Treatment of critically ill patients with venovenous (V-V) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has gained wide acceptance in the last few decades. However, the use of V-V ECMO in septic shock remains controversial. The effect of ECMO-induced inflammation on the microcirculation of the intestine, liver, and critically damaged lungs is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to measure the hepatic and intestinal microcirculation and pulmonary inflammatory response in a model of V-V ECMO and septic shock in the rat. Twenty male Lewis rats were randomly assigned to receive V-V ECMO therapy or a sham procedure. Hemodynamic data were measured by a pressure-volume catheter in the left ventricle and a catheter in the lateral tail artery. Septic shock was induced by the intravenous infusion of lipopolysaccharide (1 mg/kg). During V-V ECMO therapy, rats received lung-protective ventilation. The hepatic and intestinal microcirculation was assessed by micro-lightguide spectrophotometry after median laparotomy for 2 h. Systemic and pulmonary inflammation was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays of plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), respectively, which included tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-10, C-X-C motif ligand 2 (CXCL2), and CXCL5. Reduced oxygen saturation and relative hemoglobin concentration were measured in the hepatic and intestinal microcirculation during treatment with V-V ECMO. These animals also showed increased systolic, mean, and diastolic blood pressures. While no differences in left ventricular ejection fraction were observed, animals in the V-V ECMO group presented an increased heart rate, stroke volume, and cardiac output. Blood gas analysis showed dilutional anemia during V-V ECMO, whereas plasma analysis revealed a decreased concentration of IL-10 during V-V ECMO therapy, and BAL measurements showed increased concentrations of TNF-α, CXCL2, and CXCL5. Rats treated with V-V ECMO showed impaired microcirculation of the intestine and liver during septic shock despite increased blood pressure and cardiac output. Despite lung-protective ventilation, increased pulmonary inflammation was recognized during V-V ECMO therapy in septic shock.

暂无摘要。

In veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO), the dual-lumen catheter (DLC) facilitates mobility, reduces recirculation, and mitigates the risk of infection. The right internal jugular vein (IJV) is the most common site for DLC insertion. Still, it is often unavailable for various reasons, including local infection, hematoma, or thrombus. A 64-year-old male patient with mantle lymphoma, which was in remission after autogenous blood transplantation, suffered lung damage and refractory pneumothorax from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and required V-V ECMO treatment initiated on day 39. The patient was unable to be weaned off V-V ECMO due to uncontrolled high serum carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration and required long-term V-V ECMO treatment for more than 80 days. DLC placement was necessary to implement aggressive rehabilitation, reduce puncture site-induced infections, and reduce recirculation. On day 119, a supraclavicular approach was used for DLC placement under fluoroscopic guidance using ultrasound guidance because a thrombus in the right IJV prevented the DLC insertion at a usual puncture site. Rehabilitation was safely performed at a higher intensity than preoperatively of DLC insertion. Overall, the DLC catheter was maintained for more than 30 days until the patient died due to septic shock by an unknown focus on day 150, with no complications such as bleeding or infection. This case report highlights the significance of using the supraclavicular approach for DLC placement in V-V ECMO in cases where IJV is not possible due to thrombus presence. In conclusion, the supraclavicular approach is safe and feasible for V-V ECMO insertion as an alternative to the IJV.

The available literature has furnished substantial evidence indicating the favorable outcomes of prone positioning (PP) on oxygenation parameters among patients afflicted with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, there is a notable disparity in the reported influence of PP on the overall outcomes of COVID-19 patients undergoing venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) across studies. This article has been prepared in adherence with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were utilized for data retrieval. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the cumulative survival rate among COVID-19 patients receiving V-V ECMO, comparing those who received PP to those who did not. Secondary endpoints included the duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, ECMO duration, and mechanical ventilation duration. A total of 15 studies involving 2286 patients were analyzed in the meta-analysis. PP significantly improved the cumulative survival rate (0.48, 95% CI: 0.40-0.55); risk ratio (RR) of 1.24 (95% CI: 1.11-1.38).PP during ECMO for COVID-19 patients yielded favorable outcomes in terms of 60-day survival, 90-day survival, ICU survival, and hospital survival. In contrast, patients who underwent PP had longer ECMO duration (8.1 days, 95% CI: 6.2-9.9, p<0.001) and mechanical ventilation duration (9.6 days, 95% CI: 8.0-11.2, p<0.001). PP demonstrated improved survival in COVID-19 patients with ARDS receiving V-V ECMO. However, additional well-designed prospective trials are warranted to further explore the effects of this combination on survival outcomes in COVID-19 patients.

Massive hemoptysis is one of the fatal complications of lung cancer. There is no established standard treatment method for it, and it often causes sudden suffocation, and some cases may be difficult to save. A 63-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with dyspnea, and developed massive hemoptysis from lung cancer shortly after admission. The tumor had obstructed the right main bronchus and had invaded the right pulmonary artery. Surgery and interventional radiology were judged impossible. The patient was successfully saved by the introduction of Veno-Venous Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (V-V ECMO), and hemostasis was obtained by radiotherapy. Two months after completion of radiotherapy, he was weaned off the ventilator and discharged on his own. He died of increased peritoneal dissemination and other complications 1 year and 1 month later, but no recurrence of hemoptysis was noted until his death. We experienced a case of massive hemoptysis in which V-V ECMO and radiation therapy succeeded in saving life and stopping bleeding. The use of V-V ECMO by emergency care teams and multimodality therapy, including radiotherapy, were effective for massive hemoptysis from lung cancer.

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for acute respiratory failure encompasses veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R). V-V ECMO is primarily used to treat severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), characterized by life-threatening hypoxemia or ventilatory insufficiency with conventional protective settings. It employs an artificial lung with high blood flows, and allows improvement in gas exchange, correction of hypoxemia, and reduction of the workload on the native lung. On the other hand, ECCO2R focuses on carbon dioxide removal and ventilatory load reduction (\"ultra-protective ventilation\") in moderate ARDS, or in avoiding pump failure in acute exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clinical indications for V-V ECLS are tailored to individual patients, as there are no absolute contraindications. However, determining the ideal timing for initiating extracorporeal respiratory support remains uncertain. Current ECLS equipment faces issues like size and durability. Innovations include intravascular lung assist devices (ILADs) and pumpless devices, though they come with their own challenges. Efficient gas exchange relies on modern oxygenators using hollow fiber designs, but research is exploring microfluidic technology to improve oxygenator size, thrombogenicity, and blood flow capacity. Coagulation management during V-V ECLS is crucial due to common bleeding and thrombosis complications; indeed, anticoagulation strategies and monitoring systems require improvement, while surface coatings and new materials show promise. Moreover, pharmacokinetics during ECLS significantly impact antibiotic therapy, necessitating therapeutic drug monitoring for precise dosing. Managing native lung ventilation during V-V ECMO remains complex, requiring a careful balance between benefits and potential risks for spontaneously breathing patients. Moreover, weaning from V-V ECMO is recognized as an area of relevant uncertainty, requiring further research. In the last decade, the concept of Extracorporeal Organ Support (ECOS) for patients with multiple organ dysfunction has emerged, combining ECLS with other organ support therapies to provide a more holistic approach for critically ill patients. In this review, we aim at providing an in-depth overview of V-V ECMO and ECCO2R, addressing various aspects of their use, challenges, and potential future directions in research and development.

BACKGROUND: Assessing the outcome of Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (V-V ECMO) support remains challenging as plasma lactate (pLA), the widely used tool for this purpose, has been shown unreliable. We hypothesized that plasma oncostatin M (pOSM), a sensitive marker of leukocyte activation in infection and inflammation, could address this deficiency.
METHODS: Plasma OSM levels were measured by ELISA in 30 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) patients, prior to cannulation (baseline) and decannulation.
RESULTS: Based on the absolute pOSM levels at presentation, patients were separated into two groups, A and B. Patients in group A had low pOSM levels (Mean ± SD; Median, 1.1 ± 3.8; 0 pg/mL), whereas group B had high pOSM levels (1548 ± 1999; 767 pg/mL) [t-test: p < 0.01]. The percentage of pOSM levels at decannulation relative to baseline OSM levels was significantly higher in those who died (116.8 ± 68.0; 85.3%) than those who survived (47.6 ± 25.5; 48.9%) [t-test: p = 0.02; Mann-Whitney U Test: p = 0.01]. Conversely, no significant difference was observed in the percentage of pLA levels between those who died (142.9 ± 179.9; 89.8%) and those who survived (79.3 ± 34.3; 81.8%) [t-test: p = 0.31; Mann-Whitney U Test: p = 0.63].
CONCLUSIONS: These early findings suggested critical value of absolute and relative pOSM to characterize the inflammatory burden of ARDS patients and the outcome of their V-V ECMO support.

BACKGROUND: Mobilization is important in longer courses in intensive care unit (ICU), typical for patients requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO). For patients supported with ECMO, especially out-of-bed mobilizations improve outcome. We hypothesized that utilization of a dual lumen cannula (DLC) for V-V ECMO would facilitate out-of-bed mobilization compared to single lumen cannulas (SLC).
METHODS: Retrospective single center registry study including all V-V ECMO patients cannulated between 10/2010 and 05/2021 for respiratory failure.
RESULTS: The registry included 355 V-V ECMO patients (median age 55.6 years, 31.8% female, 27.3% with preexisting pulmonary disease), 289/355 (81.4%) primary cannulated with DLC, and 66/355 (18.6%) using SLC. Both groups had similar pre-ECMO characteristics. The runtime of the first ECMO cannula was significantly longer in DLC compared to SLC (169 vs. 115 h, p = 0.015). The frequency of prone positioning during V-V ECMO was similar in both groups (38.4 vs. 34.8%, p = 0.673). There was no difference in in-bed mobilization (41.2 vs. 36.4%, for DLC and SLC, respectively, p = 0.491). Patients with DLC were more often mobilized out-of-bed (25.6 vs. 12.1%, OR 2.495 [95% CI 1.150 to 5.268], for DLC and SLC, respectively, p = 0.023). Hospital survival was similar in both groups (46.4 vs. 39.4%, for DLC and SLC, respectively, p = 0.339).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients cannulated with a dual lumen cannula for V-V ECMO support were significantly more often mobilized out-of-bed. Since mobilization is important in prolonged ICU courses typical for ECMO patients, this might be an important benefit. Other benefits of DLC were the longer runtime of the initial cannula set and fewer suction events.

BACKGROUND: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) is a lifesaving support modality for severe respiratory failure, but its resource-intensive nature led to significant controversy surrounding its use during the COVID-19 pandemic. We report the performance of several ECMO mortality prediction and severity of illness scores at discriminating survival in a large COVID-19 V-V ECMO cohort.
METHODS: We validated ECMOnet, PRESET (PREdiction of Survival on ECMO Therapy-Score), Roch, SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment), APACHE II (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation), 4C (Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium), and CURB-65 (Confusion, Urea nitrogen, Respiratory Rate, Blood Pressure, age >65 years) scores on the ISARIC (International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infection Consortium) database. We report discrimination via Area Under the Receiver Operative Curve (AUROC) and Area under the Precision Recall Curve (AURPC) and calibration via Brier score.
RESULTS: We included 1147 patients and scores were calculated on patients with sufficient variables. ECMO mortality scores had AUROC (0.58-0.62), AUPRC (0.62-0.74), and Brier score (0.286-0.303). Roch score had the highest accuracy (AUROC 0.62), precision (AUPRC 0.74) yet worst calibration (Brier score of 0.3) despite being calculated on the fewest patients (144). Severity of illness scores had AUROC (0.52-0.57), AURPC (0.59-0.64), and Brier Score (0.265-0.471). APACHE II had the highest accuracy (AUROC 0.58), precision (AUPRC 0.64), and best calibration (Brier score 0.26).
CONCLUSIONS: Within a large international multicenter COVID-19 cohort, the evaluated ECMO mortality prediction and severity of illness scores demonstrated inconsistent discrimination and calibration highlighting the need for better clinically applicable decision support tools.

The course of COVID-19 with an incidence of 15-42% can be complicated by the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The mortality rate with severe forms exceeds 60%, which sometimes requires extracorporeal methods of life support.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyse the therapeutic efficacy of V-V ECMO in patients with ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in patients with acute lung injury caused by COVID-19 and treated with V-V ECMO within a period from February 2020 to May 2021 at the ECMO Center of the Heart Institute Ministry of Health of Ukraine. All patients had PCR testing for viral RNA particles using RT-PCR ELITe analyser.
RESULTS: During this period, 7 cases reported of V-V ECMO for ARDS caused by COVID-19. Five of seven patients were urgently transferred to our ECMO Center from other medical institutions, while 2 patients were transferred to the hospital being already connected to ECMO, and one patient was connected to ECMO immediately after hospitalization. The most common ECMO complication was circuit thrombosis - 42.9% (3/7), which required oxygenator replacement - in 2 cases and circuit replacement - in 1 case. Three patients had bleeding at the cannulation site. ECMO mortality rate was 57.1% (4/ 7), while the 30-day mortality rate - 71.4% (5/7).
CONCLUSIONS: In our case series, out of seven critically ill COVID-19 patients who required ECMO to maintain adequate oxygenation, inpatient mortality was observed in 71.4%.