OBJECTIVE: Phantom limb pain (PLP) is debilitating and affects over 70% of people with lower-limb amputation. Other neuropathic pain conditions correspond with increased spinal excitability, which can be measured using reflexes and F-waves. Spinal cord neuromodulation can be used to reduce neuropathic pain in a variety of conditions and may affect spinal excitability, but has not been extensively used for treating phantom limb pain. Here, we propose using a non-invasive neuromodulation method, transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), to reduce PLP and modulate spinal excitability after transtibial amputation. Approach: We recruited three participants, two males (5- and 9-years post-amputation, traumatic and alcohol-induced neuropathy) and one female (3 months post-amputation, diabetic neuropathy) for this 5-day study. We measured pain using the McGill Pain Questionnaire, visual analog scale (VAS), and pain pressure threshold test. We measured spinal reflex and motoneuron excitability using posterior root-muscle (PRM) reflexes and F-waves, respectively. We delivered tSCS for 30 minutes/day for 5 days. Main Results: After 5 days of tSCS, McGill Pain Questionnaire scores decreased by clinically-meaningful amounts for all participants from 34.0±7.0 to 18.3±6.8; however, there were no clinically-significant decreases in VAS scores. Two participants had increased pain pressure thresholds across the residual limb (Day 1: 5.4±1.6 lbf; Day 5: 11.4±1.0 lbf). F-waves had normal latencies but small amplitudes. PRM reflexes had high thresholds (59.5±6.1 µC) and low amplitudes, suggesting that in PLP, the spinal cord is hypoexcitable. After 5 days of tSCS, reflex thresholds decreased significantly (38.6±12.2 µC; p<0.001). Significance: These preliminary results in this non-placebo-controlled study suggest that, overall, limb amputation and PLP may be associated with reduced spinal excitability and tSCS can increase spinal excitability and reduce PLP.

Transspinal (or transcutaneous spinal cord) stimulation is a promising noninvasive method that may strengthen the intrinsic spinal neural connectivity in neurological disorders. In this study we assessed the effects of cervical transspinal stimulation on the amplitude of leg transspinal evoked potentials (TEPs), and the effects of lumbosacral transspinal stimulation on the amplitude of arm TEPs. Control TEPs were recorded following transspinal stimulation with one cathode electrode placed either on Cervical 3 (21.3 ± 1.7 mA) or Thoracic 10 (23.6 ± 16.5 mA) vertebrae levels. Associated anodes were placed bilaterally on clavicles or iliac crests. Cervical transspinal conditioning stimulation produced short latency inhibition of TEPs recorded from left soleus (ranging from - 6.11 to -3.87% of control TEP at C-T intervals of -50, -25, -20, -15, -10, 15 ms), right semitendinosus (ranging from - 11.1 to -4.55% of control TEP at C-T intervals of -20, -15, 15 ms), and right vastus lateralis (ranging from - 13.3 to -8.44% of control TEP at C-T intervals of -20 and - 15 ms) (p < 0.05). Lumbosacral transspinal conditioning stimulation produced no significant effects on arm TEPs. We conclude that in the resting state, cervical transspinal stimulation affects the net motor output of leg motoneurons under the experimental conditions used in this study. Further investigations are warranted to determine whether this protocol may reactivate local spinal circuitry after stroke or spinal cord injury and may have a significant effect in synchronization of upper and lower limb muscle synergies during rhythmic activities like locomotion or cycling.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) coupled with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) enhances task-specific training and leads to superior and more sustained gait improvements as compared with each of these strategies used in isolation in persons with chronic, incomplete spinal cord injury.
METHODS: Proof of concept, randomized crossover trial.
METHODS: Outpatient, rehabilitation hospital.
METHODS: Ten participants completed 3 intervention arms: (1) AIH, tSCS, and gait training (AIH + tSCS); (2) tSCS plus gait training (SHAM AIH + tSCS); and (3) gait training alone (SHAM + SHAM). Each arm consisted of 5 consecutive days of intervention with a minimum of a 4-week washout between arms. The order of arms was randomized. The study took place from December 3, 2020, to January 4, 2023.
METHODS: 10-meter walk test at self-selected velocity (SSV) and fast velocity, 6-minute walk test, timed Up and Go (TUG) and secondary outcome measures included isometric ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion torque RESULTS: TUG improvements were 3.44 seconds (95% CI: 1.24-5.65) significantly greater in the AIH + tSCS arm than the SHAM AIH + tSCS arm at post-intervention (POST), and 3.31 seconds (95% CI: 1.03-5.58) greater than the SHAM + SHAM arm at 1-week follow up (1WK). SSV was 0.08 m/s (95% CI: 0.02-0.14) significantly greater following the AIH + tSCS arm than the SHAM AIH + tSCS at POST. Although not significant, the AIH + tSCS arm also demonstrated the greatest average improvements compared with the other 2 arms at POST and 1WK for the 6-minute walk test, fast velocity, and ankle plantarflexion torque.
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study is the first to demonstrate that combining these 3 neuromodulation strategies leads to superior improvements in the TUG and SSV for individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury and warrants further investigation.

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzes the stimulation parameters implemented during two successful trials that used non-invasive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) to effectively improve upper extremity function after chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). It proposes a framework to guide stimulation programming decisions for the successful translation of these techniques into the clinic.
METHODS: Programming data from 60 participants who completed the Up-LIFT trial and from 17 participants who subsequently completed the LIFT Home trial were analyzed. All observations of stimulation amplitudes, frequencies, waveforms, and electrode configurations were examined. The incidence of adverse events and relatedness to stimulation parameters is reported. A comparison of parameter usage across the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) subgroups was conducted to evaluate stimulation strategies across participants with varying degrees of sensorimotor preservation.
RESULTS: Active (cathodal) electrodes were typically placed between the C3/C4 and C6/C7 spinous processes. Most sessions featured return (anodal) electrodes positioned bilaterally over the anterior superior iliac spine, although clavicular placement was frequently used by 12 participants. Stimulation was delivered with a 10-kHz carrier frequency and typically a 30-Hz burst frequency. Biphasic waveforms were used in 83% of sessions. Average stimulation amplitudes were higher for biphasic waveforms. The AIS B subgroup required significantly higher amplitudes than did the AIS C and D subgroups. Device-related adverse events were infrequent, and not correlated with specific waveforms or amplitudes. Within the home setting, participants maintained their current amplitudes within 1% of the preset values. The suggested stimulation programming framework dictates the following hierarchical order of parameter adjustments: current amplitude, waveform type, active/return electrode positioning, and burst frequency, guided by clinical observations as required.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis summarizes effective stimulation parameters from the trials and provides a decision-making framework for clinical implementation of tSCS for upper extremity functional restoration after SCI. The parameters are aligned with existing literature and proved safe and well tolerated by participants.

UNASSIGNED: It has been suggested that transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective in the rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the evidence is mainly based on case reports.
UNASSIGNED: To summarize the influence of transcutaneous SCS on extremity motor function of patients with SCI in a meta-analysis.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search was performed in electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, and CNKI to obtain relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A random-effects model was used to pool the results by incorporating the impact of the potential heterogeneity. The most recent database search was conducted on December 31, 2023.
UNASSIGNED: Six small-scale open-label or single-blind RCTs were included. Transcutaneous SCS on the basis of conventional rehabilitation could significantly improve limb strength (mean difference: 4.82, p = 0.004; I2 = 0%) and attenuate spasticity (MD: -0.40, p = 0.02; I2 = 0%). The upper-extremity motor function was not significantly affected (p = 0.75). However, transcutaneous SCS significantly improved mobility as indicated by walking speed (MD: 0.13 m/s, p = 0.009; I2 = 0%) and walking distance (standardized MD: 0.62, I2 = 0%).
UNASSIGNED: Transcutaneous SCS is effective in improving limb strength, spasticity and mobility of patients with SCI.

Transcutaneous multisegmental spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has shown superior efficacy in modulating spinal locomotor circuits compared to single-site stimulation in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Building on these findings, we hypothesized that administering a single session of tSCS at multiple spinal segments may yield greater enhancements in muscle strength and gait function during stimulation compared to tSCS at only one or two segments. In our study, tSCS was applied at single segments (C5, L1, and Coc1), two segments (C5-L1, C5-Coc1, and L1-Coc1), or multisegments (C5-L1-Coc1) in a randomized order. We evaluated the 6-m walking test (6MWT) and maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) and assessed the Hmax/Mmax ratio during stimulation in ten individuals with incomplete motor SCI. Our findings indicate that multisegmental tSCS improved walking time and reduced spinal cord excitability, as measured by the Hmax/Mmax ratio, similar to some single or two-site tSCS interventions. However, only multisegmental tSCS resulted in increased tibialis anterior (TA) muscle strength. These results suggest that multisegmental tSCS holds promise for enhancing walking capacity, increasing muscle strength, and altering spinal cord excitability in individuals with incomplete SCI.

Transspinal (or transcutaneous spinal cord) stimulation is a noninvasive, cost-effective, easily applied method with great potential as a therapeutic modality for recovering somatic and nonsomatic functions in upper motor neuron disorders. However, how transspinal stimulation affects motor neuron depolarization is poorly understood, limiting the development of effective transspinal stimulation protocols for rehabilitation. In this study, we characterized the responses of soleus α motor neurons to single-pulse transspinal stimulation using single-motor unit (SMU) discharges as a proxy given the 1:1 discharge activation between the motor neuron and the motor unit. Peristimulus time histogram, peristimulus frequencygram, and surface electromyography (sEMG) were used to characterize the postsynaptic potentials of soleus motor neurons. Transspinal stimulation produced short-latency excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) followed by two distinct phases of inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) in most soleus motor neurons and only IPSPs in others. Transspinal stimulation generated double discharges at short interspike intervals in a few motor units. The short-latency EPSPs were likely mediated by muscle spindle group Ia and II afferents, and the IPSPs via excitation of group Ib afferents and recurrent collaterals of motor neurons leading to activation of diverse spinal inhibitory interneuronal circuits. Further studies are warranted to understand better how transspinal stimulation affects depolarization of α motor neurons over multiple spinal segments. This knowledge will be seminal for developing effective transspinal stimulation protocols in upper motor neuron lesions.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Transspinal stimulation produces distinct actions on soleus motor neurons: an early short-latency excitation followed by two inhibitions or only inhibition and doublets. These results show how transspinal stimulation affects depolarization of soleus α motor neurons in healthy humans.

UNASSIGNED: Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSCS), a non-invasive form of spinal cord stimulation, has been shown to improve motor function in individuals living with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the effects of different types of TSCS currents including direct current (DC-TSCS), alternating current (AC-TSCS), and spinal paired stimulation on the excitability of neural pathways have not been systematically investigated. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the effects of TSCS on the excitability of neural pathways in adults with non-progressive SCI at any level.
UNASSIGNED: The following databases were searched from their inception until June 2022: MEDLINE ALL, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and clinical trials. A total of 4,431 abstracts were screened, and 23 articles were included.
UNASSIGNED: Nineteen studies used TSCS at the thoracolumbar enlargement for lower limb rehabilitation (gait & balance) and four studies used cervical TSCS for upper limb rehabilitation. Sixteen studies measured spinal excitability by reporting different outcomes including Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex), flexion reflex excitability, spinal motor evoked potentials (SMEPs), cervicomedullay evoked potentials (CMEPs), and cutaneous-input-evoked muscle response. Seven studies measured corticospinal excitability using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and one study measured somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) following TSCS. Our findings indicated a decrease in the amplitude of H-reflex and long latency flexion reflex following AC-TSCS, alongside an increase in the amplitudes of SMEPs and CMEPs. Moreover, the application of the TSCS-TMS paired associative technique resulted in spinal reflex inhibition, manifested by reduced amplitudes in both the H-reflex and flexion reflex arc. In terms of corticospinal excitability, findings from 5 studies demonstrated an increase in the amplitude of MEPs linked to lower limb muscles following DC-TSCS, in addition to paired associative stimulation involving repetitive TMS on the brain and DC-TSCS on the spine. There was an observed improvement in the latency of SSEPs in a single study. Notably, the overall quality of evidence, assessed by the modified Downs and Black Quality assessment, was deemed poor.
UNASSIGNED: This review unveils the systematic evidence supporting the potential of TSCS in reshaping both spinal and supraspinal neuronal circuitries post-SCI. Yet, it underscores the critical necessity for more rigorous, high-quality investigations.

Spasticity is a complex and multidimensional disorder that impacts nearly 75% of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and currently lacks adequate treatment options. This sensorimotor condition is burdensome as hyperexcitability of reflex pathways result in exacerbated reflex responses, co-contractions of antagonistic muscles, and involuntary movements. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has become a popular tool in the human SCI research field. The likeliness for this intervention to be successful as a noninvasive anti-spastic therapy after SCI is suggested by a mild and transitory improvement in spastic symptoms following a single stimulation session, but it remains to be determined if repeated tSCS over the course of weeks can produce more profound effects. Despite its popularity, the neuroplasticity induced by tSCS also remains widely unexplored, particularly due to the lack of suitable animal models to investigate this intervention. Thus, the basis of this work was to use tSCS over multiple sessions (multi-session tSCS) in a rat model to target spasticity after SCI and identify the long-term physiological improvements and anatomical neuroplasticity occurring in the spinal cord. Here, we show that multi-session tSCS in rats with an incomplete (severe T9 contusion) SCI (1) decreases hyperreflexia, (2) increases the low frequency-dependent modulation of the H-reflex, (3) prevents potassium-chloride cotransporter isoform 2 (KCC2) membrane downregulation in lumbar motoneurons, and (4) generally augments motor output, i.e., EMG amplitude in response to single pulses of tSCS, particularly in extensor muscles. Together, this work displays that multi-session tSCS can target and diminish spasticity after SCI as an alternative to pharmacological interventions and begins to highlight the underlying neuroplasticity contributing to its success in improving functional recovery.

Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSCS) is gaining popularity as a noninvasive alternative to epidural stimulation. However, there is still much to learn about its effects and utility in assisting recovery of motor control. In this study, we applied TSCS to healthy subjects concurrently performing a functional training task to study its effects during a training intervention. We first carried out neurophysiological tests to characterize the H-reflex, H-reflex recovery, and posterior root muscle reflex thresholds, and then conducted balance tests, first without TSCS and then with TSCS. Balance tests included trunk perturbations in forward, backward, left, and right directions, and subjects\' balance was characterized by their response to force perturbations. A balance training task involved the subjects playing a catch-and-throw game in virtual reality (VR) while receiving trunk perturbations and TSCS. Balance tests with and without TSCS were conducted after the VR training to measure subjects\' post-training balance characteristics and then neurophysiological tests were carried out again. Statistical comparisons using t-tests between the balance and neurophysiological data collected before and after the VR training intervention found that the immediate effect of TSCS was to increase muscle activity during forward perturbations and to reduce balance performance in that direction. Muscle activity decreased after training and even more once TSCS was turned off. We thus observed an interaction of effects where TSCS increased muscle activity while the physical training decreased it.