不引起快速性心律失常的腹室纤维(FVF)是一种罕见的心室预激,这对区分肯特纤维很重要。虽然,腺苷和一些心电图特征在WolffParkinsonWhite(WPW)的分化中重要,没有电生理研究(EPS),明确的区别可能并不总是可能的。在这项研究中,我们的目的是介绍我们的小儿有束脑室纤维患者的临床和电生理特征。
在2013年10月至2021年9月之间,在我们的诊所中筛查了565例因心室预激而接受电生理研究的患者。纳入27例(4.7%)有束脑室纤维的患者。使用电子互联网数据库系统Filemaker®从文件记录中获得患者的数据。电生理研究年龄,体重,性别,症状,并从档案记录中获取是否存在先天性心脏病的患者。在术前心电图中根据改良的Arruda算法评估附件通路定位。此外,在从表面ECG开始的前40ms内测量δ波振幅。PR间隔,QRS间期,在有其他辅助途径的患者中,在消融术前后记录δ波振幅.术后值包括在FVF组中。
患者的平均年龄为11.47±4.25岁。所有70.4%的入院原因是心悸和晕厥等症状。2例患者患有肥厚型心肌病,1例患者患有ccTGA。在电生理研究中,在9例(33%)患者中发现了额外的清单WPW(3例高风险患者,6例直行性室上性心动过速),患者的局灶性房性心动过速,患者房室结折返性心动过速。在9例附加辅助途径的患者中,在体表心电图的前40ms发现δ波振幅为2.56±1.38(1-5.5)mm,FVF组为1.64±0.67(0.5-3)mm。两组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.398)。在任何孤立的FVF患者中均未检测到δ波振幅>3.5mm。有趣的是,在9例患者中,有7例(78%)的δ波振幅<3.5mm,这些患者被确定并消融了额外的辅助途径.总共有19例患者(59.3%)是腺苷反应性的(18个分离的FVF,1个明显的AP+FVF腺苷反应。8例其他明显的AP+FVF患者术前没有腺苷-心搏停止反应,并且所有QRS都得到了扩展)。
虽然,肌层脑室纤维本身并不是快速性心律失常的原因,伴随这些病例的副通路和其他快速性心律失常底物频率在EPS中相当高(约40%).消融患者的δ波特征与FVF患者非常相似。虽然所有孤立的FVF患者都有腺苷反应,大多数具有附加清单WPW的人反应迟钝。因此,根据体表ECG特征对疑似FVF的患者进行EPS,对于检测其他快速性心律失常和危险的辅助通路似乎很重要.
Fasciculoventricular fiber (FVF) that does not cause tachyarrhythmia is a rare form of ventricular preexcitation, which is important to distinguish from Kent fibers. Although, adenosine and some electrocardiographic features are important in the differentiation of Wolff Parkinson White (
WPW) than FVF, a clear distinction may not always be possible without an electrophysiological study (EPS). In this study, we aimed to present the clinical and electrophysiological features of our pediatric patients with fasciculoventricular fiber.
Between October 2013 and September 2021, 565 patients who underwent electrophysiological studies due to ventricular preexcitation in our clinic were screened in the study, and 27 (4.7%) patients with fasciculoventricular fiber were included. The data of the patients were obtained from the file records using the electronic internet database system Filemaker® . Electrophysiological study age, weight, gender, symptom, and presence of congenital heart disease of the patients were obtained from the file records. Accessory pathway localization was evaluated according to the modified Arruda algorithm in pre-procedural electrocardiography. In addition, delta wave amplitudes were measured in the first 40 ms from the surface ECG. PR interval, QRS interval, and delta wave amplitude were recorded before and after ablation in patients with additional accessory pathways. Post-procedure values were included in the FVF group.
The mean age of the patients was 11.47 ± 4.25 years. All 70.4% of the reasons for admission were symptoms such as palpitations and syncope. Two patients had hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and 1 patient had ccTGA. In the electrophysiological study, additional manifest
WPW was found in 9 (33%) patients (3 patients with high risk, 6 patients with orthodromic supraventricular tachycardia), focal atrial tachycardia in a patient, and atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia in a patient. While the delta wave amplitude was found to be 2.56 ± 1.38(1-5.5) mm in the first 40 ms in surface electrocardiography in 9 patients with additional accessory pathway, it was found to be 1.64 ± 0.67(0.5-3) mm in the FVF group. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (p = .398). Delta wave amplitude > 3.5 mm was not detected in any patient with isolated FVF. Interestingly, delta wave amplitude was < 3.5 mm in 7 (78%) of 9 patients who were identified and ablated with an additional accessory pathway. Total 19 of the patients (59.3%) were adenosine-responsive (18 isolated FVF, 1 manifest AP+FVF adenosine-responsive. 8 patients with other manifest AP + FVF had no pre-procedural adenosine-asystole response, and all of them QRS were expanded).
Although, the fasciculoventricular fibers themselves are not the cause of tachyarrhythmia, the accessory pathway and other tachyarrhythmia substrate frequency accompanying these cases are quite high (approximately 40%) in EPS. The delta wave characteristics of ablated patients are very similar to FVF patients. While all patients with isolated FVF were adenosine responsive, most of those with additional manifest
WPW were unresponsive. Therefore, performing EPS in patients with suspected FVF based on surface ECG features seems to be important for the detection of additional tachyarrhythmias and risky accessory pathways.