BACKGROUND: Double eyelid blepharoplasty is the most popular cosmetic operation in Asian population. Various surgical techniques have been developed in order to create dynamic eyelid folds with natural-looking in recent years, but postoperative complications like so-called sausage-like appearance have not been resolved completely.
OBJECTIVE: To create natural-looking dynamic folds, we propose a new method imitating the original anatomical structure of congenital double-eyelid.
METHODS: Eighty-six patients who underwent the double-eyelid surgery from June 1st, 2018 to October 31st, 2020 were included in this retrospective study, including 10 males and 76 females, aged 18-39 years (mean 27.4 ± 5.6 years). All the included patients received double eyelid surgery performed by the same senior doctor, using the pretarsal orbicularis oculi muscle-releasing technique. Patient Reported Outcome Measures questionnaires were administrated to assess the severity of scarring, pain, and asymmetry, as well as functional and appearance issues. Surgical outcome was assessed through objective and subjective evaluation forms (PROM and patient satisfaction rate).
RESULTS: Among the 86 patients, 5 were lost during the follow-up period. The absolute number of enrolled patients is 81. 91.36% of the enrolled patients reported minimal or non-visible scarring at the double eyelid incision. As to functional and appearance issues, the main problem were asymmetry (12.35%) and the narrowing of the supratarsal crease width (8.64%). No supratarsal depression and \"sausage-like\" appearance occurred in this study. 95.1% of patients reported either good or excellent outcome (mean score: 108 of 120) based on analysis of PROM results, and 96.3% of patients reported either high or very high satisfaction (mean score: 96 of 120) for the patient satisfaction assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: This new surgical method of double-eyelid blepharoplasty provides comparatively safe and effective results.

After reading this article, one should better understand the anatomy of the forehead, brow, and eyelid complexes in the male patient. A thorough history and physical examination allows the facial plastic surgeon to properly select male patients in whom blepharoplasty and brow lift may be indicated. Specific surgical approaches to upper and lower blepharoplasty are discussed in detail. Surgical techniques and indications for each approach to brow lift in men, including direct, midforehead, coronal, pretrichial, endoscopic, temporal, and transblepharoplasty are explicitly outlined.

BACKGROUND: Eyelid surgery is one of the top five aesthetic procedures. It is performed to improve both appearance and function, but intraoperative bleeding leads to adverse events which perturb patients. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of TXA combined with epinephrine in decreasing intraoperative blood loss and postoperative inflammation.
METHODS: This prospective randomized control trial was performed on the 30 eyelids of 15 patients who underwent upper blepharoplasty. One of each patient\'s eyes was randomly assigned to the TXA group, and the other eye was in the control group. Eyes in the TXA group were given 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100000) mixed with TXA (50 mg/ml) in 1:1 mixture subcutaneously as a local anesthetic. The eyes in the control group received 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100000) diluted with normal saline in 1:1 mixture. Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative swelling were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Intraoperative blood loss was significantly higher in the TXA group [4.86 (1.83) ml] than it was in the control group [2.53 (1.49) ml] (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in operative time (p = 0.645), pain score (p = 0.498), lid crease (p = 0.548), or MRD1 (p = 0.626). On postoperative day 7, there was no difference in lid crease (p = 0.879), MRD1 (p = 0.463), pain score (p = 0.934), or ecchymosis (p = 0.976) between two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: TXA in lidocaine with epinephrine was found to increase intraoperative bleeding compared to lidocaine with epinephrine alone, but there was no difference in postoperative swelling or ecchymosis. TXA combined with lidocaine and epinephrine injected subcutaneously should be avoided until additional relevant data are obtained. Further drug interaction study is needed.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

BACKGROUND: Double-eyelid blepharoplasty was the most prevailing cosmetic procedures in China. To reduce the visible scar and unnatural crease after the removal of the OOM in the traditional full-incision double-eyelid technique. This research tried to introduce and promote the orbicularis oculi muscle sparing full-incision double-eyelid blepharoplasty with more conservative resection of upper eyelid soft tissue.
METHODS: The orbicularis oculi muscle sparing full-incision double-eyelid blepharoplasty was operated and evaluated in 227 patients (454 eyes), and the esthetic results, the satisfaction of patients and complications were scored and analyzed at 6-12 months postoperative.
RESULTS: Of the 227 patient, 164 (72.25%) patients were very satisfied, and 49 (21.59%) patients were satisfied, 14 (6.17%) patients were unsatisfied mainly because of the loss of palpebral fold or shallow folds. The average subjective scar score was 4.92 with 209 (92.1%) patients scored very satisfied, 18 patients scored satisfied. No patients experienced the eyelid numbness, dry eyes, and stitch abscess. 8 patients (3.52%) developed mild eye irritation in early postoperative period, however the symptoms resolved spontaneously in 2 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: The orbiculars oculi muscle sparing full-incision double-eyelid blepharoplasty contributes to the conservation of the physiology of the eyelid structure, producing a reliable, nature, dynamic double-eyelid crease with a light scar and less complication.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

BACKGROUND: Lacrimal gland prolapse (LGP) is a term used to describe a benign, anterior displacement of the lacrimal gland. If this condition is not properly addressed during upper blepharoplasty, the aesthetic and functional results are less than optimal. This study aimed to report the surgical outcomes of upper blepharoplasty combined with dacryoadenopexy in patients with LGP.
METHODS: We reported an unusual case of severe LGP in a young patient. In addition, we performed a systematic review of the English literature on surgical cases of LGP published between 1973 and 2023. Eligible articles were analyzed for individual patient data (IPD) and aggregate patient data (APD). The primary predictor variable was the surgical technique used for lacrimal gland repositioning/suspension. The primary outcome variable was relapse rate.
RESULTS: The bibliographic search retrieved 488 surgical cases of LGP: 12 in IPD, and 476 in APD datasets. The relapse rates in the IPD and APD cohorts were 8.3% (1/12) and 1.2% (6/476), respectively. Within the APD dataset, no significant difference in the relapse rates between dacryoadenopexy via suture suspension and Whitnall\'s ligament suspension (5/409 and 1/20, respectively; P > 0.05) was observed. Light cauterization of the lacrimal gland capsule and surrounding soft tissues was performed in mild LGP cases (< 4 mm prolapse), with a relapse rate of 0% (0/47).
CONCLUSIONS: Upper blepharoplasty combined with dacryoadenopexy proved to be a safe surgical procedure with very satisfactory aesthetic outcome and minimal relapse rate.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Background The periorbital area undergoes transformative changes with age, influencing both aesthetic appearance and functional aspects of the eyelids. Age-related alterations involve volume loss, shifts in eyelid crease position, drooping eyebrows, reduced skin elasticity, and the presence of dermatochalasis. Dermatochalasis, characterized by redundant upper eyelid skin folds, poses aesthetic and functional challenges, impacting visual acuity and eyelid elevation efficiency. Upper blepharoplasty addresses these age-related changes. Despite the elective nature of upper blepharoplasty, the procedure can evoke preoperative anxiety and discomfort. Various premedication strategies, including benzodiazepines, aim to alleviate anxiety and enhance the overall patient experience. However, ongoing debates persist regarding the optimal strategy for implementation. The study aims to contribute insights into the effectiveness of different premedication approaches in optimizing patient comfort during and after upper blepharoplasty. Methods The research design involves 182 patients divided into three groups: control group (CG) (n = 45) receiving no premedication, Group 1 (n = 98) receiving oral midazolam (a benzodiazepine), and Group 2 (n = 39) receiving a combination of midazolam, eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) eyelid ointment, and oral paracetamol with codeine phosphate hemihydrate. The study assesses anxiety levels, pain perception during local anesthetic injection, surgery, and postoperatively, as well as the use of painkillers and adverse effects. Ethical approval was obtained for the study. Results Significant differences were noted among the groups during local anesthetic injection (p < 0.0001), surgery (p < 0.0001), and post surgery (p < 0.0197). CG patients experienced higher pain levels during local anesthetic injection and surgery compared to Groups 1 and 2. Group 1 reported more pain during surgery than Group 2. Substantial differences were observed in preoperative (p < 0.0001), during-surgery (p < 0.0001), and after-surgery (p < 0.0001) anxiety levels. The CG exhibited higher preoperative anxiety compared to Group 1, while Group 1 had lower anxiety during surgery compared to the CG. Group 1 also reported lower anxiety after surgery than both the CG and Group 2. A significant difference was found in post-surgery painkiller usage among the groups (p = 0.0003). Group 2 showed significantly lower usage compared to Group 1 (p = 0.0004) and the CG (p = 0.0006). A significant difference was observed in the duration of painkiller use after surgery (p < 0.0014). The CG had a longer duration than Group 1 (p = 0.0049) and Group 2 (p = 0.0495). Conclusions Midazolam alone as premedication effectively reduced anxiety before, during, and after surgery. EMLA administration for injection pain did not produce superior results, likely due to its delayed onset. Paracetamol with codeine phosphate hemihydrate effectively reduced surgical pain and postoperative pain duration and decreased the need for painkillers.

BACKGROUND: Subclinical ptosis is prevalent in Asian patients presenting for aesthetic upper blepharoplasty. To achieve predictable and satisfactory results in these patients, addressing the ptosis component is critical. In this paper, we present a precision levator advancement technique that enabled us to predictably incorporate the levator advancement into our upper blepharoplasty to deliver more predictable results in these patients.
METHODS: Asian patients with normal or near normal margin to reflex distance 1 (MRD 1 of ≥ 3.5 mm) and symptoms and signs of straining of the frontalis with eyelid opening were diagnosed with subclinical upper eyelid ptosis and included in this prospective study. The advancement required was estimated pre-operatively using a formula that we developed. Our surgical technique is presented in detail here, and our long-term results were analysed.
RESULTS: From December 2019 to August 2022, 97 patients were included in this study. Sixty-five patients were primary cases and 32 were revision cases. The mean follow-up was 15 months. Of the 192 eyelids analysed, our formula was able to correctly identify the required fixation location in 69% of eyelids. In majority of the eyelids (94%), the correct location of fixation location within +/- 1 mm of the estimated location. All patients (100%) were satisfied with their long-term results. Our revision rate was 3%.
CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating a precisely done levator advancement into the upper blepharoplasty in patients with subclinical ptosis is critical for optimizing the aesthetic and functional outcomes. This approach has enabled us to perform this procedure greater predictably in this group of patients.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Eyebrow tail ptosis is usually associated with dermatochalasis of the upper eyelid, and it is necessary to treat them together. For these associated procedures to be incorporated as a routine in upper eyelid surgeries, they should preferably be less invasive with consequent fewer complications.
We describe a minimally invasive technique for the correction of mild-to-moderate eyebrow tail ptosis corrected together with superior dermatochalasis through the blepharoplasty incision.
A phase 2 clinical trial was conducted from February 2020 to December 2021. A total of 50 patients underwent conventional upper blepharoplasty surgery associated with the proposed eyebrow lift technique: internal pexia in the periosteum, dissection, and posterior fixation of the orbicularis muscle to the arcus marginalis, removal of the lateral part of the orbicularis muscle, and loosening of the orbital retention ligament. Evaluation of the height of the eyebrow tail was performed with digital photography in the initial consultation and at 30-90 days postoperatively and analyzed with ImageJ software.
Mean difference in brow height at 1-month and 3-month postoperative evaluations compared to the preoperative period was 3.45-3.33 mm, respectively.
Our study demonstrated a minimally invasive surgical technique for the treatment of mild-to-moderate eyebrow ptosis with significant eyebrow tail lift results that remained stable during the study period.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a three mini-incision upper blepharoplasty combined with simultaneous orbital fat pad repositioning for correcting primary multiple upper eyelid folds in East Asians.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 75 patients who underwent three mini-incision double-eyelid blepharoplasty in conjunction with orbital fat pad repositioning for the correction of multiple upper eyelid folds between January 2018 and January 2022 was conducted. During the surgery, the lateral extension of the central upper eyelid fat mass was anchored medially to the upper medial eyelid via three small skin incisions. Postoperative follow-up was carried out to evaluate the improvement in multiple upper eyelid folds, and patient satisfaction was measured.
RESULTS: The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 36 months, with an average of 12 months. Post-surgery, the multiple fold lines were completely resolved in 71 patients (95%), while relapse occurred in 4 patients (5%). The overall satisfaction rate was 88%.
CONCLUSIONS: The three mini-incision double-eyelid blepharoplasty combined with simultaneous orbital fat repositioning is an effective method for correcting primary multiple upper eyelid folds. This technique presents a novel alternative for patients with primary multiple eyelid folds, particularly those who are hesitant to undergo a full-incision double-eyelid procedure.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Upper eyelid blepharoplasty is a surgical procedure that aims to correct the typical changes that occur with aging to the periorbital area. The outcomes of this surgery are aesthetic, as well as functional. Many studies have described an impact on the cornea, intraocular pressure, dry eye syndrome, and visual quality. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the different surgical techniques and their outcomes.
The authors performed a literature review through online databases PubMed, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov, and CENTRAL libraries. Information was collected about the surgery techniques and the functional and aesthetic outcomes as well as complications of the interventions. Six types of upper blepharoplasty surgery were studied. Data were analyzed using Cochrane RevMan.
Twenty studies were included in our systematic review and nine in our meta-analysis. We presented results about intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, flattest keratometry, steepest keratometry, corneal astigmatism, visual acuity, Schirmer test 1 and 2, tear film break-up time and the ocular surface disease index questionnaire, according to type of surgery. Our meta-analysis showed no significant results.
No significant results were found; however, many studies reported an impact of upper blepharoplasty surgery in the outcomes studied. Only a small number of complications were reported, and patients were satisfied with the aesthetic outcomes.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://www.springer.com/00266 .