BACKGROUND: This study investigated the combination of venous stasis and inflammation in varicose vein development.
METHODS: The study included patients with primary varicose veins operated using high ligation and stripping of greater saphenous vein. All of them showed reflux at sapheno-femoral junction on preoperative Doppler ultrasound. Mesenteric veins from early or advanced gastric cancer specimens were used as control group. Inflammatory mediators expressed in the venous wall were measured via immunohistochemistry and compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Thirty-five (59.3%) men and 24 women with a mean age of 52.8 years (range, 23-77 years) were included and 29 (49.2%) patients had edema or skin changes according to Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (CEAP) classification and reporting standards for chronic venous disorders. The expression of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) in intima and those of IL-6 in media of greater saphenous veins increased, with statistically significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.001). IL-6 in media and TGF-β1 levels in intima were independent predictors of varicose veins (adjusted odds ratios 74.62 and 66.69, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Elevated venous pressure represented by reflux on Doppler ultrasound and increased expression of inflammatory cytokines including IL-6 in media and TGF-β1 in intima are associated with the development of varicose veins.

暂无摘要。

Venous pressure is an often-unrecognized cause of patient morbidity. However, bedside assessment of PV is challenging. We review the clinical significance of venous pressure measurement, existing techniques, and introduce the Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) Score as a novel approach using doppler ultrasound to assess venous pressure.
Studies show clear associations between elevated venous pressure and adverse outcomes in critically ill patients. Current venous pressure measurement techniques include physical examination, right heart catheterization (RHC), two-dimensional ultrasound, and a variety of labor-intensive research-focused physiological maneuvers. Each of these techniques have specific shortcomings, limiting their clinical utility. To address these gaps, Beaubien-Souligny et al. introduced the VExUS Score, a novel doppler ultrasound-based method that integrates IVC diameter with doppler measurements of the hepatic, portal, and renal veins to generate a venous congestion assesment. Studies show strong correlations between VExUS score and RHC measurements, and well as an association between VExUS score and improvement in cardiorenal acute kidney injury, diuretic response, and fluid status shifts. However, studies in noncardiac populations have been small, heterogenous, and inconclusive.
Early studies evaluating the use of doppler ultrasound to assess venous congestion show promise, but further research is needed in diverse patient populations and clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE: This study is to investigate the increase in retinal venous pressure (RVP) induced by a stepwise increase in airway pressure (AirP) using the new IOPstim method, which is designed to artificially increase the intraocular pressure (IOP) and thus to stimulate vascular pulsation.
METHODS: Twenty-eight healthy subjects were examined in the left eye. The RVP was measured at baseline and at four different levels of AirP (10, 20, 30, and 40 mmHg) using the new IOPstim method: a half balloon of 8 mm diameter is inflated laterally to the cornea under observation of the central retinal vein. As soon as the vein pulsates at a certain AirP level, the IOP is measured with a commercially available tonometer, which then corresponds to the RVP.
RESULTS: Spontaneous venous pulsation was observed in all study participants. The mean RVP values at baseline and at the AirP levels of 10, 20, 30, and 40 mmHg were 17.6 ± 2.8 mmHg; 20.1 ± 3.0 mmHg; 22.1 ± 3.5 mmHg; 24.3 ± 3.7 mmHg, and 26.6 ± 4.2 mmHg, respectively. The mean RVP values of each AirP level were statistically significantly different from each other in pairwise comparison. In a linear mixed model, the effect of AirP on RVP was highly significant (p < 0.001). In the model, a 10-mmHg increase in AirP resulted in a linear increase in RVP of 2.2 mmHg.
CONCLUSIONS: An increase in AirP was accompanied by a linear increase in RVP. The influence of AirP on RVP, and thus on retinal perfusion pressure during the Valsalva maneuver, is less than was assumed based on previous studies in which contact lens dynamometry was used.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Column interruption duration (CID) is a noninvasive surrogate for venous refill time (VFT), a parameter used in ambulatory venous pressure measurement. CID is more accurate than invasive VFT measurement because it avoids errors involved with indirect access of the deep system through the dorsal foot vein. The aim of this retrospective single center study is to analyze the clinical usefulness of CID in assessment of chronic venous disease (CVD).
METHODS: A total of 1551 limbs (777 patients) were referred with CVD symptoms over a 5-year period (2018-2023); CID, air plethysmography, and duplex reflux data were analyzed. Of these limbs, 679 had supine venous pressure data as well. The pathology was categorized as obstruction if supine peripheral venous pressure was >11 mm Hg and as reflux if duplex reflux time in superficial or deep veins was >1 second. CID was measured via Doppler monitoring of flow in the great saphenous vein (GSV) and one of the paired posterior tibial (PT) veins near the ankle in the erect posture. The calf is emptied by rapid inflation cuff. CID is the time interval in seconds when cephalad venous flow in great saphenous vein and posterior tibial veins reappear after calf ejection. A CID <20 seconds in either vein is abnormal similar to the threshold used in VFT measurement.
RESULTS: Thirty-two percent of the limbs had obstruction, 17% had reflux, and 37% had a combination; 14% had neither. Higher clinical-etiology-anatomy-pathophysiology (CEAP) clinical classes (C4-6) were prevalent in 44% of pure reflux, significantly less (P < .0001) than in pure obstruction (73%) or obstruction plus reflux subsets (72%), partly reflecting distribution of pathology. There is a progressive increase in supine venous pressure and abnormal CID (P < .0001 and P < .0001, respectively) in successive CEAP clinical class. No such correlation between CEAP and any of the reflux severity grading methods (reflux segment score, Venous Filling Index, and Kistner axial grading) was observed. Abnormal CID (55%) was more prevalent in higher CEAP classes (>4) (P < .0001) than in lesser clinical classes (0-2) or limbs with neither obstruction nor reflux (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Obstruction seems to be a more dominant pathology in clinical progression among CEAP clinical classes than reflux. CID is abnormal in both obstructive and refluxive pathologies and may represent a common end pathway for similar clinical manifestations (eg, ulcer). These data suggest a useful role for CID measurement in clinical assessment of limbs with CVD.

UNASSIGNED: The mesenteric venous reservoir plays a vital role in mediating blood volume and pressure changes and is richly innervated by sympathetic nerves; however, the precise nature of venous sympathetic regulation and its role during hypertension remains unclear. We hypothesized that sympathetic drive to mesenteric veins in spontaneously hypertensive (SH) rats is raised, increasing mean circulatory filling pressure (MCFP), and impairing mesenteric capacitance.
UNASSIGNED: Arterial pressure, central venous pressure, mesenteric arterial, and venous blood flow were measured simultaneously in conscious male Wistar and SH rats. MCFP was assessed using an intraatrial balloon. Hemodynamic responses to volume changes (±20%) were measured before and after ganglionic blockade and carotid body denervation. Sympathetic venoconstrictor activity was measured in situ.
UNASSIGNED: MCFP in vivo (10.8±1.6 versus 8.0±2.1 mm Hg; P=0.0005) and sympathetic venoconstrictor drive in situ (18±1 versus 10±2 µV; P<0.0001) were higher in SH rats; MCFP decreased in SH rats after hexamethonium and carotid body denervation (7.6±1.4; P<0.0001 and 8.5±1.0 mm Hg; P=0.0045). During volume changes, arterial pressure remained stable. With blood loss, net efflux of blood from the mesenteric bed was measured in both strains. However, during volume infusion, we observed net influx in Wistar (+2.3±2.6 mL/min) but efflux in SH rats (-1.0±1.0 mL/min; P=0.0032); this counterintuitive efflux was abolished by hexamethonium and carotid body denervation (+0.3±1.7 and 0.5±1.6 mL/min, respectively).
UNASSIGNED: In SH rats, excessive sympathetic venoconstriction elevates MCFP and reduces capacitance, impairing volume buffering by mesenteric veins. We propose selective targeting of mesenteric veins through sympathetic drive reduction as a novel therapeutic opportunity for hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: The deleterious consequences of chronically elevated venous pressure in patients with profound right ventricular or biventricular dysfunction are well known, including renal and hepatic dysfunction, and volume overload. The only option for these patients, if they fail optimal medical treatment, is a heart transplant, as they are not candidates for left ventricular assist device therapy. Mean perfusion pressure (MPP) is important in the outcomes of critically ill patients with high venous pressure. The question arises whether MPP is important for the outcomes of heart transplants in patients with elevated pre-transplant venous pressure. Medical management of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction involves lowering the systemic afterload with vasodilators while awaiting a transplant. We hypothesised that when venous pressure is elevated prior to transplant, a substantial reduction in systemic arterial elastance (Ea) through vasodilation may significantly decrease MPP, resulting in compromised end-organ function and consequent unfavourable outcomes after heart transplantation. This study aims to investigate whether a low MPP serves as a risk factor for adverse outcomes in heart transplant recipients with high venous pressure.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 250 heart transplant recipients undergoing isolated heart transplantation at a single institution from October 2012 to March 2020. Right atrial pressure (RAP) of more than 15 mmHg was considered high. Additionally, Ea calculated as the ratio of end-systolic pressure to stroke volume, and MPP calculated as the difference between mean arterial pressure and RAP were considered in our analysis. The outcomes of transplantation were measured in terms of 90-day mortality and survival up to 7 years.
RESULTS: High RAP was a significant risk factor for short-term and medium-term survival if Ea was low (<2.7 mmHg/mL, the median value). This group had 39.39% in-hospital mortality compared to 14.49% for RAP<15 mmHg (p∼0.005). When Ea was high, this difference in survival was not evident: 8% for RAP<15 mmHg vs 4.8% for RAP>15 mmHg (p∼0.550). This effect was mediated through a lower MPP, and the mortality due to lower MPP increased strikingly with higher body surface area (BSA). A negative correlation was observed between MPP indexed to BSA (MPPI) and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (r∼-0.3580, p<0.0001) as well as creatinine (r∼-0.3551, p<0.0001). MPPI less than 40 mmHg/m2 was associated with poorer short-term (23.2% for MPPI<40 mmHg/m2 vs 7.1% for MPPI>40 mmHg/m2, p∼0.001) and medium-term survival. The impact of high RAP and low Ea on survival was evident even on medium-term follow-up; only 30% survival at 7 years follow-up for high RAP and low Ea vs 75% for RAP<15 mmHg (p∼0.0033).
CONCLUSIONS: The acceptable blood pressure during vasodilator therapy in patients with high RAP needs to be higher, especially in those with higher BSA. MPPI less than 40 mmHg/m2 is a risk factor for survival, in the short and medium-term, after heart transplantation.

Objective: The transjugular or transfemoral approach is used as a common method for hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement in current practice. This study aims to confirm the safety and effectiveness of measuring HVPG via the forearm venous approach. Methods: Prospective recruitment was conducted for patients with cirrhosis who underwent HVPG measurement via the forearm venous approach at six hospitals in China and Japan from September 2020 to December 2020. Patients\' clinical baseline information and HVPG measurement data were collected. The right median cubital vein or basilic vein approach for all enrolled patients was selected. The HVPG standard process was used to measure pressure. Research data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 statistical software. Quantitative data were used to represent medians (interquartile ranges), while qualitative data were used to represent frequency and rates. The correlation between two sets of data was analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis. Results: A total of 43 cases were enrolled in this study. Of these, 41 (95.3%) successfully underwent HVPG measurement via the forearm venous approach. None of the patients had any serious complications. The median operation time for HVPG detection via forearm vein was 18.0 minutes (12.3~38.8 minutes). This study confirmed that HVPG was positively closely related to Child-Pugh score (r = 0.47, P = 0.002), albumin-bilirubin score (r = 0.37, P = 0.001), Lok index (r = 0.36, P = 0.02), liver stiffness (r = 0.58, P = 0.01), and spleen stiffness (r = 0.77, P = 0.01), while negatively correlated with albumin (r = -0.42, P = 0.006). Conclusion: The results of this multi-centre retrospective study suggest that HVPG measurement via the forearm venous approach is safe and feasible.
目的： 经颈静脉或经股动脉途径被用作当前实践中肝静脉压力梯度（HVPG）测量的常用方法。该研究旨在证实经前臂静脉途径测量HVPG的安全性和有效性。 方法： 针对2020年9月至2020年12月前瞻性地从中国和日本的6所医院招募了经前臂静脉进行HVPG检测肝硬化患者，并收集患者的临床基线资料以及HVPG检测数据。入组患者均选择经右侧肘正中静脉或贵要静脉入路，采用HVPG标准化流程进行测压。研究数据采用SPSS 22.0统计学软件进行分析。定量资料采用中位数（四分位数间距）表示，定性资料采用频数和率表示。两组数据之间的相关性分析采用Pearson相关性分析。 结果： 研究共入组43例患者，其中41例（95.3%）患者成功接受了经前臂静脉途径HVPG检测。无患者出现任何严重并发症。经前臂静脉途径HVPG检测中位操作时间为18.0min（12.3～38.8min）。研究证实HVPG与Child-Pugh评分（r = 0.47，P = 0.002）、白蛋白-胆红素评分（r = 0.37，P = 0.001）、Lok指数（r = 0.36，P = 0.02)、肝脏硬度(r = 0.58，P = 0.01)、脾硬度(r = 0.77, P = 0.01)呈正相关，且与白蛋白呈负相关(r = -0.42, P = 0.006)。 结论： 多中心回顾性研究结果提示经前臂静脉途径HVPG测量是安全可行的。.

暂无摘要。