Severe thoracic trauma can occur as a penetrating or blunt mono-injury or as part of a polytrauma. Almost half of all severely injured patients documented in the TraumaRegister DGU were diagnosed with severe chest trauma, defined according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) as ≥ 3. In our own collective, the proportion was even higher with 60%. Emergency surgical treatment with a thoracotomy within the Trauma Resuscitation Unit or within the first hour of admission is an extremely rare intervention in Germany, accounting for 0.9% of severe thoracic injuries. The management of complex polytraumas and extensive pathophysiological reactions to the trauma, as well as knowledge about the development of secondary damage have led to the conclusion that minimally invasive procedures such as video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) or inserting a chest drain can resolve most severe thoracic injuries. At < 4%, penetrating injuries to the thorax are a rarity. Among blunt thoracic injuries, > 6% show an unstable thoracic wall that requires surgical reconstruction. The demographic development in Germany leads to a shift in injury pattern. Low-energy trauma results have lower incidence than higher-grade chest wall injuries with penetrating rib fractures in the pleura, lungs, peri-/myocardium and diaphragm. Sometimes this results in instability of the chest wall with severe restriction of respiratory mechanics, which leads to fulminant pneumonia and even ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome). With this background, surgical chest wall reconstruction has become increasingly important over the past decade. Together with the underlying strong evidence, the assessment of the extend and severity of the trauma and the degree of respiratory impairment are the basis for a structured decision on a non-surgical or surgical-reconstructive strategy, as well as the timing, type and extent of surgery. Early surgery within 72 hours can reduce morbidity (pneumonia rate, duration of intensive care and ventilation) and mortality. In the following article, evidence-based algorithms for surgical and non-operative strategies are discussed in the context on the management of severe thoracic injuries. Thus, a selective literature search was carried out for the leading publications on indications, treatment strategy and therapy recommendations for severe thoracic injury, chest wall reconstruction.
Das schwere Thoraxtrauma kann einerseits als penetrierende oder stumpfe Monoverletzung oder im Rahmen einer Polytraumatisierung auftreten. Bei der Hälfte der im TraumaRegister DGU dokumentierten Schwerverletzten ist ein schweres Thoraxtrauma, definiert nach Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) mit ≥ 3, diagnostiziert worden. Im eigenen Kollektiv betrug der Anteil 60%. Die Notfallthorakotomie im Schockraum oder innerhalb der 1. Stunde nach Aufnahme ist in Deutschland mit 0,9% der schweren Thoraxverletzungen eine äußerst seltene Intervention. Das differenzierte Management von komplexen Polytraumata und umfangreichen pathophysiologischen Reaktionen auf die Traumatisierung haben ebenso wie das Wissen über die Entstehung von Sekundärschaden dazu geführt, dass durch minimalinvasive Verfahren wie videoassistierte Thorakoskopien (VATS) oder das Einlegen einer Thoraxdrainage der Großteil der schweren Thoraxverletzungen erfolgreich therapiert werden kann. Dabei sind penetrierende Verletzungen des Thorax mit < 4% eine Seltenheit. Mit steigender Tendenz weisen unter den stumpfen Thoraxverletzungen > 6% eine instabile Thoraxwand auf, die einer operativen Rekonstruktion bedarf. Die demografische Entwicklung in Deutschland führt dazu, dass zunehmend auch Niedrigenergietraumata zu höhergradigen Thoraxwandverletzungen mit penetrierenden Rippenfrakturen in Pleura, Lunge, Peri- bzw. Myokard und Zwerchfell führen. Eine Thoraxwandinstabilität mit hochgradiger Einschränkung der Atemmechanik kann zu fulminanten Pneumonien bis hin zum ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome) führen. In der vergangenen Dekade hat vor diesem Hintergrund die operative Thoraxwandrekonstruktion stark an Bedeutung gewonnen. Auf der Grundlage der überzeugenden Evidenz ist die klinische Beurteilung des Umfangs und der Schwere des Traumas und der Grad der atemmechanischen Einschränkung die Basis für eine strukturierte Entscheidung über eine nicht operative oder operativ-rekonstruktive Strategie sowie den OP-Zeitpunkt, die OP-Art und den OP-Umfang. Durch die frühzeitige OP innerhalb von 72 h können Morbidität (Pneumonierate, Intensivliegedauer und Beatmungsdauer) sowie Letalität verringert werden. In dem folgenden Artikel werden evidenzbasierte Algorithmen zur operativen und nicht operativen Versorgungsstrategie von schweren Thoraxverletzungen diskutiert. Dazu wurden in einer selektiven Literaturrecherche die wegweisenden Veröffentlichungen zu Indikationsstellung, Versorgungsstrategie und Therapieempfehlungen der schweren Thoraxverletzung sowie Thoraxwandrekonstruktion eingeschlossen.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: This study aims to discuss the characteristics, origins, degree of injury, results, reporting, and forensic medical aspects of penetrating abdominal injuries.
METHODS: In this study, 28,619 cases who applied to the emergency department of Kutahya Health Sciences University Evliya Celebi Training and Research Hospital between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020 were reviewed. The forensic reports and medical documents of 85 cases with penetrating abdominal injuries were evaluated retrospectively, with the approval of the ethics committee.
RESULTS: Among the patients included in the study, 87.1% were male and 12.9% were female. The mean age was found to be 31±13 years. When the origins of the cases were analyzed, 87.1% were found to have developed as a result of intentional injury. The incidents predominantly occurred between 20: 00 and 04: 00 hours. As a result of the examinations performed at the hospital after the incident, alcohol was detected in 36.5% of the cases, while 30.6% of the individuals did not consume alcohol. It was observed that 32.9% of the cases were not tested for alcohol. The most common injuries identified were sharp injuries, accounting for 69.4% of cases, and firearm injuries, comprising 27.1%. Organ damage was noted in 68.2% of the cases, with the small intestine being the most frequently damaged organ. The average number of wounds present was 3.6. Intra-abdominal hemorrhage was detected in 61.2% of the cases, and intra-abdominal artery injuries were found in 8.2%. The mortality rate for penetrating abdominal injuries was 8.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: In forensic traumatology, penetrating abdominal injuries commonly lead to life-threatening conditions and loss of organ function, which represent the most severe category in trauma severity assessment. Penetrating abdominal injuries most often result from violent incidents, as observed in our study and in the literature.

BACKGROUND: A significant number of referrals to the emergency departments is due to violence and conflict leading to serious injuries and death. The increasing number of such cases highlights the urgent need for investigating victimization of physical violence.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of demographic and clinical characteristics in victims of violence and classify them based on penetrating or blunt trauma.
METHODS: The data of the patients who had been the victims of violence in 2020 were extracted from the Trauma Registry System(TRS) of the Guilan Road Trauma Research Center(GTRC). All analyses were performed using SPSS software version 24. The significance level was considered less than 0.05.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the type of violence-related trauma in different age groups (P < 0.001), based on sex (P = 0.002), and marital status (P = 0.012). A significant difference also existed between the trauma type and clinical variables including smoking (P = 0.032), history of alcohol drinking (P = 0.005), and other substance use (P = 0.002), the anatomical location of injury (P < 0.001) and therapeutic interventions (p < 0.001(.
CONCLUSIONS: Most of the clients of the violence suffered from blunt trauma, the severity of which was mild, and they were treated supportively without the need for surgery. Blunt trauma was seen more in women, divorcees, over 40 years and non-smokers. Penetrating trauma was observed more in lower limb injuries and alcohol and amphetamine users. Prevention programs and educational interventions should be programmed for the society long before men alcohol and amphetamine abusers reach their fourth decade of life. Accurately recording the type of physical violence, and the weapon used, and determining the injury severity score in TRS can lead to more reliable results in researching the field of violence issues.

Trauma is a serious public health problem, and abdominal injuries are among the leading causes of hospitalization after trauma. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the outcome of abdominal trauma and its predictors in patients who underwent laparotomy at Asella Referral and Teaching Hospital (ARTH), South Central Ethiopia. We conducted a retrospective institutional based cross-sectional study of patients who underwent laparotomy for abdominal trauma at ARTH from October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2020. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to determine associations between independent factors and mortality due to abdominal trauma, and a P value of <0.05 indicated statistical significance. Out of 139 patients, 110 (79.1%) were males and 88 (63.3%) aged <30 years old, with a mean age of 29 ± 15.73 years. The most common mechanism of injury was penetrating trauma, which accounted for 94 (67.6%) patients. The mortality rate was 21 (15.1%). Factors such as blunt mechanism of injury (95% CI: AOR: 3.36, 1.24-9.09), SBP < 90 mmHg at presentation (95% CI: AOR = 9.37, 3.28-26.80), time >6 hours from trauma to admission (95% CI: AOR: 5.44, 1.78-16.63), unstable intraoperative patient condition (95% CI: AOR = 8.82, 3.05-25.52), and patients who need blood transfusion (95% CI: AOR: 6.63, 1.92-22.91) were significantly associated with mortality. The mortality rate of abdominal trauma patients who underwent laparotomy was high. Therefore, healthcare providers should provide priority for traumatic patients as prolonged waiting time to get healthcare results in poor outcomes for the patients.

UNASSIGNED: Ballistic embolism (BE) is a rare complication of firearm injuries notoriously associated with a vexing clinical picture in the trauma bay. Unless considered early, the associated confusion can lead to needless delay in the management of the patient with a gunshot wound. Despite this known entity, there is a relative paucity of high-grade evidence regarding complications, management, and follow-up in these patients.
UNASSIGNED: An electronic database literature search was conducted to identify cases of acute intravascular BE in pediatric and adult civilians occurring during index hospitalization, filtered to publications during the past 10 years. Exclusion criteria included non-vascular embolization, injuries occurring in the military setting, and delayed migration defined as occurring after discharge from the index hospitalization.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 136 cases were analyzed. Nearly all cases of BE occurred within 48 hours of presentation. Compared with venous emboli, arterial emboli were significantly more likely to be symptomatic (71% vs. 7%, p<0.001), and 43% of patients developed symptoms attributable to BE in the trauma bay. In addition, arterial emboli were significantly less likely to be managed non-invasively (19% vs. 49%, p<0.001). Open retrieval was significantly more likely to be successful compared with endovascular attempts (91% vs. 29%, p<0.001). Patients with arterial emboli were more likely to receive follow-up (52% vs. 39%) and any attempt at retrieval during the hospitalization was significantly associated with outpatient follow-up (p=0.034). All but one patient remained stable or had clinically improved symptoms after discharge.
UNASSIGNED: Consideration for BE is reasonable in any patient with new or persistent unexplained signs or symptoms, especially during the first 48 hours after a penetrating firearm injury. Although venous BE can often be safely observed, arterial BE generally necessitates urgent retrieval. Patients who are managed non-invasively may benefit from follow-up in the first year after injury.

BACKGROUND: Penetrating thoracic injuries have a significant risk of morbi-mortality. Despite the advancements in damage control methods, a subset of patients with severe pulmonary vascular lesions and bronchial injuries persists. In some of these cases, post-traumatic pneumonectomy is required, and perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support may be required due to right ventricular failure and respiratory failure.
METHODS: A male was brought to the emergency department (ED) with a penetrating thoracic injury, presenting with massive right hemothorax and active bleeding that required ligation of the right pulmonary hilum to control the bleeding. Subsequently, he developed right ventricular dysfunction and ARDS, necessitating a dynamic hybrid ECMO configuration to support his condition and facilitate recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: Penetrating thoracic injuries with severe pulmonary vascular lesions may need pneumonectomy to control bleeding. ECMO support reduces the associated mortality by decreasing the complications rate. A multidisciplinary team is essential to achieve good outcomes in severe compromised patients.

BACKGROUND: Subclavian artery (SCA) injuries, though rare, carry significant morbidity and mortality risks due to significant blood loss causing hypovolemic shock. Early diagnosis and adequate treatment are crucial to minimize bleeding and associated morbidity. Recent advances in endovascular techniques offer faster and more accurate treatment options compared to traditional open surgical repair. This study demonstrates the efficacy of endovascular treatment in 2 cases of SCA injury and reviews its indications, limitations, and precautions.
METHODS: A 69-year-old man presented with a penetrating SCA injury from a steel bar, and a 38-year-old woman presented with a blunt SCA injury caused by a fall. Both patients were hemodynamically unstable upon presentation.
METHODS: Both patients were diagnosed with SCA injuries. The man had a penetrating injury, while the woman had a blunt injury, both resulting in hemodynamic instability and significant risk of hypovolemic shock.
METHODS: Endovascular techniques, including the use of covered stent grafts, were employed to manage the injuries. These techniques allowed for rapid and efficient treatment, reducing the need for open surgical intervention.
RESULTS: Both patients were successfully treated using endovascular methods and were discharged without any complications. The endovascular approach minimized blood loss, transfusion needs, and hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of endovascular techniques in rapidly diagnosing, bridging, and definitively treating SCA injuries, suggesting their use as a first-line therapy.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter study examines the contemporary management of penetrating carotid artery injury (PCAI) to identify trends in management, outcomes, and to determine prognostic factors for stroke and death.
METHODS: Data from three large urban trauma centers in South Africa were retrospectively reviewed for patients who presented with PCAI from 2012 to 2020.
RESULTS: Of 149 identified patients, 137 actively managed patients were included. Twenty-four patients (17.9%) presented in coma and 12 (9.0%) with localizing signs (LS). CT angiography was performed on admission for 120 (87.6%) patients. Thirty patients (21.9%) underwent nonoperative management, 87 (63.5%) open surgery, and 20 (14.6%) endovascular stenting. Eighteen patients (13.1%) died, and 15 (12.6%) surviving patients had strokes. Ligation was significantly related to death and reperfusion to survival. A mechanism of gunshot wound, occlusive injuries, a threatened airway, a systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, hard signs of vascular injury, a low GCS, coma, a CT brain demonstrating infarct, a high injury severity score and shock index, a low pH or HCO3, and an elevated lactate were significant independent prognostic factors for death. Ligation was unsurvivable in all patients with severe neurological deficits, whereas reperfusion procedures resulted in survival in 63% (12/19) patients with coma and 78% (7/9) with LS although with high stroke rates (coma: 25.0%, LS: 85.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes in PCAI, including patients with severe neurological deficit and stroke, are better when reperfused. Reperfusion holds the best promise of survival and ligation should be reserved for technically inaccessible bleeding injuries.

The case presents a traumatic ventricular perforation of a girl, accidentally felt on a sharp instrument. The uniqueness of the case presented is due to the very high infrequency of injuries with this type of sharp object. The 7-year-old girl was transported to the hospital after accidentally falling on a sharp instrument. The child had no signs of heart failure. On opening the chest, it was found that the metal object was lodged in the right ventricle. Quickly proceeded to remove the object and suture the entry hole. After a short hospitalization, the child was discharged completely cured.