Chronic inflammation is associated with diabetes and contributes to the development and progression of micro- and macrovascular complications. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) has been proposed to reduce levels of circulating inflammatory cytokines in non-diabetics by activating the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. We investigated the anti-inflammatory potential of tVNS as a secondary endpoint of a randomized controlled trial in people with diabetes (NCT04143269). 131 people with diabetes (type 1: n = 63; type 2: n = 68), gastrointestinal symptoms and various degrees of autonomic neuropathy were included and randomly assigned to self-administer active (n = 63) or sham (n = 68) tVNS over two successive study periods: (1) Seven days with four daily administrations and, (2) 56 days with two daily administrations. Levels of systemic inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ) were quantified from blood samples by multiplex technology. Information regarding age, sex, diabetes type, and the presence of cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) was included in the analysis as possible confounders. No differences in either cytokine were seen after study period 1 and 2 between active and sham tVNS (all p-values > 0.08). Age, sex, diabetes type, presence of CAN, and baseline levels of inflammatory cytokines were not associated with changes after treatment (all p-values > 0.07). A tendency towards slight reductions in TNF-α levels after active treatment was observed in those with no CAN compared to those with early or manifest CAN (p = 0.052). In conclusion, tVNS did not influence the level of systemic inflammation in people with diabetes.

Paired vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has emerged as a promising strategy to potentiate recovery after neurological injury. This approach, which combines short bursts of electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve with rehabilitation exercises, received approval from the US Food and Drug Aministration in 2021 as the first neuromodulation-based therapy for chronic stroke. Because this treatment is increasingly implemented in clinical practice, there is a need to take stock of what we know about this approach and what we have yet to learn. Here, we provide a survey on the foundational basis of VNS therapy for stroke and offer insight into the mechanisms that underlie potentiated recovery, focusing on the principles of neuromodulatory reinforcement. We discuss the current state of observations regarding synaptic reorganization in motor networks that are enhanced by VNS, and we propose other prospective loci of neuromodulation that should be evaluated in the future. Finally, we highlight the future opportunities and challenges to be faced as this approach is increasingly translated to clinical use. Collectively, a clearer understanding of the mechanistic basis of VNS therapy may reveal ways to maximize its benefits.

暂无摘要。

(1) Background: Tinnitus involves the conscious awareness of a tonal or composite noise for which there is no identifiable corresponding external acoustic source. For many people, tinnitus is a disorder associated with symptoms of emotional distress, cognitive dysfunction, autonomic arousal, behavioural changes, and functional disability. Many symptoms can be addressed effectively using education or cognitive behavioural therapy. However, there is no treatment that effectively reduces or alters tinnitus-related neurophysiological activity and thus the tinnitus percept. In this systematic review, we evaluated the effectiveness of neuromodulation therapies for tinnitus that explicitly target pathological synchronous neural activity. (2) Methods: Multiple databases were searched for randomised controlled trials of neuromodulation interventions for tinnitus in adults, with 24 trials included. The risk of bias was assessed, and where appropriate, meta-analyses were performed. (3) Results: Few trials used acoustic, vagal nerve, or transcranial alternating current stimulation, or bimodal stimulation techniques, with limited evidence of neuromodulation or clinical effectiveness. Multiple trials of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) were identified, and a synthesis demonstrated a significant improvement in tinnitus symptom severity in favour of tDCS versus control, although heterogeneity was high. (4) Discussion: Neuromodulation for tinnitus is an emerging but promising field. Electrical stimulation techniques are particularly interesting, given recent advances in current flow modelling that can be applied to future studies.

OBJECTIVE: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) Therapy is routinely indicated for people with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). We analyzed the baseline characteristics of individuals receiving the recently released VNS models and identified factors associated with early or late implantation.
METHODS: The Comprehensive Outcomes Registry of subjects with Epilepsy (CORE-VNS), a prospective observational study evaluating the clinical and psychosocial outcomes of VNS Therapy®, is following participants for up to 60 months after VNS implantation. In this analysis, we used Cox proportional hazards model to identify baseline characteristics associated with the time from diagnosis to first implantation.
RESULTS: Of the 819 enrolled, 792 (96.7%) participants implanted with a VNS device were evaluated. 529 (64.6%) underwent the first implantation and 263 (32.1%) a re-implantation. Participants\' median age at first implant was 24 years; 492 (62.1%) were ≥18 years old and 166 (20.3%) were < 12 years old. The average number of failed ASMs prior to VNS implantation was 7.1, and 145 (17.7%) had undergone previous epilepsy-related surgery. Epilepsy was classified as focal in 47.7% of participants, generalized in 16.1% and combined focal and generalized in 34.2%. Many of the participants (40.9%) had epilepsy of unknown etiology. The median time from diagnosis to first implantation was 10.33 years and was significantly shorter in participants with combined focal and generalized epilepsy compared to those with focal epilepsy alone, and in participants with genetic and immune epilepsy compared to those with unknown etiologies.
CONCLUSIONS: In people with DRE, VNS Therapy is provided after multiple failures of ASMs and after failure of epilepsy surgery in one in six individuals. Time from diagnosis to first implantation is associated with epilepsy type and etiology, likely reflecting variable treatment pathways. Clearer guidelines on when and how non-drug therapies should be deployed in people with DRE related to different epilepsy factors are needed.
CONCLUSIONS: Neuromodulation can be a very helpful treatment in people who have seizures that do not respond to medications. The most widely utilized neuromodulation therapy is vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). We present data from a large, global study to show that people use an average of seven anti-seizure medications before attempting VNS Therapy and that it takes about 10 years for people to get their first VNS implant. We advocate for clearer treatment guidelines on how and when to consider VNS Therapy in people with seizures that are resistant to medication.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation has been implicated in driving the morbidity associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Despite understanding the important role of inflammation in morbidity following SAH, there is no current effective way to modulate this deleterious response. There is a critical need for a novel approach to immunomodulation that can be safely, rapidly, and effectively deployed in SAH patients. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) provides a non-pharmacologic approach to immunomodulation, with prior studies demonstrating VNS can reduce systemic inflammatory markers, and VNS has had early success treating inflammatory conditions such as arthritis, sepsis, and inflammatory bowel diseases. The aim of the Non-invasive Auricular Vagus nerve stimulation for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (NAVSaH) trial is to translate the use of non-invasive transcutaneous auricular VNS (taVNS) to spontaneous SAH, with our central hypothesis being that implementing taVNS in the acute period following spontaneous SAH attenuates the expected inflammatory response to hemorrhage and curtails morbidity associated with inflammatory-mediated clinical endpoints.
METHODS: The overall objectives for the NAHSaH trial are to 1) Define the impact that taVNS has on SAH-induced inflammatory markers in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 2) Determine whether taVNS following SAH reduces radiographic vasospasm, and 3) Determine whether taVNS following SAH reduces chronic hydrocephalus. Following presentation to a single enrollment site, enrolled SAH patients are randomly assigned twice daily treatment with either taVNS or sham stimulation for the duration of their intensive care unit stay. Blood and CSF are drawn before initiation of treatment sessions, and then every three days during a patient\'s hospital stay. Primary endpoints include change in the inflammatory cytokine TNF-α in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid between day 1 and day 13, rate of radiographic vasospasm, and rate of requirement for long-term CSF diversion via a ventricular shunt. Secondary outcomes include exploratory analyses of a panel of additional cytokines, number and type of hospitalized acquired infections, duration of external ventricular drain in days, interventions required for vasospasm, continuous physiology data before, during, and after treatment sessions, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, and modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) at admission, discharge, and each at follow-up appointment for up to two years following SAH.
CONCLUSIONS: Inflammation plays a central role in morbidity following SAH. This NAVSaH trial is innovative because it diverges from the pharmacologic status quo by harnessing a novel non-invasive neuromodulatory approach and its known anti-inflammatory effects to alter the pathophysiology of SAH. The investigation of a new, effective, and rapidly deployable intervention in SAH offers a new route to improve outcomes following SAH.
BACKGROUND: Clinical Trials Registered, NCT04557618. Registered on September 21, 2020, and the first patient was enrolled on January 4, 2021.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been used as an adjunctive therapeutic option for drug-resistant epilepsy for decades. Traditionally, the left vagus nerve is used for stimulation, while the right vagus nerve is rarely used. The long-term efficacy and safety of the right VNS (R-VNS) in humans are unknown. We presented three patients who were treated with R-VNS over a follow-up period of up to eight years. All three patients tolerated R-VNS well with minimal complications. R-VNS displayed reasonable effectiveness in all three patients. One patient had an excellent response and became seizure-free. The other two patients demonstrated a less favorable response to R-VNS compared to their previous left VNS therapy.

Impairments in somatosensory function are a common and often debilitating consequence of neurological injury, with few effective interventions. Building on success in rehabilitation for motor dysfunction, the delivery of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) combined with tactile rehabilitation has emerged as a potential approach to enhance recovery of somatosensation. In order to maximize the effectiveness of VNS therapy and promote translation to clinical implementation, we sought to optimize the stimulation paradigm and identify neural mechanisms that underlie VNS-dependent recovery. To do so, we characterized the effect of tactile rehabilitation combined with VNS across a range of stimulation intensities on recovery of somatosensory function in a rat model of chronic sensory loss in the forelimb. Consistent with previous studies in other applications, we find that moderate intensity VNS yields the most effective restoration of somatosensation, and both lower and higher VNS intensities fail to enhance recovery compared to rehabilitation without VNS. We next used the optimized, moderate intensity to evaluate the mechanisms that underlie recovery. We find that moderate intensity VNS enhances transcription of Arc, a canonical mediator of synaptic plasticity, in the cortex, and that transcript levels were correlated with the degree of somatosensory recovery. Moreover, we observe that blocking plasticity by depleting acetylcholine in the cortex prevents the VNS-dependent enhancement of somatosensory recovery. Collectively, these findings identify neural mechanisms that subserve VNS-dependent somatosensation recovery and provide a basis for selecting optimal stimulation parameters in order to facilitate translation of this potential intervention.

Despite its efficacy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive cancer treatment, trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity (TIC) has become a growing concern. Due to the lack of cardiomyocyte regeneration and proliferation in adult heart, cell death significantly contributes to cardiovascular diseases. Cardiac autonomic modulation by vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has shown cardioprotective effects in several heart disease models, while the effects of VNS and its underlying mechanisms against TIC have not been found. Forty adult male Wistar rats were divided into 5 groups: (i) control without VNS (CSham) group, (ii) trastuzumab (4 mg/kg/day, i.p.) without VNS (TSham) group, (iii) trastuzumab + VNS (TVNS) group, (iv) trastuzumab + VNS + mAChR blocker (atropine; 1 mg/kg/day, ip, TVNS + Atro) group, and (v) trastuzumab + VNS + nAChR blocker (mecamylamine; 7.5 mg/kg/day, ip, TVNS + Mec) group. Our results showed that trastuzumab induced cardiac dysfunction by increasing autonomic dysfunction, mitochondrial dysfunction/dynamics imbalance, and cardiomyocyte death including apoptosis, autophagic deficiency, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis, which were notably alleviated by VNS. However, mAChR and nAChR blockers significantly inhibited the beneficial effects of VNS on cardiac autonomic dysfunction, mitochondrial dysfunction, cardiomyocyte apoptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis. Only nAChR could counteract the protective effects of VNS on cardiac mitochondrial dynamics imbalance and autophagy insufficiency. Therefore, VNS prevented TIC by rebalancing autonomic activity, ameliorating mitochondrial dysfunction and cardiomyocyte death through mAChR and nAChR activation. The current study provides a novel perspective elucidating the potential treatment of VNS, thus also offering other pharmacological therapeutic promises in TIC patients.

Learning new skills requires neuroplasticity. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) during sensory and motor events can increase neuroplasticity in networks related to these events and might therefore serve to facilitate learning on sensory and motor tasks. We tested if VNS could broadly improve learning on a wide variety of tasks across different skill domains in healthy, female adult rats. VNS was paired with presentation of stimuli or on successful trials during training, strategies known to facilitate plasticity and improve recovery in models of neurological disorders. VNS failed to improve either rate of learning or performance for any of the tested tasks, which included skilled forelimb motor control, speech sound discrimination, and paired-associates learning. These results contrast recent findings from multiple labs which found VNS pairing during training produced learning enhancements across motor, auditory, and cognitive domains. We speculate that these contrasting results may be explained by key differences in task designs, training timelines and animal handling approaches, and that while VNS may be able to facilitate rapid and early learning processes in healthy subjects, it does not broadly enhance learning for difficult tasks.