (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.23, p = 0.004), and disappearance rate of tonsillar redness and swelling (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.38, p < 0.00001), with no significant increase in adverse events (RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.20 to 1.10, p = 0.08). Conclusion: The current systematic review and meta-analysis tentatively suggest that the combination of XYP and CTs yields superior clinical outcomes for patients with SAT compared to CTs alone, with a favorable safety profile. Nonetheless, these findings warrant further confirmation through more rigorous RCTs, given the notable heterogeneity and publication bias observed in the included studies. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=296118, identifier CRD42022296118.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and safety of Xiyanping injection through intramuscular injection for the treatment of acute bronchitis in children.
    METHODS: A prospective study was conducted from December 2021 to October 2022, including 78 children with acute bronchitis from three hospitals using a multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled design. The participants were divided into a test group (conventional treatment plus Xiyanping injection; n=36) and a control group (conventional treatment alone; n=37) in a 1:1 ratio. Xiyanping injection was administered at a dose of 0.3 mL/(kg·d) (total daily dose ≤8 mL), twice daily via intramuscular injection, with a treatment duration of ≤4 days and a follow-up period of 7 days. The treatment efficacy and safety were compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: The total effective rate on the 3rd day after treatment in the test group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the total effective rate on the 5th day between the two groups (P>0.05). The rates of fever relief, cough relief, and lung rale relief in the test group on the 3rd day after treatment were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The cough relief rate on the 5th day after treatment in the test group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the fever relief rate and lung rale relief rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The cough relief time, daily cough relief time, and nocturnal cough relief time in the test group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05), while there were no significant differences in the fever duration and lung rale relief time between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups (P>0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The overall efficacy of combined routine treatment with intramuscular injection of Xiyanping injection in the treatment of acute bronchitis in children is superior to that of routine treatment alone, without an increase in the incidence of adverse reactions.
    目的: 观察喜炎平注射液肌内注射治疗小儿急性支气管炎的疗效和安全性。方法: 采用多中心、随机、平行对照方法,前瞻性纳入2021年12月—2022年10月在3家医院的78例急性支气管炎患儿。按1∶1比例分为试验组(常规治疗加喜炎平注射液;n=36)和对照组(单用常规治疗;n=37)。喜炎平注射液采用0.3 mL/(kg·d)(日剂量≤8 mL),2次/d肌内注射,疗程≤4 d,观察7 d。比较两组患儿的治疗疗效和安全性。结果: 试验组治疗后第3天总有效率显著高于对照组(P<0.05),两组治疗后第5天总有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组治疗后第3天发热缓解率、咳嗽缓解率、肺啰音缓解率高于对照组(均P<0.05);试验组治疗后第5天咳嗽缓解率高于对照组(P<0.05),两组发热缓解率、肺啰音缓解率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组咳嗽缓解时间、日咳嗽缓解时间、夜咳嗽缓解时间均显著短于对照组(P<0.05);两组热程和肺部啰音缓解时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患儿不良事件发生率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论: 常规治疗联用喜炎平注射液肌内注射治疗小儿急性支气管炎比单独常规治疗的总体疗效更佳,且未增加不良反应的发生。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:年龄和联合用药是喜炎平注射液(XYP)相关不良事件(AE)严重程度的危险因素。
    目的:使用可变重要性预测(VIP)方法分析导致XYP不良事件严重程度的危险因素。
    方法:从中国国家药品不良反应监测信息系统(2004-2017)中提取与使用XYP相关的不良事件,并分类为一般或严重。对年龄和12种草药组合的数据进行了分析,包括利巴韦林(RB),头孢曲松,青霉素钠,盐酸氨溴索(AH),克林霉素,头孢西丁钠,阿奇霉素(AZM),头孢他啶,阿莫西林钠/克拉维酸钾,盐酸左氧氟沙星,五水头孢唑林钠,根据VIP评分和相关系数(Coeff)和阿昔洛韦。
    结果:共纳入了与XYP组合相关的21,714个不良事件(一般为20,660个;严重的1054个)。单独使用XYP倾向于产生一般AE(所有VIP=3.124;1.329;1.857;2.169;2.400,Coeff<0)。对于所有设置,0-6岁患者倾向于发生一般性不良事件(VIP=2.425,Coeff<0),而那些>41岁的患者往往有严重的AE(VIP=1.180;2.323,Coeff>0)。对于0-40岁的患者,XYP-RB组合对AEs的严重程度有较大影响(VIP=1.158;1.360;1.147,Coeff>0)。对于7-17岁的患者,XYP-AZM组合倾向于产生一般AE(VIP=1.502,Coeff<0)。在65岁以上的人中,XYP-AH组合倾向于导致严重的AE(VIP=1.232,Coeff>0)。
    结论:VIP方法有望有效分析影响不良事件严重程度的危险因素,更有效地控制不良事件。年龄是导致AE严重程度的关键因素,有不同的影响方向。建议临床医生密切关注不同年龄组的代谢特点。单独使用XYP是安全的,严格执行药物间隔和冲洗等标准化操作将避免不期望的AE。
    BACKGROUND: Age and herb-drug combination are risk factors for the severity of Xiyanping injection (XYP) associated adverse events (AEs).
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze risk factors contributing to the severity of XYP\'s AEs using a variable importance for projection (VIP) method.
    METHODS: AEs related to the use of XYP were extracted from the China National Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Information System (2004-2017) and classified as general or severe. Data were analyzed with respect to age and 12 herb-drug combinations, including ribavirin (RB), ceftriaxone, penicillin sodium, ambroxol hydrochloride (AH), clindamycin, cefoxitin sodium, azithromycin (AZM), ceftazidime, amoxicillin sodium/potassium clavulanate, levofloxacin hydrochloride, sodium cefazolin pentahydrate, and acyclovir according to VIP scores and correlation coefficient (Coeff).
    RESULTS: A total of 21,714 AEs (general 20,660; severe 1054) related to XYP combinations were included. Using XYP alone tended to produce general AEs (All VIP = 3.124; 1.329; 1.857; 2.169; 2.400, Coeff < 0). For all set, 0-6 years old patients tend to have general AEs (VIP = 2.425, Coeff < 0), while those > 41 years old patients tend to have severe AEs (VIP = 1.180; 2.323, Coeff > 0). For 0-40 years old patients, XYP-RB combination had a greater impact on the severity of AEs (VIP = 1.158; 1.360; 1.147, Coeff > 0). For 7-17 years old patients, XYP-AZM combination tended to produce general AEs (VIP = 1.502, Coeff < 0). In individuals > 65 years old, XYP-AH combination tended to result in severe AEs (VIP = 1.232, Coeff > 0).
    CONCLUSIONS: VIP method was expected to effectively analyze risk factors in affecting the severity of AEs and control AEs more effectively. Age is the key factor contributing to the severity of AEs, and there are different influence directions. It is recommended that clinicians pay closer attention to the metabolic characteristics of different age groups. It is safe to use XYP alone and strictly implementing standardized operations such as medication interval and flushing will avoid undesired AEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    病毒性肺炎(VP)正在成为一种持续且普遍的疾病负担。中药注射剂(TCMI)已被证明可有效治疗VP患者,现在在中国广泛使用。VP的TCMI证据正在迅速发展。本研究旨在评估TCMI的疗效和安全性,为VP的治疗选择提供更多的证据和视野。
    从成立到2022年3月16日,共搜索了七个数据库。仅包括随机对照试验(RCT),以比较抗病毒TCMIs治疗病毒性肺炎的疗效和安全性。临床疗效和不良事件发生率被认为是主要结果。
    共有76个RCTs和8个TCMI,包括7925名患者纳入NMA。根据NMA,热毒宁注射液联合常规抗病毒药物(CAD)在有效结局方面产生了优异的效果,并降低了VP的不良事件发生率。
    这项研究表明,TCMIs联合CAD比CAD单药治疗更有效和更安全,并比较了不同的TCMIs治疗,为临床治疗药物的选择提供指导和参考。
    Viral pneumonia (VP) is becoming a persistent and pervasive burden of disease. Traditional Chinese medicine Injections (TCMIs) have been proved effective in the treatment of patients with VP, which are now widely used in China. The evidence of TCMIs for VP is evolving rapidly. This study aims to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of TCMIs to provide more evidence and sights for the treatment selection of VP.
    Seven databases were searched from their inception up to 16 March 2022. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are included to compare the efficacy and safety of antiviral TCMIs for the treatment of viral pneumonia. Clinical efficacy and rate of adverse events were considered as primary outcomes.
    A total of 76 RCTs with eight TCMIs comprising 7925 patients were included in the NMA. According to NMA, Reduning Injection combined with conventional antiviral drugs (CAD) produced superior effects in the effective outcomes and reduced the adverse event incidence rate of VP.
    This study indicated that TCMIs combined with CAD was more effective and safer than CAD monotherapy and compared different TCMIs therapies, which provided guidance and reference for the selection of clinical treatment medication.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:牛皮癣代表慢性,复发性和炎症性疾病。中药喜炎平注射液(XYP)在中国被广泛用于治疗各种炎症性疾病,比如支气管炎,病毒性肺炎或上呼吸道感染。XYP可能为寻常型银屑病(PV)提供潜在的治疗方法。本研究重点分析XYP联合阿维A是否有效和安全。方法:本荟萃分析是根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)的首选报告项目指南进行的。该系统评价在PROSPERO(CRD4202233273)中注册。此外,从开始至2022年5月,我们从多个数据库中检索了相关的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验比较了XYP+阿维A与单独阿维A治疗PV的疗效.此外,这项工作利用RevMan5.4进行风险评估和荟萃分析.结果:这项荟萃分析共选择了10个RCT,包括815名受试者。经过质量评估,RCT主要风险较低或不明确.根据我们的荟萃分析结果,相对于阿维A单药治疗,XYP加阿维A提高临床总有效率,由银屑病面积和严重程度指数评分(PASI)-20,PV患者的PASI-30和PASI-60证明[风险比(RR)=1.23Z=4.87,p<0.00001,95%置信区间(CI):1.13-1.34;RR=1.29,Z=3.89,p=0.009,95%CI:1.07至1.55;并且RR=1.31%,=1.89-MCP-1和RANTES,阿曲汀引起的副作用缓解,如瘙痒(RR=0.54,95%CI:0.4至0.74,Z=3.94,p<0.0001),转氨酶水平升高和血脂异常(RR=0.5,95CI=0.29,0.86,p=0.01;RR=0.41,95%CI=0.23,0.75,p=0.004)。结论:正如本荟萃分析所建议的那样,XYP与阿维A联合有效且安全地治疗PV。系统审查注册:https://www。crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?ID=CRD4202233273,标识符PROSPERO2022CRD4202233273。
    Background: Psoriasis represents the chronic, recurrent and inflammatory disorder. The Traditional Chinese Medicine Xiyanping injection (XYP) is extensively applied in China for treating diverse inflammatory disorders, such as bronchitis, viral pneumonia or upper respiratory tract infection. XYP may offer a potential treatment for psoriasis vulgaris (PV). This study focused on analyzing whether XYP combined with acitretin was effective and safe. Methods: The present meta-analysis was carried out in line with guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022333273). Besides, relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared XYP plus acitretin with acitretin alone for treating PV were searched from several databases from their inception till May 2022. In addition, this work utilized RevMan5.4 to conduct risk assessment as well as meta-analysis. Results: This meta-analysis selected altogether 10 RCTs including 815 subjects. Upon quality assessment, the RCTs mainly had low or unclear risk. According to our meta-analysis results, relative to acitretin monotherapy, XYP plus acitretin increased the total clinical effective rate, as evidenced by Psoriasis area and severity index score (PASI)-20, PASI-30 and PASI-60 in patients with PV [risk ratio (RR) = 1.23 Z = 4.87, p < 0.00001, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.34; RR = 1.29, Z = 3.89, p = 0.009, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.55; and RR = 1.31, Z = 3.89, p = 0.0001, 95% CI: 1.14-1.49]; the reduced levels of TNF-α, MCP-1 and RANTES, the alleviated side effects resulting from acitretin like itchiness (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.4 to 0.74, Z = 3.94, p < 0.0001), and the increased levels of aminotransferases and dyslipidemia (RR = 0.5, 95%CI = 0.29, 0.86, p = 0.01; and RR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.23, 0.75, p = 0.004). Conclusion: As suggested in the present meta-analysis, XYP combined with acitretin effectively and safely treats PV. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022333273, identifier PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022333273.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肺炎克雷伯菌被认为是最主要的机会性人类病原体之一。尽管抗生素如一线药物阿奇霉素(AZM)通常可有效治疗肺炎克雷伯菌相关感染,越来越多的抗生素耐药性威胁已成为一个重大挑战。已经开发了基于中药(TCM)临床经验的各种制剂,以帮助应对这种全球公共卫生威胁,包括由天然产物穿心莲内酯制成的喜炎平注射液(XYP),具有有效的清热和解毒功能。
    目的:本研究旨在证明其治疗潜力,以及AZM联合XYP对大鼠肺炎克雷伯菌感染的作用机制。
    方法:建立肺炎克雷伯菌感染大鼠肺炎模型,并进行多种治疗。评估肺组织病理学病变。ELISA和Griess技术用于确定关键细胞因子的水平。Westernblot分析MAPKs和NF-κB通路的蛋白表达。
    结果:该组合在体内能显著抑制肺炎克雷伯菌在肺部的增殖,改善肺组织病理改变,降低肺匀浆和支气管肺泡灌洗液中的炎症因子,主要通过灭活MAPKs和NF-κB信号通路。多次给药后,联合治疗导致大鼠AZM表观分布体积增加1倍,随着肺中AZM水平的显着增加,而肝脏中AZM水平明显下降。
    结论:AZM和XYP的联合治疗显示抗菌和抗炎特性增加,表明它可能用于治疗肺炎克雷伯菌感染。
    BACKGROUND: Klebsiella pneumoniae is known as one of the most principal opportunistic human pathogens. Although antibiotics such as the first-line agent azithromycin (AZM) usually are efficient for the treatment of K. pneumonia-related infections, growing threat from antibiotic resistance has become a major challenge. Various preparations based on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) clinical experience have been developed to help combat such a global public health threat, including Xiyanping injection (XYP) that is made from the natural product andrographolide with potent heat-clearing and toxin-resolving functions.
    OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to demonstrate the therapeutic potential, as well as the action of mechanism of AZM in combination with XYP against K. pneumonia infection in rats.
    METHODS: Pneumonia model of K. pneumoniae infection in rats was established and subjected to various treatments. The lung histopathological lesions were evaluated. ELISA and Griess techniques were used to determine the level of crucial cytokines. The protein expressions of MAPKs and NF-κB pathways were analyzed by Western blotting.
    RESULTS: The combination in vivo could significantly inhibit the proliferation of K. pneumoniae in lung, improve the pathological changes of lung and reduce inflammatory factors in lung homogenate and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, mainly by inactivating MAPKs and NF-κB signaling pathways. Combination therapy caused one-fold increase in apparent distribution volume of AZM in rats after multiple dosing, along with a significant increase of AZM level in lungs but obvious decrease in livers.
    CONCLUSIONS: The combination therapy of AZM and XYP showed increased antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties, indicating that it might be used to treat K. pneumoniae infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:喜炎平注射液(XYP),一种中药,被广泛使用,并经常与其他药物联合应用于治疗支气管炎,扁桃体炎,和中国的细菌性痢疾。近年来,在XYP之后观察到过敏反应的风险升高,但合并用药是否会导致这种风险尚不清楚.目的:本研究旨在调查中国接受XYP的患者同时使用XYP和25种最常见的共同使用药物与可疑过敏反应之间的关系。方法:采用2015年中国城镇职工基本医疗保险和城镇居民基本医疗保险数据库的抽样数据进行巢式病例对照研究。使用四种抗过敏标记药物来评估可疑的过敏反应。进行单变量分析和多变量条件逻辑回归,结果报告为比值比(ORs),95%置信区间(CI).通过包括与XYP在同一天用抗过敏标记药物处方的那些对扩大的样品进行敏感性分析,然后在第二天停止XYP。结果:在57,612名XYP处方参与者中,我们获得了949个匹配的病例对照对.多变量条件logistic回归显示,包括庆大霉素在内的7种合并用药[OR=4.29;95%CI(2.52,7.30)],头孢哌酮-舒巴坦[OR=4.26;95%CI(1.40,13.01)],利多卡因[OR=2.76;95%CI(1.79,4.25)],氨茶碱[OR=1.73;95%CI(1.05,2.85)],利巴韦林[OR=1.54;95%CI(1.13,2.10)],氯化钾[OR=1.45;95%CI(1.10,1.91)],和维生素C[OR=1.32;95%CI(1.03,1.70)]与风险增加相关,而头孢硫脒[OR=0.29;95%CI(0.16,0.51)]与风险降低相关.对2,438对配对的敏感性分析显示出类似的发现。结论:发现XYP与七种药物同时使用会增加可疑过敏反应的风险。我们的数据表明庆大霉素,头孢哌酮-舒巴坦,利多卡因,和利巴韦林应与预防措施一起应用于接受XYP的患者,和药物相互作用和过敏机制的进一步研究是必要的。
    Introduction: Xiyanping injection (XYP), a type of Traditional Chinese Medicine, is widely used and often applied in combination with other medications in treating bronchitis, tonsillitis, and bacillary dysentery in China. In recent years, an elevated risk of allergic reactions has been observed following XYP, but whether concomitant medication use contributes to this risk is still unknown. Objective: This study aims to investigate the association between the concomitant use of XYP and the 25 most frequently co-applied medications with suspected allergic reactions for China\'s patients receiving XYP. Methods: A nested case-control study was conducted using the sampling data from 2015 China\'s Urban Employees Basic Medical Insurance and Urban Residents Basic Medical Insurance database. Four anti-allergic marker drugs were used to evaluate suspected allergic reactions. Univariate analyses and multivariable conditional logistic regression were conducted, and results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Sensitivity analyses were performed on the expanded sample by including those prescribed with anti-allergic marker drugs on the same day as XYP and then stopped XYP on the next day. Results: Out of 57,612 participants with XYP prescription, we obtained 949 matched case-control pairs. Multivariable conditional logistic regression revealed that seven concomitant medications including gentamicin [OR = 4.29; 95% CI (2.52, 7.30)], cefoperazone-sulbactam [OR = 4.26; 95% CI (1.40, 13.01)], lidocaine [OR = 2.76; 95% CI (1.79, 4.25)], aminophylline [OR = 1.73; 95% CI (1.05, 2.85)], ribavirin [OR = 1.54; 95% CI (1.13, 2.10)], potassium chloride [OR = 1.45; 95% CI (1.10, 1.91)], and vitamin C [OR = 1.32; 95% CI (1.03, 1.70)] were associated with increased risk, while cefathiamidine [OR = 0.29; 95% CI (0.16, 0.51)] was associated with reduced risk. Sensitivity analysis on 2,438 matched pairs revealed similar findings. Conclusion: Increased risks for suspected allergic reactions were found for the concomitant use of XYP with seven medications. Our data suggest that gentamicin, cefoperazone-sulbactam, lidocaine, and ribavirin should be applied with precautions for patients receiving XYP, and further studies on drug interactions and allergy mechanisms are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The global epidemic outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which exhibits high infectivity, resulted in thousands of deaths due to the lack of specific drugs. Certain traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs), such as Xiyanping injection (XYPI), have exhibited remarkable benefits against COVID-19. Although TCM combined with Western medicine is considered an effective approach for the treatment of COVID-19, the combination may result in potential herb-drug interactions in the clinical setting. The present study aims to verify the effect of XYPI on the oral pharmacokinetics of lopinavir (LPV)/ritonavir (RTV) using an in vivo rat model and in vitro incubation model of human liver microsomes. After being pretreated with an intravenous dose of XYPI (52.5 mg/kg) for one day and for seven consecutive days, the rats received an oral dose of LPV/RTV (42:10.5 mg/kg). Except for the t1/2 of LPV is significantly prolonged from 4.66 to 7.18 h (p < 0.05) after seven consecutive days pretreatment, the pretreatment resulted in only a slight change in the other pharmacokinetic parameters of LPV. However, the pharmacokinetic parameters of RTV were significantly changed after pretreatment with XYPI, particularly in treatment for seven consecutive days, the AUC0-∞ of RTV was significantly shifted from 0.69 to 2.72 h μg/mL (p < 0.05) and the CL exhibited a tendency to decrease from 2.71 L/h to 0.94 L/h (p < 0.05), and the t1/2 of RTV prolonged from 3.70 to 5.51 h (p < 0.05), in comparison with the corresponding parameters in untreated rats. After administration of XYPI, the expression of Cyp3a1 protein was no significant changed in rats. The in vitro incubation study showed XYPI noncompetitively inhibited human CYP3A4 with an apparent Ki value of 0.54 mg/ml in a time-dependent manner. Our study demonstrated that XYPI affects the pharmacokinetics of LPV/RTV by inhibiting CYP3A4 activity. On the basis of this data, patients and clinicians can take precautions to avoid potential drug-interaction risks in COVID-19 treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    To analyze the clinincal application characteristics of Xiyanping Injection in real world. The data of the patients came from the hospital information systerm(HIS) of 29 tertiary hospitals in China from 2006 to 2016. It included three parts about basic information, Western medicine diagnosis information, and doctor advice information. The exploration was conducted for the characteristics of the patients and disease distribution as well as the therapeutic regimen. Apriori algorithm was adopted to establish the models, and Clementing 12.0 was used for a correlation analysis of the comprehensive therapeutic regimen of Xiyanping Injection. There were 194 873 cases in the study. The male to female ratio was 1.44∶1. The median age was 4 years old. The median daily dosage was 200 mg. 46.68% of the patients were administered with 250-500 mg, and 33.07% were 50-100 mg one day. 47.08% of the patients were administered for 4-7 d, and 32.65% of the patients were 1-3 d. In the doctor advice information, the most frequently types of Western medicine, traditional Chinese medicine were mucilagin, heat-clearing agent. Second generation cephalosporins, third generation cephalosporins, compound penicillin were the most common types of antibiotic. Interferon, nucleoside and nucleotide, human immunoglobulin were the most common types of antiviral drug. The mining association rules results were analyzed, finding the application of Xiyanping Injection in severe infectious diseases. To improve respiratory symptoms, Xiyanping Injection treaments were Budesonide + Ipratropium Bromide + Ambroxol. To severe pulmonary infection, the treaments were Dopamine + Ambroxine. To severe hand, foot and mouth disease, the treatments were Namefen + Mannitol. To pulmonary heart failure, the treatments were Dobutamine + Heparin. Based on the results of the real world HIS, we could provide clinical application the idea, and a reference for further excavation of the applicable diseases of Xiyanping Injection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Xiyanping Injection is widely used in the treatment of respiratory infectious diseases. However,its package insert is still less instructive for physicians in understanding the specific clinical application of Xiyanping Injection. To discover potential clinical advantages of Xiyanping Injection,the team invited clinical experts of traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine from the field of respiratory diseases,pharmacists and methodologists of evidence-based medicine to compile the consensus. The consensus was based on a combination of clinical research evidence and expert experience,involving recommendations for clinical problems supported by clini-cal evidence as well as consensus suggestions for clinical problems with no clinical evidence. The consensus recommended the indication,timing of intervention,usage,dosage,course of treatment,combined medication of Xiyanping Injection used for adults,and introduced the safety and precautions of its clinical application. It is suitable for guiding clinical medical workers to rationally use Xiyanping Injection in the treatment of adult's respiratory infectious diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号