随着威尔弗雷德·比昂的文本“从经验中学习”的出版,精神分析为理解婴儿与照顾者接触的过程和影响提供了一种新的模式。因此,我们对一些最基本的心理生活现象的概念得到了极大的丰富。通过提出他的阿尔法功能理论,Bion描绘了与内部和外部世界的有意义的联系如何在头脑中建立起来。相比之下,通过对精神病患者的临床工作,Bion揭示了这些联系如何灾难性地消失。正是有了这些想法,以及它们与马尔可夫毯相关的一组神经科学结构的链接,主要由卡尔·弗里斯顿开发,本文所关注的。通过对最初被称为“dream-work-alpha”的心理功能的调查,论文第一部分的重点是Bion如何构想“接触障碍”的创建,该障碍可以将意识与无意识的意识区分开来。投射这个组织的后果,然后探索接触屏障的精神病性解体。随后,讨论范围扩大,以纳入自由能神经科学的当代理论,这些理论与半个多世纪前Bion所支持的精神分析思想有着重要的和启发性的关系。最后,通过提出一系列三个问题并伴随讨论,尝试将这些理论图式叠加。这些建议直接解决,(1)感受性接触屏障和外感受性马尔可夫毯之间是否存在密切的联系,(2)接触屏障的消除是否可以反映为马尔可夫毯功能织物的撕裂,(3)在投影表面的水平上工作的临床意义。最终,本文的目的是揭示不同概念框架内部和之间的相关接触点;这些框架最终来自与检查大脑潜在机制有关的学科。
With the publication of Wilfred Bion\'s text \'Learning from Experience,\' psychoanalysis was afforded a new schema for understanding the processes and implications involved in an infant\'s contact with their caregivers. As a result, our conception of some of the most fundamental phenomena of psychic life was significantly enriched. By proposing his theory of alpha-functioning, Bion mapped out how meaningful connexions to the internal and external worlds become established in the mind. In contrast, and through working clinically with psychotic patients, Bion revealed how these ties can catastrophically come undone. It is with these ideas, as well as their links to a corresponding set of neuroscientific constructs relating to the Markov blanket and principally developed by Karl Friston, that this paper is concerned. Through an investigation of the psychic functioning originally dubbed \'dream-work-alpha,\' the paper\'s first section focuses on how Bion conceived of the creation of a \'contact-barrier\' that allows for the differentiation of consciousness from an unconscious mind. Casting the ramifications of this organisation in sharp relief, the psychotic disorganisation of the contact-barrier is then explored. The discussion subsequently broadens to incorporate contemporary theories from free energy neuroscience that bear significant and illuminating relations to the psychoanalytic ideas espoused by Bion over half a century ago. Finally, through posing a series of three questions with accompanying discussions, a superimposition of these theoretical schemas is attempted. These suggestions directly address, (1) whether there is an intimate connexion between the interoceptive contact-barrier and the exteroceptive Markov blanket, (2) whether a disobjectalising of the contact-barrier may be reflected as a tear in the functional fabric of the Markov blanket, and (3) what the clinical implications are of working at the level of the projected surface. Ultimately, the aim of the paper is to expose relevant points of contact within and between the varying conceptual frameworks; frameworks that ultimately derive from disciplines that are both concerned with examining the underlying mechanisms of the mind-brain.