Video laryngoscope

视频喉镜
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Securing an airway enables the oxygenation and ventilation of the lungs and is a potentially life-saving medical procedure. Adverse and critical events are common during airway management, particularly in neonates and infants. The multifactorial reasons for this include patient-dependent, user-dependent and also external factors. The recently published joint ESAIC/BJA international guidelines on airway management in neonates and infants are summarized with a focus on the clinical application. The original publication of the guidelines focussed on naming formal recommendations based on systematically documented evidence, whereas this summary focusses particularly on the practicability of their implementation.
    UNASSIGNED: Die Sicherung der Atemwege ermöglicht die Oxygenierung und Ventilation der Lungen und stellt eine potenziell lebensrettende medizinische Maßnahme dar. Insbesondere bei Neugeborenen und Säuglingen kommt es gehäuft zu unerwünschten und kritischen Ereignissen während des Atemwegsmanagements. Die multifaktoriellen Gründe dafür umfassen patientenabhängige, anwenderabhängige, aber auch externe Faktoren. Im Folgenden wird die neu erschienene internationale Leitlinie zur Atemwegssicherung bei Neugeborenen und Säuglingen fokussierend auf die klinische Anwendung zusammengefasst. Während die Originalpublikation der Leitlinie darauf fokussiert, auf Basis der systematisch erfassten Evidenz formale Empfehlungen zu benennen, stellt diese Zusammenfassung v. a. die Praktikabilität ihrer Umsetzung in den Fokus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    视频喉镜的使用增强了声带的可视化,从而提高气管插管的可及性。利用人工智能(AI)来识别通过视频喉镜获得的图像,特别是在标记会厌和声带时,可以阐明解剖结构并增强对解剖学的理解。这项研究调查了AI模型在从人体模型捕获的视频喉镜图像中准确识别声门的能力。使用具有记录功能的支气管镜对人体模型进行气管插管,并收集声门的图像数据以创建AI模型。声带的数据预处理和注释,会厌,进行了声门检查,和人类对声带的注释,会厌,声门被执行。根据AI的判断,解剖结构采用颜色编码进行鉴定.AI模型对会厌和声带的识别准确率为0.9516,超过95%。人工智能成功地标记了声门,会厌,气管插管过程中的声带。这些标记显著地有助于相应结构的视觉识别,准确度超过95%。人工智能展示了识别会厌的能力,声带,和声门使用人体模型的图像识别。
    The use of video laryngoscopes has enhanced the visualization of the vocal cords, thereby improving the accessibility of tracheal intubation. Employing artificial intelligence (AI) to recognize images obtained through video laryngoscopy, particularly when marking the epiglottis and vocal cords, may elucidate anatomical structures and enhance anatomical comprehension of anatomy. This study investigates the ability of an AI model to accurately identify the glottis in video laryngoscope images captured from a manikin. Tracheal intubation was conducted on a manikin using a bronchoscope with recording capabilities, and image data of the glottis was gathered for creating an AI model. Data preprocessing and annotation of the vocal cords, epiglottis, and glottis were performed, and human annotation of the vocal cords, epiglottis, and glottis was carried out. Based on the AI\'s determinations, anatomical structures were color-coded for identification. The recognition accuracy of the epiglottis and vocal cords recognized by the AI model was 0.9516, which was over 95%. The AI successfully marked the glottis, epiglottis, and vocal cords during the tracheal intubation process. These markings significantly aided in the visual identification of the respective structures with an accuracy of more than 95%. The AI demonstrated the ability to recognize the epiglottis, vocal cords, and glottis using an image recognition model of a manikin.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是通过将摄像机和监视器连接到传统的Macintosh喉镜(CML)来评估可连接视频喉镜(AVL)的实用性。使用人体模型模拟正常和舌水肿气道情况。二十名医生使用CML进行了气管插管,AVL,PentaxAirwayscope®(AWS),和McGrathMAC®(MAC)在每个场景中。将10名有使用气管插管临床经验的医师指定为熟练组,另外10名与其他科室有关联且几乎没有使用气管插管临床经验的医师被指定为非熟练组.记录插管所需时间和成功率。参与者对使用难度和声门视图评估进行评分。所有20名参与者都成功完成了这项研究。在正常气道情况下,熟练组和不熟练组的气管插管成功率和插管时间均无差异。在有经验的群体中,AWS在舌水肿气道场景中成功率最高(100%),其次是AVL(60%),MAC(60%),慢性粒细胞白血病(10%)(p=0.001)。使用AWS插管所需的时间明显短于AVL(10.2svs.19.2s)或MAC(10.2svs.20.4s,p=0.007)。使用AVL的难度明显低于CML(7.8vs.2.8;p<0.001)。对于有经验的群体来说,AVL被解释为劣于AWS,但优于MAC。同样,在不熟练的群体中,在舌水肿情况下,AVL的成功率和气管插管时间与MAC相似,但这没有统计学意义。使用AVL的难度明显低于CML(8.8vs.3.3;p<0.001)。AVL可以是VL的替代方案。
    The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of an attachable video laryngoscope (AVL) by attaching a camera and a monitor to a conventional Macintosh laryngoscope (CML). Normal and tongue edema airway scenarios were simulated using a manikin. Twenty physicians performed tracheal intubations using CML, AVL, Pentax Airwayscope® (AWS), and McGrath MAC® (MAC) in each scenario. Ten physicians who had clinical experience in using tracheal intubation were designated as the skilled group, and another ten physicians who were affiliated with other departments and had little clinical experience using tracheal intubation were designated as the unskilled group. The time required for intubation and the success rate were recorded. The degree of difficulty of use and glottic view assessment were scored by participants. All 20 participants successfully completed the study. There was no difference in tracheal intubation success rate and intubation time in the normal airway scenario in both skilled and unskilled groups. In the experienced group, AWS had the highest success rate (100%) in the tongue edema airway scenario, followed by AVL (60%), MAC (60%), and CML (10%) (p = 0.001). The time required to intubate using AWS was significantly shorter than that with AVL (10.2 s vs. 19.2 s) or MAC (10.2 s vs. 20.4 s, p = 0.007). The difficulty of using AVL was significantly lower than that of CML (7.8 vs. 2.8; p < 0.001). For the experienced group, AVL was interpreted as being inferior to AWS but better than MAC. Similarly, in the unskilled group, AVL had a similar success rate and tracheal intubation time as MAC in the tongue edema scenario, but this was not statistically significant. The difficulty of using AVL was significantly lower than that of CML (8.8 vs. 3.3; p < 0.001). AVL may be an alternative for VL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是比较HugeMed®视频喉镜与直接Macintosh喉镜在经鼻气管插管中的性能。
    88名4-10岁儿童被随机分配到HugeMed®视频喉镜(HVL)或Macintosh直接喉镜(MDL)组。插管困难,声门视图等级,插管时间,尝试气管插管的次数,使用外部喉部操作和Magill镊子,恢复时间,小儿麻醉谵妄量表(PAEDS)评分,气管插管引起的疼痛,和喉部出血进行评估。
    HVL组易气管插管发生率高于MDL组(p=0.001)。与MDL组相比,HVL组的声门视图更好(p=0.027)。两组在气管插管时间方面没有差异,尝试气管插管的次数,马吉尔镊子的用法,疼痛,以及气管插管引起的出血.与HVL组相比,MDL组需要进行外部喉部操作(p=0.004)和PAEDS评分(p=0.006)。
    HugeMed®可视喉镜可以提供更容易的气管插管,创造一个更好的声门视图,与Macintosh直接喉镜相比,显着减少了对额外操作的需求,用于经鼻气管插管.
    www.clinicaltrial.gov标识符是NCT05121597。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the HugeMed® videolaryngoscope with a direct Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation.
    UNASSIGNED: Eighty-eight children aged 4-10 years were randomly assigned to either the HugeMed® videolaryngoscope (HVL) or the Macintosh direct laryngoscope (MDL) group. Intubation difficulty, glottic view grade, time-to-intubation, number of tracheal intubation attempts, use of external laryngeal manipulation and Magill forceps, recovery time, pediatric-anesthesia-delirium-scale (PAEDS) scores, pain due to tracheal intubation, and laryngeal bleeding were evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: Easy tracheal intubation incidence was higher in the HVL group than that in the MDL group (p = 0.001). Glottic view was better in the HVL group as compared to the MDL group (p = 0.027). There was no difference between the groups in terms of time-to-tracheal intubation, number of tracheal intubation attempts, Magill forceps usage, pain, and bleeding due to tracheal intubation. The need for external laryngeal manipulation (p = 0.004) and PAEDS scores (p = 0.006) were higher in the MDL group than those in the HVL group.
    UNASSIGNED: HugeMed® videolaryngoscope may provide easier tracheal intubation, create a better glottic view, and significantly reduce the need for additional manipulation compared to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope, for nasotracheal intubation.
    UNASSIGNED: www.clinicaltrial.gov identifier is NCT05121597.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    视频喉镜通常与Macintosh和McCoy喉镜一起用于鼻气管插管(NTI)。这项研究的目的是评估麦考伊的表现,Macintosh,和Truview喉镜在Bougie辅助NTI期间的插管时间,成功率,以及手术过程中的血液动力学变化。
    45名美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I-II成年患者,Mallampati1-4级,需要NTI,在接受书面知情同意书后登记。ASAIII/IV,限制张口,体重指数>30被排除在研究之外。患者被随机分配到用三个喉镜中的一个插管(McCoy,Macintosh,和Truview)和麻醉师对所有这些都很有经验。主要结局是插管时间,次要结局包括首次尝试成功率,喉外部操作,Cormack-Lehane(CL)等级,和血液动力学反应。
    McCoy的插管时间,Macintosh,和Truview,分别为86.87±15.92、82.87±16.46和79.93±14.53(平均值±标准偏差)秒,分别,这与Truview最短的情况相当。与其他两组相比,Truview组获得的CL1级更多(53.3%),而在McCoy和Macintosh组中,CL3级各占20%。
    麦考伊,Macintosh,和Truview喉镜在Bougie辅助NTI期间的性能相当,Truview具有最短的插管时间和更好的可视化。
    UNASSIGNED: Video laryngoscopes are commonly used along with Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes for Nasotracheal intubation (NTI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview laryngoscopes during bougie-aided NTI with respect to intubation time, success rate, and hemodynamic changes during the procedure.
    UNASSIGNED: Forty-five American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II adult patients, with Mallampati grade 1-4, requiring NTI, were enrolled after taking written informed consent. ASA III/IV, restricted mouth opening, and body mass index >30 were excluded from the study. Patients were randomly allocated to intubate with one of the three laryngoscopes (McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview) and the anesthesiologists were well experienced with all of them. The primary outcome was intubation time and secondary outcomes included first attempt success rate, external laryngeal manipulation, Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade, and hemodynamic responses.
    UNASSIGNED: The intubation time of McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview, was 86.87 ± 15.92, 82.87 ± 16.46, and 79.93 ± 14.53 (mean ± standard deviation) seconds, respectively, which is comparable with Truview being the shortest. CL grade 1 was obtained more in the Truview group (53.3%) compared to the other two groups, while CL grade 3 was obtained in 20% each in McCoy and Macintosh groups.
    UNASSIGNED: McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview laryngoscopes were comparable in performance during bougie-aided NTI, with Truview having the shortest intubation time and better visualization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:儿科气道管理需要仔细的临床评估和有经验的执行,生理,和发展考虑。小儿气道的视频喉镜检查是一个发展中的研究领域,最近的数据表明视频喉镜比标准的Macintosh刀片更好。具体来说,与McCoy直接喉镜相比,关于C-MACD刀片的优势的文献很少。
    方法:伦理委员会批准后,招募了70名美国麻醉医师协会的身体状况1和2名4-12岁的儿童,这些儿童计划在全身麻醉下进行择期手术。使用C-MAC视频喉镜尺寸2D刀片(第1组)和McCoy喉镜尺寸2刀片(第2组)将患者随机分配到插管。插管困难量表(IDS)是插管的主要结果,而Cormack-Lehane成绩,喉镜和插管的持续时间,血液动力学反应,和任何气道并发症的发生率是次要结局.
    结果:两组在患者特征方面具有可比性。中位(IQR)插管困难量表(IDS)评分较好,但与C-MAC(0[0-0]vs.0[0-2],p=.055)。声门视图较好(CLI级在32/35与23/35,p=.002),以及达到最佳声门视图的时间(6s[5-7]vs.8.0s[6-10],p=.006)在C-MACD刀片组中较小,而插管的总持续时间相当(20s[16-22]与18s[15-22],p=.374)。所有患者都可以在第一次尝试时成功插管。所有患者均未出现任何并发症。
    结论:在儿童中,与McCoy2号喉镜相比,C-MAC2号视频喉镜提供了更快更好的声门可视化,但插管难度相似。与McCoy喉镜相比,C-MAC显示的较短的声门视图时间未能转化为较短的插管总持续时间,这归因于D刀片的明显弯曲。
    BACKGROUND: Pediatric airway management requires careful clinical evaluation and experienced execution due to anatomical, physiological, and developmental considerations. Video laryngoscopy in pediatric airways is a developing area of research, with recent data suggesting that video laryngoscopes are better than standard Macintosh blades. Specifically, there is a paucity of literature on the advantages of the C-MAC D-blade compared to the McCoy direct laryngoscope.
    METHODS: After Ethics Committee approval, 70 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 children aged 4-12 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were recruited. Patients were randomly allocated to intubation using a C-MAC video laryngoscope size 2 D-blade (Group 1) and a McCoy laryngoscope size 2 blade (Group 2). The Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) for ease of intubation was the primary outcome, while Cormack-Lehane grades, duration of laryngoscopy and intubation, hemodynamic responses, and incidence of any airway complications were secondary outcomes.
    RESULTS: Both groups were comparable in terms of patient characteristics. The median (IQR) Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) score was better but was statistically nonsignificant with C-MAC (0 [0-0] vs. 0 [0-2], p = .055). The glottic views were superior (CL grade I in 32/35 vs. 23/35, p = .002), and the time to best glottic view (6 s [5-7] vs. 8.0 s [6-10], p = .006) was lesser in the C-MAC D-blade group while the total duration of intubation was comparable (20 s [16-22] vs. 18 s [15-22], p = .374). All the patients could be successfully intubated on the first attempt. None of the patients had any complications.
    CONCLUSIONS: The C-MAC video laryngoscope size 2 D-blade provided faster and better glottic visualization but similar intubation difficulty compared to McCoy size 2 laryngoscope in children. The shorter time to achieve glottic view demonstrated with the C-MAC failed to translate into a shorter total duration of intubation when compared to the McCoy laryngoscope attributable to a pronounced curvature of the D-blade.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    与成年人相比,由于解剖学和生理学差异,儿科困难的气道管理对于麻醉师来说更具挑战性。此外,成人对使用困难气道设备的熟悉程度并不等同于儿童对这种设备的熟练程度。所以,在这里,我们介绍了一个4岁儿童因烧伤后颈部挛缩引起的困难气道的独特病例,在使用柔性纤维支气管镜尝试失败后,在视频喉镜的帮助下成功管理。
    Pediatric difficult airway management is more challenging for an anesthesiologist due to anatomical and physiological differences as compared to adults. Moreover, the familiarity with the use of difficult airway equipment in adults does not equate to proficiency for the same in children. So, here we are presenting the management of a unique case of a difficult airway due to postburn neck contracture in a 4-year-old child, which was managed successfully with the help of a video laryngoscope after the failure attempt with a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    微创表面活性剂治疗(MIST)已成为表面活性剂递送的优选方法。该技术的先驱已经描述了将直接喉镜(DL)用于MIST。随着视频喉镜(VL)在新生儿气道管理中的应用越来越多,据推测,MIST技术可以适用于VL。
    目的:为了比较手术成功,操作员易于使用,使用VL与MIST的并发症MIST使用DL。
    方法:这是一个回顾性研究,在获得伦理批准后在三级新生儿重症监护病房进行的观察性队列研究.我们包括在2020年10月1日至2022年10月31日期间接受MIST的新生儿。基线人口统计特征,连同程序数据,被收集。主要结果指标包括总体程序成功率,需要多次尝试,以及尝试的总数。次要结局指标包括不良事件的发生,需要第二剂表面活性剂,以及手术后7天内需要插管。手段和SDs,独立t检验,频率,适当使用卡方。P值<0.05被认为是统计学上显著的。
    结果:在79例新生儿中,37名新生儿通过VL接受了MIST,而42则通过DL接收了MIST。VL组的中位胎龄在29.0周较低。DL组30.5周(p=0.011)。VL组的中位出生体重为1260g,IQR(1080,1690),显著低于DL组,1575克,IQR(1220,2251),p=0.028。DL组的专用导管使用率更高。两组之间的总体程序成功相似。与DL[4(11%)相比,VL对多次尝试的需求较低。13(31%);p=0.034)]在单变量水平上,但在多变量分析中不显著(p=0.131)。手术并发症,需要第二剂表面活性剂,MIST后机械通气的需要,和操作员的易用性相似。用户评论强调了VL在提供实时视觉信息以确认导管放置和指导操作员/受训者方面的价值。
    结论:总体而言,在我们的队列中,尽管VL是一种较新的适应技术,病情加重,更多的早产儿,程序上的成功,并发症,使用VL和DL的MIST的操作员易用性具有可比性。我们的发现表明VL在MIST中的成功应用,并提出了可能促进普遍采用的程序优势。
    Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) has emerged as a preferred method of surfactant delivery. Pioneers of this technique have described the use of direct laryngoscopy (DL) for MIST. With the increasing application of video laryngoscopy (VL) for neonatal airway management, it is speculated that MIST techniques can be adapted for use with VL.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare procedural success, operator ease of use, and complication of MIST using VL vs. MIST using DL.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study conducted at a tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit after obtaining ethical approval. We included neonates who received MIST between 1 October 2020 and 31 October 2022. Baseline demographic characteristics, along with procedural data, were collected. Primary outcome measures included the overall procedural success rate, the need for multiple attempts, and the total number of attempts. Secondary outcome measures included the occurrence of adverse events, the need for a second dose of surfactant, and the need for intubation within 7 days of the procedure. Means and SDs, independent t-tests, frequencies, and chi-square were used as appropriate. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
    RESULTS: Of the 79 neonates included, 37 neonates received MIST via VL, while 42 received MIST via DL. The median gestational age was lower in the VL group at 29.0 weeks vs. 30.5 weeks (p = 0.011) in the DL group. The median birthweight in the VL group was 1260 g, IQR (1080, 1690), which was significantly lower than the DL group, which was 1575 g, IQR (1220, 2251), p = 0.028. Purpose-built catheter use was higher in the DL group. The overall procedural success was similar between groups. The need for multiple attempts was lower with VL in comparison to DL [4 (11%) vs. 13 (31%); p = 0.034)] at the univariate level but not significant at multivariate analysis (p = 0.131). Procedural complications, the need for a second dose of surfactant, the need for mechanical ventilation post-MIST, and operator ease of use were similar. User comments emphasized the value of VL in providing real-time visual information to confirm catheter placement and guide operators/trainees.
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, in our cohort, despite VL being a more recently adapted technology used more in smaller, sicker, and more premature neonates, procedural success, complications, and operator ease of use for MIST using VL and DL were comparable. Our findings show the successful application of VL for MIST and suggest procedural advantages that might facilitate universal adoption.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    提出了25°的备用位置,以增加预充氧的功效,并在使用直接喉镜时提供更好的气管插管条件。这项研究旨在比较使用两个视频喉镜(VLS)时仰卧和25°备用位置之间气管插管的难易程度。
    一百名正常气道的成年人,属于美国麻醉师协会的身体状况I级和II级,需要全身麻醉,随机分为K组和M组。使用KingVision和McGrathVLS在仰卧位(K1和M1组)或25°后位(K2和M2组)插管。通过在臀部弯曲躯干将手术台从水平位置抬起,以使一条假想线将患者的外耳道连接到胸骨切迹,从而给出25°的备用位置。改良插管困难量表(mIDS)是主要结果,和插管时间,尝试插管的次数,重要参数,其次比较并发症。使用MedCalc软件通过对参数数据应用独立t检验和对分类数据应用卡方检验并找到风险比进行统计分析。
    在25°备用位置使用两个VLS时,平均(标准偏差)mIDS显着降低[0.92(0.75)对0.48(0.58),P=0.025,自由度(DF):48,平均差(95%置信区间[CI]):K1组与K2组的-0.44(-0.821至-0.059)和0.76(0.59)与0.36(0.48),M1组与M2组的P=0.012,DF:48,平均差异(95%CI):-0.40(-0.706至-0.094)]。在使用VLS插管期间需要操作的患者总数的两个位置的风险比为0.48,P=0.0004,95%CI=0.305-0.765。通过使用KingVision(P=0.005)和McGrath(P=0.042)VLS,在25°备用位置插管时间更短。
    25°备用位置有助于使用通道(KingVision)和非通道(McGrath)VLS轻松插管。
    UNASSIGNED: The 25°back-up position is proposed to increase the efficacy of preoxygenation and provide better tracheal intubating conditions when using a direct laryngoscope. This study aimed to compare the ease of tracheal intubation between supine and 25° back-up positions when using two video laryngoscopes (VLS).
    UNASSIGNED: One hundred adults with normal airways and belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classes I and II, requiring general anaesthesia, were randomised in groups K and M. The trachea was intubated using King Vision and McGrath VLS in either supine (groups K1 and M1) or 25° back-up (groups K2 and M2) positions. The 25° backup position was given by raising the operating table from the horizontal position by flexing the torso at the hips so that an imaginary line connected the patient\'s external auditory meatus to the sternal notch. Modified Intubation Difficulty Scale (mIDS) was the primary outcome, and intubation time, the number of intubation attempts, vital parameters, and complications were compared secondarily. Statistical analysis was done using MedCalc software by applying an independent t-test for parametric data and a Chi-square test for categorical data and finding the risk ratio.
    UNASSIGNED: Mean (Standard deviation) mIDS was significantly reduced using both VLS in the 25° back-up position [0.92 (0.75) versus 0.48 (0.58), P = 0.025, degree of freedom (DF): 48, mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]):-0.44 (-0.821 to - 0.059) in group K1 versus group K2 and 0.76 (0.59) versus 0.36 (0.48), P = 0.012, DF: 48, mean difference (95% CI): -0.40(-0.706 to - 0.094) in group M1 versus group M2, respectively]. The risk ratio comparing both the positions for the total number of patients requiring manoeuvres during intubation using both the VLS was 0.48 with P = 0.0004 and 95% CI = 0.305 - 0.765. Intubation time was shorter in the 25° backup position by using King Vision (P = 0.005) and McGrath (P = 0.042) VLS.
    UNASSIGNED: The 25° backup position helps provide ease of intubation using both the channelled (King Vision) and non-channelled (McGrath) VLS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Arytenoid软骨脱位可作为气管插管和喉外伤的并发症,但其发生与间接视频喉镜尚未报道。本文报道了使用视频喉镜(McGRATHMAC;Medtronic)在间接喉镜下进行经鼻气管插管后发生的前关节脱位。据推测,脱位是由于喉镜刀片最初插入太深并向左环关节的后部施加压力所致。该患者的关节前脱位采用言语治疗保守治疗,术后约40天消退。手术后的第74天,纤维镜检查证实脱位恢复和愈合。然而,其他类型的蝶骨脱位和喉损伤可能需要替代治疗。如果怀疑蝶骨脱位,建议尽早咨询耳鼻喉科医生。
    Arytenoid cartilage dislocation can occur as a complication of tracheal intubation and laryngeal trauma, but its occurrence with indirect video laryngoscopy has not been reported. This paper reports anterior arytenoid dislocation occurring after nasotracheal intubation performed under indirect laryngoscopy using a video laryngoscope (McGRATH MAC; Medtronic). The dislocation is presumed to have resulted from the laryngoscope blade being initially inserted too deeply and applying pressure to the posterior aspect of the left cricoarytenoid joint. This patient\'s anterior arytenoid dislocation was treated conservatively using speech therapy with resolution occurring approximately 40 days postoperatively. On the 74th day after surgery, fibroscopic examination confirmed recovery and healing of the dislocation. However, other types of arytenoid dislocations and laryngeal injuries may require alternative treatment. Early consultation with an otolaryngologist is recommended if arytenoid dislocation is suspected.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号