Vasovagal

血管迷走
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:没有普遍遵循的治疗反射血管迷走性晕厥(VVS)的协议。
    方法:VVS患者采用2步方案治疗。第一步-咨询,水合作用,物理治疗,和Tadasana瑜伽动作。VVS复发≥2例的患者给予步骤II护理-强化步骤I,弹力长袜,和药物治疗。后续行动包括通过定期的功能状态问卷进行评估。
    结果:157例患者(男103例,女54例,平均年龄-53±20岁和平均LVEF-62±5%。)总共经历了837次事件-382次晕厥,在14±9个月内有485次接近晕厥发作。在第一步协议之后,平均总数,晕厥和近晕厥事件从5±7下降到0.3±1.2(P<0.0001),3±2至0.1±0.4(P<0.0001)和3±6至0.2±1.1(P<0.0001)。20例(12.7%)患者有53例事件复发,15-晕厥发作7次,13次晕厥事件38次。第二步后,5例患者发生14例事件。在33±15个月时,在152例患者(96.8%)中,无复发,所有患者均可预防晕厥(100%).中位数总数,晕厥和近晕厥事件分别从3降至0,(p<0.001)2降至0(p<0.001)和1降至0(p<0.001).所有3个生活质量参数都有改善。
    结论:我们展示了一种简单有效的方案,可以普遍采用该方案来防止VVS复发,随着生活质量的提高。
    BACKGROUND: There is no universally followed protocol for managing Reflex Vasovagal syncope (VVS).
    METHODS: VVS patients were treated with a 2 step protocol. Step I - counseling, hydration, physiotherapy, and Tadasana Yoga maneuver. Patients with ≥2 VVS recurrences were given step II care - intensification of step I, elastic stockings,and pharmacotherapy. Follow-up included assessment by periodic functional status questionnaires.
    RESULTS: 157 patients (103 males & 54 females,mean age - 53 ± 20 years & mean LVEF - 62 ± 5%.) experienced 867 total events - 382 syncopal, and 485 near syncopal episodes over 14 ± 9 months. After step I protocol, the mean total, syncopal and near syncopal events declined from 5 ± 7 to 0.3 ± 1.2 (P < 0.0001), 3 ± 2 to 0.1 ± 0.4 (P < 0.0001) and 3 ± 6 to 0.2 ± 1.1 (P < 0.0001) respectively. Twenty (12.7%) patients had 53 event recurrences, 15- syncopal episodes in 7 and 38 near syncope events in 13. After step II, 5 patients had 14 events. At 33 ± 15 months, in 152 patients (96.8%) there were no recurrences and syncope was prevented in all (100%). The median total, syncopal and near syncopal events declined from 3 to 0,(p < 0.001) 2 to 0 (p < 0.001) and 1 to 0 (p < 0.001) respectively. There was an improvement in all the 3 quality of life parameters.
    CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a simple and effective protocol that can be universally adopted to prevent VVS recurrences,with improvement in quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    心脏神经消融术是治疗复发性血管迷走性晕厥(VVS)患者的一种新方法,靶向心房周围的神经节丛,从而减少迷走神经对心脏的输入。本研究报告1例COVID-19感染后药物难治性VVS,心脏神经消融术成功治疗。
    Cardioneuroablation is a novel approach to treat patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope (VVS), targeting the ganglionated plexi around the atria and thus reducing the vagal input to the heart. This study reports a case of drug-refractory VVS after COVID-19 infection, successfully managed with cardioneuroablation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一名41岁的男性在进食时出现晕厥,随后被证明在吞咽时反复出现症状性鼻窦停顿。在排除结构性心脏病之后,他被诊断为吞咽性晕厥,一种罕见的神经心源性晕厥。为了避免经静脉起搏器的长期并发症,该病例采用无导线起搏器治疗,症状完全缓解.
    A 41-year-old male presented with syncope whilst eating and was subsequently demonstrated to have recurrent symptomatic sinus pauses whilst swallowing. Following the exclusion of structural heart disease, he was diagnosed with swallow syncope, an uncommon variant of neurocardiogenic syncope. To avoid long-term complications of a transvenous pacemaker, the case was managed with a leadless pacemaker which resulted in complete resolution of symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景虽然晕厥是医疗环境中常见的紧急情况,还没有研究评估一般人群对此的认识。这项研究调查了普通人群对晕厥的知识和认识,以及他们是否可以区分短暂性意识丧失(TLOC)的晕厥和非晕厥原因。方法学在利雅得进行了一项横断面研究,使用GoogleForms(方便抽样)通过社交媒体向普通人群分发的自我管理的阿拉伯语问卷。利雅得年龄小于18岁或不来自利雅得的参与者被排除在研究之外。两名心脏病专家验证了问卷,随后进行了向前和向后翻译。问卷包括三个部分。第一部分包括人口统计数据和慢性病。在第二部分,参与者被问及他们或他们的亲属是否经历过晕厥.第三部分有八个方案评估参与者的晕厥知识。具有≥五个正确答案的受试者被认为是意识到的。结果总应答人数为405名参与者。关于人口统计数据,53%的参与者是女性,33%有医学背景,76%拥有大学学位(分别为n=214,n=134和n=306)。参与者的平均年龄为33.2±13.3岁。意识到晕厥的参与者占55%(n=221)。在晕厥病例中,直立性晕厥的正确答案最多(79%,n=319),其次是血管迷走性晕厥(61%,n=246)。男性在病例一表现更好(p=0.001),两个(p=0.004),和7(p=0.01)。结论这项研究的结果表明,大多数参与者被认为意识到晕厥。性别,婚姻状况,医学背景对结果有重大影响。
    Background Although syncope is a common emergency in medical settings, no research has yet evaluated the general population\'s awareness regarding it. This study investigated the general population\'s knowledge and awareness of syncope and if they could differentiate syncopal and non-syncopal causes of transient loss of consciousness (TLOC). Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted in Riyadh through a validated, self-administered Arabic questionnaire that was distributed to the general population through social media using Google Forms (convenience sampling). Participants younger than 18 or not from Riyadh were excluded from the study. Two cardiologists validated the questionnaire, following which forward and backward translation was done. The questionnaire contained three sections. The first section included demographic data and chronic conditions. In the second section, participants were asked if they or one of their relatives had ever experienced syncope. The third section had eight scenarios assessing the participants\' syncope knowledge. Subjects with ≥five correct answers were considered to be aware. Results The number of total responses was 405 participants. Regarding demographic data, 53% of the participants were female, 33% had a medical background, and 76% had a university degree (n = 214, n = 134, and n = 306, respectively). The mean age of the participants was 33.2 ± 13.3 years. Participants who were aware of syncope represented 55% (n = 221). Among the syncope cases, orthostatic syncope had the highest number of correct answers (79%, n = 319), followed by vasovagal syncope (61%, n = 246). Males performed better in cases one (p = 0.001), two (p = 0.004), and seven (p = 0.01). Conclusions The results of this study showed that most participants were considered aware of syncope. Gender, marital status, and having a medical background had a significant influence on the results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管迷走性晕厥(VVS)仍然是所有年龄段晕厥的最常见原因。最近的随机双盲试验(RCT)为某些复发性难治性VVS患者的起搏提供了进一步的支持,这些患者具有自发记录或在抬头倾斜测试(HUTT)期间诱发的显着心脏抑制反应。心脏起搏是对血管迷走神经(反射)晕厥的主要心脏抑制表型唯一有效的治疗方法;然而,关于最佳候选人的几个问题仍然存在。当前的评论集中在在实践中使用心脏起搏的实用技巧。
    Vasovagal syncope (VVS) continues to be the most frequent cause of syncope in all age groups. Recent randomized double-blinded trials (RCTs) provide further support for pacing in selected cases of patients with recurrent refractory VVS with significant cardio-inhibitory response either documented spontaneously or induced during head-up tilt testing (HUTT). Cardiac pacing is the only therapy of proven efficacy for the predominant cardio-inhibitory phenotype of vasovagal (reflex) syncope; however, several questions regarding the best candidates remain. The current review focuses on practical tips for use of cardiac pacing in practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    直立性晕厥(站立昏厥时短暂失去意识)很常见,并对生活质量产生负面影响。许多晕厥患者报告感到疲劳,有时有“脑雾”,这可能会进一步影响他们的生活质量,但晕厥患者疲劳的发生率和严重程度尚不清楚.在这次系统审查中,我们报告了疲劳与体位性晕厥相关的证据.
    我们对四个学术数据库进行了全面的文献检索,以确定评估体位性晕厥[体位性心动过速综合征(POTS),血管迷走性晕厥(VVS),直立性低血压(OH)]和疲劳。研究由两名研究人员使用多阶段方法进行独立筛选,以保持一致性和限制偏差。
    我们的初始搜索确定了2797篇文章,其中13项符合我们的纳入标准(POTSn=10;VVSn=1;OHn=1;VVS和POTSn=1)。体位性晕厥患者的疲劳评分明显高于健康对照组,在那些有POTS的人中尤为严重。与体位性晕厥障碍相关的疲劳跨越多个领域,每个维度对疲劳增加的贡献相等。“脑雾”是POTS的重要症状,对生产力和认知产生负面影响。最后,疲劳与POTS患者的心理健康呈负相关。
    在体位性晕厥的情况下,疲劳是普遍存在的,使人衰弱,尤其是患有POTS的患者。考虑体位障碍患者的疲劳对于改善症状的诊断和管理至关重要,从而提高受影响个体的生活质量。
    Orthostatic syncope (transient loss of conscious when standing-fainting) is common and negatively impacts quality of life. Many patients with syncope report experiencing fatigue, sometimes with \"brain fog\", which may further impact their quality of life, but the incidence and severity of fatigue in patients with syncope remain unclear. In this systematic review, we report evidence on the associations between fatigue and conditions of orthostatic syncope.
    We performed a comprehensive literature search of four academic databases to identify articles that evaluated the association between orthostatic syncope [postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), vasovagal syncope (VVS), orthostatic hypotension (OH)] and fatigue. Studies were independently screened using a multi-stage approach by two researchers to maintain consistency and limit bias.
    Our initial search identified 2797 articles, of which 13 met our inclusion criteria (POTS n = 10; VVS n = 1; OH n = 1; VVS and POTS n = 1). Fatigue scores were significantly higher in patients with orthostatic syncope than healthy controls, and were particularly severe in those with POTS. Fatigue associated with orthostatic syncope disorders spanned multiple domains, with each dimension contributing equally to increased fatigue. \"Brain fog\" was an important symptom of POTS, negatively affecting productivity and cognition. Finally, fatigue was negatively associated with mental health in patients with POTS.
    In conditions of orthostatic syncope, fatigue is prevalent and debilitating, especially in patients with POTS. The consideration of fatigue in patients with orthostatic disorders is essential to improve diagnosis and management of symptoms, thus improving quality of life for affected individuals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:倾斜表测试代表了一种有价值的诊断方法,用于评估一过性意识丧失的患者并确认血管迷走性晕厥的诊断。然而,测试缺乏标准化,各种协议存在于不同的中心。这项研究的目的是比较与无刺激的标准测试相比,倾斜表测试与疼痛刺激刺激的敏感性和晕厥时间的差异。
    方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,包括连续诊断为血管迷走性晕厥的患者,这些患者被转诊为倾斜台测试。患者被随机分为两组:第1组,在直立姿势的前10分钟后进行疼痛挑衅,第2组,两组均未进行挑衅,并进一步倾斜30分钟。
    结果:在第1组中,66例(78.6%)患者发生晕厥,而在第2组中,35例(44.3%)患者发生晕厥(p<0.001)。这表示随着疼痛刺激的应用,TTT灵敏度增加了34.3%。根据Cox回归的结果,第2组倾斜10分钟后发生晕厥的风险为第1组的0.275(95%C.I.0.170-0.444,p<0.001).
    结论:疼痛激发是提高倾斜台测试灵敏度和缩短持续时间的有用方法。
    BACKGROUND: Tilt table test represents a valuable diagnostic method in assessing patients with transient loss of consciousness and confirming the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope. However, the test lacks standardization, and various protocols exist in different centers. The aim of this study was to compare the difference in sensitivity and time-to-syncope of tilt table test with a painful stimulus provocation compared to standard test with no provocation.
    METHODS: This was a prospective study that included consecutive patients diagnosed with vasovagal syncope who were referred for tilt table testing. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: group 1 with pain provocation after the first 10 min of upright position and group 2 with no provocation with further 30 min of tilt in both groups.
    RESULTS: In group 1, 66 (78.6%) patients developed syncope while in group 2, 35 (44.3%) patients had syncope (p < 0.001). This represents an increase of 34.3% in TTT sensitivity with the application of painful provocation. According to results of the Cox regression, the hazard for developing syncope after the 10th min of the tilt for group 2 was 0.275 of the hazard of group 1 (95% C.I. 0.170-0.444, p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Pain provocation is a useful method for increasing sensitivity and shortening the duration of tilt table testing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    静脉回流减少是血管迷走性晕厥(VVS)的重要诱因。弹性压缩长袜(ECS)可以改变静脉回流,具有治疗意义;然而,在VVS中ECS疗效的证据很少。这项随机对照试验旨在解决这个问题。
    COMFORTS-II是一个多中心,三盲,并行设计,随机对照试验旨在评估ECS预防VVS复发的疗效。使用中央在线随机化,268名参与者将被分配到2个武器(1:1比例),佩戴干预ECS(25-30mmHg压力)或假ECS(≤10mmHg压力)。所有参与者将以教育的形式接受标准的VVS治疗,和改变生活方式的建议(饮用2-3l/d的液体和消耗10g/d-大约半汤匙食盐)。坚持ECS治疗将通过日记表进行评估,并在研究武器之间进行比较。后续行动持续1年,并通过24/7电话线路提供给患者和三个月的访问。共同主要结果是有任何晕厥复发的参与者的比例和第一次晕厥发作的时间。次要结果包括VVS法术的频率,复发之间的时间间隔,以及任何患者报告的不良反应的发生率。
    据我们所知,COMFORTS-II是第一个在VVS患者中评估ECS疗效的临床试验,解决VVS治疗证据的重要差距。
    Reduced venous return is an important trigger of vasovagal syncope (VVS). Elastic compression stockings (ECS) can modify venous return and be of therapeutic interest; however, evidence for ECS efficacy in VVS is scarce. This randomized controlled trial was designed to address the issue.
    COMFORTS-II is a multicenter, triple-blind, parallel design, randomized controlled trial aimed to assess the efficacy of ECS in preventing VVS recurrences. Using central online randomization, 268 participants will be allocated to 2 arms (1:1 ratio), wearing intervention ECS (25-30 mm Hg pressure) or sham ECS (≤10 mm Hg pressure). All participants will receive standard VVS treatment in the form of education, and lifestyle modification recommendations (drinking 2-3 l/d of fluids and consuming 10 g/d-roughly half a tablespoon-of table salt). Adherence to ECS treatment will be evaluated through diary sheets, and compared between study arms. Follow-up continues for 1 year, and is conducted via a 24/7 phone line available to patients and trimonthly visits. The co-primary outcomes are proportion of participants with any syncopal recurrence and time to first syncopal episode. Secondary outcomes include frequency of VVS spells, time intervals between recurrences, and incidence of any patient-reported adverse effects.
    To the best of our knowledge, COMFORTS-II is the first clinical trial to assess ECS efficacy among patients with VVS, addressing an important gap in evidence for VVS treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号