Unipolar depression

单相抑郁症
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:焦虑性抑郁是在被诊断为重度抑郁障碍(MDD)的亚洲精神病患者中观察到的一个普遍特征。这项研究旨在调查诊断为MDD的台湾个体中焦虑抑郁症的患病率和临床表现。
    方法:我们招募了18岁以上通过临床访谈诊断为MDD的精神科门诊患者。这次招募是在台湾北部的五家医院进行的。我们收集了参与者的基线临床和人口统计信息。在21项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)上,使用焦虑/躯体化因子得分≥7的阈值来识别焦虑抑郁。
    结果:在我们对399名患者(84.21%为女性)的研究中,64.16%符合焦虑抑郁的标准。他们往往年纪大了,已婚,受教育程度较低,有了更多的孩子,发病年龄较大。焦虑抑郁症患者的HAM-D和临床总体印象-严重程度量表评分较高,更多的恐慌症(没有广场恐惧症),表现出躁动等症状,烦躁,集中困难,心理和躯体焦虑,躯体投诉,软骨病,减肥,和增加洞察力。令人惊讶的是,他们的自杀率与非焦虑抑郁症患者没有显著差异.这突出了认识和解决这些独特特征的重要性。
    结论:我们的研究结果揭示,与住院患者相比,台湾诊断为MDD的门诊患者中焦虑抑郁的患病率较低,但大大高于欧洲国家和美国报告的患病率。此外,焦虑抑郁症患者表现出更多的躯体症状。
    OBJECTIVE: Anxious depression is a prevalent characteristic observed in Asian psychiatric patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD). This study aims to investigate the prevalence and clinical presentation of anxious depression in Taiwanese individuals diagnosed with MDD.
    METHODS: We recruited psychiatric outpatients aged over 18 who had been diagnosed with MDD through clinical interviews. This recruitment took place at five hospitals located in northern Taiwan. We gathered baseline clinical and demographic information from the participants. Anxious depression was identified using a threshold of an anxiety/somatization factor score ≥7 on the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D).
    RESULTS: In our study of 399 patients (84.21% female), 64.16% met the criteria for anxious depression. They tended to be older, married, less educated, with more children, and an older age of onset. Anxious depression patients had higher HAM-D and Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale score, more panic disorder (without agoraphobia), and exhibited symptoms like agitation, irritability, concentration difficulties, psychological and somatic anxiety, somatic complaints, hypochondriasis, weight loss, and increased insight. Surprisingly, their suicide rates did not significantly differ from non-anxious depression patients. This highlights the importance of recognizing and addressing these unique characteristics.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings unveiled that the prevalence of anxious depression among Taiwanese outpatients diagnosed with MDD was lower compared to inpatients but substantially higher than the reported rates in European countries and the United States. Furthermore, patients with anxious depression exhibited a greater occurrence of somatic symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然情绪不稳定与抑郁密切相关,其后果仍未被探索。在诊断为单相抑郁症(UD)的患者中,我们的目的是调查情绪不稳定之间的关系,根据每日基于智能手机的患者报告的情绪数据计算,和功能,生活质量,感知压力,赋权,沉思,recovery,担心和幸福。
    患有UD的患者每天完成基于智能手机的情绪自我评估,为期6个月,这使得使用均方根逐差(rMSSD)方法计算情绪不稳定成为可能。共纳入59例UD患者。使用混合效应回归模型分析数据。
    情绪不稳定增加与感知压力增加之间存在统计学上的显着关联(调整模型:B:0.010,95%CI:0.00027;0.021,p=0.044),和令人担忧(调整后的模型:B:0.0060,95%CI:0.000016;0.012,p=0.049),和生活质量下降(调整模型:B:-0.0056,95%CI:-0.011;-0.00028,p=0.039),恢复(调整模型:B:-0.032,95%CI:-0.0059;-0.00053,p=0.019)和健康。情绪不稳定和功能之间没有统计学上的显著关联,赋权,和反省(p>0.09)。
    这些发现强调了情绪不稳定对患者日常生活的显著影响。情绪波动的识别提供了对这些个体的疾病轨迹的潜在见解。
    UNASSIGNED: While mood instability is strongly linked to depression, its ramifications remain unexplored. In patients diagnosed with unipolar depression (UD), our objective was to investigate the association between mood instability, calculated based on daily smartphone-based patient-reported data on mood, and functioning, quality of life, perceived stress, empowerment, rumination, recovery, worrying and wellbeing.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with UD completed daily smartphone-based self-assessments of mood for 6 months, making it possible to calculate mood instability using the Root Mean Squared Successive Difference (rMSSD) method. A total of 59 patients with UD were included. Data were analyzed using mixed effects regression models.
    UNASSIGNED: There was a statistically significant association between increased mood instability and increased perceived stress (adjusted model: B: 0.010, 95% CI: 0.00027; 0.021, p = 0.044), and worrying (adjusted model: B: 0.0060, 95% CI: 0.000016; 0.012, p = 0.049), and decreased quality of life (adjusted model: B: -0.0056, 95% CI: -0.011; -0.00028, p = 0.039), recovery (adjusted model: B: -0.032, 95% CI: -0.0059; -0.00053, p = 0.019) and wellbeing. There were no statistically significant associations between mood instability and functioning, empowerment, and rumination (p\'s >0.09).
    UNASSIGNED: These findings underscore the significant influence of mood instability on patients\' daily lives. Identification of mood fluctuations offer potential insights into the trajectory of the illness in these individuals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    单相(UD)和双相抑郁(BDD)在临床表现上显示出高度的相似性,这使得这些疾病的鉴别诊断复杂化。这项研究的目的是研究血清白细胞介素6(IL-6)的水平,C反应蛋白(CRP),白蛋白(Alb),UD患者的锌(Zn),BDD,和健康对照(HC)。总共收集了211个样品:131个患者样品(65UD和68BDD)和80HC。蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS),连同汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17),给予患者组以评估症状。进行了横断面研究以分析血清IL-6,CRP,白蛋白,和锌。用免疫比浊法测定CRP浓度,锌使用比色法,在Alinityc设备上使用溴甲酚绿比色法和白蛋白。血清样品中的IL-6细胞因子浓度使用商业酶免疫测定法确定,ELISA。我们发现锌的血清浓度没有显着差异,白蛋白,CRP,单相和双相抑郁患者组之间的IL-6。与HC相比,两组抑郁症患者的所有研究参数的血清水平之间存在显着统计学差异(p<0.001)。此外,与HAMD-17上特定项目的相关性;(即软骨病,工作和活动,躯体症状-一般,和体重减轻)和MADRS(浓缩困难,在两组患者中都观察到了疲劳)。这些发现证实了抑郁症中存在低度炎症,从而增加了对炎症假说的更深入的了解,该假说旨在解释抑郁症的病因。我们的研究结果并不表明区分单相和双相抑郁的潜在生物标志物。
    Unipolar (UD) and bipolar depression (BDD) show a high degree of similarity in clinical presentations, which complicates the differential diagnosis of these disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate the serum levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin (Alb), and zinc (Zn) in patients with UD, BDD, and healthy controls (HC). A total of 211 samples were collected: 131 patient samples (65 UD and 68 BDD) and 80 HC. The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), along with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), were administered to patient groups to evaluate symptoms. A cross-sectional study was performed to analyse the serum levels of IL-6, CRP, albumin, and zinc. The concentration of CRP was determined using the immunoturbidimetry method, zinc using the colorimetric method, and albumin using the colorimetric method with bromocresol green on the Alinity c device. IL-6 cytokine concentration in serum samples was ascertained using a commercial enzyme immunoassay, ELISA. We found no significant differences in serum concentrations of zinc, albumin, CRP, and IL-6 between the groups of patients with unipolar and bipolar depression. There was a significant statistical difference (p < 0.001) between serum levels of all investigated parameters in both groups of depressed patients in comparison with HC. Furthermore, correlations with specific items on HAMD-17; (namely, hypochondrias, work and activities, somatic symptoms-general, and weight loss) and on MADRS (concentration difficulties, lassitude) were observed in both patient groups. These findings confirm the presence of low-grade inflammation in depression, thus adding better insight into the inflammation hypothesis directed to explain the aetiology of depressive disorders. Our results do not indicate potential biomarkers for distinguishing between unipolar and bipolar depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:精神分裂症,单相抑郁症,双相情感障碍,躁郁症,和双相抑郁症是影响数百万人及其整体生活质量的一些严重精神疾病。本研究旨在观察TGA的差异,TC,HDL,LDL,以及正在经历所列疾病急性发作的人群的FPG水平。材料和方法:2023年1月至11月在约旦进行了一项横断面前瞻性研究,涉及所有上述疾病的患者,他们参加了三个精神病诊所。这项研究包括1187名患者(女性N=675,56.87%)的结果,这些患者分为以下范围:<25、25-45、45-65和>65。结果:LDL平均水平在双相抑郁中最高(112.442±36.178mg/dL),在双相躁狂症中最低(111.25±33.14mg/dL)。HDL的平均水平在精神分裂症中最高(58.755±16.198mg/dL),在双相抑郁中最低(45.584±12.128mg/dL)。双相抑郁患者的TC和TGA的平均水平最高(188.403±37.396mg/dL和149.685±96.951mg/dL,分别)和双相躁狂症最低(164.790±40.488mg/dL和100.679±54.337mg/dL,分别)。单相抑郁症患者的FPG水平最高(94.00±21.453mg/dL),双相躁狂症患者的FPG水平最低(89.492±14.700mg/dL)。结论:结果证实,血脂和血糖异常在精神分裂症和情绪障碍(单相和双相)患者中更为常见。
    Objectives: Schizophrenia, unipolar depression, bipolar disorder, bipolar mania, and bipolar depression are a few of the severe psychiatric diseases that affect millions of individuals and their overall life quality. This study aimed to look at differences in TGA, TC, HDL, LDL, and FPG levels in people who were going through acute episodes of listed diseases. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional prospective study was carried out in Jordan between January and November of 2023, involving all patients with the aforementioned diseases who attended three psychiatric clinics. This study encompassed results from 1187 patients (women N = 675, 56.87%) who were classified into the following ranges: <25, 25-45, 45-65, and >65. Results: The average level of LDL was the highest in bipolar depression (112.442 ± 36.178 mg/dL) and the lowest in bipolar mania (111.25 ± 33.14 mg/dL). The average level of HDL was the highest in schizophrenia (58.755 ± 16.198 mg/dL) and the lowest in bipolar depression (45.584 ± 12.128 mg/dL). Both average levels of TC and TGA were the highest in patients with bipolar depression (188.403 ± 37.396 mg/dL and 149.685 ± 96.951 mg/dL, respectively) and the lowest in bipolar mania (164.790 ± 40.488 mg/dL and 100.679 ± 54.337 mg/dL, respectively). The average level of FPG was the highest in unipolar depression (94.00 ± 21.453 mg/dL) and the lowest in bipolar mania (89.492 ± 14.700 mg/dL). Conclusions: The results confirmed that lipid and glucose abnormalities were more common in people with schizophrenia and mood disorders (unipolar and bipolar).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:精神运动迟缓是导致残疾的重度抑郁症的核心临床组成部分,被称为抑郁症生物学治疗的治疗反应标志物。我们的目标是描述在治疗难治性抑郁症(TRD)的THETAD-DEP试验中通过重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗期间的认知和运动测量变化,并比较治疗结束时和应答者之间一个月后的表现(MADRS评分改善>50%),部分反应者(25-50%)和非反应者(无临床相关改善)。我们的次要目的是调查与无反应和反应甚至部分相关的基线精神运动表现。
    方法:54名患有难治性单相抑郁症并接受高频10HzrTMS或iTBS治疗4周(20个疗程)的患者接受了评估,包括法国抑郁延迟量表(ERD)。言语流畅性测试,和跟踪测试A之前,治疗后和一个月后。
    结果:20例患者为应答者(R,21个部分反应者(PR)和13个非反应者(NR)。rTMS治疗可改善R和PR组的精神运动表现,而NR患者的精神运动表现未通过治疗得到改善。在基线,参与者,后来被确定为部分响应者,表现明显高于无反应者。
    结论:较高的基线认知运动表现可能与rTMS治疗后的临床改善有关。这项工作突出了客观精神运动测试对识别rTMS反应者和部分反应者的价值,因此可用于患者选择和方案个体化,例如早期部分反应者的治疗延续。
    OBJECTIVE: Psychomotor retardation is a core clinical component of Major Depressive Disorder responsible for disability and is known as a treatment response marker of biological treatments for depression. Our objective was to describe cognitive and motoric measures changes during a treatment by repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) within the THETAD-DEP trial for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), and compare those performances at the end of treatment and one month after between responders (>50% improvement on MADRS score), partial responders (25-50%) and non-reponders (no clinically relevant improvement). Our secondary aim was to investigate baseline psychomotor performances associated with non-response and response even partial.
    METHODS: Fifty-four patients with treatment-resistant unipolar depression and treated by either high frequency 10 Hz rTMS or iTBS for 4 weeks (20 sessions) underwent assessment including French Retardation Rating Scale for Depression (ERD), Verbal Fluency test, and Trail Making Test A. before, just after treatment and one month later.
    RESULTS: 20 patients were responders (R, 21 partial responders (PR) and 13 non-responders (NR). rTMS treatment improved psychomotor performances in the R and PR groups unlike NR patients whose psychomotor performance was not enhanced by treatment. At baseline, participants, later identified as partial responders, showed significantly higher performances than non-responders.
    CONCLUSIONS: Higher cognitivo-motor performances at baseline may be associated with clinical improvement after rTMS treatment. This work highlights the value of objective psychomotor testing for the identification of rTMS responders and partial responders, and thus may be useful for patient selection and protocol individualization such as treatment continuation for early partial responders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:抑郁症在全球范围内造成重大疾病负担,并经常导致社会功能丧失。患有抑郁症的患者报告的生活质量(QOL)比没有精神健康问题史的人低。基于认知行为疗法(CBT)的基于互联网的干预(IBI)可有效降低症状严重程度,但迄今为止,有关其对临床抑郁症患者生活质量影响的数据很少。
    方法:Selfapy是一种基于CBT的抑郁症IBI。401名参与者(332名女性,平均年龄37岁(SD=11),诊断为重度抑郁障碍(MDD)或心境恶劣的患者被纳入一项随机研究,平行,比较治疗师指导的Selfapy干预与无指导的Selfapy干预和等待列表控制的三臂试验。QOL使用WHOQOL-BREF在基线测量,治疗后(12周)和24周随访。使用线性混合效应模型计算干预措施对生活质量的影响。
    结果:在治疗后(12周),有指导和无指导干预组报告称,与对照组相比,身体和心理健康领域的QOL增加(显着组*时间相互作用)。仅在心理健康方面,QOL的增长在随访期内得以维持。在所有参与者的治疗过程中和后续治疗期间,社会关系和环境领域的QOL均下降。指导干预和非指导干预之间没有差异。
    结论:在患有抑郁症的参与者样本中,自我证明对心理和身体生活质量有积极影响,因此可以被认为是一种有效且高度可扩展的治疗工具。结果模式可能部分归因于COVID-19大流行的影响以及与试验相吻合的公共卫生措施。
    背景:德国临床试验注册(DRKS):DRKS00017191。6月14日登记,2019,https://www。drks.de/drks_web/navigate。做什么?navigationId=审判。HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00017191。
    OBJECTIVE: Depressive disorders cause a major burden of disease worldwide and often lead to a loss of social functioning. Patients suffering from depressive disorders report a lower quality of life (QOL) than people without a history of mental health issues. Internet-based interventions (IBIs) based on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) are effective in reducing symptom severity but data on their impact on quality of life in clinically depressed patients so far is scarce.
    METHODS: Selfapy is a CBT-based IBI for depressive disorders. 401 participants (332 female, mean age 37 (SD = 11) with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) or dysthymia were enrolled in a randomized, parallel, three-arm trial comparing a therapist-guided Selfapy intervention with an unguided Selfapy intervention and a waiting list control. QOL was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF at baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks) and at 24-week follow-up. The effects of the interventions on QOL were calculated using linear mixed effects models.
    RESULTS: At post-treatment (12 weeks) the guided and unguided intervention groups reported an increase in QOL on physical and psychological health domains compared to controls (significant group*time interaction). The gain in QOL was maintained over the follow-up period only for psychological health. QOL decreased in the social relationships and environment domains over the course of treatment and during the follow-up treatment for all participants. There were no differences between the guided and the unguided intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: Selfapy proved to positively affect psychological and physical QOL in a sample of participants suffering from depressive disorders and can therefore be considered an effective and highly scalable therapeutic tool. The pattern of results might partly be attributable to effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and public health measures that coincided with the trial.
    BACKGROUND: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00017191. Registered June 14th, 2019, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00017191 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    单相和双相抑郁症提出了治疗挑战,患者有时对标准药物反应有限或没有反应。氯胺酮及其对映体,艾氯胺酮,提供有希望的替代疗法,可以迅速缓解自杀念头。本综述(OoR)分析和综合了系统评价(SRs),并对涉及各种制剂氯胺酮的随机临床试验(RCTs)进行了荟萃分析(静脉注射,肌肉内,鼻内,皮下)适用于单相或双相抑郁患者。我们评估了氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮治疗各种形式的重度抑郁发作的疗效和安全性,包括单极,双极,抗治疗,和非抗性抑郁症,在有和没有自杀意念的患者人群中,旨在全面评估其治疗潜力和安全性。
    遵循先前的准则,这个OoR的协议在Implasy上注册(ID:202150049)。在PubMed中搜索,Scopus,科克伦图书馆,Epistemonikos专注于氯胺酮或艾氯胺酮RCT的英语荟萃分析,作为单一疗法或附加疗法,评估自杀风险等结果,抑郁症状,复发,反应率,和副作用。我们纳入了涉及自杀和非自杀患者的研究;所有给药途径和制剂(静脉内,肌肉内,鼻内)被考虑,以及与控制干预措施的所有可用比较。我们排除了荟萃分析,其中干预被用作电惊厥治疗的麻醉或随机递增剂量设计。的选择,数据提取,研究的质量评估是由成对的审稿人以盲目的方式进行的。疗效数据,可接受性,提取了耐受性。
    我们的分析包括26个SR和44个RCT,有3316个科目。干预措施有效且耐受性良好,尽管纳入的SR和原始研究的质量很差,导致证据的确定性低。
    这项研究受到质量差的SR和原始研究的限制,导致证据的确定性低。此外,现有数据不足,无法区分氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮在单相和双相型抑郁症中的作用.
    虽然氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮显示出很有希望的治疗潜力,目前的证据存在研究质量低的问题.在未来的研究中,方法学上的严谨性将使这些干预措施在单相和双相抑郁的治疗指南中得到更明智的应用。
    [https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2021-5-0049/],标识符(INPLASY202150049)。
    UNASSIGNED: Unipolar and bipolar depression present treatment challenges, with patients sometimes showing limited or no response to standard medications. Ketamine and its enantiomer, esketamine, offer promising alternative treatments that can quickly relieve suicidal thoughts. This Overview of Reviews (OoR) analyzed and synthesized systematic reviews (SRs) with meta-analysis on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving ketamine in various formulations (intravenous, intramuscular, intranasal, subcutaneous) for patients with unipolar or bipolar depression. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ketamine and esketamine in treating major depressive episodes across various forms, including unipolar, bipolar, treatment-resistant, and non-resistant depression, in patient populations with and without suicidal ideation, aiming to comprehensively assess their therapeutic potential and safety profile.
    UNASSIGNED: Following PRIOR guidelines, this OoR\'s protocol was registered on Implasy (ID:202150049). Searches in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Epistemonikos focused on English-language meta-analyses of RCTs of ketamine or esketamine, as monotherapy or add-on, evaluating outcomes like suicide risk, depressive symptoms, relapse, response rates, and side effects. We included studies involving both suicidal and non-suicidal patients; all routes and formulations of administration (intravenous, intramuscular, intranasal) were considered, as well as all available comparisons with control interventions. We excluded meta-analysis in which the intervention was used as anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy or with a randomized ascending dose design. The selection, data extraction, and quality assessment of studies were carried out by pairs of reviewers in a blinded manner. Data on efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability were extracted.
    UNASSIGNED: Our analysis included 26 SRs and 44 RCTs, with 3,316 subjects. The intervention is effective and well-tolerated, although the quality of the included SRs and original studies is poor, resulting in low certainty of evidence.
    UNASSIGNED: This study is limited by poor-quality SRs and original studies, resulting in low certainty of the evidence. Additionally, insufficient available data prevents differentiation between the effects of ketamine and esketamine in unipolar and bipolar depression.
    UNASSIGNED: While ketamine and esketamine show promising therapeutic potential, the current evidence suffers from low study quality. Enhanced methodological rigor in future research will allow for a more informed application of these interventions within the treatment guidelines for unipolar and bipolar depression.
    UNASSIGNED: [https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2021-5-0049/], identifier (INPLASY202150049).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    BACKGROUND: Internet-based interventions (IBIs) for the treatment of depression have been found to have positive effects in international meta-analyses; however, it is unclear whether these effects also extend to IBIs specifically available in Germany. The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate the immediate effects and the long-term effects of IBIs available in Germany free of charge or available on prescription and covered by the public health insurances as so-called digital health applications (DiGAs) and to compare the efficacy of DiGAs and freely available IBIs.
    METHODS: A systematic literature search and random-effects meta-analysis were performed (preregistration: INPLASY202250070). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IBIs freely available in Germany or as DiGA in adults with elevated depressive symptoms were compared with active and inactive controls available at the time of the survey in May 2022.
    RESULTS: A total of six interventions were identified: COGITO, deprexis, iFightDepression, moodgym, Novego, and Selfapy. The pooled effect size of a total of 28 studies with 13,413 participants corresponded to an effect of Cohen\'s d = 0.42, (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.31-0.54, I2 = 81%). The analysis of long-term effects showed a smaller effect size of d = 0.29, (95% CI: 0.21-0.37, I2 = 22%, N = 10). Subgroup analyses indicated a possible superiority of the three interventions listed in the DiGA directory (d = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.38-0.74, I2 = 83%, N = 15) compared to the three freely available IBIs (d = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.14-0.33, I2 = 44%, N = 13, p = 0.002).
    CONCLUSIONS: The IBIs for depressive disorders available in Germany are effective and can therefore be used in the treatment of people with a depressive disorder; however, it is possible that not all interventions are equally effective.
    UNASSIGNED: HINTERGRUND: Internetbasierte Interventionen (IBIs) zur Behandlung von Depressionen zeigen in internationalen Metaanalysen positive Effekte. Es ist jedoch unklar, ob diese Effekte sich auch auf die in Deutschland verfügbaren IBIs erstrecken. Ziel dieser Metaanalyse war es, die unmittelbaren Effekte und die Langzeiteffekte der in Deutschland frei oder als sog. digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen (DiGA) auf Rezept verfügbaren IBIs abzuschätzen und die Wirkstärke von DiGA und frei verfügbaren IBIs zu vergleichen.
    METHODS: Es erfolgte eine systematische Literaturrecherche und Random-effects-Metaanalyse (Präregistrierung: INPLASY202250070). Berücksichtigt wurden RCTs von in Deutschland frei verfügbaren oder als DiGA erhältlichen IBIs an Erwachsenen mit erhöhter depressiver Symptomatik im Vergleich zu aktiven und inaktiven Kontrollen zum Erhebungszeitpunkt im Mai 2022.
    UNASSIGNED: Es wurden sechs Interventionen identifiziert: COGITO, deprexis, iFightDepression, moodgym, Novego und Selfapy. Die gepoolte Effektstärke von insgesamt 28 Studien mit 13.413 Teilnehmer*innen entsprach einem Effekt von Cohen’s d = 0,42, (95 %-Konfidenzintervall[KI]: [0,31; 0,54], I2 = 81 %). Die Analyse der Langzeiteffekte zeigte eine geringere Effektstärke von d = 0,29, (95 %-KI: [0,21; 0,37], I2 = 22 %, n = 10). Subgruppenanalysen deuteten auf eine mögliche Überlegenheit der drei im DiGA-Verzeichnis gelisteten Interventionen (d = 0,56, 95 %-KI: [0,38; 0,74], I2 = 83 %, n = 15) im Vergleich zu den drei frei verfügbaren Interventionen (d = 0,24, 95 %-KI: [0,14; 0,33], I2 = 44 %, n = 13) hin (p = 0,002).
    UNASSIGNED: Die in Deutschland verfügbaren IBIs für depressive Störungen sind wirksam und können daher in der therapeutischen Versorgung von Menschen mit depressiven Störungen eingesetzt werden. Möglicherweise sind nicht alle Interventionen gleich gut wirksam.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:由于临床表现相似,双相情感障碍(BD)患者常被误诊为重度抑郁障碍(MDD)。本研究旨在根据扩散张量成像(DTI)比较抑郁症患者后来转为BD和单相抑郁症(UD)之间的差异。
    方法:在10年内招募了抑郁发作状态的MDD患者(562名参与者)和健康对照(HCs)(145名参与者)。招募时收集人口统计学和磁共振成像(MRI)数据。所有MDD患者均随访5年,根据随访结果分为转BD(tBD)组(83例)和UD组(160例)。比较基线时的DTI和功能磁共振成像。
    结果:在tBD和UD组中都发现了常见的异常,包括左上小脑花梗(SCP。L),内囊的右前肢(ALIC。R),右额枕叶上束(SFOF。R),和右额枕骨下束(IFOF。R).tBD在call体体内显示出比UD更广泛的异常,穹窿,左上日冕辐射,左后日冕辐射,左上纵束,和左额枕叶上束。
    结论:该研究证明了与HC相比,tBD和UD的常见和明显异常。tBD组显示出更广泛的白质完整性破坏,这可能是早期识别BD的潜在生物标志物。
    OBJECTIVE: Because of similar clinical manifestations, bipolar disorder (BD) patients are often misdiagnosed as major depressive disorder (MDD). This study aimed to compare the difference between depressed patients later converting to BD and unipolar depression (UD) according to diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).
    METHODS: Patients with MDD (562 participants) in depressive episode states and healthy controls (HCs) (145 participants) were recruited over 10 years. Demographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were collected at the time of recruitment. All patients with MDD were followed up for 5 years and classified into the transfer to BD (tBD) group (83 participants) and UD group (160 participants) according to the follow-up results. DTI and functional magnetic resonance imaging at baseline were compared.
    RESULTS: Common abnormalities were found in both tBD and UD groups, including left superior cerebellar peduncle (SCP.L), right anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC.R), right superior fronto-occipital fasciculus (SFOF.R), and right inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF.R). The tBD showed more extensive abnormalities than the UD in the body of corpus callosum, fornix, left superior corona radiata, left posterior corona radiata, left superior longitudinal fasciculus, and left superior fronto-occipital fasciculus.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated the common and distinct abnormalities of tBD and UD when compared to HC. The tBD group showed more extensive disruptions of white matter integrity, which could be a potential biomarker for the early identification of BD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:双相情感障碍(BD)在早期常被误诊为重度抑郁症(MDD),这可能会导致不适当的治疗。这项研究旨在表征诊断从MDD转移到BD的抑郁发作患者的自发性神经元活动的变化。
    方法:招募了超过10年的532例MDD患者和132例健康对照(HCs)。在后续期间,75名MDD参与者转移到BD(tBD),157名参与者仍被诊断为单相抑郁症(UD)。排除图像质量差和头部运动过度的参与者后,68名被诊断为tBD的参与者,150名诊断为UD的参与者,和130个HC最终被纳入分析。在tBD中评估了自发神经元活动的低频波动(dALFF)的动态幅度,纳入研究时使用功能磁共振成像的UD和HC。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)分析以评估基于dALFF的从MDD到BD的转化预测的灵敏度和特异性。
    结果:与HC相比,tBD在左运动前皮质(PMC_L)表现出DALFF升高,右颞侧皮层(LTC_R)和右早期听觉皮层(EAC_R),UD在PMC_L时显示dALFF降低,左中央旁小叶(PCL_L),双侧内侧前额叶皮质(mPFC),右眶额叶皮质(OFC_R),右背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC_R),右后扣带皮质(PCC_R)和LTC_R处的dALFF升高此外,tBD在PMC_L表现出升高的dALFF,PCL_L,双边mPFC,双边OFC,DLPFC_R,PCC_R和LTC_R比UD。此外,基于差异面积中的dALFF的ROC分析获得72.7%的曲线下面积(AUC)。
    结论:该研究表明,在躯体运动网络(SMN)的关键区域,tBD和UD的时间动态异常,默认模式网络(DMN),和中央执行网络(CEN)。两种疾病之间时间动态的差异异常模式有可能预测从MDD到BD的诊断转变。
    OBJECTIVE: Bipolar disorder (BD) is often misdiagnosed as major depressive disorder (MDD) in the early stage, which may lead to inappropriate treatment. This study aimed to characterize the alterations of spontaneous neuronal activity in patients with depressive episodes whose diagnosis transferred from MDD to BD.
    METHODS: 532 patients with MDD and 132 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited over 10 years. During the follow-up period, 75 participants with MDD transferred to BD (tBD), and 157 participants remained with the diagnosis of unipolar depression (UD). After excluding participants with poor image quality and excessive head movement, 68 participants with the diagnosis of tBD, 150 participants with the diagnosis of UD, and 130 HCs were finally included in the analysis. The dynamic amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (dALFF) of spontaneous neuronal activity was evaluated in tBD, UD and HC using functional magnetic resonance imaging at study inclusion. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of the conversion prediction from MDD to BD based on dALFF.
    RESULTS: Compared to HC, tBD exhibited elevated dALFF at left premotor cortex (PMC_L), right lateral temporal cortex (LTC_R) and right early auditory cortex (EAC_R), and UD showed reduced dALFF at PMC_L, left paracentral lobule (PCL_L), bilateral medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), right orbital frontal cortex (OFC_R), right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC_R), right posterior cingulate cortex (PCC_R) and elevated dALFF at LTC_R. Furthermore, tBD exhibited elevated dALFF at PMC_L, PCL_L, bilateral mPFC, bilateral OFC, DLPFC_R, PCC_R and LTC_R than UD. In addition, ROC analysis based on dALFF in differential areas obtained an area under the curve (AUC) of 72.7%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated the temporal dynamic abnormalities of tBD and UD in the critical regions of the somatomotor network (SMN), default mode network (DMN), and central executive network (CEN). The differential abnormal patterns of temporal dynamics between the two diseases have the potential to predict the diagnosis transition from MDD to BD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号