White blood cell differential

白细胞差异
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    SysmexDI-60对白细胞进行计数和分类。有限的研究已经评估了SysmexDI-60在异常样品中的性能,最关注白细胞减少的样本。我们评估了DI-60在确定不同WBC计数中正常和异常样品中白细胞(WBC)差异中的功效。外周血涂片(n=166)分为正常对照组和疾病组,进一步分为中度和重度白细胞增多,轻度白细胞增多症,正常,轻度白细胞减少症,根据白细胞计数,中度和重度白细胞减少症。使用Bland-Altman和Passing-Bablok回归分析评估DI-60预分类和验证以及手动计数结果。Kappa检验比较了DI-60和手动计数在异常细胞检测中的一致性。DI-60对所有细胞表现出显著的总体敏感性和特异性,除了嗜碱性粒细胞.对于分段中性粒细胞,DI-60预分类和手动计数之间的相关性很高,带中性粒细胞,淋巴细胞,和爆炸,并在验证后对所有单元格类别进行了改进。在中度和重度白细胞增多症(WBC>30.0×109/L)和中度和重度白细胞减少症(WBC<1.5×109/L)组中,所有细胞类别的DI-60和手动计数之间的平均差异均显着高。对于母细胞,未成熟粒细胞,和非典型淋巴细胞,DI-60验证结果与人工计数结果相似.浆细胞显示较差的一致性。总之,DI-60显示出在1.5-30.0×109范围内的WBC差异的一致和可靠的分析。在检查中度和重度白细胞增多症样本时,手动计数是必不可少的,中度和重度白细胞减少症样本,以及单核细胞和浆细胞的计数。
    Sysmex DI-60 enumerates and classifies leukocytes. Limited research has evaluated the performance of Sysmex DI-60 in abnormal samples, and most focused on leukopenic samples. We evaluate the efficacy of DI-60 in determining white blood cell (WBC) differentials in normal and abnormal samples in different WBC count. Peripheral blood smears (n = 166) were categorised into normal control and disease groups, and further divided into moderate and severe leucocytosis, mild leucocytosis, normal, mild leukopenia, and moderate and severe leukopenia groups based on WBC count. DI-60 preclassification and verification and manual counting results were assessed using Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok regression analyses. The Kappa test compared the concordance in the abnormal cell detection between DI-60 and manual counting. DI-60 exhibited notable overall sensitivity and specificity for all cells, except basophils. The correlation between the DI-60 preclassification and manual counting was high for segmented neutrophils, band neutrophils, lymphocytes, and blasts, and improved for all cell classes after verification. The mean difference between DI-60 and manual counting for all cell classes was significantly high in moderate and severe leucocytosis (WBC > 30.0 × 109/L) and moderate and severe leukopenia (WBC < 1.5 × 109/L) groups. For blast cells, immature granulocytes, and atypical lymphocytes, the DI-60 verification results were similar to the manual counting results. Plasma cells showed poor agreement. In conclusion, DI-60 demonstrates consistent and reliable analysis of WBC differentials within the range of 1.5-30.0 × 109. Manual counting was indispensable in examining moderate and severe leucocytosis samples, moderate and severe leukopenia samples, and in enumerating of monocytes and plasma cells.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:很少有研究评估了体液(BF)上的数字形态学(DM)分析仪。我们评估了DM分析仪的性能,SysmexDI-60(Sysmex,神户,日本)用于BF样品中的白细胞(WBC)差异。
    方法:在5个BF样本(2个胸膜液和3个腹水)中,优势细胞类型(>80%,中性粒细胞,淋巴细胞,巨噬细胞,异常淋巴细胞,和每个样本中的恶性细胞),我们评估了DI-60的精确度,并比较了DI-60和手动计数之间的白细胞差异和周转时间(TAT).
    结果:DI-60预分类和验证的精度非常好(%CV,0.01-3.16%)。经过验证,DI-60显示出高灵敏度,特异性,和效率(范围:90.8-98.1%,96.8-97.9%,和92.5-98.0%,分别)用于中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞显性样品中的显性细胞类型。对于所有样品,DI-60和手动计数显示主要细胞类型(中性粒细胞,淋巴细胞,巨噬细胞,和其他人,验证后r=0.72至0.94)。在中性粒细胞占优势的样本中,DI-60的预分类和验证之间的一致性很强(κ=0.81)。对于所有样品,DI-60显示出比手动计数明显更长的TAT(min:s)(中位TAT/载玻片:6:28vs.1:53,p<0.0001),在异常淋巴细胞和恶性细胞优势样本中具有显着差异(21:05vs.2:06;12:34vs.2:25)。
    结论:DI-60可能在中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞占优势的BF样本中提供可靠的数据。然而,WBC差异可能需要更长的时间和更高的工作量,特别是在含有非典型细胞的BF样品中。在将DM分析仪用于BF分析的常规临床实践之前,需要进一步改进。
    BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated digital morphology (DM) analyzers on body fluids (BF). We evaluated the performance of a DM analyzer, Sysmex DI-60 (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) for white blood cell (WBC) differentials in BF samples.
    METHODS: In five BF samples (two pleural fluids and three ascites) containing a single, dominant cell type (>80%, neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, abnormal lymphocytes, and malignant cells in each sample), we evaluated the precision of the DI-60 and compared the WBC differentials and turnaround times (TAT) between DI-60 and manual counting.
    RESULTS: The precision of the DI-60 pre-classification and verification was excellent (%CV, 0.01-3.16%). After verification, the DI-60 showed high sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency (ranges: 90.8-98.1%, 96.8-97.9%, and 92.5-98.0%, respectively) for the dominant cell types in neutrophil- and lymphocyte-dominant samples. For all samples, the DI-60 and manual counting showed high correlations for major cell types (neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, and others, r = 0.72 to 0.94) after verification. The agreement between the pre-classification and verification of the DI-60 was strong in the neutrophil-dominant sample (κ = 0.81). The DI-60 showed a significantly longer TAT (min: s) than manual counting for all samples (median TAT/slide: 6:28 vs. 1:53, p < 0.0001), with remarkable differences in abnormal lymphocyte- and malignant cell-dominant samples (21:05 vs. 2:06; 12:34 vs. 2:25).
    CONCLUSIONS: The DI-60 may provide reliable data in neutrophil- and lymphocyte-dominant BF samples. However, it may require longer times and higher workloads for WBC differentials especially in BF samples containing atypical cells. Further improvement would be needed before applying DM analyzers for routine clinical practice in BF analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:数字病理学人工智能(AI)平台具有通过“深度机器学习”随着时间的推移而改进的能力。“我们以前已经报道了通过Techcyte(Techcyte,Inc.,Orem,UT,美国),基于数字扫描仪的基于网络的血片报告系统。当前研究的目的是比较随着时间的推移发布的AI方案,以评估细胞识别的改善。
    方法:使用Techcyte的在线AI软件对2019年相同的124例数字化异常外周血膜(包括64例急性和22例慢性白血病)进行WBC差异分析(AI1),2020(AI2),和2022(AI3),在任何时间点都没有形态学家的重新分配。人工智能结果与手动显微镜的“黄金标准”相关,并比较了Lin的一致性系数(LCC)以及爆炸识别的敏感性和特异性,以确定优越的AI版本。
    结果:手动显微镜对单个细胞类型的AI相关性(r)范围为0.50-0.90(AI1),0.66-0.86(AI2)和0.71-0.91(AI3)。与AI1相比,AI3与手动显微镜的一致性显着提高了嗜中性粒细胞的鉴定(LCCAI3=0.86vs.AI1=0.77,p=0.03),总粒细胞(LCCAI3=0.92与AI1=0.82,p=0.0008),未成熟粒细胞(LCCAI3=0.67vs.AI1=0.38,p=0.0014),和早幼粒细胞(LCCAI3=0.53vs.AI1=0.16,p=0.0008)。爆炸识别的灵敏度(n=65张幻灯片)从97%(AI1)提高,到98%(AI2),至100%(AI3),而blast特异性从24%(AI1)下降,至14%(AI2)至12%(AI3)。
    结论:随着时间的推移,TechcyteAI在细胞识别方面显示出显着的改善,并且在恶性膜中保持对母细胞识别的高灵敏度。
    BACKGROUND: Digital pathology artificial intelligence (AI) platforms have the capacity to improve over time through \"deep machine learning.\" We have previously reported on the accuracy of peripheral white blood cell (WBC) differential and blast identification by Techcyte (Techcyte, Inc., Orem, UT, USA), a digital scanner-agnostic web-based system for blood film reporting. The aim of the current study was to compare AI protocols released over time to assess improvement in cell identification.
    METHODS: WBC differentials were performed using Techcyte\'s online AI software on the same 124 digitized abnormal peripheral blood films (including 64 acute and 22 chronic leukaemias) in 2019 (AI1), 2020 (AI2), and 2022 (AI3), with no reassignment by a morphologist at any time point. AI results were correlated to the \"gold standard\" of manual microscopy, and comparison of Lin\'s concordance coefficients (LCC) and sensitivity and specificity of blast identification were used to determine the superior AI version.
    RESULTS: AI correlations (r) with manual microscopy for individual cell types ranged from 0.50-0.90 (AI1), 0.66-0.86 (AI2) and 0.71-0.91 (AI3). AI3 concordance with manual microscopy was significantly improved compared to AI1 for identification of neutrophils (LCC AI3 = 0.86 vs. AI1 = 0.77, p = 0.03), total granulocytes (LCC AI3 = 0.92 vs. AI1 = 0.82, p = 0.0008), immature granulocytes (LCC AI3 = 0.67 vs. AI1 = 0.38, p = 0.0014), and promyelocytes (LCC AI3 = 0.53 vs. AI1 = 0.16, p = 0.0008). Sensitivity for blast identification (n = 65 slides) improved from 97% (AI1), to 98% (AI2), to 100% (AI3), while blast specificity decreased from 24% (AI1), to 14% (AI2) to 12% (AI3).
    CONCLUSIONS: Techcyte AI has shown significant improvement in cell identification over time and maintains high sensitivity for blast identification in malignant films.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为儿科患者建立直接参考区间的成本很高,具有挑战性,和耗时的企业。间接建立的参考间隔可以帮助改善这种情况。我们的目标是通过数据挖掘和非参数百分位数方法为自动白细胞差异建立特定于人群的参考间隔。
    方法:0天至18岁患者的血细胞计数和自动白细胞差异,从2018年1月1日至2022年6月30日进行,在我们的实验室信息系统中确定。参考间隔是根据IFCC和CLSI建议以及Haeckel等人的提议建立的。
    结果:最初,在我们的SYSMEXXN-9000上鉴定了47,173个血细胞计数。排除了11,707个数据集,留下35,466套样品用于分析。其中,17,616个包含自动白细胞差异。由于患者人数不足,对于年龄<7个月的儿童,无法建立自动白细胞差异的参考区间.与Herklotz等人发表的相应参考区间相比。,我们确定的参考区间在所有年龄组中显示相关差异.
    结论:非参数百分位法与Haeckel等人的命题相结合。利用认真的数据挖掘似乎是直接参考区间确定的有效替代方案。
    Establishing direct reference intervals for pediatric patients is a costly, challenging, and time-consuming enterprise. Indirectly established reference intervals can help to ameliorate this situation. It was our objective to establish population-specific reference intervals for automated white blood cell differentials via data mining and non-parametric percentile method.
    Blood counts and automated white blood cell differentials of patients aged 0 days to 18 years, performed from the 1st of January 2018 until the 30th of June 2022, were identified in our laboratory information system. Reference intervals were established in accordance with IFCC and CLSI recommendations as well as the propositions by Haeckel et al.
    Initially, 47,173 blood counts on our SYSMEX XN-9000 were identified. 11,707 data sets were excluded, leaving 35,466 sample sets for analysis. Of these, 17,616 contained automated white blood cell differentials. Due to insufficient patient numbers, no reference intervals for automated white blood cell differentials could be established for children aged <7 months. In comparison to the corresponding reference intervals published by Herklotz et al., reference intervals determined by us showed relevant differences throughout all age groups.
    The combination of non-parametric percentile method and the propositions by Haeckel et al. utilizing conscientious data mining appears to be potent alternative to direct reference interval determination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    白细胞差异是评估病原体感染过程中全身免疫变化的有用工具。特别是对于非模型物种。迄今为止,还没有研究探讨如何用常见的细菌病原体进行实验性感染,鸡毒支原体(MG),影响自然鸣禽宿主的血液学变化的过程和强度,家雀。在这里,我们用已知毒力不同的MG分离株实验接种家雀,并量化整个感染中循环白细胞的比例。首先,我们发现MG感染对大多数细胞类型的比例有显著的时间影响,在感染过程中,异型和单核细胞比例强烈增加。在感染期间,淋巴细胞比例明显下降,尽管这些比例变化可能只是由其他白细胞的相关增加驱动。第二,我们发现了分离株毒力的显著影响,在接种了较高毒力分离株的鸟类中,细胞比例发生了最强烈的变化,在接种最低毒力分离株的鸟类中,相对于假治疗组几乎没有可检测到的变化。最后,我们发现感染严重程度的变化正预测循环中的嗜异粒细胞和淋巴细胞的比例,但是这些相关性的强度取决于分离。一起来看,这些结果表明,在MG感染期间,家雀有强烈的血液学变化,对不同毒力的MG分离株的反应明显不同。这些结果与家雀MG中进化的毒力导致更高程度的免疫刺激和相关的免疫病理学的可能性一致。对MG变速器有潜在的直接好处。研究重点家雀对鸡败血症分枝杆菌感染有明显的促炎反应。毒力病原体分离物产生更强的雀类白细胞反应。在鸟类中,较强的白细胞反应与较高的感染严重程度相关。
    Leukocyte differentials are a useful tool for assessing systemic immunological changes during pathogen infections, particularly for non-model species. To date, no study has explored how experimental infection with a common bacterial pathogen, Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG), influences the course and strength of haematological changes in the natural songbird host, house finches. Here we experimentally inoculated house finches with MG isolates known to vary in virulence, and quantified the proportions of circulating leukocytes over the entirety of infection. First, we found significant temporal effects of MG infection on the proportions of most cell types, with strong increases in heterophil and monocyte proportions during infection. Marked decreases in lymphocyte proportions also occurred during infection, though these proportional changes may simply be driven by correlated increases in other leukocytes. Second, we found significant effects of isolate virulence, with the strongest changes in cell proportions occurring in birds inoculated with the higher virulence isolates, and almost no detectable changes relative to sham treatment groups in birds inoculated with the lowest virulence isolate. Finally, we found that variation in infection severity positively predicted the proportion of circulating heterophils and lymphocytes, but the strength of these correlations was dependent on isolate. Taken together, these results indicate strong haematological changes in house finches during MG infection, with markedly different responses to MG isolates of varying virulence. These results are consistent with the possibility that evolved virulence in house finch MG results in higher degrees of immune stimulation and associated immunopathology, with potential direct benefits for MG transmission. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS House finches show a marked pro-inflammatory response to M. gallisepticum infection. Virulent pathogen isolates produce stronger finch white blood cell responses. Among birds, stronger white blood cell responses are associated with higher infection severity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号