Vasomotor symptoms

血管舒缩症状
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:更多被诊断为乳腺癌(BC)的女性患有肿瘤治疗引起的潮热(HF)。这项以澳大利亚为基础的调查探讨了为什么一些女性会经历更严重或持续的HF,以及特定的人群特征是否可以预测HF的发生。频率,和/或严重性。
    方法:在线发布的非概率匿名调查(Register4)和两家澳大利亚医院收集了人口统计学和临床信息。资格是同意澳大利亚女性,18年及以上,原发性BC诊断。分析包括线性和逻辑回归模型。
    结果:共分析了324份调查回复。化疗和激素治疗均与HF发生相关(aOR=2.92,95%CI[1.27,6.70],p=0.01;和aOR=7.50,95%CI[3.02,18.62],p<0.001)和组合(aOR=5.98,95%CI[2.61,13.69],p<0.001)。在BC诊断时自我报告的焦虑增加与HF频率和严重程度评分显著相关(aCO=0.71,95%CI[0.31,1.12],p=0.001;aCO=0.44,95%CI[0.33,0.55],p<0.001)。绝经后女性的HF严重程度和频率评分明显低于绝经前女性(aCO=-0.93,95%CI[-1.62,-0.25],p=0.008;aCO=-2.62,95%CI[-5.14,-0.11],p=0.041)。
    结论:接受化疗和/或激素治疗和绝经前或经历焦虑和/或压力升高的BC患者可能会经历更严重的肿瘤治疗相关的HFS。
    结论:HFs继续跨越BC治疗轨迹,女性>5年生存率仍报告生命影响,与绝经后女性相比,在BC诊断时绝经前女性经历严重和更频繁的肿瘤治疗诱发的HFs的风险更高。高危妇女需要有关减轻HF潜在生活影响并保持治疗依从性的方法的信息。
    OBJECTIVE: More women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) are living with oncology treatment-induced hot flushes (HFs). This Australian-based survey explores why some women experience more severe or ongoing HF and whether specific population characteristics are predictive of HF occurrence, frequency, and/or severity.
    METHODS: A non-probabilistic anonymous survey distributed online (Register4) and two Australian hospitals collected demographic and clinical information. Eligibility was consenting Australian-based women, 18 years and over, with a primary BC diagnosis. Analysis included linear and logistic regression models.
    RESULTS: A total of 324 survey responses were analyzed. Chemotherapy and hormone therapy were each associated with HF occurrence (aOR = 2.92, 95% CI [1.27, 6.70], p = 0.01; and aOR = 7.50, 95% CI [3.02, 18.62], p < 0.001) and in combination (aOR = 5.98, 95% CI [2.61, 13.69], p < 0.001). Increased self-reported anxiety at BC diagnosis was significantly associated with HF frequency and severity scores (aCO = 0.71, 95% CI [0.31, 1.12], p = 0.001; and aCO = 0.44, 95% CI [0.33, 0.55], p < 0.001). Postmenopausal women had significantly lower HF severity and frequency scores than premenopausal women (aCO = -0.93, 95% CI [-1.62, -0.25], p = 0.008; and aCO = -2.62, 95% CI [-5.14, -0.11], p = 0.041).
    CONCLUSIONS: Women with BC receiving chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy and premenopausal or experiencing elevated anxiety and/or stress will likely experience more severe oncology treatment-related HFs.
    CONCLUSIONS: HFs continue across the BC treatment trajectory with women >5-year survivorship still reporting life impacts, with premenopausal women at the time of BC diagnosis at higher risk of experiencing severe and more frequent oncology treatment-induced HFs than postmenopausal women. Women at high risk require information on methods to moderate HF potential life impacts and maintain treatment compliance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在绝经后妇女中,口服,超低剂量持续联合雌二醇(E0.5mg)+地屈孕酮(D2.5mg)可减少血管舒缩症状(VMS).
    本研究是对来自两个3期双盲研究的数据的事后分析。绝经后妇女以2:1:2随机接受E0.5mg/D2.5mg,E1mg/D5mg(不包括在本分析中)或安慰剂13周(欧洲研究),或随机1:1接受E0.5mg/D2.5mg或安慰剂12周(中国研究)。在种族亚组(欧洲和中国)中评估的终点包括潮热次数相对于基线的变化,中重度潮热次数和更年期评定量表(MRS)评分。
    总的来说,579名女性被纳入分析(E0.5mg/D2.5mg,n=288;安慰剂,n=291)。与接受安慰剂的女性相比,接受E0.5mg/D2.5mg的欧洲和中国女性在第4周,第8周和治疗结束时,平均每日潮热次数和平均每日中度至重度潮热次数均较基线减少。在潮热方面有了显著的改善,在欧洲和中国女性中报告了出汗\'MRS项目评分。
    口头,在欧洲和中国绝经后妇女中,与安慰剂相比,超低剂量连续联合0.5mg17β-雌二醇和2.5mg地屈孕酮可改善VMS,对健康相关生活质量有积极影响。
    UNASSIGNED: Among postmenopausal women, oral, ultra-low-dose continuous combined estradiol (E0.5 mg) plus dydrogesterone (D2.5 mg) reduces vasomotor symptoms (VMS).
    UNASSIGNED: This study was a post hoc analysis of data from two phase 3, double-blind studies. Postmenopausal women were randomized 2:1:2 to receive E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg, E1 mg/D5 mg (not included in this analysis) or placebo for 13 weeks (European study), or randomized 1:1 to receive E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg or placebo for 12 weeks (Chinese study). Endpoints assessed in ethnicity subgroups (European and Chinese) included changes from baseline in number of hot flushes, number of moderate-to-severe hot flushes and Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) score.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, 579 women were included in the analysis (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg, n = 288; placebo, n = 291). European and Chinese women receiving E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg experienced greater reductions from baseline in mean daily number of hot flushes and mean daily number of moderate-to-severe hot flushes at week 4, week 8 and end of treatment versus those receiving placebo. Significant improvements in the \'hot flushes, sweating\' MRS item score were reported in both European and Chinese women.
    UNASSIGNED: Oral, ultra-low-dose continuous combined 0.5 mg 17β-estradiol and 2.5 mg dydrogesterone improved VMS compared with placebo in European and Chinese postmenopausal women, with a positive impact on health-related quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:潮热,在更年期期间很常见,影响多达80%的西方更年期妇女,据报道会导致中年睡眠障碍。很少有前瞻性数据可以证实潮热在破坏中年女性睡眠中的具体作用。然而,或确认潮热对临床治疗的反应是否会导致睡眠改善。
    目的:研究持续硝酸甘油治疗对频繁潮热的围绝经期和绝经后妇女睡眠质量的影响(预先指定的次要试验终点),并研究该人群潮热与睡眠中断之间的前瞻性关联。
    方法:睡眠数据来自随机,双盲,持续经皮硝酸甘油(NTG)治疗抑制绝经前后潮热妇女一氧化氮介导的血管舒张的安慰剂对照试验.参与者被随机分配到不间断使用经皮NTG(0.2-0.6mg/小时)或安慰剂12周。使用基线时的7天症状日记评估夜间潮热从睡眠中唤醒参与者,5周,和12周。睡眠中断(睡眠开始后的唤醒时间,WASO)使用经过验证的睡眠日记进行评估,通过验证的匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI:范围0[最佳]21[最差])问卷评估全球睡眠质量。混合线性模型检查了睡眠质量和中断的变化,以及夜间热闪光频率和睡眠结果之间的关联强度,超过5周和12周,调整基线值,年龄,种族,和种族。
    结果:在141名参与者中(NTG为70名,安慰剂为71名,平均年龄54.6[±3.9]岁),平均基线热闪光频率为每天10.8(±3.5),包括2.6(±1.7)名夜间潮热唤醒参与者。在基线,潮热是夜间觉醒最常见的原因,62.6%的参与者报告每晚至少两次因潮热而醒来。超过5周和12周,两组中引起觉醒的夜间潮热的平均频率均降低(NTG:-0.9次/夜,安慰剂:-1.0发作/晚)。通过平均每晚WASO测量的睡眠中断也减少了(NTG:-10.1分钟,安慰剂:-7.3分钟),平均PSQI得分提高(NTG:-1.3分,安慰剂:-1.2分)。从基线到5周和12周没有检测到睡眠结果变化的显著组间差异,包括PSQI睡眠质量评分作为预先指定的次要试验终点(全部P≥0.05)。在合并样本中,5周和12周夜间热闪光频率的改善与PSQI睡眠质量评分(β=-0.30,P=.01)和WASO反映的睡眠中断(β=-1.88,P=.02)的改善有关。
    结论:在一项连续NTG治疗潮热的随机试验中,在绝经妇女中,潮热是夜间觉醒的最常见原因。与安慰剂相比,从基线至第5周和第12周,持续NTG治疗并未使睡眠质量得到更大改善.根据夜间症状日记和问卷,然而,两组患者夜间热闪光频率的较大改善与睡眠质量和睡眠中断的较大改善相关.
    BACKGROUND: Hot flashes, common during menopause, affect up to 80% of Western menopausal women and are reported to contribute to sleep disturbances in midlife. Few prospective data are available to confirm the specific role of hot flashes in disrupting sleep in midlife women, however, or confirm whether changes in hot flashes in response to clinical therapies result in improvement in sleep.
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of continuous nitroglycerin therapy on sleep quality in peri- and postmenopausal women with frequent hot flashes (pre-specified secondary trial endpoint), and to examine prospective associations between hot flashes and sleep disruption in this population.
    METHODS: Sleep data were analyzed from a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of continuous transdermal nitroglycerin (NTG) therapy to suppress nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in peri- or postmenopausal women with hot flashes. Participants were randomized to uninterrupted use of transdermal NTG (0.2-0.6 mg/hour) or placebo for 12 weeks. Nocturnal hot flashes awakening participants from sleep were evaluated using 7-day symptom diaries at baseline, 5 weeks, and 12 weeks. Sleep disruption (wake time after sleep onset, WASO) was assessed using validated sleep diaries, and global sleep quality was assessed by the validated Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI: range 0 [best] 21 [worst]) questionnaire. Mixed linear models examined changes in sleep quality and disruption, as well as the strength of associations between nocturnal hot flash frequency and sleep outcomes, over 5 and 12 weeks, adjusting for baseline values, age, race, and ethnicity.
    RESULTS: Among the 141 participants (70 to NTG and 71 to placebo, mean age 54.6 [±3.9] years), the mean baseline hot flash frequency was 10.8 (±3.5) per day, including 2.6 (±1.7) nocturnal hot flashes awakening participants. At baseline, hot flashes were the most commonly reported reason for nocturnal awakening, with 62.6% of participants reporting waking due to hot flashes at least twice nightly. Over 5 and 12 weeks, mean frequency of nocturnal hot flashes causing awakenings decreased in both groups (NTG: -0.9 episodes/night, placebo: -1.0 episodes/night). Sleep disruption as measured by average nightly WASO also decreased (NTG: -10.1 minutes, placebo: -7.3 minutes), and mean PSQI score improved (NTG: -1.3 points, placebo: -1.2 points). No significant between-group differences in change in sleep outcomes were detected from baseline to 5 and 12 weeks, including PSQI sleep quality score as a pre-specified secondary trial endpoint (P ≥ .05 for all). Greater improvement in nocturnal hot flash frequency over 5 and 12 weeks was associated with greater improvement in PSQI sleep quality score (β= -0.30, P=.01) and sleep disruption reflected by WASO (β= -1.88, P=.02) in the combined sample.
    CONCLUSIONS: Among menopausal women in a randomized trial of continuous NTG therapy for hot flashes, hot flashes were the most frequently reported cause of nocturnal awakenings. Compared to placebo, continuous NTG therapy did not result in greater improvements in sleep quality from baseline to 5 and 12 weeks. Based on night-by-night symptom diaries and questionnaires, however, greater improvement in nocturnal hot flash frequency in both groups was associated with greater improvement in sleep quality and disruption.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在记录墨尔本难民妇女中血管舒缩症状(VMS)和性症状的患病率和严重程度,澳大利亚。
    这项横断面研究包括难民妇女,18-63岁,2023年2月至7月从社区中心和社交媒体招募。更年期特异性生活质量(MENQOL)问卷测量了VMS和性症状。比较不同绝经状态之间的得分。
    在333名参与者中,62.8%为绝经前,8.0%围绝经期和29.2%绝经后,年龄中位数为40岁(范围18-63岁)。中重度VMS在围绝经期(20.8%;95%置信区间[CI]:8.9-41.4%)与绝经后(9.5%;95%CI:5.0-17.3%)和绝经前(0%)妇女中最为普遍。中-重度性症状影响围绝经期妇女的15.8%(95%CI:5.2-39.3%)和绝经后妇女的16.9%(95%CI:10.4-26.1%)与绝经前妇女的1.4%(95%CI:0.3-5.3%)。围绝经期和绝经后妇女的VMS和性症状评分高于绝经前妇女(均p<0.0001);围绝经期妇女的评分也高于绝经后妇女(分别为p=0.016和p=0.013)。
    虽然围绝经期和绝经后的VMS和性症状在难民妇女中并不少见,这些症状在绝经后难民中的发生率低于非难民人群.需要进一步的研究来证实和扩展这些发现。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to document the prevalence and severity of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and sexual symptoms among refugee women in Melbourne, Australia.
    UNASSIGNED: This cross-sectional study included refugee women, aged 18-63 years, recruited from community centers and social media between February and July 2023. The Menopause-specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire measured VMS and sexual symptoms. The scores were compared between different menopausal states.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 333 participants, 62.8% were premenopausal, 8.0% perimenopausal and 29.2% postmenopausal, with a median age of 40 years (range 18-63 years). Moderate-severe VMS was most prevalent amongst perimenopausal (20.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.9-41.4%) versus postmenopausal (9.5%; 95% CI: 5.0-17.3%) and premenopausal (0%) women. Moderate-severe sexual symptoms affected 15.8% (95% CI: 5.2-39.3%) of perimenopausal and 16.9% (95% CI: 10.4-26.1%) of postmenopausal women versus 1.4% (95% CI: 0.3-5.3%) of premenopausal women. Perimenopausal and postmenopausal women had higher VMS and sexual symptom scores than premenopausal women (both p < 0.0001); the scores were also higher in perimenopausal women than postmenopausal women (p = 0.016 and p = 0.013, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: While perimenopausal and postmenopausal VMS and sexual symptoms are not uncommon amongst refugee women, these symptoms were less prevalent in postmenopausal refugees than in the non-refugee population. Further research is warranted to confirm and expand on these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在更年期期间,大多数女性会出现血管舒缩症状,这可能会导致一些不良影响并对生活质量产生负面影响。Fezolinetant,a,直接针对绝经相关血管舒缩症状的潜在病理生理学的新型药物提供了激素疗法的替代方案,许多患者由于安全问题而有禁忌症或不愿意服用激素疗法.
    这篇综述总结了关键的药理学,药代动力学,和非唑林坦的药效学参数以及来自临床试验的疗效和安全性数据。使用PubMed和EMBASE数据库对评估非唑啉坦疗效和安全性的同行评审出版物进行了文献检索。对clinicaltrials.gov中的注册试验进行了评估,以确定正在进行的研究。
    安慰剂对照研究表明,在中度至重度血管舒缩症状患者中,非唑尼坦导致血管舒缩症状频率和严重程度的统计学显着降低。最常见的不良事件是头痛(5-10%),没有注意到严重的安全信号。与VMS的激素疗法和非激素疗法的直接头对头比较,评估睡眠结果,以及超过一年的疗效和安全性评估是仍需要额外数据的关键领域.
    UNASSIGNED: During menopause, the majority of women experience vasomotor symptoms which may lead to several untoward effects and negatively impact quality of life. Fezolinetant, a novel agent directly targeting the underlying pathophysiology of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms, offers an alternative to hormonal therapies for which many patients have a contraindication or unwillingness to take due to safety concerns.
    UNASSIGNED: This review summarizes key pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic parameters of fezolinetant along with efficacy and safety data derived from clinical trials. A literature search of peer-reviewed publications evaluating the efficacy and safety of fezolinetant was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE databases. A review of registered trials in clinicaltrials.gov was evaluated to identify ongoing studies.
    UNASSIGNED: Placebo-controlled studies demonstrated that fezolinetant led to a statistically significant reduction in vasomotor symptom frequency and severity among patients with moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms. The most common adverse event is headache (5-10%) and no serious safety signals have been noted. Direct head-to-head comparison with hormonal therapies and nonhormonal therapies for vasomotor symptoms, assessment of sleep outcomes, and evaluation of efficacy and safety beyond 1 year are key areas where additional data are still needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在许多绝经后妇女中,由于血管舒缩症状,生活质量下降。需要有效和耐受性良好的非激素治疗选择。
    本综述总结了关于绝经后血管舒缩症状的病因,作为Elinzanetant作用机制的基本原理,一种新的神经激肽(NK)-1/-3受体拮抗剂,以及它的功效和副作用。
    Elinzanetant可能对视前体温调节区的NK-3受体产生拮抗作用,而且对NK-1受体的额外拮抗作用可能导致血管舒张和热感神经活性的降低。Elinzanetant报告的峰值药物浓度在1小时内达到,终末消除半衰期约为15小时。两项IIb期临床试验评估了几种剂量的安全性和有效性。没有发生严重不良事件,其中还包括缺乏药物相关肝毒性的证据。总的来说,Elinzanetant似乎耐受性良好。在SWITCH-1研究中,120mg/day和160mg/day方案在治疗血管舒缩症状方面显示出良好的疗效,并导致生活质量显著改善.因此,在III期试验中使用120毫克口服Elinzanetant/天,其结果尚未公布。
    UNASSIGNED: In many postmenopausal women, quality of life is decreased due to vasomotor symptoms. Efficient and well-tolerated non-hormonal treatment options are needed.
    UNASSIGNED: The present review summarizes what is known about the etiology of postmenopausal vasomotor symptoms as a rationale for the mechanism of action of Elinzanetant, a new neurokinin (NK)-1/-3 receptor antagonist, as well as its efficacy and side effect profile.
    UNASSIGNED: Elinzanetant likely exerts an antagonistic effect on the NK-3 receptor in the preoptic thermoregulatory zone, but also an additional antagonistic effect on the NK-1 receptor possibly leading to a reduction in vasodilatation and heat-sensing neuro-activity. Elinzanetant\'s reported peak drug concentrations are reached within one hour and the terminal elimination half-life is approximately 15 hours. Two phase IIb clinical trials evaluated the safety profile and efficacy of several doses. There were no serious adverse events, which also included a lack of evidence of drug-related hepatotoxicity. Overall, Elinzanetant seems to be well-tolerated. In the SWITCH-1 study, the 120 mg/day and 160 mg/day regimen showed good efficacy for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms and led to significant improvements in quality of life. Thus, 120 mg oral Elinzanetant/day was used in phase III trials, whose results have not yet been published.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    进行了II期STARLIGHT研究,以调查非唑尼坦在日本女性中的疗效/安全性,并确定未来评估的最佳剂量。
    参与者是来自日本36个中心的年龄≥40至≤65岁的围绝经期/绝经后妇女,她们寻求与绝经相关的血管舒缩症状(VMS)的治疗/缓解。筛选后,参与者以1:1:1随机分组,按绝经状态分层,每天一次口服fezolinetant15或30mg或安慰剂,共12周。参与者完成了每日VMS日记。主要终点是从基线到第8周的任何严重程度的VMS频率的平均变化。次要终点包括每周至第12周的VMS频率从基线的平均变化以及不良事件的频率/严重程度。
    共有147名参与者被随机分组(安慰剂,n=47;非唑尼坦15毫克,n=53;非唑林剂30毫克,n=47)。与安慰剂相比,Fezolinetant15和30mg在第8周显示平均VMS频率的统计学显着降低。Fezolinetant15mg的VMS从基线到第8周的平均变化的最小二乘均值估计为-7.04,-6.31用于非唑林坦30mg,安慰剂为-4.55。最小二乘均值估计的差异为-2.50(95%CI:-4.03,-0.96),对于fezolinetant15mg和安慰剂,p=0.002,为-1.76(95%置信区间[CI]:-3.35,-0.17),对于fezolinetant30mg和安慰剂,p=0.030。治疗第1周后,与安慰剂相比,平均VMS频率从基线降低,维持12周。Fezolinetant耐受性良好,没有安全信号的关注任一剂量到第12周。
    每日1次剂量为15或30mg的口服非唑啉对治疗轻度,在这项日本研究中,中度和重度VMS与更年期相关。
    UNASSIGNED: The phase II STARLIGHT study was conducted to investigate the efficacy/safety of fezolinetant in Japanese women and identify the optimal dose for future evaluation.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants were perimenopausal/postmenopausal women aged ≥40 to ≤65 years from 36 centers in Japan seeking treatment/relief for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause. After screening, participants were randomized 1:1:1, stratified by menopausal status, to receive fezolinetant 15 or 30 mg or placebo orally once daily for 12 weeks. Participants completed a daily VMS diary. The primary endpoint was mean change in frequency of VMS of any severity from baseline to week 8. Secondary endpoints included mean change in VMS frequency from baseline each week up to week 12 and frequency/severity of adverse events.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 147 participants were randomized (placebo, n = 47; fezolinetant 15 mg, n = 53; fezolinetant 30 mg, n = 47). Fezolinetant 15 and 30 mg demonstrated statistically significant reductions in mean VMS frequency at week 8 versus placebo. Least-squares mean estimates of mean change in frequency of VMS from baseline to week 8 were -7.04 for fezolinetant 15mg, -6.31 for fezolinetant 30mg, and -4.55 for placebo. The difference in least-squares mean estimates was -2.50 (95% CI: -4.03, -0.96), p = 0.002 for fezolinetant 15mg and placebo, and was -1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.35, -0.17), p = 0.030 for fezolinetant 30mg and placebo. Reductions from baseline in mean VMS frequency versus placebo were seen after week 1 of treatment, maintained throughout 12 weeks. Fezolinetant was well tolerated, with no safety signals of concern for either dose to week 12.
    UNASSIGNED: Oral fezolinetant at once-daily doses of 15 or 30 mg was efficacious and well tolerated for treatment of mild, moderate and severe VMS associated with menopause in this Japanese study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在评估非唑尼坦的长期安全性和耐受性,非激素神经激肽3受体拮抗剂,在参与MOONLIGHT3试验的绝经相关血管舒缩症状的中国女性中。
    方法:在此阶段3开放标签研究中,40-65岁的绝经期女性接受非唑尼坦30mg,每日1次,共52周.主要终点是治疗引起的不良事件(TEAE)的频率和严重程度,在第52周的每次访问中进行评估,并在第55周进行一次随访。
    结果:总体而言,150名妇女登记(平均年龄,54年)和105完成治疗。TEAE的频率为88.7%。大多数TEAE为轻度(63.3%)或中度(22.7%)。最常见的TEAE是上呼吸道感染(16.0%),接着是头晕,头痛,和尿蛋白(各10.7%)。子宫内膜厚度(基线,2.95±1.11毫米;第52周,2.94±1.18毫米)。1.4%的女性报告丙氨酸氨基转移酶和/或天冬氨酸氨基转移酶水平>正常上限的3倍;没有发生Hy/s法病例。
    结论:Fezolinetant30mg每日1次在52周期间在中国有与更年期相关的血管舒缩症状的女性中通常是安全且耐受性良好的。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04451226。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess long-term safety and tolerability of fezolinetant, a nonhormonal neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist, among Chinese women with vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause participating in the MOONLIGHT 3 trial.
    METHODS: In this phase 3 open-label study, women in menopause aged 40-65 years received fezolinetant 30 mg once daily for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), assessed at every visit through week 52 and one follow-up visit at week 55.
    RESULTS: Overall, 150 women were enrolled (mean age, 54 years) and 105 completed treatment. The frequency of TEAEs was 88.7%. Most TEAEs were mild (63.3%) or moderate (22.7%). The most common TEAE was upper respiratory tract infection (16.0%), followed by dizziness, headache, and protein urine present (10.7% each). There was no clinically relevant change (mean ± standard deviation) in endometrial thickness (baseline, 2.95 ± 1.11 mm; week 52, 2.94 ± 1.18 mm). Alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase levels >3 times the upper limit of normal were reported in 1.4% of women; no Hy\'s Law cases occurred.
    CONCLUSIONS: Fezolinetant 30 mg once daily was generally safe and well tolerated over a 52-week period among women in China with vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04451226.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:血管舒缩症状(VMS),更年期过渡的特征性症状,通常是女性寻求治疗的主要原因。目前VMS的治疗选择包括非唑林坦,非荷尔蒙,选择性神经激肽3受体拮抗剂。这项研究旨在定义一个临床上有意义的阈值,以减少使用非唑尼坦治疗的绝经后妇女的中度至重度VMS,然后将其应用于汇总试验数据的响应者分析。
    方法:此分析汇集了来自两个相同的阶段3,双盲,安慰剂对照研究将患有中度至重度VMS的女性随机分配至每日一次的非唑尼坦30毫克,45毫克,或安慰剂(SKYLIGHT1和2)。每天使用电子日记收集VMS的频率。患者完成了患者整体VMS变化印象(PGI-CVMS)仪器,使用7点Likert量表评估第4周和第12周与基线相比的潮热/盗汗变化。VMS频率数据锚定于PGI-CVMS数据;PGI-CVMS有意义的患者内部变化的锚定水平稍好。\"
    结果:在合并人群中(N=1022),中重度VMS频率有意义的患者内部变化的平均(标准差)估计阈值在第4周为-5.73(3.47),在第12周为-6.20(5.18).将有意义的患者内部变化的阈值应用于响应者分析(“缺失为无响应者”填补方法)表明有利的临床益处:在第4周(比值比范围为2.48-2.91;P<0.001)和第908周(比值比范围为1.68-2.68;P<0.001)时,在30-mg和45-mg的非唑尼坦组中观察到更高的响应者比例。
    结论:PGI-CVMS对变化敏感,并与VMS频率相关:从基线到第12周,每天减少约6次VMS发作在个体患者水平上是有意义的。Fezolinetant为患有与绝经相关的中度至重度VMS的女性提供了有意义的临床益处,并且代表了重要的非激素治疗选择。
    背景:NCT04003155和NCT04003142。
    BACKGROUND: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS), the characteristic symptoms of menopausal transition, are often the primary reason women seek treatment. Current treatment options for VMS include fezolinetant, a nonhormonal, selective neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist. This study aimed to define a clinically meaningful threshold for reduction of moderate-to-severe VMS in postmenopausal women treated with fezolinetant and then apply it in a responder analysis of the pooled trial data.
    METHODS: This analysis pooled data from two identical phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that randomized women with moderate-to-severe VMS to once-daily fezolinetant 30 mg, 45 mg, or placebo (SKYLIGHT 1 and 2). The frequency of VMS was collected daily using an electronic diary. Patients completed the Patient Global Impression of Change in VMS (PGI-C VMS) instrument, which assessed changes in hot flushes/night sweats at weeks 4 and 12 compared with baseline using a seven-point Likert scale. VMS frequency data were anchored to PGI-C VMS data; the anchor level for meaningful within-patient change in PGI-C VMS was \"moderately better.\"
    RESULTS: In the pooled population (N = 1022), the mean (standard deviation) estimated thresholds for a meaningful within-patient change in moderate-to-severe VMS frequency were - 5.73 (3.47) at week 4 and - 6.20 (5.18) at week 12. Applying the thresholds for meaningful within-patient change to responder analyses (\"missing as non-responder\" imputation method) indicated a favorable clinical benefit: greater proportions of responders were observed in the fezolinetant 30-mg and 45-mg groups compared with placebo at week 4 (odds ratio range 2.48-2.91; P < 0.001) and week 12 (odds ratio range 1.908-2.68; P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: PGI-C VMS is sensitive to change and correlates with VMS frequency: a reduction of approximately six VMS episodes per day from baseline to week 12 was meaningful at the individual patient level. Fezolinetant provides a meaningful clinical benefit for women with moderate-to-severe VMS associated with menopause and represents an important nonhormonal treatment option.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04003155 and NCT04003142.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:血管舒缩症状(VMS)在乳腺癌(BC)患者中很常见,治疗不良的症状与生活质量下降有关,停止治疗,和较差的乳腺癌预后。疗法之间的直接比较是有限的,由于先前评估VMS干预措施的研究使用了异质变化措施,这些措施可能无法完全评估VMS严重程度变化的感知影响。
    方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,其中BC患者选择了四类干预措施之一来管理VMS。使用经验证的热冲洗评定量表(HFRS)评估6周时VMS严重程度的变化。计算整合基线症状严重程度和变化方向性的新的加权变化评分,以最大化变化评分和感知的治疗有效性评分之间的相关性。影响VMS严重程度变化的变量包括在回归树中,以对影响加权变化评分的因素进行建模。
    结果:88例患者完成了评估VMS的100份基线和随访问卷。调整基线症状后,治疗效果与VMS结果之间的相关性得到加强。基线时VMS严重程度低的患者没有感觉到治疗效果的变化。干预类别可预测6周时HFRS的变化。
    结论:基线症状严重程度和变化(症状改善或恶化)的方向性影响了对VMS严重程度的临床意义变化的感知。未来使用加权变化评分的介入研究应针对中度-高度基线严重程度的患者。
    OBJECTIVE: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are common among individuals with breast cancer (BC) and poorly managed symptoms are associated with reduced quality of life, treatment discontinuation, and poorer breast cancer outcomes. Direct comparisons among therapies are limited, as prior studies evaluating VMS interventions have utilized heterogeneous change measures which may not fully assess the perceived impact of change in VMS severity.
    METHODS: We performed a prospective study where BC patients chose one of four categories of interventions to manage VMS. Change in VMS severity at 6 weeks was assessed using the validated Hot Flush Rating Scale (HFRS). A novel weighted change score integrating baseline symptom severity and directionality of change was computed to maximize the correlation between the change score and a perceived treatment effectiveness score. Variables influencing change in VMS severity were included in a regression tree to model factors influencing the weighted change score.
    RESULTS: 100 baseline and follow-up questionnaires assessing VMS were completed by 88 patients. Correlations between treatment effectiveness and VMS outcomes strengthened following adjustment for baseline symptoms. Patients with low VMS severity at baseline did not perceive change in treatment effectiveness. Intervention category was predictive of change in HFRS at 6 weeks.
    CONCLUSIONS: Baseline symptom severity and the directionality of change (improvement or deterioration of symptoms) influenced the perception of clinically meaningful change in VMS severity. Future interventional studies utilizing the weighted change score should target moderate-high baseline severity patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号