Wounds, Nonpenetrating

伤口, 非穿透性
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:晚期血胸是钝性胸部创伤的一种罕见并发症。创伤事件与血胸发展之间的最长报告时间间隔为44天。
    方法:一名因胸部创伤导致右侧肋骨骨折的老年患者,最初用闭合性胸廓造口术管理,初次治疗后60天出现延迟血胸,由于患者的虚弱状况和相关并发症,需要保守治疗,然后进行手术干预。
    结论:本病例强调了胸部创伤中迟发性血胸的临床挑战和意义,强调在复杂的演示中需要警惕和潜在的手术矫正,尤其是老年人。
    BACKGROUND: Late hemothorax is a rare complication of blunt chest trauma. The longest reported time interval between the traumatic event and the development of hemothorax is 44 days.
    METHODS: An elderly patient with right-sided rib fractures from chest trauma, managed initially with closed thoracostomy, presented with a delayed hemothorax that occurred 60 days after initial management, necessitating conservative and then surgical intervention due to the patient\'s frail condition and associated complications.
    CONCLUSIONS: This case emphasizes the clinical challenge and significance of delayed hemothorax in chest trauma, highlighting the need for vigilance and potential surgical correction in complex presentations, especially in the elderly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:钝性胸部创伤引起的气管支气管损伤在儿童中很少见,这种损伤通常涉及多个器官。大多数病例在去医院的路上出现呼吸衰竭,死亡率很高。在这里,我们描述了一个5岁的病人从电动车上摔下来的案例,导致双侧主支气管完全破裂。
    方法:我们治疗了一名5岁双侧主支气管完全性破裂患者。胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)未能检测到支气管破裂。持续的胸腔闭式引流导致大量气泡溢出。怀疑气管破裂。纤维支气管镜检查显示右主支气管完全破裂,左主支气管破裂。在体外循环(CPB)下进行紧急气管成形术。在操作过程中,我们发现双侧主支气管完全破裂。术后恢复顺利。治疗这些损伤的传统手术方法是侧方开胸手术。然而,正中胸骨切开术为选择性修复提供了更好的机会.呼吸不稳定患者需要体外循环辅助手术。
    结论:双侧主支气管完全骨折是罕见的。尽管在胸外伤后发生血气胸的情况下进行了导管胸廓造口术,但在存在扩张缺陷的肺部和大量漏气的情况下,应怀疑支气管破裂。对于呼吸系统难以维持的儿童,体外循环辅助气管成形术是一种相对安全的选择,从而确保氧合通气和清晰的手术领域。
    BACKGROUND: Tracheobronchial injuries caused by blunt chest trauma are rare in children, and such injuries usually involve multiple organs. Most cases involve respiratory failure on the way to the hospital, and the mortality rate is high. Herein, we describe the case of a 5-year-old patient who fell from an electric vehicle, causing complete rupture of the bilateral main bronchus.
    METHODS: We treated a 5-year-old patient with complete bilateral main bronchus rupture. Chest computed tomography (CT) failed to detect bronchial rupture. Continuous closed thoracic drainage resulted in a large amount of bubble overflow. Tracheal rupture was suspected. Fibreoptic bronchoscopy revealed complete rupture of the right main bronchus and rupture of the left main bronchus. Emergency tracheoplasty was performed under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). During the operation, we found that the bilateral main bronchi were completely ruptured. Postoperative recovery was smooth. The traditional surgical method for treating these injuries is lateral thoracotomy. However, a median sternotomy provides a better opportunity for selective repair. Extracorporeal circulation-assisted surgery is required for patients with unstable breathing.
    CONCLUSIONS: Complete fractures of the bilateral main bronchi are rare. Bronchial rupture should be suspected in the presence of expansion defect-dropped lungs and massive air leakage despite tube thoracostomy in haemopneumothorax developing after thoracic trauma. Extracorporeal circulation-assisted tracheoplasty is a relatively safe option for children whose respiratory system is difficult to maintain, thus ensuring oxygenation ventilation and a clear surgical field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:钝性腹部创伤是急诊入院的常见原因。计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描是识别钝性创伤患者腹内损伤的金标准方法,尤其是那些有高能创伤的人.虽然这种成像技术的诊断准确率很高,患者入院和长期观察方案仍然是世界范围内的常见做法.我们旨在评估在哥伦比亚一级创伤中心的高能量钝性创伤和正常腹部CT扫描的血流动力学稳定患者的腹内损伤发生率。南美洲,评估长期观察期的相关性。
    方法:我们对2021年至2022年因钝性创伤而进入急诊科的患者进行了回顾性研究。包括所有具有高能创伤机制和入院时正常CT扫描的连续患者。我们的主要结果是在24小时观察期或住院期间确定的腹内损伤的发生率,入住ICU,和死亡。
    结果:我们纳入了符合纳入标准的480例患者。中位年龄为33岁(IQR25.5,47),74.2%为男性。最常见的伤害机制是机动车事故(64.2%),从高处坠落(26%),和自行车下跌(3.1%)。总共99.2%的患者的修正创伤评分为8。仅1例患者(0.2%)(95%CI:0.01-1.16)在观察期间出现腹部损伤。没有ICU入院或死亡报告。
    结论:在血流动力学稳定的闭合性创伤和腹部CT扫描阴性的患者中,腹内损伤的发生率极低,在这些患者中,长时间的观察可能是不合理的。
    OBJECTIVE: Blunt abdominal trauma is a common cause of emergency department admission. Computed tomography (CT) scanning is the gold standard method for identifying intra-abdominal injuries in patients experiencing blunt trauma, especially those with high-energy trauma. Although the diagnostic accuracy of this imaging technique is very high, patient admission and prolonged observation protocols are still common practices worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of intra-abdominal injury in hemodynamically stable patients with high-energy blunt trauma and a normal abdominal CT scan at a Level-1 Trauma Center in Colombia, South America, to assess the relevance of a prolonged observation period.
    METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients admitted to the emergency department for blunt trauma between 2021 and 2022. All consecutive patients with high-energy mechanisms of trauma and a normal CT scan at admission were included. Our primary outcomes were the incidence of intra-abdominal injury identified during a 24-hour observation period or hospital stay, ICU admission, and death.
    RESULTS: We included 480 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 33 (IQR 25.5, 47), and 74.2% were male. The most common mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle accidents (64.2%), falls from height (26%), and falls from bikes (3.1%). A total of 99.2% of patients had a Revised Trauma Score of 8. Only 1 patient (0.2%) (95% CI: 0.01-1.16) presented with an abdominal injury during the observation period. No ICU admissions or deaths were reported.
    CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of intra-abdominal injury in patients with hemodynamically stable blunt trauma and a negative abdominal CT scan is extremely low, and prolonged observation may not be justified in these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:有限的研究探讨了钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)中威利斯环(CoW)解剖结构对预后的影响。目前尚不清楚BCVI筛查和扫描方法是否足以识别伴随的COW异常以及它们如何影响结局。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究包括17个I-IV级创伤中心的成人创伤性BCVIs(2017年08月01日-2021年07月31日)。目的是比较筛查标准,扫描实践,以及有和没有COW异常的人的结果。
    结果:在561个BCVI中,65%为男性,中位年龄为48岁。17%(n=93)有CoW异常。与正常CoW解剖结构相比,患有CoW异常的人发生中风的比率明显更高(10%vs.4%,p=0.04),ICHs(38%vs.21%,p=0.001),和临床显著出血(CSB)在抗血栓开始前(14%vs.3%,p<0.0001),分别。与CoW正常的患者相比,那些CoW异常的人在抗血栓治疗中断后也更容易出现缺血性中风(13%vs.2%,p=0.02)。与CoW解剖结构正常的患者相比,由于BCVI筛查标准中未概述的其他头颈部适应症,CoW异常患者的筛查频率明显更高(27%vs.18%,p=0.04),分别。识别CoW异常的扫描包括头部和颈部的频率明显更高(53%与29%,p=0.0001)比识别正常CoW解剖结构的扫描,分别。
    结论:虽然以前的研究建议对BCVI检测进行通用扫描,本研究发现,与正常CoW患者相比,BCVI和CoW异常患者的其他一些未被确定为BCVI扫描标准的头颈部损伤明显多于正常CoW患者,这可能提示在所有头颈部损伤患者中进行BCVI筛查可以改善CoW和BCVIs的同时检测.筛查BCVI时,在检测伴随CoW异常方面,包括头部和颈部的扫描优于单个区域.恶化的结果(中风,ICH,与CoW正常的患者相比,CoW异常的患者观察到了抗血栓形成前的临床显着出血)。CoW异常患者的中风发生率高于CoW解剖结构正常的患者,尤其是在中断抗血栓治疗时。这强调了CoW异常患者需要严格的抗血栓治疗方案,并可能表明CoW异常患者将从更多不同的治疗中受益。在扫描BCVI时,强调需要包括CoW解剖结构。
    方法:三级,预后/流行病学。
    BACKGROUND: Limited research has explored the effect of Circle of Willis (CoW) anatomy among blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) on outcomes. It remains unclear if current BCVI screening and scanning practices are sufficient in identification of concomitant COW anomalies and how they affect outcomes.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult traumatic BCVIs at 17 level I-IV trauma centers (08/01/2017-07/31/2021). The objectives were to compare screening criteria, scanning practices, and outcomes among those with and without COW anomalies.
    RESULTS: Of 561 BCVIs, 65% were male and the median age was 48 y/o. 17% (n = 93) had a CoW anomaly. Compared to those with normal CoW anatomy, those with CoW anomalies had significantly higher rates of any strokes (10% vs. 4%, p = 0.04), ICHs (38% vs. 21%, p = 0.001), and clinically significant bleed (CSB) before antithrombotic initiation (14% vs. 3%, p < 0.0001), respectively. Compared to patients with a normal CoW, those with a CoW anomaly also had ischemic strokes more often after antithrombotic interruption (13% vs. 2%, p = 0.02).Patients with CoW anomalies were screened significantly more often because of some other head/neck indication not outlined in BCVI screening criteria than patients with normal CoW anatomy (27% vs. 18%, p = 0.04), respectively. Scans identifying CoW anomalies included both the head and neck significantly more often (53% vs. 29%, p = 0.0001) than scans identifying normal CoW anatomy, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: While previous studies suggested universal scanning for BCVI detection, this study found patients with BCVI and CoW anomalies had some other head/neck injury not identified as BCVI scanning criteria significantly more than patients with normal CoW which may suggest that BCVI screening across all patients with a head/neck injury may improve the simultaneous detection of CoW and BCVIs. When screening for BCVI, scans including both the head and neck are superior to a single region in detection of concomitant CoW anomalies. Worsened outcomes (strokes, ICH, and clinically significant bleeding before antithrombotic initiation) were observed for patients with CoW anomalies when compared to those with a normal CoW. Those with a CoW anomaly experienced strokes at a higher rate than patients with normal CoW anatomy specifically when antithrombotic therapy was interrupted. This emphasizes the need for stringent antithrombotic therapy regimens among patients with CoW anomalies and may suggest that patients CoW anomalies would benefit from more varying treatment, highlighting the need to include the CoW anatomy when scanning for BCVI.
    METHODS: Level III, Prognostic/Epidemiological.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:儿童颈椎损伤并不常见,但具有潜在的破坏性;创伤后不分青红皂白的颈部成像使儿童不必要地暴露于电离辐射。这项研究的目的是得出并验证儿科临床预测规则,该规则可以纳入算法中,以指导急诊科儿童对颈椎损伤的影像学筛查。
    方法:在这项前瞻性观察队列研究中,我们在美国儿科急诊应用研究网络(PECARN)附属医院的18个专门儿童急诊科筛查了0-17岁已知或疑似钝性创伤的儿童.通过满足以下标准之一,受伤儿童有资格参加推导或验证队列:由急诊医疗服务从受伤现场转移到急诊科;由创伤小组评估;并在到达PECARN附属急诊科之前或之前进行颈部成像,以关注颈椎损伤。排除了仅出现穿透性创伤的儿童。在查看登记的儿童颈部成像结果之前,主治急诊科临床医生完成了临床检查,并在电子问卷中前瞻性记录了颈椎损伤的危险因素.在急诊室就诊后21-28天内,通过影像学报告和监护人的电话随访确定颈椎损伤,儿童神经外科医生证实了颈椎损伤。通过具有稳健误差估计的双变量Poisson回归确定与颈椎损伤高风险(>10%)相关的因素。通过分类和回归树(CART)分析确定与不可忽略风险相关的因素.在颈椎损伤预测规则中组合变量。感兴趣的主要结果是初始创伤后28天内的颈椎损伤,需要住院观察或手术干预。为推导和验证队列计算规则绩效度量。在研究人群中应用了一种临床护理算法,用于确定哪些危险因素需要对钝性外伤后的颈椎损伤进行影像学检查,以评估对减少儿科急诊科CT和X射线使用的潜在影响。这项研究在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,NCT05049330。
    结果:九个急诊科参加了派生队列,9人参加了验证队列.总的来说,22430名出现已知或疑似钝性创伤的儿童被纳入(派生队列中的11857名儿童;验证队列中的10573名儿童)。占总人口的433(1·9%)已确认颈椎损伤。以下因素与颈椎损伤的高风险相关:精神状态改变(格拉斯哥昏迷量表[GCS]评分3-8分或警报上反应迟钝,言语,疼痛,意识无反应量表[AVPU]);异常气道,呼吸,或循环发现;和局灶性神经功能缺损,包括感觉异常,麻木,或弱点。在出现至少一种风险因素的衍生队列中,928人中,118人(12·7%)患有颈椎损伤(风险比8·9[95%CI7·1-11·2])。通过CART分析,以下因素与不可忽视的颈椎损伤风险相关:颈部疼痛;精神状态改变(GCS评分为9-14;AVPU的言语或疼痛;或其他精神状态改变的迹象);严重的头部受伤;严重的躯干受伤;和中线颈部压痛。高风险和CART衍生因素组合并应用于验证队列,敏感性为94·3%(95%CI90·7-97·9),60·4%(59·4-61·3)特异性,和99·9%(99·8-100·0)的阴性预测值。如果将该算法应用于所有参与者以指导成像的使用,我们估计,在不增加接受X线平片检查的儿童数量的情况下,在22430名儿童中,接受CT检查的儿童数量可能从3856名(17·2%)减少到1549名(6·9%).
    结论:纳入临床算法,颈椎损伤预测规则显示出很强的潜力,可以帮助临床医生确定哪些钝性外伤后到达急诊科的儿童应该接受X线颈部成像检查以发现潜在的颈椎损伤。临床算法的实施可以减少急诊科不必要的射线照相测试的使用,并消除高风险的辐射暴露。未来的工作应该在更一般的环境中验证预测规则和护理算法,例如社区急诊科。
    背景:EuniceKennedyShriver国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所以及美国妇幼保健局卫生与人类服务部卫生资源与服务管理局在紧急医疗服务儿童计划下。
    BACKGROUND: Cervical spine injuries in children are uncommon but potentially devastating; however, indiscriminate neck imaging after trauma unnecessarily exposes children to ionising radiation. The aim of this study was to derive and validate a paediatric clinical prediction rule that can be incorporated into an algorithm to guide radiographic screening for cervical spine injury among children in the emergency department.
    METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, we screened children aged 0-17 years presenting with known or suspected blunt trauma at 18 specialised children\'s emergency departments in hospitals in the USA affiliated with the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Injured children were eligible for enrolment into derivation or validation cohorts by fulfilling one of the following criteria: transported from the scene of injury to the emergency department by emergency medical services; evaluated by a trauma team; and undergone neck imaging for concern for cervical spine injury either at or before arriving at the PECARN-affiliated emergency department. Children presenting with solely penetrating trauma were excluded. Before viewing an enrolled child\'s neck imaging results, the attending emergency department clinician completed a clinical examination and prospectively documented cervical spine injury risk factors in an electronic questionnaire. Cervical spine injuries were determined by imaging reports and telephone follow-up with guardians within 21-28 days of the emergency room encounter, and cervical spine injury was confirmed by a paediatric neurosurgeon. Factors associated with a high risk of cervical spine injury (>10%) were identified by bivariable Poisson regression with robust error estimates, and factors associated with non-negligible risk were identified by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Variables were combined in the cervical spine injury prediction rule. The primary outcome of interest was cervical spine injury within 28 days of initial trauma warranting inpatient observation or surgical intervention. Rule performance measures were calculated for both derivation and validation cohorts. A clinical care algorithm for determining which risk factors warrant radiographic screening for cervical spine injury after blunt trauma was applied to the study population to estimate the potential effect on reducing CT and x-ray use in the paediatric emergency department. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05049330.
    RESULTS: Nine emergency departments participated in the derivation cohort, and nine participated in the validation cohort. In total, 22 430 children presenting with known or suspected blunt trauma were enrolled (11 857 children in the derivation cohort; 10 573 in the validation cohort). 433 (1·9%) of the total population had confirmed cervical spine injuries. The following factors were associated with a high risk of cervical spine injury: altered mental status (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score of 3-8 or unresponsive on the Alert, Verbal, Pain, Unresponsive scale [AVPU] of consciousness); abnormal airway, breathing, or circulation findings; and focal neurological deficits including paresthesia, numbness, or weakness. Of 928 in the derivation cohort presenting with at least one of these risk factors, 118 (12·7%) had cervical spine injury (risk ratio 8·9 [95% CI 7·1-11·2]). The following factors were associated with non-negligible risk of cervical spine injury by CART analysis: neck pain; altered mental status (GCS score of 9-14; verbal or pain on the AVPU; or other signs of altered mental status); substantial head injury; substantial torso injury; and midline neck tenderness. The high-risk and CART-derived factors combined and applied to the validation cohort performed with 94·3% (95% CI 90·7-97·9) sensitivity, 60·4% (59·4-61·3) specificity, and 99·9% (99·8-100·0) negative predictive value. Had the algorithm been applied to all participants to guide the use of imaging, we estimated the number of children having CT might have decreased from 3856 (17·2%) to 1549 (6·9%) of 22 430 children without increasing the number of children getting plain x-rays.
    CONCLUSIONS: Incorporated into a clinical algorithm, the cervical spine injury prediction rule showed strong potential for aiding clinicians in determining which children arriving in the emergency department after blunt trauma should undergo radiographic neck imaging for potential cervical spine injury. Implementation of the clinical algorithm could decrease use of unnecessary radiographic testing in the emergency department and eliminate high-risk radiation exposure. Future work should validate the prediction rule and care algorithm in more general settings such as community emergency departments.
    BACKGROUND: The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Health Resources and Services Administration of the US Department of Health and Human Services in the Maternal and Child Health Bureau under the Emergency Medical Services for Children programme.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Case Reports
    结论:我们介绍了一个以前健康的13岁男性,他从自行车上摔下来后手把受伤。计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描显示可能的胰腺肿瘤与腹膜后血肿有关,切除后,组织学证实是胰腺的实性假乳头状肿瘤。这些是罕见的胰腺肿瘤,尤其是年轻男性。这种肿瘤的稀有性和导致其出现的机制使其成为一个有趣和独特的案例。
    CONCLUSIONS: We present a previously healthy 13-year-old male, who sustained a handlebar injury after falling from his bicycle. The computerised tomography (CT) scan indicated a probable pancreatic neoplasm associated with a retroperitoneal haematoma which was, following resection, confirmed histologically to be a solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas. These are rare tumours of the pancreas, especially in young males. The rarity of this neoplasm and the mechanism that led to its presentation make this an interesting and unique case.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们介绍了一名10岁以前健康的男性,该男性因腹部创伤而在院外心脏骤停,并存活下来,神经系统预后良好,出院时几乎完全恢复了基线功能状态。尽管受伤严重,但快速反应和有效调动资源仍可带来出色的患者预后,包括预期死亡率的腹内损伤,院外创伤性逮捕,凝血病,和延长儿科重症监护病房的住院时间。此案例强调了及时进行创伤生命支持干预的重要性,尤其是早期的血液制品管理,高效运输,和气道管理,同时分享了一个非凡的院外儿科创伤性逮捕案例,几乎完全康复。
    We present the case of a 10-year-old previously healthy male who suffered an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest because of abdominal trauma and survived with excellent neurologic outcomes and near complete return to baseline functional status at hospital discharge. The rapid response and efficient mobilization of resources led to an excellent patient outcome despite the severity of injuries, including intra-abdominal injuries with expected mortality, out-of-hospital traumatic arrest, coagulopathy, and an extended pediatric intensive care unit stay. This case underscores the significance of timely advanced trauma life support interventions, especially early blood product administration, efficient transport, and airway management, while sharing a remarkable case of out-of-hospital pediatric traumatic arrest with near full recovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:伤害是世界范围内死亡的主要原因之一,腹部是头部和四肢后最常见的创伤区域。腹部损伤通常分为两类:钝性损伤和穿透性损伤。这项研究旨在确定在伊朗国家创伤登记处(NTRI)注册的患者中这两种类型的腹部损伤的流行病学和临床特征。
    方法:这项多中心横断面研究是使用2016年7月24日至2023年5月21日NTRI的数据进行的。本研究纳入了国际疾病分类第10版(ICD-10)代码定义的所有腹部创伤患者。纳入标准是以下之一:住院时间(LOS)超过24小时,致命伤,和外伤患者从其他医院的ICU转移过来。
    结果:在532例腹部损伤患者中,420(78.9%)钝伤,其中435人(81.7%)为男性。钝性创伤中最受伤的器官是脾脏,200(47.6%)和肝脏,171例(40.7%),分别。此外,结肠和小肠,42例(37.5%),穿透性损伤中受伤人数最多。在103例(23.5%)的钝性受伤受害者和17例(15.2%)的穿透性创伤中输血(p=0.03)。ICU入院在两组间有显著差异,钝器组266例(63.6%),穿透性47例(42%)(p<0.001)。穿透性损伤阴性开腹21例(28%),钝器组只有11例(7.7%)(p<0.001)。在调整后的多元逻辑回归模型中,与ISS1-8相比,ISS≥16的ICU入院机会增加了3.13倍[OR:3.13,95%CI(1.56至6.28),P=0.001]。另一个预测指标是NOM,比OM增加了1.75倍的ICU机会[OR:1.75,95%CI(1.17至2.61),p=0.006]。此外,GCS3-8的ICU入院几率是GCS13-15的5.43倍[OR:5.43,95CI(1.81至16.25),P=0.002]。
    结论:这项研究发现,肝脏和脾脏在钝性损伤中大多受损。此外,在大多数穿透伤的情况下,与其他器官相比,结肠和小肠的损伤频率最高。腹部钝性损伤导致更多的输血和ICU入院。更高的国际空间站,较低的GCS,和NOM是腹部损伤患者入住ICU的预测因素。
    BACKGROUND: Injury is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, and the abdomen is the most common area of trauma after the head and extremities. Abdominal injury is often divided into two categories: blunt and penetrating injuries. This study aims to determine the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of these two types of abdominal injuries in patients registered with the National Trauma Registry of Iran (NTRI).
    METHODS: This multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted with data from the NTRI from July 24, 2016, to May 21, 2023. All abdominal trauma patients defined by the International Classification of Diseases; 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes were enrolled in this study. The inclusion criteria were one of the following: hospital length of stay (LOS) of more than 24 h, fatal injuries, and trauma patients transferred from the ICU of other hospitals.
    RESULTS: Among 532 patients with abdominal injuries, 420 (78.9%) had a blunt injury, and 435 (81.7%) of the victims were men. The most injured organs in blunt trauma were the spleen, with 200 (47.6%) and the liver, with 171 (40.7%) cases, respectively. Also, the colon and small intestine, with 42 (37.5%) cases, had the highest number of injuries in penetrating injuries. Blood was transfused in 103 (23.5%) of blunt injured victims and 17 (15.2%) of penetrating traumas (p = 0.03). ICU admission was significantly varied between the two groups, with 266 (63.6%) patients in the blunt group and 47 (42%) in penetrating (p < 0.001). Negative laparotomies were 21 (28%) in penetrating trauma and only 11 (7.7%) in blunt group (p < 0.001). In the multiple logistic regression model after adjusting, ISS ≥ 16 increased the chance of ICU admission 3.13 times relative to the ISS 1-8 [OR: 3.13, 95% CI (1.56 to 6.28), P = 0.001]. Another predictor was NOM, which increased ICU chance 1.75 times more than OM [OR: 1.75, 95% CI (1.17 to 2.61), p = 0.006]. Additionally, GCS 3-8 had 5.43 times more ICU admission odds than the GCS 13-15 [OR:5.43, 95%CI (1.81 to 16.25), P = 0.002] respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the liver and spleen are mostly damaged in blunt injuries. Also, in most cases of penetrating injuries, the colon and small intestine had the highest frequency of injuries compared to other organs. Blunt abdominal injuries caused more blood transfusions and ICU admissions. Higher ISS, lower GCS, and NOM were predictors of ICU admission in abdominal injury victims.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:创伤主要影响经济活跃人群,造成社会和经济影响。实体器官损伤的非手术治疗旨在保护器官功能,降低与手术干预相关的发病率和死亡率。研究的目的是证明在创伤医院接受非手术治疗的患者的流行病学特征,并评估与这些患者死亡率相关的因素。
    方法:这是2018年至2022年在巴西创伤参考医院接受非手术治疗实体器官损伤的患者的历史队列。包括钝性和穿透性创伤的患者,分析流行病学特征,输血,以及与手术干预的需要有关。
    结果:共365名患者纳入研究。三百四十三名病人出院(93.97%),非手术治疗成功率为84.6%。死亡率与以下相关损伤之间存在关联:血胸,胸骨骨折,主动脉夹层,和创伤性脑损伤。输血需求和手术干预之间存在关联。38名患者需要某种形式的手术干预。
    结论:接受非手术治疗的患者包括年轻男性,他们是钝性创伤的受害者。非手术治疗是安全的,成功率很高。
    BACKGROUND: Trauma primarily affects the economically active population, causing social and economic impact. The non-operative management of solid organ injuries aims to preserve organ function, reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with surgical interventions. The aim of study was to demonstrate the epidemiological profile of patients undergoing non-operative management in a trauma hospital and to evaluate factors associated with mortality in these patients.
    METHODS: This is a historical cohort of patients undergoing non-operative management for solid organ injuries at a Brazilian trauma reference hospital between 2018 and 2022. Included were patients with blunt and penetrating trauma, analyzing epidemiological characteristics, blood transfusion, and association with the need for surgical intervention.
    RESULTS: A total of 365 patients were included in the study. Three hundred and forty-three patients were discharged (93.97%), and the success rate of non-operative treatment was 84.6%. There was an association between mortality and the following associated injuries: hemothorax, sternal fracture, aortic dissection, and traumatic brain injury. There was an association between the need for transfusion and surgical intervention. Thirty-eight patients required some form of surgical intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: The profile of patients undergoing non-operative treatment consists of young men who are victims of blunt trauma. Non-operative treatment is safe and has a high success rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号