OBJECTIVE: The association between metabolic factors and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk is inconclusive. This umbrella review aimed to summarise and describe the association using existing systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses.
METHODS: Four databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were searched for systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses of observational studies. Two independent authors extracted data on the summary estimated effect and heterogeneity of studies using I2 from the individual reviews. The Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2) tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality.
RESULTS: 49 articles were included in this review. Although most included studies were graded with critically low methodological quality (81.6%), we found a significant positive association between obesity (summary relative risk (SRR) range 1.19 - 1.49), diabetes mellitus (SRR range 1.20 - 1.37), hypertension (SRR range 1.07 - 1.62), metabolic syndrome (SRR range 1.25 - 1.36), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (pooled odds ratio (POR) range 1.13 - 1.56), and risk of CRC. Higher serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were associated with a lower risk of CRC in 3/6 reviews, while others did not find any association. There was no clear association between high triglyceride levels, total cholesterol levels, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and risk of CRC.
CONCLUSIONS: This umbrella review identified that most metabolic factors are significantly associated with increased risk of CRC. Thus, people affected by metabolic factors may be benefited from CRC screening and surveillance.

BACKGROUND: The number of frail older people is increasing worldwide, and all countries will be confronted with their growing needs for healthcare and social support. The aim of this umbrella review was to summarize the evidence on the factors associated with frailty in older people, using a socioecological approach.
METHODS: PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Hinari (research4life), and the Trip database were systematically searched up to April 2023. Systematic reviews of observational studies that explored factors associated with frailty in older adults aged 60 years and over were considered for inclusion. No language, geographical or setting restrictions were applied. However, we excluded systematic reviews that investigated frailty factors in the context of specific diseases. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses and the ROBIS tool were used to assess the quality and risk of bias in the included studies.
RESULTS: Forty-four systematic reviews were included, covering 1,150 primary studies with approximately 2,687,911 participants overall. Several risk factors, protective factors and biomarkers were found to be associated with frailty, especially in community-dwelling older people, including 67 significant associations from meta-analyses. The certainty of the evidence was rated as moderate or reached moderate levels for seven factors relevant to older people. These factors include depression (OR 4.66, 95% CI 4.07 to 5.34), loneliness (OR 3.51, 95% CI 2.70 to 4.56), limitations in activities of daily living (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.71 to 3.48), risk of malnutrition (OR 3.52, 95% CI 2.96 to 4.17), Dietary Inflammatory Index score (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.33), maximal walking speed (Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) -0.97, 95% CI -1.25 to -0.68), and self-reported masticatory dysfunction (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.18). Additionally, only greater adherence to a Mediterranean diet showed a high level of evidence (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.64).
CONCLUSIONS: This umbrella review will provide guidance for prevention strategies and clinical practice by promoting healthy lifestyles and addressing all modifiable risk factors associated with frailty. Future systematic reviews should consider heterogeneity and publication bias, as these were the main reasons for downgrading the level of evidence in our review.
BACKGROUND: PROSPERO 2022, CRD42022328902.

We systematically reviewed observational and Mendelian randomization (MR) articles that evaluated the association between obesity and 17 gastrointestinal (GI) diseases to integrate causal and observational evidence. A total of 594 observational studies from 26 systematic reviews and meta-analyses and nine MR articles were included. For every 5 kg/m2 increase in body mass index (BMI), there was an increased risk of GI diseases ranging from 2% for rectal cancer (relative risk [RR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.03) to 63% for gallbladder disease (RR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.50 to 1.77). MR articles indicated that risks of developing GI diseases elevated with each 1 standard deviation increase in genetically predicted BMI, ranging from 11% for Crohn\'s disease to 189% for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Moreover, upper GI conditions were less susceptible, whereas hepatobiliary organs were more vulnerable to increased adiposity. Among the associations between obesity and the 17 GI conditions, causal relationships were inferred from only approximately half (10/17, 59%). This study reveals a substantial gap between observational and causal evidence, indicating that a combined approach is necessary to effectively inform public health policies and guide epidemiological research on obesity and GI diseases.

BACKGROUND: Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS)-e-cigarettes or vapes-have been shown to substantially reduce or eliminate many toxins compared with cigarette smoke, but simultaneously ENDS use also produces their own unique toxins. Yet the patterns of use among people who use ENDS are not homogeneous. Some people who use ENDS also smoke cigarettes (dual use). Other people who formerly smoked cigarettes are completely substituting ENDS (exclusive use). A small number of people who have never smoked cigarettes are using ENDS (naïve use of nicotine). Each of these patterns of use results in different exposures to toxins. Unfortunately, epidemiological studies routinely group together any ENDS use regardless of other tobacco use.
OBJECTIVE: This umbrella review primarily aims to present all the evidence available on the respiratory effects of ENDS use by adults based on their pattern of use: dual use, exclusive use, and naïve use. With each of these patterns of use, are there benefits, no changes, or harmful effects on respiratory functioning? Our objective is to provide clinicians with a detailed analysis of how different patterns of ENDS use impact respiratory functioning and to point to the best sources of evidence.
METHODS: This umbrella review follows the Methods for Overviews of Reviews framework and the PRIOR (Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews) statement. Systematic reviews published since 2019 will be searched across 4 databases and 3 gray literature sources. Additional searches will include citation chasing, references lists, and referrals from respiratory specialists. The quality of included reviews will be evaluated using the AMSTAR2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) checklist. We will document biases in 3 areas: protocol deviations, biases from the Oxford Catalogue of Bias, and internal data discrepancies. Two reviewers will independently conduct the search and quality assessments. Our analysis will focus on reviews rated as moderate or high confidence by AMSTAR2. We will use the Vote Counting Direction of Effect method to manage expected data heterogeneity, assessing whether ENDS use is beneficial or detrimental, or has no effect on respiratory functions based on the pattern of use.
RESULTS: The review is expected to be completed by December 2024. The database search was concluded in April 2024, and data extraction and bias assessment were completed in June 2024. The analysis phase is planned to be completed by October 2024.
CONCLUSIONS: A thorough and comprehensive assessment of the evidence will better inform the contentious debate over the respiratory effects of ENDS providing much needed clarity by linking their effects to specific usage patterns. This analysis is particularly crucial in understanding the risks associated with continued cigarette smoking.
BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42024540034; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=540034.
UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/60325.

UNASSIGNED: The medical profession faces a critical challenge with the mental health of its practitioners, leading to an alarming increase in suicide rates among healthcare workers (HCW). Factors such as the culture of perfectionism, excessive workloads, and stigma against seeking help exacerbate this issue. This umbrella review synthesizes the existing literature on HCW suicide, exploring the prevalence, causes, and potential preventive strategies.
UNASSIGNED: This study conducted a search of the literature from PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar until April 2, 2024. The non-exhaustive search terms used were \"doctor suicide,\" \"physician suicide,\" \"medical professional suicide,\" \"suicide in healthcare,\" \"healthcare worker suicide prevention,\" and \"causes of healthcare worker suicide.\" Hand-searches were also conducted. Of the 487 studies initially identified, a total of 10 systematic reviews/meta-analyses were included.
UNASSIGNED: This umbrella review collates findings from 400 primary clinical studies conducted between the years 2004 and 2023. With a focus on mental health factors contributing to suicide in HCW, there are regional and specialty-specific variations in stress prevalence in the populace. Further, anesthesiologists and psychiatrics depicted higher rates of burnout compared to other HCW; causative factors such as seeking perfection and challenging work-life balance were key when assessing suicidal behaviors in these groups. Job demand level was found to correlate directly with suicidal thoughts, specifically among psychiatric ward HCW, where access to drugs and sharp instruments is readily available. In specific contexts, female HCWs showed a standardized mortality ratio (SMR), indicating that the rate of suicide was higher among them as compared to the general female population. Interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness were effective in decreasing depression, psychological distress, and anxiety in several included studies. This umbrella review also identified major obstacles to seeking help, including stigma and the fear of professional consequences.
UNASSIGNED: To reduce suicide rates among HCWs, it is the need of the hour to implement evidence-based interventions and create supportive work environments that encourage mutual care for each other\'s emotional health. Further research is necessary to determine the effectiveness of various measures in preventing suicide among HCW.

UNASSIGNED: To comprehensively review systematic reviews of prevalence, incidence, and mortality of Raynaud\'s, Sjögren\'s and Scleroderma, and to identify any research gaps.
UNASSIGNED: An umbrella review of English language systematic reviews was undertaken using PubMed and Embase (OVID) covering the period 2000-2023 (PROSPERO CRD42023434865). The estimate and its corresponding 95% confidence interval were reported when available from each systematic review. The quality of systematic reviews was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) tool. A narrative synthesis was undertaken.
UNASSIGNED: Seventeen systematic reviews were identified, of which 1 was for RP, 5 for Sjögren\'s and 11 for Scleroderma. There were some high-quality systematic reviews for Sjögren\'s and mortality of Scleroderma. However, there were only low-quality systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence of RP and Scleroderma. Furthermore, there were no systematic reviews for the mortality of RP. For RP, the pooled prevalence was 4850 per 100 000; pooled annual incidence was 250 per 100 000. For Sjögren\'s, prevalence was 60-70 per 100 000; annual incidence was 6.92 per 100 000 and the pooled standardized mortality ratio ranged from 1.38 to 1.48. For Scleroderma, pooled prevalence ranged from 17.6 to 23 per 100 000; annual incidence was 1.4 per 100 000; and the pooled standardized mortality ratio ranged from 2.72 to 3.53.
UNASSIGNED: The outcomes of RP were less well described compared with Sjögren\'s and Scleroderma. There was a lack of high-quality systematic reviews for the prevalence and incidence of RP and Scleroderma. Therefore, further studies and systematic reviews with rigorous case definitions, assessing different ethnic groups are warranted in this area.

BACKGROUND: Mobile Health (mHealth), leveraging nearly 4.5 billion people actively use mobile phone and internet, can be crucial in promoting tobacco cessation. This umbrella review aimed to assess the effectiveness of mobile phone applications in achieving this outcome.
METHODS: Searches were conducted in databases like Medline, EMBASE, PubMed Central, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library from their inception till June 2022, without language restriction. Quality assessment was carried out using the AMSTAR-2 tool. The narrative synthesis findings were presented in terms of the overall effect size reported by the individual systematic review along with the heterogeneity measures and risk of bias assessment findings.
RESULTS: We included 11 reviews, most of which had critical weaknesses in certain domains. Among these, three reviews conducted meta-analyses providing pooled estimates, but the effect sizes were non-significant and imprecise, indicating that mobile phone applications did not have a significant effect on tobacco cessation. Only three reviews concluded a promising role for mobile phone applications in tobacco cessation, particularly when these applications were based on theoretical constructs or combined with face-to-face interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: Our review indicates that mobile phone applications could play a promising role in tobacco cessation. However, using a single mobile phone application without any theoretical construct may not sufficiently drive behavioural change to reduce tobacco usage.

BACKGROUND: Numerous systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses (MA) on low calorie sweeteners (LCS) have been published in recent years, concluding that LCS have beneficial, neutral, or detrimental effects on various health outcomes, depending on the review.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this overview of reviews was to determine how the methodologies of SR investigating the association between LCS consumption and body weight (BW) influence their findings and whether MA results can provide a consistent estimated effect.
METHODS: Systematic searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were conducted in November 2022 to identify SR of randomized controlled trials (RCT) or non-randomized studies (NRS) investigating the association between LCS consumption and BW. The methods, MA results, and conclusions were extracted from each eligible SR.
RESULTS: Of the 985 search results, 20 SR evaluated the association between LCS and BW, drawing from publications of 75 RCT, 42 prospective cohort studies, and 10 cross-sectional studies. There was a considerable lack of overlap of studies included within each SR attributed, in part, to the inclusion of studies based on design; thus, each SR synthesized results from distinctly different studies. Evidence synthesis methods were heterogeneous and often opaque, making it difficult to determine why results from certain studies were excluded or why disparate results were observed between SR.
CONCLUSIONS: SR investigating the effect of LCS on BW implement different methodologies to answer allegedly the same question, drawing from a different set of heterogeneous studies, ignoring the basic assumptions required for MA, resulting in disparate results and conclusions. Previous MA show the large effects of study design, which results in inconsistent estimates of the effect of LCS on BW between MA of RCT and NRS. Given the availability of long-term RCT, these studies should be the basis of determining causal relationships (or lack thereof) between LCS and BW. This trial was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42022351200.

OBJECTIVE: Previous meta-analyses have investigated the effects of isoflavones on bone metabolism in perimenopausal or postmenopausal women. However, there were still conflicting results. Thereby, this umbrella review assessed the existing meta-analysis evidence of the effects of isoflavone interventions on bone metabolism in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
METHODS: This study was conducted following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). From the inception until August 24, 2023, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The outcomes included bone mineral densities (BMDs), and bone turnover markers (BTMs) of osteocalcin (OC), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), pyridinoline (PYD), deoxypyridinoline (DPD), Procollagen Type 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP), and C-telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen (CTX). The random-effects model was used to recalculate the extracted effect sizes. Mean difference (MD) was used as a summary effect measure.
RESULTS: Ten meta-analyses of RCTs were included. The isoflavone intervention was associated with increased BMDs in lumbar spine (MD: 11.50 mg/cm2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.46 to 16.55), femoral neck (MD: 2.03%, 95% CI: 0.57 to 3.50), and top hip (MD: 0.31%, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.59) in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that isoflavone interventions have the potential to improve BMD at different bone sites, including the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Isoflavone may be considered a complementary option in the bone loss of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: To review the effects of shared decision making (SDM) on health outcomes, health care quality, cost, and consultation time METHODS: We conducted an umbrella review and searched systematic reviews on SDM from PubMed, CINHAL, and Web of Science. We included reviews on SDM interventions used in a health care setting with patients. We assessed the eligibility of retrieved articles and evaluated whether the review addressed Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) characteristics.
RESULTS: Out of 3678 records, 48 reviews were included. Half of the reviews focused exclusively on RCT studies (n = 21). A little less than half were focused specifically on decision aids (n = 23). Thirty-two reviews discussed CFIR characteristics explicitly or implicitly; the majority of which were specific to intervention characteristics. Reviews tended to cluster around patient populations and tended to be low or critically low to moderate in their quality. Reviews of SDM on health outcomes, health care quality, cost, and consultation time were highly uncertain but often ranged from neutral to positive.
CONCLUSIONS: We observed that SDM implementation did not typically increase costs or increase consultation time while having some neutral to positive benefits on outcomes and quality for certain populations. Gaps in knowledge remain including better research on the climate where SDM is most effective.