Vaginal Birth after Cesarean

剖宫产术后阴道分娩
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    黑色素瘤在育龄妇女中越来越常见,是怀孕期间诊断出的最常见癌症之一。关于妊娠期黑色素瘤的文献,尤其是那些先前有子宫疤痕的人,是有限的。我们介绍了一个有趣的案例,一名22岁的妇女因大腿上的可疑病变而去皮肤科医生那里。病灶被切除,组织病理学证实是黑色素瘤.皮肤科医生建议立即分娩。然后,患者敦促她的产科医生接受引产(IOL)的风险,以进行剖宫产后的分娩试验(TOLAC),因为她希望有一个大家庭,第二次剖腹产会使这种情况变得更加困难。她最终在剖宫产(VBAC)后成功地进行了阴道分娩,并在产后立即进行了黑色素瘤手术切除。因此,在这种情况下,TOLAC的IOL决定是基于患者对第39周黑色素瘤疾病进展的担忧.鉴于她的黑色素瘤分娩和切除之间的时间很短,她可能已经能够等待自发分娩,这将避免与TOLACIOL相关的风险。对于需要TOLAC的妊娠患者,黑色素瘤手术干预的最佳时机尚不清楚。在接近预产期的怀孕中,等待自然分娩可能是避免引产风险的合理方法,尤其是在先前剖宫产的女性中。涉及皮肤病学的多学科方法,肿瘤外科,产科团队有必要优化皮肤病学和产科结局.
    Melanoma is increasingly common among reproductive-age women and is one of the most common cancers diagnosed during pregnancy. The literature for melanoma in pregnancy, especially among those with prior uterine scars, is limited. We present an interesting case of a 22-year-old woman who went to her dermatologist for a suspicious lesion on her thigh. The lesion was excised, and histopathology confirmed that it was a melanoma. The dermatologist recommended immediate delivery. The patient then urged her obstetrician to undergo the risks of an induction of labor (IOL) for a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) because she desired a large family, and a second cesarean would make this more difficult to happen. She ultimately had a successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and subsequent excision of the melanoma with surgical oncology in the immediate postpartum period. Therefore, the decision for IOL for TOLAC in this case was based on the patient\'s fears regarding melanoma disease progression in her 39th week. Given the short time course between delivery and excision of her melanoma, it is possible that she may have been able to wait for spontaneous labor, which would have avoided the risks associated with IOL for TOLAC. The optimal timing of surgical intervention for melanoma in pregnant patients who desire TOLAC is unknown. In pregnancies that are approaching their due date, waiting for spontaneous labor may be a reasonable approach to avoid the risks of labor induction, especially in women with prior cesarean delivery. A multidisciplinary approach involving dermatology, surgical oncology, and the obstetric team is warranted to optimize both dermatologic and obstetric outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大多数德国医院不提供两次剖腹产后的试产(TOLA2C)。据称TOLA2C与太多并发症有关,最重要的是子宫破裂的高风险。这项研究的目的是回顾我们对TOLA2C的经验,特别注意子宫破裂的风险和可能性。次要结果包括比较TOLA2C组和选择性再次剖宫产(ERCS)组的新生儿和产妇结局,并评估两次剖宫产后阴道分娩的成功率(VBAC-2)。
    方法:回顾性队列研究在北莱茵-威斯特法伦州的一家社区医院进行。纳入标准均为病史中两次剖腹产的孕妇,目前的顶点单例妊娠和胎儿没有形态异常,在2015年1月至2021年6月期间在我们的设施分娩。计算了描述性统计数据,并进行了Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验,Mann-WhitneyU测试,渔民的精确测试,对独立样品进行Chi2检验和t检验。
    结果:共91例纳入TOLA2C组。这些病例与99例相比,在同一时间框架内,有选择性再次剖腹产(ERCS组)。两组新生儿结局差异无统计学意义(新生儿pH值:p0.024除外)。TOLA2C组的住院时间明显缩短,而产妇并发症发生率几乎相似(TOLA2C组中为13.2%,vs.ERCS组16.2%)。TOLA2C的成功率为55%。没有发现完全的子宫破裂,但有3例发生不完全破裂(子宫不完全破裂率为3.3%),但对新生儿结局无影响。
    结论:与ERCS相比,TOLA2C与更差的母婴结局无关,尤其是子宫完全破裂的风险似乎很低。TOLA2C应该更广泛地提供给有动机的合适患者。
    BACKGROUND: Most German hospitals do not offer a trial of labour after two caesarean sections (TOLA2C). TOLA2C is claimed to be associated with too many complications, above all the high risk of uterine rupture. The objective of this study is to review our experience with TOLA2C, with special attention paid to the risk and probability of uterine ruptures. Secondary outcomes include comparing neonatal and maternal outcomes in the group of TOLA2C with the group of elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) and to assess the success rate for vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2).
    METHODS: The retrospective cohort study was conducted in a community hospital in North Rhine-Westphalia. Inclusion criteria were all pregnant women with two caesarean sections in their medical history, with a current vertex singleton pregnancy and the absence of morphological abnormalities of the foetus, who gave birth in our facility between January 2015 and June 2021. Descriptive statistics were calculated and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, Fishers exact tests, Chi2 -tests and t-tests for independent samples were performed.
    RESULTS: A total of 91 cases were included in the TOLA2C-group. These were compared to 99 cases that, within the same time frame, had an elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS-group). There was no statistically significant difference found in the neonatal outcome between the two groups (except for the neonatal pH-value: p 0.024). The hospital stay was significantly shorter in the TOLA2C-group, while maternal complication rates were almost similar (13.2% in the TOLA2C-Group, vs. 16.2% in the ERCS-Group). The success rate for TOLA2C was 55%. No complete uterine rupture was found, but in three cases an incomplete rupture (3.3% rate for incomplete uterine ruptures) occurred, but had no influence on the neonatal outcome.
    CONCLUSIONS: TOLA2C is not associated with a worse maternal or neonatal outcome compared to ERCS, and especially the risk of complete uterine ruptures seems to be low. TOLA2C should be more widely offered to suitable patients who are motivated for it.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:剖腹产(剖腹产)率在全球范围内上升,重复剖腹产与产妇发病率增加有关。剖腹产后试产(TOLAC)是减少剖腹产复发的一种方法。然而,关于剖宫产瘢痕对TOLAC产程影响的研究有限,考虑通过剖腹产终止劳动和选择偏差。本研究旨在探讨剖宫产瘢痕对TOLAC参与者产程的影响。考虑潜在的混杂因素和偏见。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究包括2012年至2021年在日本一个中心尝试阴道分娩的2,964名妇女。该研究将参与者分为TOLAC(n=187)和非TOLAC(n=2,777)组。倾向得分是根据14个可能影响产程的因素计算的,并应用治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)。Cox比例风险回归分析劳动力持续时间的估计风险比(HR),有和没有IPTW调整。敏感性分析使用倾向评分匹配,自举,和间隔审查以解决潜在的偏见,包括报告的分娩开始中的回忆偏差。
    结果:与非TOLAC组相比,TOLAC组的分娩时间未调整HR为0.83(95%CI:0.70-0.98,P=0.027),表明TOLAC组的产程较长。在使用IPTW调整混杂因素后,HR为0.98(95%CI:0.74-1.30,P=0.91),提示两组之间的产程时间没有显着差异。使用倾向评分匹配的敏感性分析,自举,和间隔审查产生了一致的结果。这些发现表明,TOLAC与更长的分娩时间之间的明显关联是由于混杂因素而不是TOLAC本身。
    结论:在调整了混杂因素并解决了潜在的偏见之后,剖宫产瘢痕对TOLAC参与者的产程影响有限。产妇和胎儿的特征可能对分娩时间有更大的影响。
    BACKGROUND: Cesarean section (C-section) rates are increasing globally, and repeated C-sections are associated with increased maternal morbidity. Trial of labor after C-section (TOLAC) is an approach to reduce the recurrence of C-sections. However, limited research exists on the impact of cesarean scars on labor duration in TOLAC, considering the termination of labor through C-section and selection bias. This study aimed to investigate the impact of cesarean scars on labor duration in TOLAC participants, accounting for potential confounding factors and biases.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 2,964 women who attempted vaginal birth at a single center in Japan from 2012 to 2021. The study categorized participants into TOLAC (n = 187) and non-TOLAC (n = 2,777) groups. Propensity scores were calculated based on 14 factors that could influence labor duration, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for labor duration, with and without IPTW adjustment. Sensitivity analyses used propensity score matching, bootstrapping, and interval censoring to address potential biases, including recall bias in the reported onset of labor.
    RESULTS: The unadjusted HR for labor duration in the TOLAC group compared to the non-TOLAC group was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.70-0.98, P = 0.027), indicating a longer labor duration in the TOLAC group. After adjusting for confounding factors using IPTW, the HR was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.74-1.30, P = 0.91), suggesting no significant difference in labor duration between the groups. Sensitivity analyses using propensity score matching, bootstrapping, and interval censoring yielded consistent results. These findings suggested that the apparent association between TOLAC and longer labor duration was because of confounding factors rather than TOLAC itself.
    CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for confounding factors and addressing potential biases, cesarean scars had a limited impact on labor duration in TOLAC participants. Maternal and fetal characteristics may have a more substantial influence on labor duration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:通过鼓励剖宫产(TOLAC)后分娩试验,呼吁降低非医学指征剖宫产(CD)的发生率,这项研究观察了选择TOLAC和定期再次剖宫产(SRCD)的患者的社会特征,以确定分娩方式选择方面的差异.
    方法:这是一项2015年4月29日至2020年4月29日期间有1例CD病史的患者的回顾性队列研究。根据入院时选择的分娩类型对患者进行划分。卡方检验检查了组间的比例差异,逻辑回归模型检查了根据包括种族/种族在内的社会依赖类别选择TOLAC与SRCD的奇数比率,健康保险,孕前体重指数,社会脆弱性指数(SVI)。
    结果:纳入1,983例患者。多变量逻辑回归模型显示,高SVI患者(参考:低/中SVI)(AOR2.0,CI:1.5,2.5),自我识别为黑人/非洲裔美国人(AOR:2.4,CI:1.6,3.6)或西班牙裔/拉丁裔(AOR:2.0,CI:1.4,2.8)(参考:白色),有公共保险(参考:私人保险)(AOR:3.7,CI:2.8,5.0),肥胖BMI(参考:非肥胖BMI)的患者更有可能选择TOLAC而非SRCD.
    结论:这些发现表明了分娩方式偏好的差异。具体来说,更弱势的患者更有可能选择TOLAC,这表明社会和经济因素可能在分娩偏好中发挥作用。这些发现对于改善个性化咨询和围绕交付方式进行共同决策具有重要意义。
    OBJECTIVE: Given the call to reduce rates of non-medically indicated cesarean deliveries (CDs) by encouraging trials of labor after cesarean (TOLAC), this study looks at social characteristics of patients choosing a TOLAC versus a scheduled repeat cesarean delivery (SRCD) to determine disparities regarding delivery method choice.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with a history of one CD between April 29, 2015-April 29, 2020. Patients were divided based on type of delivery chosen at admission. Chi-squared tests examined proportional differences between groups and logistic regression models examined odd ratios of choosing TOLAC versus SRCD according to socially dependent categories including race/ethnicity, health insurance, pre-pregnancy body mass index, and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI).
    RESULTS: 1,983 patients were included. Multivariable logistic regression models revealed that patients with a high SVI (reference: low/medium SVI) (AOR 2.0, CI: 1.5, 2.5), self-identified as Black/ African American (AOR: 2.4, CI: 1.6, 3.6) or Hispanic/Latina (AOR: 2.0, CI: 1.4, 2.8) (reference: White), had public insurance (reference: private insurance) (AOR: 3.7, CI: 2.8, 5.0), and who had an obese BMI (reference: non-obese BMI) were more likely to opt for a TOLAC rather than SRCD.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate differences in delivery method preferences. Specifically, more disadvantaged patients are more likely to choose TOLAC, suggesting that social and economic factors may play a role in delivery preferences. These findings have implications for improving individualized counselling and engaging in shared decision-making around mode of delivery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    剖宫产(CS)的患病率越来越高,特别是重复的CS,是当代助产学的一个主要问题。这项研究旨在全面了解孕妇和CS后阴道分娩的专家的经验,以及可能出现的障碍。
    从2020年3月到2021年5月,10名女性,12名助产士,和8名产科医生和库姆医科大学附属产科医生进行了访谈,以调查与剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)相关的经验和挑战.我们使用了内容分析法,取样是有目的的。进行了半结构化访谈以收集数据,然后在常规内容分析的基础上使用定性内容分析进行分析。
    结果表明,子类别“VBAC的个人方面”和“VBAC的家庭社会方面”构成了VBAC的积极方面。“子类别”“自我效能”和“决策参与”形成了“赋予妇女权力”。“子类别”“技术团队挑战”和“女性挑战”构成了“即将到来的挑战”的主要类别。\"
    正关系,选择能力,自信会影响女性选择VBAC的决定。在CS后告知女性替代分娩选择并追求梦想会增加VBAC成功的可能性。
    UNASSIGNED: The growing prevalence of Cesarean Sections (CS), particularly repeated CS, is a major issue in contemporary midwifery. This study seeks to gain a comprehensive understanding of the experiences of pregnant women and specialists with vaginal delivery after CS, as well as the obstacles that may arise.
    UNASSIGNED: From March 2020 to May 2021, 10 women, 12 midwives, and 8 obstetricians and obstetricians affiliated with Qom University of Medical Sciences were interviewed to investigate the experiences and challenges associated with Vaginal Birth After Cesarean section (VBAC). We used the content analysis method, and the sampling was purposive. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect data, which were then analyzed using qualitative content analysis based on conventional content analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: The results show that subcategories \"individual aspects of VBAC\" and \"family-social aspects of VBAC\" formed \"positive aspects of VBAC.\" Subcategories \"self-efficacy\" and \"decision-making participation\" formed the \"empowerment for the woman.\" Subcategories \"technical team challenges\" and \"woman\'s challenges\" formed the main category of \"upcoming challenges.\"
    UNASSIGNED: Positive relationships, choice-making ability, and self-confidence impact a woman\'s decision to choose VBAC. Informing women of alternative delivery options after a CS and pursuing their dreams increases the likelihood of successful VBAC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    剖宫产(CD)会影响母婴健康和未来怀孕。自中国放弃独生子女政策以来,产科医生倾向于在剖宫产(TOLAC)后重复进行CD而不是试产.这项研究旨在通过增加剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)率并引入子宫电描记术(EHG)进行准确监测来降低CD发生率。
    总共,82名妇女在中国石家庄市第六医院接受了关于TOLAC的咨询。选择TOLAC的女性被随机分组进行外部生育力测定法(TOCO,即标准护理)或EHG。主要结果是VBAC率。次要结果是CD的适应症,辅助阴道分娩的百分比,劳动持续时间,产妇失血,并发症和新生儿结局。
    考虑到早产和辍学后,所有接受咨询的女性都选择了TOLAC(100%)。随机化后,TOCO组包括42名妇女,EHG组包括37名妇女。妇女没有接受止痛药,催产素也没有增加分娩。TOCO组的VBAC率为71.4%,与EHG组的78.4%相比(p=0.48)。TOCO组11.9%的产钳辅助分娩,EHG组为2.7%(p=0.21)。由于怀疑子宫破裂,进行了一次二次CD(即在同一分娩中从预期的阴道分娩转变为手术分娩)(TOCO组)。CD的其他适应症是:胎儿窘迫,难产,胎儿位置,头盆比例失调。次要研究结果无显著差异。无并发症报告。
    这项研究显示平均VBAC率为75%,没有任何并发症,在没有TOLAC经验的医院。EHG监测的VBAC率高于TOCO,虽然这种差异并不显著。为了证明一个显著的差异,更大的临床研究是必要的。
    石家庄市妇幼医院医学伦理委员会每日委员会批准了研究方案(编号20171018,荷兰试验注册NL8199)。
    UNASSIGNED: A cesarean delivery (CD) can affect health of both mother and child and future pregnancies. Since the abandonment of the one-child policy in China, obstetricians tend to perform a repeat CD rather than a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). This study aims to reduce CD rates by increasing vaginal births after cesarean (VBAC) rates and introducing electrohysterography (EHG) for accurate monitoring.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 82 women received counseling regarding TOLAC at the Shijiazhuang Sixth Hospital in China. Women opting for TOLAC were randomized for either external tocodynamometry (TOCO, i.e. standard care) or EHG. The primary outcome was the VBAC rate. Secondary outcomes were indications for CD, percentage of assisted vaginal deliveries, labor duration, maternal blood loss, complications and neonatal outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: After accounting for preterm delivery and dropouts, all counseled women opted for a TOLAC (100%). After randomization, 42 women were included in the TOCO-group and 37 in the EHG-group. Women did not receive pain medication and labor was not augmented with oxytocin. The VBAC rate was 71.4% in the TOCO-group, versus 78.4% in the EHG-group (p = .48). Birth was assisted with forceps in 11.9% of TOCO-group versus 2.7% of EHG-group (p = .21). One secondary CD (i.e. a shift from intended vaginal delivery to surgical delivery within the same labor) was performed because of a suspicion of uterine rupture (TOCO-group). Other indications for CD were: fetal distress, labor dystocia, fetal position, cephalopelvic disproportion. There were no significant differences in secondary study outcomes. No complications were reported.
    UNASSIGNED: This study showed an average VBAC rate of 75%, without any complications, in a hospital with no previous experience with TOLAC. The VBAC rate with EHG-monitoring was higher than TOCO, although this difference was not significant. To demonstrate a significant difference, larger clinical studies are necessary.
    UNASSIGNED: The Daily Board of the Medical Ethics Committee of The Maternal and Child Hospital of Shijiazhuang approved the study protocol (number 20171018, Dutch Trial Register NL8199).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全球引产和剖宫产率正在上升。随着这些趋势的融合,剖宫产后的引产率高达27-32.7%。一次剖宫产(IOLAC)后引产是一种高风险的手术,主要是由于子宫破裂的风险较高。然而,美国妇产科医师学会将IOLAC视为在适当护理环境中积极且知情的女性的一种选择.我们试图确定IOLAC后孕产妇和新生儿不良结局的综合预测因子。
    方法:对2018年1月至2022年9月在马来西亚大学医院分娩的妇女的电子病历进行了筛查,以识别IOLAC病例。如果这11种不良结局中至少有一种分娩失血≥1000ml,则将病例归类为复合不良结局。子宫瘢痕并发症,脐带脱垂或表现,胎盘早剥,产妇发热(≥38℃),绒毛膜羊膜炎,重症监护病房(ICU)入院,5分钟时Apgar评分<7,脐动脉脐带血pH<7.1或碱过量≤-12mmol/l,新生儿ICU入院。非计划剖宫产不被认为是不良结局,因为临床上指示的IOLAC的实际管理选择是计划剖宫产。对参与者的特征进行了双变量分析,以确定其与复合不良结局相关的预测因素。将双变量分析中粗p<0.10的特征纳入多变量二元逻辑回归分析模型。
    结果:筛查了19,064名女性的电子病历。确定了819例IOLAC和98例复合不良结局。产妇身高,种族,以前的阴道分娩,先前剖宫产的指征,IOLAC的适应症,和IOLAC方法在双变量分析中p<0.10,并纳入多变量二元逻辑回归分析。调整后,与Foley球囊相比,仅通过阴道地诺前列酮的产妇身高和IOLAC在p<0.05处保持显着。包括所有非计划剖宫产作为复合不良结局的附加限定符的事后调整分析显示,体重指数较高,身材矮小(<157厘米),不是中国人,之前没有阴道分娩,先前的剖宫产表明分娩难产,Bishop评分较差(<6)是复合不良结局扩大的独立预测因子.
    结论:与Foley球囊相比,阴道地诺前列酮的女性矮小和IOLAC可独立预测不良结局的复合。
    身材矮小和地诺前列酮引产是孕产妇-新生儿复合不良结局的独立预测因素,不包括计划外剖宫产。
    BACKGROUND: The rates of labor induction and cesarean delivery is rising worldwide. With the confluence of these trends, the labor induction rate in trials of labor after cesarean can be as high as 27-32.7%. Induction of labor after one previous cesarean (IOLAC) is a high-risk procedure mainly due to the higher risk of uterine rupture. Nevertheless, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists considers IOLAC as an option in motivated and informed women in the appropriate care setting. We sought to identify predictors of a composite of maternal and newborn adverse outcomes following IOLAC.
    METHODS: The electronic medical records of women who delivered between January 2018 to September 2022 in a Malaysian university hospital were screened to identify cases of IOLAC. A case is classified as a composite adverse outcome if at least one of these 11 adverse outcomes of delivery blood loss ≥ 1000 ml, uterine scar complications, cord prolapse or presentation, placenta abruption, maternal fever (≥ 38 0C), chorioamnionitis, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, umbilical artery cord artery blood pH < 7.1 or base excess ≤-12 mmol/l, and neonatal ICU admission was present. An unplanned cesarean delivery was not considered an adverse outcome as the practical management alternative for a clinically indicated IOLAC was a planned cesarean. Bivariate analysis of participants\' characteristics was performed to identify predictors of their association with composite adverse outcome. Characteristics with crude p < 0.10 on bivariate analysis were incorporated into a multivariable binary logistic regression analysis model.
    RESULTS: Electronic medical records of 19,064 women were screened. 819 IOLAC cases and 98 cases with composite adverse outcomes were identified. Maternal height, ethnicity, previous vaginal delivery, indication of previous cesarean, indication for IOLAC, and method of IOLAC had p < 0.10 on bivariate analysis and were incorporated into a multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. After adjustment, only maternal height and IOLAC by vaginal dinoprostone compared to Foley balloon remained significant at p < 0.05. Post hoc adjusted analysis that included all unplanned cesarean as an added qualifier for composite adverse outcome showed higher body mass index, short stature (< 157 cm), not of Chinese ethnicity, no prior vaginal delivery, prior cesarean indicated by labor dystocia, and less favorable Bishop score (< 6) were independent predictors of the expanded composite adverse outcome.
    CONCLUSIONS: Shorter women and IOLAC by vaginal dinoprostone compared to Foley balloon were independently predictive of composite of adverse outcome.
    Shorter stature and dinoprostone labor induction are independent predictors of a composite maternal-newborn adverse outcome excluding unplanned cesarean delivery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    很少有研究检查骨盆大小与剖宫产(TOLAC)后分娩试验成败之间的关系。在这里,我们旨在确定从X射线照相术获得的骨盆大小和形态数据是否有助于首次成功的TOLAC。这项回顾性单中心观察研究招募了2010年至2021年接受TOLAC的孕妇。X射线骨盆测量数据的结果,包括产科共轭(OC),骨盆入口的横向直径(TD),骨盆入口前后径(APD),骨盆入口的形状,和其他产科临床数据,在成功组和失败组之间进行了比较。在排除35例先前成功的TOLAC患者后,成功组的75例患者,失败组21例患者符合条件。由于分娩试验失败(p=0.042)和新生儿体重较重(p=0.014),失败组先前的剖宫产率较高。OC,TD,两组的X线骨盆测量和APD没有显着差异,骨盆入口的形状也没有影响TOLAC的成功率。广义线性模型确定了劳动试验失败的历史,作为TOLAC失败的重要预测因子(赔率比,0.26;95%置信区间0.071-0.923;p=0.037),而没有发现骨盆参数。盆腔大小和形态学发现对TOLAC的结果没有明显影响。在所有尝试TOLAC的女性中普遍应用X射线骨盆测定法可能没有明显的临床意义。
    Few studies have examined the relationship between pelvic size and the success or failure of trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC). Here we aimed to determine whether pelvic size and morphological data obtained from radiography contribute to the first successful TOLAC. This retrospective single-center observational study enrolled pregnant women who underwent TOLAC between 2010 and 2021. The results of X-ray pelvimetry data, including obstetric conjugate (OC), transverse diameter of the pelvic inlet (TD), anteroposterior diameter of the pelvic inlet (APD), shape of the pelvic inlet, and other obstetrical clinical data, were compared between the success and failure groups. Seventy-five patients in successful group after excluding 35 patients with previous successful TOLAC, and 21 patients in failure group were eligible. The failure group had a higher rate of previous cesarean sections due to failed labor trials (p = 0.042) and heavier newborns (p = 0.014). OC, TD, and APD on X-ray pelvimetry did not differ significantly between the two groups nor did the shape of the pelvic inlet affect the success rate for TOLAC. The generalized linear model identified a history of failed trials of labor as a significant predictor of failed TOLAC (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval 0.071-0.923; p = 0.037), whereas no pelvimetric parameters were found. Pelvic size and morphological findings have no discernible impact on the outcomes of TOLAC. The universal application of X-ray pelvimetry in all women attempting TOLAC may not have significant clinical relevance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号