背景:幼儿龋齿(ECC)是一种多因素疾病,环境因素可能在其中发挥作用。这次范围审查的目的是绘制已发表的文献,评估可持续发展目标(SDG)11之间的关联,该目标试图使城市和人类住区安全,包容性,弹性和可持续的,和ECC。
方法:本范围审查遵循系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的Meta分析扩展(PRISMA-ScR)指南。2023年7月,在PubMed进行了搜索,WebofScience,和Scopus使用与住房相关的定制搜索词,城市化,废物管理实践,和ECC。排除了仅检查ECC患病率而不参考SDG11目标的研究。在那些符合纳入标准的人中,总结了进行研究的国家和地区,采用的研究设计,并完成了调查结果。此外,这些研究还与相关的SDG11目标相关.
结果:10项研究符合纳入标准,没有一项来自非洲区域。六项研究评估了住房和ECC之间的关联,研究结果表明,父母拥有房屋的儿童的ECC患病率和严重程度较低。探索的其他房屋相关参数是大小,房间数量,成本和使用的建筑材料。关于家庭中ECC患病率与废物管理方式之间关系的唯一研究没有统计学上的显着关联。五项研究确定了城市化与ECC(城市化,尺寸,和居住的偏远),结果表明,与低收入和中等收入国家的观察结果相反,高收入国家的ECC与城市化之间没有显着联系。没有研究评估生活在贫民窟之间的关系,自然灾害和ECC。我们确定了ECC与SDG11.1和SDG11.3之间的联系。对调查结果的分析表明,ECC与SDG11C(支持最不发达国家建造有弹性的建筑物)之间存在合理的联系。
结论:很少有研究确定ECC与SDG11之间的联系,研究结果表明,国家收入水平和房屋所有权对ECC的影响可能存在差异作为ECC的保护因素。需要进一步研究,以探索可持续城市的措施及其与SDG11背景下的ECC的联系。
BACKGROUND: Early childhood caries (ECC) is a multifactorial disease in which environmental factors could play a role. The purpose of this scoping review was to map the published literature that assessed the association between the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 11, which tried to make cities and human settlements safe, inclusive, resilient and sustainable, and ECC.
METHODS: This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. In July 2023, a search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus using tailored search terms related to housing, urbanization, waste management practices, and ECC. Studies that solely examined ECC prevalence without reference to SDG11 goals were excluded. Of those that met the inclusion criteria, a summary highlighting the countries and regions where the studies were conducted, the study designs employed, and the findings were done. In addition, the studies were also linked to relevant SDG11 targets.
RESULTS: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria with none from the African Region. Six studies assessed the association between housing and ECC, with findings suggesting that children whose parents owned a house had lower ECC prevalence and severity. Other house related parameters explored were size, number of rooms, cost and building materials used. The only study on the relationship between the prevalence of ECC and waste management modalities at the household showed no statistically significant association. Five studies identified a relationship between urbanization and ECC (urbanization, size, and remoteness of the residential) with results suggesting that there was no significant link between ECC and urbanization in high-income countries contrary to observations in low and middle-income countries. No study assessed the relationship between living in slums, natural disasters and ECC. We identified links between ECC and SDG11.1 and SDG 11.3. The analysis of the findings suggests a plausible link between ECC and SDG11C (Supporting least developed countries to build resilient buildings).
CONCLUSIONS: There are few studies identifying links between ECC and SDG11, with the findings suggesting the possible differences in the impact of urbanization on ECC by country income-level and home ownership as a protective factor from ECC. Further research is needed to explore measures of sustainable cities and their links with ECC within the context of the SDG11.