Vaccine manufacturers

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    英国国家置换中心,精炼,和减少研究中的动物(NC3Rs)正在审查世界卫生组织(WHO)手册,关于疫苗和生物治疗的指南和建议,以确定描述基于动物的测试方法的程度。目的是建议这些文件的更新可以导致更多和更协调地采用3Rs原则(即替换,减少和改进动物试验)在疫苗和生物治疗剂的质量控制和批量释放试验要求中。改进采用3Rs原则和非动物测试策略将有助于减少与产品发布测试相关的延迟和成本。在全球范围内制定广泛适用于疫苗和生物治疗的制造商和国家监管机构的建议,需要详细了解不同组织如何看待3R更好整合的机会和障碍。为了促进这一点,我们针对为国家监管机构(NRA)和/或国家控制实验室(NCLs)工作的个人制定并分发了一项调查.在本文中,我们介绍了本次调查的主要结果,以及这些结果将如何帮助世卫组织在其适用于疫苗和生物治疗药物质量控制和批量释放测试的指导文件中更广泛地整合3Rs方法的建议.
    The UK National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement, and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) is reviewing World Health Organization (WHO) manuals, guidelines and recommendations for vaccines and biotherapeutics to identify the extent to which animal-based testing methods are described. The aim is to recommend where updates to these documents can lead to an increased and more harmonised adoption of 3Rs principles (i.e. Replacement, Reduction and Refinement of animal tests) in the quality control and batch release testing requirements for vaccines and biotherapeutics. Improved adoption of 3Rs principles and non-animal testing strategies will help to reduce the delays and costs associated with product release testing. Developing recommendations that are widely applicable by both the manufacturers and national regulatory authorities for vaccines and biological therapeutics globally requires a detailed understanding of how different organisations view the opportunities and barriers to better integration of the 3Rs. To facilitate this, we developed and distributed a survey aimed at individuals who work for national regulatory authorities (NRAs) and/or national control laboratories (NCLs). In this paper, we present the key findings from this survey and how these will help inform the recommendations for wider integration of 3Rs approaches by WHO in their guidance documents applicable to the quality control and batch release testing of vaccines and biotherapeutics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前尚不清楚中国父母对疫苗的偏好是什么,这些疫苗可能会被添加到未来的免疫计划中。这项研究的目的是评估中国父母对疫苗属性的偏好。我们在上海免疫诊所调查了年龄≤3个月的幼儿的父母,中国,在2017年。我们使用离散选择实验(DCE)向父母提供两个假设的疫苗概况之间的选择,这些疫苗使用以下属性进行描述:成本,副作用的风险,疫苗制造商的位置,疫苗测试,疫苗有效性,疾病的严重程度,疾病患病率。偏好效用的逻辑回归输出估计。总的来说,599名护理人员完成了DCE。父母表示对疫苗的偏好较低,其中30%的机会发烧为不良事件,而10%的机会(OR:0.53,95%CI:0.44,0.64),对于疫苗,只有85%有效vs95%有效(OR:0.55,95%CI:0.48,0.62),与国产疫苗相比,进口疫苗(OR:0.74,95%CI:0.60,0.92)和未在中国儿童中进行测试的疫苗(OR:0.45,95%CI:0.37,0.53)。较富裕的群体更喜欢更昂贵的疫苗,而较不富裕的群体则没有表达基于成本的偏好。在中国推广疫苗应侧重于父母陈述的偏好,其中包括过去在中国儿童中进行的测试-也就是说,事实上,中国所有许可疫苗的要求。关于这些试验的信息可以强调不良事件的低风险和高有效性。
    It is not clear what kind of preferences parents in China would have for vaccines that could be added to a future immunization schedule. This study\'s aim was to assess Chinese parents\' preferences for attributes of vaccines. We surveyed parents of young infants ≤3 months of age at immunization clinics in Shanghai, China, in 2017. We used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to present parents with choices between two hypothetical profiles of vaccines which were described using the following attributes: cost, risk of side effect, location of vaccine manufacturer, vaccine testing, vaccine effectiveness, severity of disease, disease prevalence. A logistic regression output estimates of preference utilities. In total, 599 caregivers completed the DCE. Parents expressed lower preference for vaccines with a 30% chance of fever as an adverse event vs a 10% chance (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.64), for vaccines only 85% effective vs those 95% effective (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.62), and for imported vaccines (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.92) and those not tested in Chinese children (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.37, 0.53) compared to domestic vaccines. More affluent groups preferred more expensive vaccines whereas less affluent groups did not express cost-based preferences. Promotion of vaccines in China should focus on parents\' stated preferences, which include past testing done in Chinese children - which is, in fact, required of all licensed vaccines in China. Information about these trials could emphasize low risk of adverse events and high effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The success of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance depends on the vaccine markets providing appropriate, affordable vaccines at sufficient and reliable quantities. Gavi\'s current supplier base for new and underutilized vaccines, such as the human papillomavirus (HPV), rotavirus, and the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine is very small. There is growing concern that following globalization of laws on intellectual property rights (IPRs) through trade agreements, IPRs are impeding new manufacturers from entering the market with competing vaccines. This article examines the extent to which IPRs, specifically patents, can create such obstacles, in particular for developing country vaccine manufacturers (DCVMs). Through building patent landscapes in Brazil, China, and India and interviews with manufacturers and experts in the field, we found intense patenting activity for the HPV and pneumococcal vaccines that could potentially delay the entry of new manufacturers. Increased transparency around patenting of vaccine technologies, stricter patentability criteria suited for local development needs and strengthening of IPRs management capabilities where relevant, may help reduce impediments to market entry for new manufacturers and ensure a competitive supplier base for quality vaccines at sustainably low prices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号