Uterine round ligament

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是进行一项荟萃分析,比较保留或不保留子宫圆韧带(URL)的女性腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的短期和长期结果。
    方法:我们搜索了几个数据库,包括PubMed、WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,和CNKI数据库。这项荟萃分析包括随机临床试验,关于女性腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中URL保留或分割的回顾性比较研究。感兴趣的结果是年龄,BMI,疝气类型,手术类型,操作时间,估计失血量,住院时间,血清肿,伴随损伤,网状感染,复发,子宫脱垂,异物感,慢性疼痛,和怀孕。使用ReviewManagerv5.3和TSA软件进行Meta分析和试验序贯分析。分别。
    结果:在192篇可能符合条件的文章中,有1104名参与者的9项研究符合资格标准,并被纳入荟萃分析。年龄差异无统计学意义(MD-6.58,95%CI-13.41~0.24;P=0.06),BMI(MD0.05,95CI-0.31至0.40;P=0.81),失血量(MD-0.04,95%CI-0.75至0.66;P=0.90),住院时间(MD-0.22,95%CI-1.13至0.69;P=0.64),血清肿(OR0.71,95%CI0.41至1.24;P=0.23),伴随损伤(OR0.32,95%CI0.01至8.24;P=0.68),网状物感染(OR0.13,95%CI0.01~2.61;P=0.18),复发(OR1.13,95%CI0.18至7.25;P=0.90),子宫脱垂(OR0.71,95%CI0.07至6.94;P=0.77),异物感(OR1.95,95%CI0.53至7.23;P=0.32)和慢性疼痛(OR1.0395%CI0.4至2.69;P=0.95)。然而,这项荟萃分析显示,保留组与分割组的手术时间差异有统计学意义(MD6.62,95%CI2.20~11.04;P=0.0003).试验序贯分析表明,在第三次研究中,运行时间的累积Z值跨越了传统边界值和TSA边界值,累积样本量已达到要求的信息大小(RIS),表明目前的结论是稳定的。
    结论:总之,腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中保留子宫圆韧带的女性需要较长的手术时间,但是在短期或长期并发症方面没有优势,没有明确的证据表明它是否会导致不孕和子宫脱垂。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the short-term and long-term outcomes in laparoscopic groin hernia repair with or without preservation of the uterine round ligament (URL) in females.
    METHODS: We searched several databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and and CNKI databases. This meta-analysis included randomized clinical trials, and retrospective comparative studies regarding preservation or division of the URL in laparoscopic groin hernia repair in females. Outcomes of interest were age, BMI, type of hernia, type of surgery, operating time, estimated blood loss, time of hospitalization, seroma, concomitant injury, mesh infection, recurrence, uterine prolapse, foreign body sensation, chronic pain, and pregnancy. Meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis were performed with Review Manager v5.3 and TSA software, respectively.
    RESULTS: Of 192 potentially eligible articles, 9 studies with 1104 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant difference in age (MD-6.58, 95% CI - 13.41 to 0.24; P = 0.06), BMI (MD 0.05, 95%CI - 0.31 to 0.40; P = 0.81), blood loss (MD-0.04, 95% CI - 0.75 to 0.66; P = 0.90), time of hospitalization (MD-0.22, 95% CI-1.13 to 0.69; P = 0.64), seroma (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.24; P = 0.23), concomitant injury (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.24; P = 0.68), mesh infection (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.61; P = 0.18), recurrence (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.18 to 7.25; P = 0.90), uterine prolapse(OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.07 to 6.94; P = 0.77), foreign body sensation (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.53 to 7.23; P = 0.32) and chronic pain(OR 1.03 95% CI 0.4 to 2.69; P = 0.95). However, this meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in operating time (MD 6.62, 95% CI 2.20 to 11.04; P = 0.0003) between the preservation group and division group. Trial sequential analysis showed that the cumulative Z value of the operating time crossed the traditional boundary value and the TSA boundary value in the third study, and the cumulative sample size had reached the required information size (RIS), indicating that the current conclusion was stable.
    CONCLUSIONS: In summary, laparoscopic groin hernia repair in women with the preservation of the round uterine ligament requires a longer operating time, but there was no advantage in short-term or long-term complications, and there was no clear evidence on whether it causes infertility and uterine prolapse.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:子宫圆韧带在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)修补术治疗女性腹股沟疝中的应用有争议。本研究旨在探讨两种处理方式在手术效果和术后并发症方面是否存在差异。保存,子宫圆韧带的横切,在接受TAPP的成年女性腹股沟疝患者中。
    方法:回顾性分析2013年7月至2022年8月在XXX医院行TAPP的84例(117侧)女性患者。收集患者特征和手术过程的技术细节,并根据术中是否切断子宫圆韧带分为两组。保留子宫圆韧带组52例(77侧),子宫圆韧带横断组32例(40侧),比较一般情况,手术情况,术后相关并发症的发生情况。
    结果:保留组和横断组单侧原发性腹股沟疝的手术时间分别为(129.2±35.1)和(89.5±42.6)分钟,分别。两组在年龄方面无统计学差异,住院时间,ASA,BMI,下腹部手术史,疝气的类型和侧面,术中出血,原发性双侧疝的手术时间(P>0.05)。此外,术后Clavien-Dindo分类的发生率也没有统计学差异,VAS,血清肿,网状感染,大阴唇水肿,腹股沟区域的慢性疼痛或异常感觉,两组疝复发情况也比较(P>0.05)。
    结论:没有证据表明TAPP期间子宫圆韧带的横切对患者术后并发症有影响。然而,鉴于子宫圆韧带在子宫脱垂患者的手术治疗中的重要作用以及老年妇女子宫脱垂的高发生率,疝气外科医生也应该意识到保护老年女性子宫圆韧带的必要性。
    The processing of the round ligament of uterus in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of inguinal hernia in women has contended. This study aimed to explore whether there is any difference in the surgical outcome and postoperative complications between the two processing modalities, preservation, and transection of the round ligament of uterus, in adult female inguinal hernia patients undergoing TAPP.
    Retrospective analysis of 84 female patients (117 sides) who underwent TAPP in XXX Hospital from July 2013 to August 2022. Patient characteristics and technical details of the surgical procedure were collected and divided into two groups according to whether the round ligament of uterus was severed intraoperatively or not. There were 52 cases (77 sides) in the group with preservation of the round ligament of uterus and 32 cases (40 sides) in the group with transection of the round ligament of uterus, comparing the general condition, surgical condition, and the occurrence of postoperative related complications between the 2 groups.
    The operative time for unilateral primary inguinal hernia was (129.2 ± 35.1) and (89.5 ± 42.6) minutes in the preservation and transection groups, respectively. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of age, length of hospital stay, ASA, BMI, history of lower abdominal surgery, type and side of hernia, intraoperative bleeding, and time to surgery for primary bilateral hernia (P > 0.05). In addition, there was likewise no statistical difference in the occurrence of postoperative Clavien-Dindo classification, VAS, seroma, mesh infection, labia majora edema, chronic pain or abnormal sensation in the inguinal region, and hernia recurrence in the two groups as well (P > 0.05).
    There is no evidence that the transection of the round ligament of the uterus during TAPP has an impact on postoperative complications in patients. However, given the important role of the uterine round ligament in the surgical management of patients with uterine prolapse and the high incidence of uterine prolapse in older women, hernia surgeons should also be aware of the need to protect the round ligament of uterus in older women.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    女性腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中是否保留子宫圆韧带存在争议。在这项研究中,我们旨在比较保留子宫圆韧带与横切手术的结果,并探讨横切子宫圆韧带的影响和长期结果.
    研究队列包括2013年1月至2020年1月在北京朝阳医院和齐鲁医院行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的419例女性,其中393例(93.8%)成功随访。收集并回顾性分析了患者特征和手术过程的技术细节。术后早期和晚期随访数据,并发症,尤其是与子宫后弯曲有关的症状,和生育结果,由一名对手术程序不知情的随访护士收集。
    保留子宫圆韧带组妇女218例(239侧),横切组妇女175例(182侧)。保存组的患者较年轻(45.9vs.53.6年,p=0.000),并且美国麻醉医师协会评分较低(p=0.000)。保留组和横切组的中位随访时间分别为41.8±24.2和42.7±24.6个月,分别(p=0.692)。与横断组相比,保留组修复原发性和复发性疝的手术时间更长。术中出血,住院时间,血清瘤的发展,复发率,术后第1个月和第3个月的术后疼痛发生率,两组的最后一次门诊就诊时间相似.保留组中有更多的绝经前患者;然而,我们没有发现圆韧带横切影响后续妊娠或分娩的证据.此外,我们发现性交困难没有差异,痛经,慢性盆腔疼痛,或者子宫脱垂.
    女性腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中横切圆韧带不会增加性交困难的发生率,痛经,慢性盆腔疼痛,或者子宫脱垂,而它的优点是减少了操作时间。
    Whether to preserve the uterine round ligament during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in women is controversial. In this study, we aimed to compare outcomes of uterine round ligament preservation versus transection during such surgery and to explore the impact and long-term outcomes of transecting the round ligament.
    The study cohort comprised 419 women who had undergone laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital and Qilu Hospital from January 2013 to January 2020; 393 (93.8%) of whom were successfully followed up. Patient characteristics and technical details of the operative procedure were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Early and late postoperative follow-up data, complications, especially symptoms related to retroflexed uterus, and fertility outcomes, were collected by a single follow-up nurse who was blinded to the operative procedure.
    There were 218 women (239 sides) in the uterine round ligament preservation group and 175 (182 sides) in the transection group. The patients in the preservation group were younger (45.9 vs. 53.6 years, p = 0.000), and had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (p = 0.000). The median follow-up times in the preservation and transection groups were 41.8 ± 24.2 and 42.7 ± 24.6 months, respectively (p = 0.692). Compared with the transection group, the preservation group had longer operative times for repair of both primary and recurrent hernias. Intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, development of seromas, recurrence rate, incidence of postoperative pain at the first and third postoperative months, and time of last outpatient visit were similar in the two groups. There were more premenopausal patients in the preservation group; however, we found no evidence that transection of the round ligament affected subsequent pregnancy or childbirth. Moreover, we identified no differences in dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, or uterine prolapse.
    Transection of the round ligament during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in women does not increase the incidence of dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, or uterine prolapse, whereas it has the advantage of reducing the operation time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号