BACKGROUND: Achieving stability in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial for long-term implant survival. In cases of severe deformity or ligament laxity, constrained implants may be required. Traditionally, increasing constraint involved intramedullary stems. However, there are intermediary alternatives, including employing a constrained polyethylene insert without stems, thereby avoiding complications related to them. The study aims to evaluate our experience with a non-modular constrained (NMC) implant in primary TKA.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 108 non-stemmed primary TKAs performed at our institution between 2013 and 2021 in patients with at least 10° deformity or 10mm ligament laxity. Data included demographics, preoperative and postoperative deformities, clinical outcomes and revision rates.
RESULTS: A total of 103 patients (108 knees) with a mean age of 74 were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. The mean postoperative range of motion was 105°/0°. The median Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score and Knee Society Function Score were 43.5, 92 and 90, respectively. 17 knees had varus deformity (mean tibiofemoral angle of 2.7°), and 87 knees had excessive valgus deformity (mean tibiofemoral angle of 15.1°). The remaining 4 knees had a neutral alignment. The mean postoperative tibiofemoral angle was 6.8°. The overall revision rate was 6.5% (7 patients): 3 deep periprosthetic infections, 2 patellar dislocations, 1 stiffness and 1 aseptic loosening.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience demonstrates favorable mid-term outcomes with the NMC implant, providing a safe alternative to stemmed implants in primary TKA, particularly in cases of severe deformity or ligament laxity.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures after hemiarthroplasty and analyze their treatment.
METHODS: An observational, longitudinal, retrospective study was conducted on a series of 17 patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip hemiarthroplasty. Fourteen fractures were treated surgically. The characteristics of patients, fractures and treatment outcomes in terms of complications, mortality and functionality were analyzed.
RESULTS: The large majority (82%) of patients were women, the mean age was 86 years and with an ASA index of 3 or 4 in 15 patients. Ten fractures were type B. There were 8 general complications, one deep infection, one mobilization of a non-exchanged hemiarthroplasty, and 2 non-unions. There were 85% consolidated fractures, and only 5 patients recovered the same function prior to the injury. At the time of the study 9 patients had died (53%).
CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic femoral fractures after hemiarthroplasty will increase in the coming years and their treatment is difficult.
CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic femoral fractures after hemiarthroplasty are more common in women around 90 years-old, and usually occur in patients with significant morbidity. Although the Vancouver classification is reliable, simple and reproducible, it is only a guide to decide on the best treatment in a patient often fragile. The preoperative planning is essential when deciding a surgical treatment.