Time to positivity (TTP) for blood culture bottles incubated in the BacT/Alert Virtuo instrument was compared to the BacT/Alert 3D. TTP was significantly shorter with the Virtuo (median 16.2 h) than 3D (median 21.1 h; P < 0.001). Switching from 3D to Virtuo significantly improved TTP in this multicenter hospital setting study. IMPORTANCE Sepsis affects millions of people around the world each year, and accounts for a significant number of deaths in hospital intensive care units (ICU). Timely diagnosis is key to decreasing morbidity and mortality. One important element of sepsis diagnosis is organism detection using blood cultures. In this study, we examined the impact of implementing the BacT/Alert Virtuo automated blood culture detection system on time to positivity in an ICU patient population at a multicenter hospital setting.

The utility of anaerobic blood culture bottles remains controversial, especially for specimens from children. Data are limited on the inclusion of an anaerobic bottle as part of a blood culture \"set\" when using contemporary blood culture instruments and media. Here, we evaluated the clinical utility of anaerobic blood culture bottles (FN Plus) and aerobic bottles (FA Plus) for the BacT/Alert Virtuo blood culture system (bioMérieux). A total of 158,710 bottles collected between November 2018 and October 2019 were evaluated. There were 6,652 positive anaerobic bottles, of which 384 (5.8%) contained 403 obligate anaerobes. In patients <19 years old, there were 389 positive anaerobic bottles, with 15 (1.8%) containing 16 obligate anaerobes. If not for anaerobic bottles, all but 8 obligate anaerobes would have gone undetected. Furthermore, anaerobic bottles were advantageous for some facultative anaerobes. Staphylococcus aureus from anaerobic bottles demonstrated statistically significant increased recovery (1,992 anaerobic versus 1,901 aerobic bottles, P = 0.009) and faster mean time to positivity (1,138 versus 1,174 min, P = 0.027). Only 25 microorganisms had statistically significant improved recovery and/or faster time to positivity from aerobic versus anaerobic bottles, suggesting anaerobic bottles offer comparable growth for most species. Finally, if only an aerobic bottle had been collected, 2,027 fewer positive cultures would have been detected and 7,452 fewer isolates would have been reported, including cultures with S. aureus (413 isolates, 10.6% less), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9 isolates, 3.1% less) and Escherichia coli (193 isolates, 14.0% less). Taken together, these findings support the practice of routinely including an anaerobic bottle for blood culture collection.

Although Candida spp are aerobic microorganisms, some Candida strains, mainly Candida glabrata, can be recovered from anaerobic blood culture vials. We assessed the contribution of the anaerobic vials for the diagnosis of candidemia, especially for C. glabrata. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including eight university or regional hospitals. A single episode of monomicrobial candidemia per patient was included from September 1st, 2016, to August 31st, 2019. The characteristics of all aerobic and anaerobic blood culture vials sampled within 2 h before and after the first positive blood culture vials were recorded (type of vials, result, and for positive vials time-to-positivity and Candida species). Overall, 509 episodes of candidemia were included. The main species were C. albicans (55.6%) followed by C. glabrata (17.1%), C. parapsilosis (4.9%), and C. tropicalis (4.5%). An anaerobic vial was positive in 76 (14.9%) of all episodes of which 56 (73.8%) were due to C. glabrata. The number of C. glabrata infections only positive in anaerobic vials was 1 (2.6%), 1 (11.1%), and 15 (37.5%) with the BACT/ALERT 3D the BACT/ALERT VIRTUO and the BACTEC FX instrument, respectively (P < 0.01). The initial positivity of an anaerobic vial was highly predictive of the isolation of C. glabrata with the BACTEC FX (sensitivity of 96.8%). C. glabrata time-to-positivity was shorter in anaerobic vial than aerobic vial with all instruments. Anaerobic blood culture vials improve the recovery of Candida spp mainly C. glabrata. This study could be completed by further analyses including mycological and pediatric vials.
BACKGROUND: Although Candida spp are aerobic microorganisms, C. glabrata is able to grow in anaerobic conditions. In blood culture, the time-to-positivity of C. glabrata is shorter in anaerobic than aerobic vials. Only the anaerobic vial was positive in up to 15 (37.5%) C. glabrata bloodstream infections.

The bioMérieux BacT/Alert Virtuo blood culture system used in combination with resin-containing media may enhance the growth of microorganisms. Our objective was to assess the impact of transitioning to the Virtuo system in comparison to the VersaTREK blood culture system at a tertiary care medical center. We retrospectively reviewed all blood cultures performed at a 1,250-bed academic medical center between January and December 2018 (VersaTREK) and January and December 2019 (Virtuo). Blood culture positivity rates and contamination rates were compared before and after Virtuo implementation. Of 101,438 blood cultures performed during the study period, 48,839 (48.1%) were processed preimplementation and 52,599 (51.9%) postimplementation. The blood culture positivity rate increased from 8.1% preimplementation to 11.7% postimplementation (P < 0.001). Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated species in both time periods and had a higher recovery rate postimplementation (1.5% of all blood cultures obtained preimplementation versus 3.4% postimplementation; P < 0.001). A higher recovery rate in the postimplementation period was also noted for coagulase-negative staphylococci (1.9% preimplementation versus 2.7% postimplementation; P < 0.001), as well as modest but statistically significant changes for Escherichia coli (0.8% versus 1.0%; P < 0.001), Klebsiella pneumoniae (0.4% versus 0.5%; P = 0.005), and Candida albicans. (0.1% versus 0.2%; P = 0.038). The inpatient blood culture contamination rate was higher postimplementation (1.5% preimplementation versus 1.9% postimplementation; P < 0.001). The Virtuo blood culture system was associated with a higher observed proportion of positive blood cultures than the VersaTREK system. Future studies are needed to assess whether an increased rate of positive blood cultures is associated with changes in clinical outcomes.

New blood culture instrumentation and medium formulations have led to improved time to positivity (TTP) for positive blood cultures. Data regarding the necessity of pediatric blood culture bottles with contemporary blood culture systems are sparse. We compared performance of three commercial blood culture systems, evaluating impact of blood volumes in standard and pediatric blood culture media across systems. Simulated blood cultures with packed red blood cells (PRBCs) and three Gram-positive, four Gram-negative, and one anaerobic organism (final concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 19 CFU/ml blood) on the Virtuo, VersaTrek, and Bactec FX instruments were evaluated with FAN Plus, Redox, and Bactec Plus media, respectively. For each medium/instrument/organism combination, 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-ml blood volumes were evaluated in triplicate. Detection rate was not affected by blood volume. Aerobic organisms that demonstrated variable rates of detection were Kingella kingae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis. Bacteroides fragilis was detected in 83%, 100%, and 100% of Virtuo, VersaTrek, and Bactec anaerobic bottles, respectively. The average TTP of standard medium for aerobic organisms detected on Virtuo was decreased compared to those for VersaTrek (-2.3 h) and Bactec (-4.9 h). Compared to standard medium, detection rate and TTP were unchanged on Virtuo, while TTP was reduced with pediatric medium for 2/8 organisms tested on Bactec and 7/8 organisms on VersaTrek, illustrating the potential benefit of pediatric medium on VersaTrek or Bactec when low blood volumes (<5 ml) are collected. These results demonstrate that TTP is decreased on the Virtuo compared to VersaTrek and Bactec for many microorganisms associated with bloodstream infection (BSI) but may have species-specific limitations.

Timely diagnosis of microorganisms in blood cultures is necessary to optimize therapy. Although blood culture media and systems have evolved for decades, the standard interval for incubation prior to being discarded as negative has remained 5 days. Here, we evaluated the optimal incubation time for the BacT/Alert Virtuo blood culture detection system (bioMérieux) using FA Plus (aerobic) and FN Plus (anaerobic) resin culture bottles in routine clinical use. Following institutional review board (IRB) approval, a retrospective review evaluated the outcomes of 158,710 bottles collected between November 2018 and October 2019. The number of positive blood bottles was 13,592 (8.6%); 99% of positive aerobic and anaerobic bottles flagged positive by 91.5 and 108 h, respectively. The mean (median) times to positivity were 18.4 h (15.6 h) for Staphylococcus aureus, 12.3 h (9.5 h) for Escherichia coli, 22.2 h (15.9 h) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 48.9 h (42.9 h) for Candida spp. Only 175 bottles (0.1% of all bottles) flagged positive after 4 days of incubation; 89 (51%) of these bottles grew Cutibacterium (Propionibacterium) species. Chart review of blood cultures positive after 4 days (96 h) rarely had a clinical impact and sometimes had a negative impact on patient care. Finally, a seeded study of the HACEK group (i.e., Haemophilus, Aggregatibacter, Cardiobacterium, Eikenella, and Kingella), historically associated with delayed blood culture positivity, demonstrated no benefit to extended incubation beyond 4 days. Collectively, these findings demonstrated that a 4-day incubation time was sufficient for the Virtuo system and media. Implementation of the 4-day incubation time could enhance clinically relevant results by reducing recovery of contaminants and finalizing blood cultures 1 day earlier.

BacT/Alert Virtuo is an advanced, automated blood culture system incorporating improved automation and an enhanced detection algorithm to shorten time to detection. A multicenter study of the investigational Virtuo system (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC) compared to BacT/Alert 3D (BTA3D) for detection of bacteremia/fungemia in four bottle types, SA and FA Plus (aerobic) and SN and FN Plus (anaerobic), was performed in a clinical setting with patient samples in a matched system design clinical trial. Blood was added to paired aerobic or anaerobic bottles, with the volume in each bottle in each pair required to be ≤10 ml and with the volumes required to be within 30% of each other. Of 5,709 bottle sets (52.5% aerobic pairs and 47.5% anaerobic pairs), 430 (7.5%) were positive for bacterial or fungal growth, with 342 (6.0%) clinically significant and 83 (1.5%) contaminated. A total of 3,539 sets (62.0%) were volume compliant, with 203 sets (5.7%) clinically significant. The positivity rates for volume-compliant bottle pairs determined by the two systems were comparable, with 68.7% of clinically significant isolates detected by both instruments, 15.7% by Virtuo only, and 15.7% by BTA3D only. Virtuo detected microbial growth nearly 2 h sooner overall than BTA3D (mean, 15.9 h versus 17.7 h). Shorter time to detection by Virtuo was related to organism group, with the time to detection being significantly shorter for enteric Gram-negative bacilli and enterococci (means, 3.6 h and 2.3 h shorter, respectively). This large clinical study demonstrated that the Virtuo blood culture system produced results comparable to those seen with the long-established BTA3D system, with significantly shorter time to detection.