Novel treatment options for uterine fibroids, such as uterine artery embolization (UAE), ultrasound-guided and magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU and MRgHIFU), and transcervical radiofrequency ablation (TFA) methods, are widely used in clinical practice. This systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42022297312) aims to assess and compare reproductive and obstetric outcomes in women who underwent these minimally invasive approaches for uterine fibroids. The search was performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Cochrane guidelines. The articles were selected to meet the following eligibility criteria: (1) research article, (2) human subject research, and (3) the study of pregnancy outcomes after the treatment of uterine fibroids by either one of three methods-UAE, HIFU, and TFA. The analysis of 25 eligible original articles shows a similar rate of live births for UAE, USgHIFU, MRgHIFU, and TFA (70.8%, 73.5%, 70%, and 75%, respectively). The number of pregnancies varied considerably among these studies, as well as the mean age of pregnant women. However, the results of pregnancy outcomes for TFA are insufficient to draw firm conclusions, since only 24 women became pregnant in these studies, resulting in three live births. The miscarriage rate was highest in the UAE group (19.2%). USgHIFU was associated with a higher rate of placental abnormalities compared to UAE (2.8% vs. 1.6%). The pooled estimate of pregnancies was 17.31% to 44.52% after UAE, 18.69% to 78.53% after HIFU, and 2.09% to 7.63% after TFA. The available evidence confirmed that these minimally invasive uterine-sparing treatment options for uterine fibroids are a good approach for patients wishing to preserve their fertility, with comparable reproductive and obstetric outcomes among the different techniques.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) ablation for desmoid tumors (DTs).
A total of 111 patients with histologically proven DTs were included and treated by USgHIFU ablation. Adverse events were continuously evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 until 3 months after treatment. The incidence of non-perfused areas within the treated tumors, non-perfused volume rate (NPVR) and tumor volume reduction were evaluated using contrast-enhanced MRI before and one week and 3 months after the procedure.
The enrolled patients (32 male, 79 female, mean age 29.5 ± 1.0 years) with 145 DTs (118 extra-abdominal, 16 abdominal wall, 11 intra-abdominal; median maximum diameter: 9.6 cm, range: 3-34.5 cm) underwent 188 sessions of HIFU ablation, and the mean number of ablations was 1.7 (range, 1-7) per patient. In majority of cases (143/145 cases, 98.6%), no serious adverse events were observed. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between patients who received a single treatment and those who received multiple treatments. Non-perfused area was observed within every treated tumor, and the median NPVR was 84.9% (range, 1.9-100%). The tumor volume reduction rate was 36.1 ± 4.2% at 3 months after treatment.
USgHIFU ablation, as a noninvasive and easily repeatable local treatment, is a promising treatment for DTs.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) for uterine fibroids on ovarian reserve in women of reproductive age.Materials and methods: From September 2015 to September 2017, 84 patients with uterine fibroids in reproductive age were enrolled from Chongqing Haifu Hospital, Three Gorges Central Hospital of Chongqing and Aegisroen obstetric gynecology Clinic of Seoul, Korea. Blood was collected before HIFU treatment and 6 months after USgHIFU treatment. The enzyme-linked immune analysis was used for assay of circulating anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH).Results: All the 84 patients were successfully treated with USgHIFU and 67 patients completed the follow-up. The median age of the 67 patients was 38 years at the time of treatment. The median AMH value before and 6 months after treatment was 1.26 ng/mL and 1.27 ng/mL, respectively. Patients who completed AMH measurements 6 months after treatment were further classified into three groups based on age, including younger than 35 years, 36 to 40 years, and older than 40 years. The median AMH values before treatment were 3.04 ng/mL, 1.73 ng/mL and 0.87 ng/mL, and the corresponding values 6 months after treatment were 3.24, 1.44 and 0.75, respectively. A significant difference in AMH level was observed in the group of patients at the age between 36 and 40 years (p < 0.05), but no significant difference in AMH levels was observed in the other two groups (p > 0.05).Conclusion: Based on our results, we conclude that USgHIFU has no influence on ovarian reserve.