Treatment adherence

治疗依从性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇综述的目的是总结有关儿童功能性便秘的家庭动态和/或治疗依从性的相关文献。在MEDLINE上进行了结构化的系统文献检索,Embase,和WebofScience核心馆藏库从2000年到2023年,使用特定的搜索词:便秘,治疗依从性,家庭动态,父母教养方式,和儿科。确定并列入了71份出版物供审查。在根据与审查的一致性进行筛选后,还有20份出版物。这些出版物根据其意图和发现分为三类:(1)进一步提高依从性的建议,(2)分析依从性因素的研究,(3)研究表明需要更好地了解家庭因素。未来的研究领域是确定家庭因素与便秘治疗方案依从性之间的关联。这些研究的结果将增加积极治疗结果的数量,并减少不必要的医疗费用。
    The objective of this review is to summarize pertinent literature looking at family dynamics and/or adherence to treatment in pediatric functional constipation. A structured systematic literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science core collection libraries from the years 2000 to 2023 using specific search terms: constipation, treatment adherence, family dynamics, parenting style, and pediatrics. Seventy-one publications were identified and included for review. After screening based on alignment to the review, 20 publications remained. These publications were placed into three categories depending on their intent and findings: (1) recommendations to further increase adherence, (2) studies analyzing factors of adherence, and (3) studies stating a need for a better understanding of family factors. A future area of research is identifying the associations between family factors on adherence to constipation treatment regimens. Results from such studies would increase the amount of positive treatment outcomes and decrease unnecessary healthcare costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性疾病,如2型糖尿病(T2DM),动脉高血压(HTN),肥胖是重大的全球健康挑战,导致数百万人过早死亡。在墨西哥,由于获得医疗保健的机会有限和初级保健质量不足,这些构成了重大挑战。在这种情况下,补充医学是一种佐剂,提供微创技术来增强身体,心理,和精神福祉。然而,有效的治疗依从性对于积极的结果至关重要,受自我效能感的影响,导致坚持率持续低-这是一个紧迫的公共卫生问题。这项观察性研究旨在探讨对补充医学和治疗依从性的看法如何预测墨西哥慢性病患者的自我效能。数据来自113名患有慢性病的参与者,包括T2DM,HTN,和肥胖。参与者完成了评估补充医学感知的调查,治疗依从性,和自我效能感。统计分析,包括相关性和回归,进行了检查变量之间的关系。该研究揭示了对补充医学的感知之间的显着相关性,治疗依从性,和自我效能感。治疗依从性与自我效能呈正相关,而对整体医学的感知与自我效能感呈负相关。发现对补充药物的认知和对治疗的坚持可预测41.9%(p=0.001)的自我效能。这些发现强调了补充疗法在提高自我效能水平方面的潜力,并强调整体医疗保健方法在管理慢性病中的重要性。需要进一步的研究来更好地了解这些关系及其对墨西哥及其他地区医疗保健结果的影响。
    Chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), arterial hypertension (HTN), and obesity are significant global health challenges, contributing to millions of premature deaths. In Mexico, these pose major challenges due to limited access to healthcare and inadequate primary care quality. Complementary medicine presents itself as an adjuvant in this context, offering minimally invasive techniques to enhance physical, mental, and spiritual well-being. However, effective treatment adherence is crucial for positive outcomes, influenced by self-efficacy, resulting in persistently low adherence rates-a pressing public health concern. This observational study aimed to explore how perceptions of complementary medicine and treatment adherence predict self-efficacy among individuals with chronic diseases in Mexico. Data were collected from 113 participants with chronic conditions, including T2DM, HTN, and obesity. Participants completed surveys assessing perception of complementary medicine, treatment adherence, and self-efficacy. Statistical analyses, including correlations and regression, were conducted to examine the relationships between variables. The study revealed significant correlations between the perception of complementary medicine, treatment adherence, and self-efficacy. Treatment adherence was positively associated with self-efficacy, while perception of holistic medicine was negatively correlated with self-efficacy. Perception of complementary medicine and adherence to treatment were found to predict 41.9% (p = 0.001) self-efficacy. These findings underscore the potential of complementary therapies in enhancing self-efficacy levels, and highlight the importance of holistic healthcare approaches in managing chronic conditions. Further research is needed to better understand these relationships and their implications for healthcare outcomes in Mexico and beyond.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究的目的是比较直接观察到的3个月异烟肼/利福喷丁(3HP)与自我给药的4个月利福平(4R),调查短期结核病预防治疗(TPT)的停药时间和危险因素。
    这是对993名开始3HP(20%)或4R(80%)的潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)患者的6个月卫生部门队列(2016-2017)的亚分析。比较不同方案的TPT停药风险时间。使用混合效应Cox模型评估危险因素。
    短期TPT停药率高于4R(31%vs14%;P<0.0001),虽然停药时间相似。拉丁裔种族(危险比[HR],1.80;95%CI,1.20-2.90)和不良事件(HR,4.30;95%CI,2.60-7.30)增加3HP停药风险。社会行为因素,如物质滥用(HR,12.00;95%CI,2.20-69.00)和聚集生活(HR,21.00;95%CI,1.20-360.00)增加4R停药风险。
    TPT停药因方案而异,有明显的风险因素。在TPT计划中解决健康的社会决定因素对于提高边缘化人群的完成率和降低结核病风险至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study was to investigate timing and risk factors for discontinuation of short-course tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT) comparing directly observed 3-month isoniazid/rifapentine (3HP) vs self-administered 4-month rifampin (4R).
    UNASSIGNED: This was a subanalysis of a 6-month health department cohort (2016-2017) of 993 latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) patients initiating 3HP (20%) or 4R (80%). Time at risk of TPT discontinuation was compared across regimens. Risk factors were assessed using mixed-effects Cox models.
    UNASSIGNED: Short-course TPT discontinuation was higher with 4R (31% vs 14%; P < .0001), though discontinuation timing was similar. Latino ethnicity (hazard ratio [HR], 1.80; 95% CI, 1.20-2.90) and adverse events (HR, 4.30; 95% CI, 2.60-7.30) increased 3HP discontinuation risk. Social-behavioral factors such as substance misuse (HR, 12.00; 95% CI, 2.20-69.00) and congregate living (HR, 21.00; 95% CI, 1.20-360.00) increased 4R discontinuation risk.
    UNASSIGNED: TPT discontinuation differed by regimen, with distinct risk factors. Addressing social determinants of health within TPT programs is critical to enhance completion rates and reduce TB disease risk in marginalized populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    本文由一名在美国接受长期抗血小板治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者和一名常规治疗ACS患者的心脏病专家共同撰写。患者描述了他从诊断到今天的经历,并讨论了他对疾病的治疗和管理的担忧。包括抗血小板治疗的获益和风险之间的平衡。患者还描述了他作为心脏健康倡导者的工作。医生对ACS患者的治疗和管理的观点是由美国的心脏病专家提供的,他参与和未参与该患者的护理。医生回顾了抗血小板治疗对ACS患者的益处和风险,并讨论了他自己管理这些患者的临床经验。包括治疗依从性等问题,以及可能在医生中看到的处方某些药物的潜在惯性,可以克服。
    抗血小板治疗通常用于经历“急性冠状动脉综合征”(ACS)事件的患者。比如心脏病发作,以防止进一步的心血管事件。然而,这些药物有潜在的风险,比如出血。本文提供了患者和心脏病专家对管理ACS的观点,以及抗血小板治疗的益处和风险。血小板抑制剂,旨在防止血凝块形成,是ACS的标准治疗方法。使用不同类型的血小板抑制剂,包括称为P2Y12抑制剂的治疗以及称为血小板聚集抑制剂的治疗。临床试验已经测试了抗血小板治疗的不同组合和持续时间,一些试验表明,在接受血小板抑制剂联合治疗后,改为单独使用P2Y12抑制剂治疗,可以降低心血管事件的风险,而不增加出血风险.治疗指南建议ACS患者至少使用12个月的血小板抑制剂;然而,治疗决策应根据患者的风险状况进行个体化。尽管有证据支持他们的好处,一些医生仍然不愿意开出有效的P2Y12抑制剂,更喜欢年纪大的,不太有效的选择。治疗依从性也具有挑战性,受到出血等因素的影响,教育水平,和成本。改善关于抗血小板治疗的益处和风险的教育可能有助于解决这些问题并改善ACS患者的预后。患者和医生的观点有助于增加对ACS管理以及患者和医疗保健提供者面临的挑战的理解。
    This article is co-authored by a patient with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who is receiving long-term antiplatelet therapy in the USA and a cardiologist who routinely treats patients with ACS. The patient describes his experience from diagnosis to the present day and discusses his concerns regarding treatment and management of the condition, including the balance between the benefits and risks of antiplatelet therapy. The patient also describes his work as an advocate for cardiac health. The physician perspective on treating and managing patients with ACS is provided by a cardiologist based in the USA who is and was not involved in this patient\'s care. The physician reviews the benefits and risks of antiplatelet therapies for the treatment of patients with ACS and discusses his own clinical experience of managing these patients, including how issues such as treatment adherence, as well as the potential inertia to prescribing certain medications that may be seen among physicians, could be overcome.
    Antiplatelet therapies are commonly prescribed to patients who have experienced events termed “acute coronary syndrome” (ACS), such as a heart attack, to prevent further cardiovascular events. However, these medicines come with potential risks, such as bleeding. This article provides perspectives from a patient and a cardiologist on managing ACS, and the benefits and risks of antiplatelet therapies. Platelet inhibitors, which aim to prevent blood clots from forming, are the standard treatment for ACS. Different types of platelet inhibitors are used, including treatments known as P2Y12 inhibitors as well as treatments referred to as platelet aggregation inhibitors. Clinical trials have tested different combinations and durations of antiplatelet therapies, and some trials have shown that changing to P2Y12 inhibitor treatment alone after receiving a combination of platelet inhibitors can reduce the risk of cardiovascular events without increasing the risk of bleeding. Treatment guidelines recommend at least 12 months of platelet inhibitors for patients with ACS; however, treatment decisions should be individualized based on the patient\'s risk profile. Despite the evidence supporting their benefits, some physicians remain reluctant to prescribe potent P2Y12 inhibitors, preferring older, less potent options. Treatment adherence is also challenging, and is influenced by factors such as bleeding, education level, and cost. Improved education about the benefits and risks of antiplatelet therapies may help to address these issues and improve outcomes for patients with ACS. The perspectives of both the patient and the physician contribute to an increased understanding of ACS management and the challenges faced by patients and health care providers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在2型糖尿病治疗中,从口服药物到胰岛素注射的过渡的坚持在患者中有所不同,并且并非一致成功,在某些情况下导致血糖控制欠佳。这项研究旨在探讨中老年人(40-74岁)诊断为2型糖尿病不到10年的认知和日常功能能力与血糖控制之间的潜在相关性。特别是那些最近过渡到胰岛素注射的人,在发展中国家的背景下,他们的教育水平较低。
    方法:进行了一项病例对照研究,其中30例HbA1c水平>8%控制不佳的糖尿病(PCDM)患者与30例HbA1c水平≤8%的糖尿病(FCDM)患者进行比较。作为两组暴露量的基础蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA-B)评分小于27分。此外,使用Pearson的r.
    结果:主要结局显示两个糖尿病组的MoCA-B评分之间无粗差异(p值=0.82)。然而,在调整了年龄之后,教育,和IADL得分,在IADL评分较高的受教育程度较低的年轻老年人中,认知功能下降显示了对PCDM的意外保护作用(p值<0.0001,OR95%CI=0~0.26).在MoCA-B和IADL评分之间的线性回归分析中,来自MoCA-B的“延迟召回”和“定向”域,来自IADL的“管理药物”和“使用电话”与HbA1c水平呈负相关(p值分别为<0.01、0.043、0.015和0.023)。电池内和电池间的相关性进一步说明了MoCA-B的“方向”与IADL的“使用电话”和“管理药物”之间的强关联(p值<0.0001)。
    结论:在某些认知领域的出色表现与更好的血糖控制有关。尽管如此,因为在临床常规中评估认知领域可能是及时的,通过评估患者使用手机或管理药物的器械能力,可以采取一种潜在的快速方法。需要未来的研究包括更大的样本量和更广泛的社会心理因素来阐述我们的发现。
    BACKGROUND: Adherence to the transition from oral agents to insulin injections in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus therapy varies among patients and is not uniformly successful, leading to suboptimal glycemic control in certain cases. This study aims to investigate the potential correlation between cognitive and daily functional capabilities and glycemic control in middle-aged to older adults (40-74 years old) diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus for less than 10 years, specifically those who have recently transitioned to insulin injections and have lower education levels within the context of a developing country.
    METHODS: A case-control study was conducted with 30 poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (PCDM) patients recognized by HbA1c levels > 8% compared to 30 fairly controlled diabetes mellitus (FCDM) patients with HbA1c levels ≤ 8%. Basic Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-B) score of less than 27 was investigated as the exposure among two groups. Additionally, intra- and inter-battery correlations were assessed among MoCA-B and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) domains using Pearson\'s r.
    RESULTS: The primary outcomes showed no crude difference between MoCA-B scores in the two diabetic groups (p-value = 0.82). However, after adjusting for age, education, and IADL scores, cognitive decline in the less-educated younger elderly with high IADL scores demonstrated an unexpected protective effect against PCDM (p-value < 0.0001, OR 95% CI = 0-0.26). In linear regression analysis among MoCA-B and IADL scores, \"delayed recall\" and \"orientation\" domains from MoCA-B, and \"managing medications\" and \"using the phone\" from IADL were negatively associated with HbA1c levels (p-values of < 0.01, 0.043, 0.015, and 0.023, respectively). Intra- and inter-battery correlations further illustrated a strong association between MoCA-B\'s \"orientation\" with IADL\'s \"using the phone\" and \"managing medications\" (p-values < 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Superior performance in certain cognitive domains is linked to better glycemic control. Still, since assessing cognitive domains may be timely in clinical routine, a potential rapid approach might be taken by assessing patients\' instrumental abilities to use cell phone or manage medications. Future studies including a larger sample size and a broader spectrum of psychosocial factors are needed to elaborate on our findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:迫切需要增加暴露前预防(PrEP)的使用,以大大降低黑人性少数男性中的HIV发病率。艾滋病毒(PRH)的低感知风险是黑人性少数男性的关键未解决的PrEP障碍。同行和智能手机应用程序是流行的干预工具,以促进社区健康行为,但是很少有研究将这些一起用于多组分策略。因此,我们设计了一种称为POSSIBLE的多成分干预措施,它使用了一个名为PrEPme的现有智能手机应用程序(EmochaMobileHealth,Inc)和对等变更代理(PCA),以增加PRH作为通往PrEP的网关。
    目的:本文旨在描述POSSIBLE对PRH的可行性和初步影响,以及在黑人性少数男性中接受PrEP转诊的意愿。
    方法:可能是一种理论指导,单组,在巴尔的摩的黑人性少数族裔男性中进行了2次试点研究,2019年至2021年之间的马里兰州(N=69)。可能集成了PCA和PrEPme应用程序,该应用程序允许用户自我监控性危险行为并与应用程序内的社区卫生工作者聊天以获取PrEP服务信息。在基线和随访研究访问之前和之后,使用8项PRH量表评估PRH。在每次研究访问结束时,PCA将感兴趣的个人转介给社区卫生工作者,以了解有关PrEP服务选择的更多信息。
    结果:参与者的平均年龄为32.5(SD8.1,范围19-62)岁。总的来说,55名(80%)参与者在1个月时被保留进行随访。在基线会话之后,29名(42%)参与者愿意接受PrEP服务,其中20人(69%)确认了PrEP护理团队的预定预约。基线和随访之间的PRH差异无统计学意义(t122=-1.36;P=0.17)。
    结论:我们观察到在基线和第1个月之间PRH没有统计学上显著的改善。然而,鉴于高保留率和可接受性,可能是可行的。未来的研究应该在黑人性少数男性中测试一种基于统计能力的基于同伴的PrEP启动方法。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT04533386;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04533386。
    BACKGROUND: Increased pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is urgently needed to substantially decrease HIV incidence among Black sexual minority men. Low perceived risk for HIV (PRH) is a key unaddressed PrEP barrier for Black sexual minority men. Peers and smartphone apps are popular intervention tools to promote community health behaviors, but few studies have used these together in a multicomponent strategy. Therefore, we designed a multicomponent intervention called POSSIBLE that used an existing smartphone app called PrEPme (Emocha Mobile Health, Inc) and a peer change agent (PCA) to increase PRH as a gateway to PrEP.
    OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to describe the feasibility and preliminary impact of POSSIBLE on PRH and willingness to accept a PrEP referral among Black sexual minority men.
    METHODS: POSSIBLE was a theoretically guided, single-group, 2-session pilot study conducted among Black sexual minority men from Baltimore, Maryland between 2019 and 2021 (N=69). POSSIBLE integrated a PCA and the PrEPme app that allows users to self-monitor sexual risk behaviors and chat with the in-app community health worker to obtain PrEP service information. PRH was assessed using the 8-item PRH scale before and after baseline and follow-up study visits. At the end of each study visit, the PCA referred interested individuals to the community health worker to learn more about PrEP service options.
    RESULTS: The average age of participants was 32.5 (SD 8.1, range 19-62) years. In total, 55 (80%) participants were retained for follow-up at month 1. After baseline sessions, 29 (42%) participants were willing to be referred to PrEP services, 20 (69%) of those confirmed scheduled appointments with PrEP care teams. There were no statistically significant differences in PRH between baseline and follow-up visits (t122=-1.36; P=.17).
    CONCLUSIONS: We observed no statistically significant improvement in PRH between baseline and month 1. However, given the high retention rate and acceptability, POSSIBLE may be feasible to implement. Future research should test a statistically powered peer-based approach on PrEP initiation among Black sexual minority men.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04533386; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04533386.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    药物不坚持显著阻碍戒烟努力。虽然有效的戒烟药物在中国是可以获得的,真实世界的依从性及其与治疗结果的相关性在很大程度上仍未被探索.
    从2017年12月到2022年1月,从中国所有七个地理区域的27个中心招募了1,120名参与者。结果显示,只有38.2%的吸烟者坚持规定的12周戒烟治疗,而受过高等教育的人更有可能坚持。此外,依从性良好的吸烟者更有可能成功戒烟.
    获得的数据可以增强我们对中国戒烟实践的了解。提高依从性是提高向吸烟者提供的戒烟治疗和管理的有效性的关键策略。
    UNASSIGNED: Medication non-adherence significantly impedes smoking cessation efforts. While effective smoking cessation medications are accessible in China, real-world adherence and its correlation with treatment outcomes remain largely unexplored.
    UNASSIGNED: From December 2017 to January 2022, 1,120 participants were recruited from 27 centers in all seven geographical regions of China. Results revealed that only 38.2% of smokers adhered to the prescribed 12-week smoking cessation treatment and those with a higher education level were more likely to be adherent. In addition, smokers with good adherence were more likely to successfully quit smoking.
    UNASSIGNED: The data obtained could enhance our understanding of smoking cessation practices in China. Improving adherence is a crucial strategy to enhance the effectiveness of smoking cessation treatments and management provided to smokers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不坚持是常见的,会导致不良的健康结果,生活质量下降,增加医疗支出。本研究的目的是使用两种在临床实践中有用且容易的自我报告方法(SRM)评估诊断有效性,以估计轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆症患者的不依从性患病率。考虑药丸计数作为参考方法(RM)。
    队列研究嵌套在一项多中心随机对照试验NCT03325699中。使用非概率连续抽样方法从8个健康中心总共选择了387名患者。纳入标准如下:迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)得分为20-28分;年龄超过55岁;服用处方药;并负责自己的药物使用。参与者在基线访视后随访18个月,即,6、12和18个月。在所有访问中测量与治疗依从性相关的变量。变量包括年龄,性别,治疗,合并症,和MMSE测试。坚持包括药丸计数和Morisky-Green检验(MGT)和Batalla检验(BT)作为SRM。统计分析包括描述性分析和95%置信区间(CI)。诊断有效性包括以下内容:1)SRM和RM之间的开放比较统计关联,以及2)层次结构比较:RM作为评估不依从性的最佳方法,Kappa值(k),灵敏度(S),特异性(Sp),和似然比(PPV/PPN)。
    共招募了387名患者,平均年龄为73.29岁(95%CI,72.54-74.04),其中59.5%为女性。合并症为54.4%HTA,35.9%骨关节病理,和24.5%DM。MMSE平均得分为25.57(95%CI,25.34-25.8)。RM的治疗依从性在基线的22.5%和26.3%之间波动,14.8%,在后续访问中占17.9%。对于SRM,治疗依从性在基线的43.5%和32.4%之间波动,21.9%,在后续访问中占20.3%。在所有访视的所有比较中,kappa值具有统计学显著性,得分在0.16和035之间。关于诊断的有效性,对于MGT来说,灵敏度在0.4和0.58之间振荡,特异性在0.68和0.87之间振荡;对于BT,灵敏度在0.4和0.7之间振荡,特异性在0.66和0.9之间振荡;当两种测试一起使用时,灵敏度在0.22和0.4之间振荡,特异性在0.85和0.96之间振荡。
    SRM正确分类非粘附受试者。它们非常容易使用,并在临床实践中产生快速结果,因此SRM将用于MCI和轻度痴呆患者的非依从性诊断。
    UNASSIGNED: Non-adherence is common and contributes to adverse health outcomes, reduced quality of life, and increased healthcare expenditure. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic validity to estimate the prevalence of non-adherence in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia using two self-reported methods (SRMs) that are useful and easy in clinical practice, considering the pill count as a reference method (RM).
    UNASSIGNED: The cohort study was nested in a multicenter randomized controlled trial NCT03325699. A total of 387 patients from 8 health centers were selected using a non-probabilistic consecutive sampling method. Inclusion criteria were as follows: a score of 20-28 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); older than 55 years; taking prescribed medication; and are in charge of their own medication use. Participants were followed up for 18 months after the baseline visit, i.e., 6, 12, and 18 months. Variables related with treatment adherences were measured in all visits. The variables included age, sex, treatment, comorbidities, and the MMSE test. Adherences included pill counts and Morisky-Green test (MGT) and Batalla test (BT) as SRMs. Statistical analysis included descriptive analysis and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The diagnostic validity included the following: 1) open comparison statistical association between SRMs and RMs and 2) hierarchy comparison: the RM as the best method to assess non-adherence, kappa value (k), sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), and likelihood ratio (PPV/PPN).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 387 patients were recruited with an average age of 73.29 years (95% CI, 72.54-74.04), of which 59.5% were female. Comorbidities were 54.4% HTA, 35.9% osteoarticular pathology, and 24.5% DM. The MMSE mean score was 25.57 (95% CI, 25.34-25.8). The treatment adherence for the RM oscillates between 22.5% in the baseline and 26.3%, 14.8%, and 17.9% in the follow-up visits. For SRMs, the treatment adherence oscillates between 43.5% in the baseline and 32.4%, 21.9%, and 20.3% in the follow-up visits. The kappa value was statistically significant in all the comparison in all visits with a score between 0.16 and 035. Regarding the diagnostic validity, for the MGT, the sensibility oscillated between 0.4 and 0.58, and the specificity oscillated between 0.68 and 0.87; for the BT, the sensibility oscillated between 0.4 and 0.7, and the specificity oscillated between 0.66 and 0.9; and when both tests were used together, the sensibility oscillated between 0.22 and 0.4, and the specificity oscillated between 0.85 and 0.96.
    UNASSIGNED: SRMs classify non-adherent subjects correctly. They are very easy to use and yield quick results in clinical practice, so SRMs would be used for the non-adherence diagnosis in patients with MCI and mild dementia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景。确定影响依从性的因素,如患者对药物的信念,对于有效的哮喘管理至关重要。这项研究旨在评估和深入了解哮喘患者对吸入药物的信念。方法。这是对INSPIRERS研究的二次分析。年龄≥13岁的患者,从2017年至2020年,我们从葡萄牙的60个初级和二级护理中心招募了患有持续性哮喘的患者和吸入型控制方处方.在面对面访问中收集人口统计学和临床特征。关于医学的特定信念问卷在1周后通过电话采访进行了管理。使用Mann-WhitneyU和Kruskal-Wallis检验来探索患者的信念和特征之间的关系。结果。共分析了552名参与者(平均32.8±17.3y.o.;64.5%为女性)。TheNecessityscore(Median19[p25-p7516,22])wassignificantlyhigherthantheConcernsscore(15[16,22],p小于0.001),导致一个正的必要性-关注微分(中位数4[0,7])。验收(高必要性,低关注)占61%的参与者,而19%的人是矛盾的(高必要性,高度关注)。青少年的必要性(中位数16vs20;p小于0.001)和关注点得分(中位数11vs15;p=0.002)低于成年人。在初级保健环境中,与二级护理相比,患者的必要性(中位数18vs19;p=0.027)和关注点(中位数14vs15;p=0.05)显著较低.Conclusions.发现吸入性哮喘药物治疗必要性的主要积极看法,尽管约有1/5的患者存在矛盾或冷漠。我们的发现强调了个性化方法解决信念和优化患者教育的重要性。
    UNASSIGNED: Background. Identifying factors influencing adherence, such as patients\' beliefs about medication, is essential for effective asthma management. This study aims to assess and gain insight into the beliefs of patients with asthma regarding inhaled medication. Methods. This is a secondary analysis of the INSPIRERS studies. Patients aged ≥ 13 y.o., with persistent asthma and a prescription for inhaled controller were recruited from 60 primary and secondary care centres in Portugal from 2017 to 2020. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected in a face-to-face visit. The Specific-Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire was administered 1-week later by telephone interview. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to explore relations between patients\' beliefs and characteristics. Results. A total of 552 participants (mean 32.8 ± 17.3 y.o.; 64.5% female) were analysed. The Necessity score (Median 19 [p25-p75 16,22]) was significantly higher than the Concerns score (15 [16,22], p less than 0.001), resulting in a positive Necessity-Concern differential (Median 4 [0,7]). Acceptance (high necessity, low concerns) characterized 61% of participants, while 19% were ambivalent (high necessity, high concerns). Adolescents exhibited lower Necessity (Median 16 vs 20; p less than 0.001) and Concerns scores (Median 11 vs 15; p = 0.002) than adults. In primary care setting, patients had significantly lower Necessity (Median 18 vs 19; p = 0.027) and Concerns (Median 14 vs 15; p = 0.05) compared to the secondary care. Conclusions. A predominantly positive perception of inhaled asthma medication necessity was found, although ambivalence or indifference exists in about 1/5 of patients. Our findings highlight the importance of personalized approaches to address beliefs and optimise patient education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号