Unrelated Donors

不相关的捐助者
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管全球有超过4100万注册的潜在自愿干细胞捐献者,许多需要移植的患者没有找到HLA匹配的无关供体或脐带血单位,不同人群各自的几率差异显著。在这项研究中,我们分析了发送给DKMS登记处的2,205次未成功的真实捐赠者搜索数据,以确定进一步招募捐赠者与特别大的患者获益相关的人群.为此,我们估计了不同样本量下67个供体群体的单倍型频率,并将它们输入到两个不同的数学模型中.这些模型评估了特定人群捐赠者招募的患者收益,通过最初不成功的搜索数量来操作,这些搜索可能由于新的捐助者而成功。始终如一,在不同的数学模型和样本量中,我们从东亚和东南亚获得了几个国家(泰国,越南,中国,和菲律宾)和美国的亚洲人人口是捐助者招募活动对患者特别有利的国家/人口。我们还确定了东南欧和中欧的各个国家作为可能的目标地区,以获得高于平均水平的患者福利。所提供的结果是特定于注册表的,因为它们是通过优化已发送到DKMS注册表的不成功搜索而获得的。因此,期望将所呈现的方法应用于包括全世界所有不成功的干细胞供体搜索的全球数据集,并且基于WMDA搜索和匹配服务中可用的所有供体使用群体特异性单倍型频率。
    Despite over 41 million registered potential volunteer stem cell donors worldwide, many patients in need of a transplant do not find an HLA-matched unrelated donor or cord blood units, with the respective odds differing significantly between various populations. In this study, we analysed data of 2205 unsuccessful real-life donor searches sent to the DKMS Registry to identify populations in which further donor recruitment would be associated with particularly large patient benefits. For that purpose, we estimated haplotype frequencies of 67 donor populations at various sample sizes and entered them into two different mathematical models. These models assessed patient benefits from population-specific donor recruitment, operationalised by the number of originally unsuccessful searches that may become successful due to new donors. Consistently, across the different mathematical models and sample sizes, we obtained several countries from East and Southeast Asia (Thailand, Vietnam, China, and the Philippines) and the population of Asians in the USA as countries/populations where donor recruitment activities would be particularly beneficial for patients. We also identified various countries in Southeast and Central Europe as possible target regions for donor recruitment with above-average patient benefits. The results presented are registry-specific in the sense that they were obtained by optimising unsuccessful searches that had been sent to the DKMS Registry. Therefore, it would be desirable to apply the presented methods to a global data set that includes all unsuccessful stem cell donor searches worldwide and uses population-specific haplotype frequencies based on all donors available in the WMDA Search & Match Service.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的重点是与孟加拉国的活体器官捐献移植有关的问题。孟加拉国的活体器官移植捐赠政策和做法是以家庭为导向的:近亲(合法和遗传)是唯一允许成为活体捐赠者的人。无关的捐助者,利他捐助者(定向和非定向),和配对/集合或非定向的利他主义活体捐助链-正如许多在其他国家实施的那样-在法律上不允许在孟加拉国作为活体捐助方。本文提出了规范性论点,解释了为什么围绕活体器官捐献移植的法规和实践的家庭导向性质对孟加拉国至关重要。在这篇文章中,我特别认为,如果孟加拉国政府在亲属之外大力修改现行的生物医学政策,并允许无关的捐赠者合法捐赠器官,由于孟加拉国的贫困和腐败问题,这可能会促进器官出售。活体器官捐赠政策和做法以家庭为导向的要求是合理的,在道德上是合理的,因为它保留了孟加拉国家庭单位和家庭纽带的共同观念。维持现行的活人捐献条例,促进死者捐献是前进的方向,因为这安全地保留了家庭价值观,防止器官出售,增加器官移植的机会。
    This study focuses on issues related to living organ donation for transplantation in Bangladesh. The policy and practice of living organ donation for transplantation in Bangladesh is family-oriented: close relatives (legal and genetic) are the only ones allowed to be living donors. Unrelated donors, altruistic donors (directed and non-directed), and paired/pooled or non-directed altruistic living donor chains-as many of these are implemented in other countries-are not legally allowed to serve as living donors in Bangladesh. This paper presents normative arguments explaining why the family-oriented nature of regulations and practices surrounding living organ donation for transplantation is essential for Bangladesh. In this article, I specifically argue that if the Bangladesh government revises the current biomedical policy robustly beyond relatives and allows unrelated donors to donate organs legally, this may foster organ selling due to the poverty and corruption problems in Bangladesh. The family-oriented requirement of the living organ donation policy and practice is defensible and morally justifiable as it preserves common notions of the family unit and family bonding in Bangladesh. Maintaining the current living-donation regulations and promoting deceased donation is the way forward, as this safely preserves the family values, protects against organ selling, and increases access to organ transplantation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    MICA多态性与异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)中急性GvHD的发生率和不良结局增加有关。MICB是MHCI类相关链基因的另一个表达成员,其对HSCT结果的影响尚未完全确定。我们对MICB多态性的患者和供体进行了大量队列分型,并研究了MICB匹配对无关HSCT后结局的影响。69.2%的患者为10/10人类白细胞抗原(HLA)匹配,而30.8%的患者为9/10HLA匹配。在IlluminaMiSeq平台上使用基于短扩增子的NGS分型测定进行MICB分型。蛋白质的差异被认为是错配。MICA多态性被鉴定为可能的混杂因素,因此作为参数包括在多变量分析中。由于与经典HLA基因的强连锁不平衡,HLA匹配状态的亚分层是必要的,与MICB匹配的病例相比,在10/10HLA匹配的组中没有观察到MICB错配的影响。然而,在9/10HLA匹配组中,MICB错配病例显示无病生存率(DFS)显著恶化,与MICB匹配病例相比,GvHD和无复发生存率(GRFS)(DFS:HR1.24,p=0.011;GRFS:HR1.26,p=0.002)。MICA错配对任何结果参数没有影响。根据我们的发现,以前归因于MICA差异的效应可能被MICB多态性所混淆。我们表明MICB差异在9/10HLA匹配的移植中贡献了很小但相关的作用,这反过来强调了MICB分型在相似合适的9/10匹配供体中的供体选择中的可能有用性,特别是当HLA-B错配必须接受。
    MICA polymorphisms have been associated with increased incidence of acute GvHD and adverse outcome in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). MICB is another expressed member of MHC class I-related chain genes and its impact on HSCT outcome is yet to be fully defined. We typed a large cohort of patients and donors for MICB polymorphisms and investigated the impact of MICB matching on outcome after unrelated HSCT. 69.2% of the patients were 10/10 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched and 30.8% were 9/10 HLA matched. MICB typing was performed using a short amplicon-based NGS typing assay on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Differences in proteins were considered as mismatches. MICA polymorphisms were identified as possible confounder and were therefore included as parameter in the multivariate analyses. Due to the strong linkage disequilibrium with the classical HLA-genes, sub-stratification for HLA matching status was necessary, and no effect of MICB mismatches was seen in the 10/10 HLA matched group when compared to the MICB matched cases. However, in the 9/10 HLA matched group, MICB mismatched cases showed significantly worse disease free survival (DFS), GvHD and relapse free survival (GRFS) compared to the MICB matched cases (DFS: HR 1.24, p = 0.011; GRFS: HR 1.26, p = 0.002). MICA mismatches had no impact on any outcome parameter. According to our findings, effects previously attributed to MICA differences may have been confounded by MICB polymorphisms. We show that MICB differences contribute a small but relevant effect in 9/10 HLA-matched transplantations, which in turn highlights the possible usefulness of MICB typing in donor selection among similarly suitable 9/10 matched donors, especially when HLA-B mismatches have to be accepted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们旨在评估供体类型对骨髓纤维化造血细胞移植(HCT)结果的影响,使用2013年至2019年期间完成的HCT的CIBMTR注册数据。在所有1597年因骨髓纤维化而接受HCT的患者中,单倍体供体的使用量从2013年的3%增加到2019年的19%。在符合资格的研究中,1032例接受慢性期骨髓纤维化外周血移植的患者,38%的单倍体HCT接受者是非白人/白种人。配对同胞供体(MSD)-HCTs与前3个月的总生存期(OS)独立相关[参考MSD,单倍体HR5.80(95%CI2.52-13.35),匹配的无关HR4.50(95%CI2.24-9.03),和不匹配的无关HR5.13(95%CI1.44-18.31),P<0.001]。OS的这种差异与MSD的较低移植物失败相符[单倍体HR6.11(95CI2.98-12.54),匹配的无关HR2.33(95CI1.20-4.51),错配的无关HR1.82(95CI0.58-5.72)。单倍体之间的OS没有显着差异,匹配无关,和前3个月不匹配的无关供体HCTs。供体类型与HCT后3个月后的OS差异无关,复发,诊断后24个月内接受HCT的患者的无病生存期或OS.经历移植失败的患者患有更晚期的疾病,并且通常使用非清髓性预处理。虽然MSD仍然是一个优越的供体选择,由于提高了植入,来自单倍体相合和匹配无关供体的HCT结局无显著差异.这些结果建立了单倍体-HCT与移植后环磷酰胺作为骨髓纤维化的可行选择。特别是对于在捐助者登记册中代表性不足的少数民族。
    UNASSIGNED: We evaluate the impact of donor types on outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in myelofibrosis, using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry data for HCTs done between 2013 and 2019. In all 1597 patients, the use of haploidentical donors increased from 3% in 2013 to 19% in 2019. In study-eligible 1032 patients who received peripheral blood grafts for chronic-phase myelofibrosis, 38% of recipients of haploidentical HCT were non-White/Caucasian. Matched sibling donor (MSD)-HCTs were associated with superior overall survival (OS) in the first 3 months (haploidentical hazard ratio [HR], 5.80 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.52-13.35]; matched unrelated (MUD) HR, 4.50 [95% CI, 2.24-9.03]; mismatched unrelated HR, 5.13 [95% CI, 1.44-18.31]; P < .001). This difference in OS aligns with lower graft failure with MSD (haploidentical HR, 6.11 [95% CI, 2.98-12.54]; matched unrelated HR, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.20-4.51]; mismatched unrelated HR, 1.82 [95% CI, 0.58-5.72]). There was no significant difference in OS among haploidentical, MUD, and mismatched unrelated donor HCTs in the first 3 months. Donor type was not associated with differences in OS beyond 3 months after HCT, relapse, disease-free survival, or OS among patients who underwent HCT within 24 months of diagnosis. Patients who experienced graft failure had more advanced disease and commonly used nonmyeloablative conditioning. Although MSD-HCTs were superior, there is no significant difference in HCT outcomes from haploidentical and MUDs. These results establish haploidentical HCT with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide as a viable option in myelofibrosis, especially for ethnic minorities underrepresented in the donor registries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一个患有原发性免疫缺陷的男孩,由酪氨酸激酶2(TYK2)突变引起,存在免疫缺陷和终身严重感染史。我们的目的是确定异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)是否可以恢复患者的免疫防御并降低对感染的易感性。在没有合适的HLA匹配血液作为供体的情况下,患者接受了来自无关供体的同种异体HSCT.患者的临床资料在重庆医科大学附属儿童医院(重庆,中国)在移植前和4年随访期间使用蛋白质印迹的组合(例如,TYK2和STAT水平),qRT-PCR(例如,T细胞受体重排切除圈,κ缺失元件重组圈,和TYK2转录水平),和流式细胞术(例如,淋巴细胞亚群和CD107α分泌)。我们发现HSCT显著降低了严重感染的发生率,TKY2水平恢复正常,和逆转的缺陷,例如响应干扰素-α或白介素-10治疗的JAK/STAT信号传导受损。尽管患者在移植后没有发生急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD),他确实在许多器官中出现了慢性GVHD症状,得到有效管理。我们的研究结果表明,HSCT是重建TYK2缺陷患者免疫系统的可行策略;然而,在接受HSCT的TYK2缺陷患者中,与GVHD和自身免疫性甲状腺炎发展相关的因素需要进一步研究.
    A boy with primary immunodeficiency, caused by a tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) mutation, presented with immune defects and a lifelong history of severe infections. Our aim was to determine whether allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) could restore the patient\'s immune defenses and reduce susceptibility to infection. In the absence of a suitable HLA-matched blood relative to act as a donor, the patient received an allogeneic HSCT from unrelated donors. The patient\'s clinical data were analyzed in the Children\'s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Chongqing, China) before transplantation and during the 4-year follow-up period using a combination of western blotting (e.g., TYK2 and STAT levels), qRT-PCR (e.g., T cell receptor rearrangement excision circles, kappa deletion element recombination circles, and TYK2 transcript levels), and flow cytometry (e.g., lymphocyte subpopulations and CD107α secretion). We found that HSCT significantly reduced the incidence of severe infections, restored normal TKY2 levels, and reversed defects such as impaired JAK/STAT signaling in response to interferon-α or interleukin-10 treatment. Although the patient did not develop acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after transplantation, he did experience chronic GVHD symptoms in a number of organs, which were effectively managed. Our findings suggest that HSCT is a feasible strategy for reconstituting the immune system in TYK2-deficient patients; however, the factors associated with GVHD and autoimmune thyroiditis development in TYK2-deficient patients undergoing HSCT warrant further investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    分析HLA-DPA1和HLA-DPB1等位基因错配对无关供者造血干细胞移植(URD-HSCT)结局的影响。我们收集了258例接受HLA-10/10匹配URD-HSCT的血液病患者.HLA-A,-B,-C,使用下一代测序(NGS)技术对供体和受体进行-DRB1、-DQB1、-DRB3/4/5、-DQA1、-DPA1和-DPB1分型。排除8例DQA1或DRB3/4/5不匹配后,我们纳入了250例HLA-14/14匹配病例进行进一步分析.我们的结果表明,DPA1和DPB1等位基因的匹配比例仅为10.4%(26/250)。其余89.6%的供体和受体表现出DPA1或DPB1错配。在DPA1匹配和DPB1不匹配组中,占队列的18.8%(47/250),DPB1*02:01/DPB1*03:01等位基因错配与2年OS降低和NRM增加相关。DPB1*02:02/DPB1*05:01和DPB1*02:01/DPB1*05:01不匹配显示对结果没有影响。此外,观察到的特定等位基因错配与DPB1T细胞表位(TCE)分类为允许性和非允许性一致.针对DPA1和DPB1不匹配的情况,我们创新性地建立了DPA1〜DPB1连锁不匹配的分析方法,占总数的70%(175/250)。DPA1*02:02~DPB1*05:01/DPA1*02:01~DPB1*17:01链接不匹配与较低的2年OS相关,尤其是AML/MDS收件人。DPA1*02:02~DPB1*05:01/DPA1*01:03~DPB1*02:01连锁错配对结果无影响。总之,应用DPA1~DPB1连锁错配分析方法可以识别影响移植结果的不同类型的错配,并为选择AML/MDS和所有受者的最佳供体提供有价值的见解.
    To analyse the effect of HLA-DPA1 and HLA-DPB1 allelic mismatches on the outcomes of unrelated donor haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (URD-HSCT), we collected 258 recipients with haematological disease who underwent HLA-10/10 matched URD-HSCT. HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DQB1, -DRB3/4/5, -DQA1, -DPA1 and -DPB1 typing was performed for the donors and recipients using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. After excluding 8 cases with DQA1 or DRB3/4/5 mismatches, we included 250 cases with HLA-14/14 matching for further analysis. Our results showed that the proportion of matched DPA1 and DPB1 alleles was only 10.4% (26/250). The remaining 89.6% of donors and recipients demonstrated DPA1 or DPB1 mismatch. In the DPA1 matched and DPB1 mismatched group, accounting for 18.8% (47/250) of the cohort, DPB1*02:01/DPB1*03:01 allelic mismatches were associated with decreased 2-year OS and increased NRM. DPB1*02:02/DPB1*05:01 and DPB1*02:01/DPB1*05:01 mismatches showed no impact on outcomes. Moreover, the specific allelic mismatches observed were consistent with the DPB1 T-cell epitope (TCE) classification as permissive and non-permissive. We innovatively established an analysis method for DPA1 ~ DPB1 linkage mismatch for cases with both DPA1 and DPB1 mismatched, accounting for 70% (175/250) of the total. DPA1*02:02 ~ DPB1*05:01/DPA1*02:01 ~ DPB1*17:01 linkage mismatches were associated with lower 2-year OS, especially among AML/MDS recipients. DPA1*02:02 ~ DPB1*05:01/DPA1*01:03 ~ DPB1*02:01 linkage mismatches showed no impact on outcomes. In conclusion, applying the DPA1 ~ DPB1 linkage mismatch analysis approach can identify different types of mismatches affecting transplant outcomes and provide valuable insight for selecting optimal donors for AML/MDS and ALL recipients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在不匹配的无关供体造血细胞移植(HCT)后,疾病复发后,一名患有急性髓细胞性白血病的儿科患者被转介到我们的机构进行研究治疗。在第二次HCT之前,患者血清I类和II类HLA抗体阴性。接受母体供体单倍体移植八天后,患者出现血小板难治性,并对多种I类HLA高度敏感.患者母亲的血清对患者体内最强的抗体呈阳性,提示抗体来源于供体.患者血清在100%供体嵌合状态的背景下显示出放大和扩大的致敏作用,尽管无法检测到循环B细胞。敏化升级表明,在输注祖细胞时,利妥昔单抗抗性抗体产生的过客淋巴细胞从单倍体供体主动转移到移植受体。在HLA错配HCT之前,评估供体致敏状态可能是一个考虑因素。
    A pediatric patient with acute myeloid leukemia was referred to our institution for investigational therapy after disease relapse following a mismatched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Prior to second HCT, the patient\'s serum was negative for antibodies to class I and class II HLA. Eight days after receiving a maternal donor haploidentical transplant, the patient became platelet refractory and highly sensitized to multiple class I HLA. Serum from the patient\'s mother was positive for the strongest antibodies present in the patient, suggesting the antibodies were donor-derived. Patient sera showed magnified and expanded sensitization over time in the context of 100% donor chimerism and despite undetectable circulating B cells. Escalating sensitization suggests active transfer of rituximab-resistant antibody-producing passenger lymphocytes from a haploidentical donor to a transplant recipient at the time of progenitor cell infusion. Evaluation of donor sensitization status may be a consideration prior to HLA mismatched HCT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    HLA匹配的异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)是许多患者的治愈性疗法。不相关的HLA匹配的供体是HCT最常用的供体。当不止一个供体移植选项可用时,移植中心可以根据非HLA因素选择供体.提高预防和治疗免疫并发症的能力,如移植物抗宿主病和感染,可以更频繁地使用HLA不匹配的供体,允许更多地考虑非HLA因素,比如捐赠者的年龄,CMV血清状态,和ABO血型匹配,对移植结果有重要影响。需要考虑的其他因素是捐助者的可用率和国内捐助者的使用以优化结果。在此更新的当前背景下,提供了对非HLA因素的回顾以及对HCT的最佳无关供体选择的考虑。
    HLA-matched allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a curative therapy for many patients. Unrelated HLA-matched donors are the most frequently used donor for HCT. When more than one donor transplant option is available, transplant centers can select donors based on non-HLA factors. With improved ability to prevent and treat immune complications, such as graft-versus-host disease and infections, it may be possible to proceed more often using HLA-mismatched donors, allowing greater consideration of non-HLA factors, such as donor age, CMV serostatus, and ABO blood group matching, which have demonstrated important impacts on transplant outcomes. Additional factors to consider are donor availability rates and the usage of domestic donors to optimize outcomes. A review of non-HLA factors and considerations on the selection of optimal unrelated donors for HCT are provided within this updated current context.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号