Universal single-shade RBCs

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近,已开发出一组通用的单阴影树脂基复合材料(RBC),以简化阴影选择过程。优异的机械和物理性能对于修复体的最终成功和临床寿命至关重要。因此,评估单阴影红细胞的特性是当务之急。这项研究旨在确定通用单色调红细胞的弯曲强度(FS)和转化度(DC)。
    在这项研究中,使用了四种商业红细胞;三种通用单色泽红细胞;全色(OC),Charisma®DiamondONE(CD),和VittraAPSUnique(VU),和用作对照的常规纳米杂化复合材料Filtek™Z250XT(FT)。FS和DC使用了60个复合梁和40个复合圆盘,分别。具有三点弯曲试验的通用试验机用于测量FS,而DC是使用傅里叶变换红外光谱仪(FTIR)测量的。使用扫描电子显微镜对每个树脂复合材料组的三个断裂试样进行定性分析。
    ANOVA用于比较四个RBC中FS和DC的平均值(OC,CD,VU,和FT)。在平均FS和DC值(F=673.043,p<0.001和F(=782.4,p<0.0001)中观察到高度显着差异,分别。CD组FS最高,其次是FT和VU组;OC组观察到最低值。此外,发现DC值存在统计学显著差异.在VU中观察到最高的DC值,其次是OC和CD,在FT中观察到最低的DC值。
    通用单阴影红细胞表现出良好的FS,除了OC,表现出显著的低FS。通用单阴影红细胞的DC高于常规纳米杂化复合修复材料。
    UNASSIGNED: Recently, a group of universal single-shade resin-based composites (RBCs) has been developed to simplify the process of shade selection. Excellent mechanical and physical properties are crucial for the ultimate success and clinical longevity of restorations. Therefore, evaluating the properties of the single-shaded RBCs is imperative. This study aimed to determine the flexural strength (FS) and degree of conversion (DC) of universal single-shade RBCs.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, four commercial RBCs were used; three universal single-shade RBCs; Omnichroma (OC), Charisma® Diamond ONE (CD), and Vittra APS Unique (VU), and a conventional nanohybrid composite Filtek™ Z250 XT (FT) which was used as a control. Sixty composite beams and 40 composite discs were used for FS and DC, respectively. A universal test machine with a three-point bending test was used to measure the FS, whereas the DC was measured using a Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR). Three fractured specimens from each resin composite group were qualitatively analyzed using scanning electron microscopy.
    UNASSIGNED: ANOVA was used to compare the mean values of FS and DC among the four RBCs (OC, CD, VU, and FT). Highly significant differences were observed in the mean FS and DC values (F = 673.043, p < 0.001 and F (=782.4, p < 0.0001), respectively. The highest FS was observed in the CD group, followed by FT and VU groups; the lowest value was observed in the OC group. In addition, a statistically significant difference was identified in DC values. The highest DC value was observed in VU, followed by OC and CD, and the lowest DC value was observed in FT.
    UNASSIGNED: Universal single-shade RBCs demonstrated a good FS, except for OC, which exhibited a significantly low FS. The DC of the universal single-shade RBCs was higher than that of the conventional nanohybrid composite restorative material.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近,通用的单阴影树脂复合材料在牙科市场上越来越多。其组成的改性可能会对其物理和表面特性产生无意影响,以及随后对其临床功能和寿命的决定性影响。因此,这项研究旨在评估不同的精加工和抛光(F/P)系统对表面粗糙度(Ra)的影响,表面光泽(GU),通用单色调红细胞的维氏显微硬度(VMH)。
    方法:使用了四种商业RBC;通用的单色调RBC是Omnichroma,Charisma®DiamondONE,和VittraAPSUnique,和常规纳米复合材料Filtek™Z250XT用作对照。3个F/P系统是Sof-Lex™XT,Enhance®/PoGo®,和Diacomp®PlusTwist。对于所有RBC,总共160个圆盘用于3个F/P系统组(n=10)。F/P后,Ra,GU,和VMH进行了评估。使用P值<0.05的双向ANOVA分析数据。
    结果:在四个红细胞和3F/P系统中发现了显着差异(p<.000)。Omnichroma显示最低的Ra和可接受的GU,但VMH最低。魅力表现出最高的Ra,可接受的GU,VMH。Vittra显示可接受的Ra,GU,VMH和Filtek显示了最高的GU,VMH,可接受的Ra
    结论:尽管传统的纳米杂化红细胞(FiltekZ250XT)显示出更好的GU和VMH值,通用单阴影红细胞表现出可比的表面性质。Diacomp实现了最高的GU和VMH和最低的Ra,其次是Enhance和Soflex。
    BACKGROUND: Recently, universal single-shade resin composites have become increasingly available in the dental market. The modification of their composition can have an inadvertent effect on their physical and surface properties, and subsequently determinantal effect on their clinical function and longevity. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of different finishing and polishing (F/P) systems on surface roughness (Ra), surface gloss (GU), and Vickers microhardness (VMH) of universal single-shade RBCs.
    METHODS: Four commercial RBCs were used; the universal single-shade RBCs were Omnichroma, Charisma® Diamond ONE, and Vittra APS Unique, and a conventional nanocomposite Filtek™ Z250 XT was used as a control. The 3 F/P systems were Sof-Lex™ XT, Enhance®/PoGo®, and Diacomp® Plus Twist. A total of 160 discs were used for the 3 F/P system groups for all RBCs (n = 10). After F/P, the Ra, GU, and VMH were assessed. The data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA at p-value < 0.05.
    RESULTS: Significant differences were found among the four RBCs and the 3 F/P systems (p < .000). Omnichroma showed the lowest Ra and acceptable GU, but the lowest VMH. Charisma showed the highest Ra, acceptable GU, and VMH. Vittra showed acceptable Ra, GU, and VMH and Filtek showed the highest GU, VMH, and acceptable Ra.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although conventional nanohybrid RBC (Filtek Z250 XT) showed better GU and VMH values, the universal single-shade RBCs demonstrated comparable surface properties. The highest GU & VMH and lowest Ra were achieved by Diacomp followed by Enhance and Soflex.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号