Evidence on the long-term use of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is limited. The aim was to evaluate the tolvaptan effectiveness and safety in real clinical setting.
A single-center observational study (2016-2022) involving ADPKD patients treated with tolvaptan was conducted. Annual change in serum creatinine (sCr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before and after treatment initiation were evaluated. Change in total kidney volume (TKV), blood pressure (BP) and urinary albuminuria at 12, 24 and 36 months after initiation were also determined. Adverse events (AEs) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 were analyzed.
A total of 22 patients were included. No significant differences pre- vs post tolvaptan treatment in annual rate of change in eGFR (-3.52ml/min/1.73m2 [-4.98%] vs -3.98ml/min/1.73m2 [-8.48%], p=0.121) and sCr (+0.06mg/dL [4.22%] vs +0.15mg/dL [7.77%], p=0.429) were observed. Tolvaptan improved urinary osmolality at 12 (p=0.019) and 24 months (p=0.008), but not at 36 months (p=0.11). There were no changes in TKV, BP control and urinary albuminuria at 12, 24 or 36 months. A worse response was shown in patients with rapid kidney function decline (p=0.042). A 36.4% of the patients developed grade III/IV AEs. A 22.7% discontinued treatment due to unacceptable toxicity.
This study shows a modest benefit of tolvaptan in ADPKD patients, as well as safety concerns.

Tafamidis is the only approved transthyretin stabiliser approved for the treatment of variant transthyretin amyloidosis (A-ATTRv) related polyneuropathy (PNP). The aim of this study is to analyse the effectiveness of tafamidis in a real-world setting in Spain.
This is a national multicenter study in which patients with V30M A-ATTR related PN treated with tafamidis for at least 1 year were included. Clinical, demographic, analytical and neurophysiological variables were analysed.
100 patients were recruited. Overall, 47 patients (47%) were classified as complete responders, 32 (32%) as partial responders and 21 (21%) as non-responders. The median duration of treatment with tafamidis was 35 months. Better treatment response was shown in patients with in polyneuropathy disability score (PND) I, lower neuropathy impairment score (NIS), compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and Norfolk QoL questionnaire. Higher albumin levels and lower NTproBNP levels were also associated with better treatment response. A basal NIS≥15 predicts that the patient could be a non-responder with a 60% probability.
Our results reinforce the tafamidis efficacy to treat A-ATTRv-PNP if started early in the disease course. Patients with the V30M variant, NIS<15 and PND I are the most appropriate subjects for this treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of arrhythmia worldwide and a significant health burden. Edoxaban, a recent novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC), is being investigated in the European real-world ETNA-AF study of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The aim of this study was to characterize the Iberian edoxaban-treated cohort of ETNA-AF at baseline and to compare it with previously retrieved Portuguese data.
METHODS: Patients with NVAF treated with edoxaban and followed in Portuguese and Spanish centers were consecutively enrolled between June 2017 and January 2018. Only patients with a previous clinical decision to receive edoxaban were included. Patients\' baseline demographic and clinical parameters, medical history, and AF-related characteristics were retrieved.
RESULTS: A total of 892 NVAF patients, with a mean age of 73.9 years, were included, 75.3% of whom received high-dose (60 mg) and 24.7% low-dose (30 mg) edoxaban. Most patients (55.9%) were male. Of the patients receiving 30 mg and 60 mg edoxaban, 55.9% and 37.9%, respectively, had an estimated CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥4. Previous bleeding event rates were low, with a predominance of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (1.9%). Most patients (47.5%) with NVAF had paroxysmal AF, followed by 26.4% with permanent AF. Median overall CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.0 and median HAS-BLED score was 2.0. Previous treatments mostly included vitamin K antagonists (35.7%). A considerably higher proportion of patients on low-dose edoxaban required dose adjustments (71.4% vs. 8.6%). Overall adherence to label dosing recommendations was 86.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable data on disease and patient profiles and will provide valuable insights into disease management and progression, as well as the safety, effectiveness, and patterns of cardiovascular events associated with edoxaban.

OBJECTIVE: The main aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of Nivolumab, an immune-checkpoint-inhibitor antibody, in advanced, previously treated, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients, in a real world setting.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicentre data analysis of patients who were included in the Portuguese Nivolumab Expanded Access Program (EAP). Eligibility criteria included histologically or citologically confirmed NSCLC, stage IIIB and IV, evaluable disease, sufficient organ function and at least one prior line of chemotherapy. The endpoints included Overall Response Rate (ORR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Safety analysis was performed with the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0, and immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) were treated according to protocol treatment guidelines. Tumour response was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1. Data was analysed using SPSS, version 21.0 (IBM Statistics).
RESULTS: From June 2015 to December 2016, a total of 229 patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled at 30 Portuguese centres. Clinical data were collected up to the end of July 2018. The baseline median age was 64 years (range 37-83) and the majority of patients were males (70.3%) and former/current smokers (69.4%). Patients with non-squamous histology predominated (88.1%), and 67.6% of the patients had received 2 or more prior lines of chemotherapy. Out of 229 patients, data was available for 219 patients (3 patients did not start treatment, while data was unavailable in 7 patients); of the 219 patients, 15.5% were not evaluated for radiological tumour assessment, 1.4% had complete response (CR), 21% partial response (PR), 31% stable disease (SD) and 31.1% progressive disease (PD). Thus, the ORR was 22.4% and DCR was 53.4% in this population. At the time of survival analysis the median PFS was 4.91 months (95% CI, 3.89-6.11) and median OS was 13.21 months (95% CI, 9.89-16.53). The safety profile was in line with clinical trial data.
CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy and safety results observed in this retrospective analysis were consistent with observations reported in clinical trials and from other centres.

To analyze the effect of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in a group of insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) patients.
One hundred and five insulin treated T2D patients were enrolled. Primary endpoints were: fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, weight, total insulin doses (TDI), total basal insulin (TDB) and total rapid insulin (TDR). Secondary variables were: total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol (cLDL), HDL cholesterol (cHDL), triglycerides and systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure. Safety and tolerance were evaluated through the appearance of severe hypoglycemia, ketoacidosis and infections.
After 4 months follow-up, a 0.7 (1.0)% HbA1c reduction was found, accompanied by a -2.8 (11.5) UI/day TDI decrease. Weight dropped for 73.7% of patients, with an average -2.0 (2.7) kg reduction. A global cHDL increase was noted after treatment, while no differences were observed for total cholesterol, triglycerides or cLDL. SBP dropped significantly, but no change in DBP was observed.
The use of SGLT2 inhibitors in insulin treated T2D patients resulted in reduction of HbA1c, which was associated to weight loss, cHDL increase and SBP decrease.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of omalizumab in the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria has been demonstrated in phase iii clinical trials, but limited information is available regarding real-life effectiveness using the weekly Urticarial Activity Score (UAS7). The aim of the study was to assess clinical response (UAS7≤6) and complete response (UAS7=0) rates at weeks 12 and 24 in a real-life cohort and to identify possible predictors of response to omalizumab.
METHODS: Clinical records of consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe chronic spontaneous urticaria (UAS≥16) treated with omalizumab at a university-affiliated reference dermatology department in Barcelona, Spain, from February 2014 to September 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. UAS7 values and patients\' evolution were assessed according to a predefined protocol. Statistical analysis of data was done using SPSS 18 statistical package (SPSS 18 Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software.
RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included in the study. All of them completed at least 24-weeks of treatment and follow-up. At week 12, clinical response rates (UAS7<6) were 70.8% and complete response rates (UAS7=0) were 47.9%. At week 24, clinical response rates were 64.6% and complete response rates were 52.1%.
METHODS: with long-term urticaria (≥18 months\' duration) were less likely to achieve a clinical response at week 12 (odds ratio: 0.25; 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.96). Previous immunosuppressive treatment tended to be associated with a lower probability of complete response at week 12 (odds ratio: 0.27 95% confidence interval: 0.07-1.02). H1-antihistamine treatment was associated with lower probability of response at week 24 (odds ratio: 0.1 95% 95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.88) CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness and safety of omalizumab in real life are similar to efficacy and safety in clinical trials. Duration of disease, previous immunosuppressive therapy and requirement for concomitant H1-antihistamine treatment may be helpful in predicting response to omalizumab treatment.

BACKGROUND: Ivacaftor is a cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) potentiator that has been shown to improve the nutritional status and lung function of cystic fibrosis patients with the G551D mutation in clinical trials. The objective of this study was to describe the real-world progress of children receiving ivacaftor.
METHODS: We describe the real-world progress of four children with cystic fibrosis and the F508del/G551D genotype comparing data during ivacaftor treatment with baseline and with the year before commencing treatment.
RESULTS: Our sample comprised 4 children aged between 6 and 14 years and including one with a recent diagnosis of CF and other with persistent Mycobacterium abscessus (M. abscessus) and recurrent allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. The baseline FEV1 was 58.5% to 81.8% of the predicted value, and ivacaftor was taken for a mean 24 months (range, 12-30 months). All patients experienced a significant and sustained improvement in lung function. Compared to baseline, the weight z-score improved by 1.53 points, and the BMI z-score by 1.6 points. Compared to the year before starting ivacaftor, the frequency of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) isolates decreased (-0.4/patient/year), as did the number of respiratory exacerbations (-1.8/patient/year). The weight-adjusted dose of lipase per kilogram decreased progressively in all patients. In 1 patient, a previously persistent M. abscessus infection and recurrent allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis resolved during treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Children with cystic fibrosis and the F508del/G551D genotype receiving treatment with ivacaftor experienced a real-world improvement in lung function, nutritional status, respiratory exacerbations, isolation of P. aeruginosa, and dose of pancreatic enzymes.

Pirfenidone was the first antifibrotic drug approved in Argentina for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Outcomes in real life may differ from the results of clinical trials. The primary endpoint was to study the tolerance of pirfenidone in real life. Secondary endpoints were to analyze effectiveness and reasons for discontinuation.
Retrospective observational study conducted in 4 specialized centers in Argentina. We analyzed the medical records of patients with IPF who received pirfenidone between June 2013 and September 2016. Adverse events (AE) and the variables that could influence these results were analyzed. Forced vital capacity (FVC%) parameters were also compared between the pre-pirfenidone and post-pirfenidone periods.
Fifty patients were included, 38 (76%) men, with mean age (SD) 67.8 (8.36) years. Mean (SD) exposure to pirfenidone was 645.68 (428.19) days, with a mean daily dose (SD) of 2,064.56mg (301.49). Nineteen AEs in 15 patients (30%) were reported: nausea (14%), asthenia (10%) and skin rash (8%). A total of 18 patients (36%) interrupted treatment, only 1 definitively. The most frequent reason for discontinuation was failure of suppliers to provide the drug (9 subjects; 18%). We compared the evolution of FVC% between the pre-pirfenidone and post-pirfenidone periods, and found a mean (SD) FVC% decline of 4.03% (7.63) pre-pirfenidone and 2.64% (7.1) post-pirfenidone (P=.534).
In our study, pirfenidone was well tolerated and associated with a reduction in FVC decline, although without reaching statistical significance.