BACKGROUND: Tourniquets are commonly used in extremity surgery to help provide a bloodless operative field to improve visibility and reduce length of procedures. With the development of WALANT (wide awake, local anaesthetic, no tourniquet) techniques, many surgeons undertake surgery without tourniquet inflation. The correct technique of pneumatic tourniquet application is poorly understood by healthcare staff. The application of a tight tourniquet when applied for optional use or use for only a portion of a procedure, rather than for inflation throughout can cause venous engorgement of an extremity leading to increased blood loss and reduced operative field visualisation thereby discouraging surgeons from persevering with WALANT strategies.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of tourniquet application tension on limb volume prior to skin incision.
METHODS: 30 volunteers had the volume of their non-dominant forearm measured post-inflation of a surgical tourniquet using two different application techniques. Tight application was defined as the tourniquet fastened using a dynamometer to a tension of 100 N. Loose application was defined as the tourniquet fastened using a dynamometer to a tension of 50 N. The tourniquet was then inflated to 200 mmHg after both application techniques. Exsanguination was performed by elevation of the arm for 1 min prior to tourniquet inflation. At 5 min the forearm volume was measured using a volume displacement technique.
RESULTS: 93 % of participants (28/30) had a higher volume of water displaced when the tourniquet was applied tightly. The mean difference between the loose and tight applications was 30.06 mls.
CONCLUSIONS: The increase in volume in tightly applied tourniquets is believed to result from increased intravascular volume. This increase in blood volume can lead to increased intra-operative blood loss and poor intra-operative visualisation when operating without tourniquet inflation. Loose application of the tourniquet pre-inflation appears to prevent sequestration of venous blood in the limb, therefore decreasing operative blood loss and improving view for operating.
METHODS: Level 1; Symptom Prevalence Study.

Maintaining intraoperative haemostasis is crucial when conducting wide-awake hand surgeries, this is particularly to improve visibility which will improve patient\'s outcome. There are various methods that could achieve the aforementioned, some of which is wide awake local anaesthesia without tourniquet (WALANT) or Tourniquet alongside sedation. Each method has its own benefits and drawbacks. This study primarily focuses on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Trigger Finger release. A comprehensive literature review was conducted through PUBMED, Scopus, google scholar, and web of science. A total of 45 articles were included in the study. We aimed to assess whether the literature supports the use of a tourniquet alongside sedation, or only local anesthesia and epinephrine in wide awake hand surgeries. Moreover, we aimed to highlight the benefits and drawbacks of using a tourniquet, and determine the patient population most likely to benefit from tourniquet application.

OBJECTIVE: Increasingly, medical schools integrate clinical skills into early didactic coursework. The Stop the Bleed® Campaign emphasizes prehospital hemorrhage control to reduce preventable deaths; however, this course overlooks team interactions. We assessed the impact of high-fidelity simulation during medical student orientation on identification and treatment of life-threatening hemorrhage in a team setting.
METHODS: In this mixed method, prospective pre-, post-, and follow-up survey analysis assessing student knowledge and attitudes, student teams encountered a standardized patient in a prehospital environment with pulsatile bleeding from an extremity wound. Individual students completed surveys assessing previous experience, willingness and ability to assist bleeding person(s), and knowledge and attitudes about tourniquets. Postscenario, faculty preceptors made qualitative observations on teamwork.
METHODS: Medical student orientation at a tertiary care academic medical center with long-term follow-up.
METHODS: Medical students (N = 150).
RESULTS: Ninety students (60%) completed both pre- and postsimulation questionnaires. Sixteen (17%) students had previous tourniquet training experience although none had applied a tourniquet outside of training. Postsimulation, students reported increased likelihood of providing treatment until additional help arrived (p = 0.035), improved ability to identify life-threatening hemorrhage (p < 0.001), and more favorable opinions about tourniquet use (p < 0.001) and potential for limb-salvage (p = 0.018). Long-term follow-up respondents (n = 34, 23%) reported increased ability to identify life-threatening hemorrhage (p = 0.010) and universal willingness to intervene until additional help arrived. Follow-up survey responses elicited themes in hemorrhage control including recognition of the importance of continuous pressure, appropriate use of tourniquets, a desire for repeated team training, and the recognition of clerkship rotations as an optimal setting for skill reinforcement. Preceptors noted variable team responses but uniformly endorsed the exercise.
CONCLUSIONS: High-fidelity bleeding simulation during medical student orientation improved students\' knowledge and attitudes about treating life-threatening hemorrhage and served as an introduction to team-based emergency care. Future studies should further explore team training and hemorrhage control education.

BACKGROUND: Tourniquet is applied in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) to reduce intraoperative blood loss and improve view of surgical field. However, tourniquet use in TKA is still in dispute. Some researchers find that tourniquet may lead to extra side effects such as aggravated pain and limb swelling, while others consider that tourniquet has no significant adverse impact on clinical outcomes of TKA patients. This trial is conducted to evaluate tourniquet effect on TKA patients.
METHODS: A prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trail is adopted with a sample size of 130 knees from August 2020 to February 2023. Patients undergoing TKA are randomly allocated to tourniquet group and non-tourniquet group. Outcomes including quadriceps thickness and stiffness, operation time, total blood loss, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, thigh circumference, knee and thigh VAS, D-Dimer and CRP level, knee function score, patient satisfaction, and complications are evaluated in this trial. Student\'s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson\'s chi-square test, and Fisher\'s exact test are used in this study.
RESULTS: No significant difference in demographic information and baseline outcomes were found (p > 0.05). Participants in the tourniquet group had significantly less total blood loss and intraoperative blood loss, more postoperative blood loss, and higher D-Dimer level on postoperative day 3 when compared with non-tourniquet group (p < 0.05). Other outcomes including quadriceps thickness and stiffness, operation time, postoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, thigh circumference, knee and thigh VAS, D-Dimer level on postoperative day 1, CRP level, knee function score, patient satisfaction, and complications showed no significant difference (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Tourniquet application can effectively reduce intraoperative blood loss and total blood loss, without significant side effects. Hence, we advocate the regular use of tourniquet in primary TKA.

BACKGROUND: Pneumatic tourniquets are frequently employed in extremity surgeries, aiming to enhance intraoperative visibility and minimize blood loss. While their benefits and drawbacks have been extensively studied in lower limb operations, their impact on upper limb procedures, particularly elbow surgery, remains poorly understood. This study investigates the advantages and risks associated with pneumatic tourniquet utilization in elbow surgery.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 183 patients who underwent elbow surgery for fractures between January 2019 and September 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: those who underwent surgery with a tourniquet (WT) and those without a tourniquet (NT). Subgroup analyses were performed based on fracture complexity. Data collected included patient characteristics, tourniquet usage, surgical duration, pre- and postoperative hemoglobin levels, C-reactive protein levels, pain assessments, opioid administration, hospital stay duration, follow-up, complications, and revisions. Statistical analyses were used to identify significant differences and correlations.
RESULTS: The use of a tourniquet in elbow surgery yielded several notable outcomes. Patients in the WT group experienced significantly shorter surgical durations and hospital stays. Hemoglobin drop was lower in the WT group, indicating reduced blood loss. However, there were no significant differences in postoperative pain, opioid consumption, or complications between the WT and NT groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that the recorded differences, particularly shorter surgical durations, were more pronounced in complex fractures.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows promising results in the use of pneumatic tourniquets in elbow surgery in terms of enhanced efficiency, reduced blood loss, and overall safety, without compromising patient outcomes. However, the potential influence of perioperative decision-making on tourniquet usage underscores the need for further research to elucidate its role and optimize its application, especially in complex elbow fractures.

UNASSIGNED: To identify the effect of releasing a tourniquet before versus after wound closure in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on blood loss, functional outcome and postoperative complications.
UNASSIGNED: A prospective cohort study was conducted including 53 patients from May 2023 to September 2023. All patients underwent unilateral TKA and were divided into two groups based on surgeon preference of deflating tourniquet, Group A consisted of patients in whom the tourniquet was deflated before wound closure for haemostasis and Group B consisted of patients in which tourniquet was deflated after wound closure and compressive dressing. Blood loss was evaluated via intraoperative blood loss (the number of soaked sponges/gauzes, blood in a suction bottle, total output in a suction bottle-irrigation used) and on-field blood loss and calculated blood loss (Using Gross and Meunier\'s formula). The Functional outcome was evaluated using Knee injury and osteoarthritis score-42 questions. Early postoperative complications and differences in the requirement of blood transfusions were also assessed.
UNASSIGNED: There was a significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups. The median intraoperative blood loss was 135 mL (interquartile range [IQR]: 90-149) in Group A and 56.2 mL (IQR: 45-68) in Group B (p value: 0.001). However, no difference was found between the groups in calculated blood loss using Gross and Meunier\'s formula. The median calculated blood loss was 439 mL (IQR: 450-813) in Group A and 508 mL (IQR: 226-671) in group B (p value: 0.981). There was no significant difference between the groups in blood transfusion requirements or functional outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Based on our results, we conclude that the intraoperative blood loss in TKA is significantly different between the groups but only represents a fraction of true blood loss (23%). The timing of releasing the tourniquet does not affect functional outcomes, blood transfusion and postoperative morbidity; hence, any time can be opted as per surgeon preference.
UNASSIGNED: Level II, prospective comparative study.

UNASSIGNED: There is conflicting evidence in the literature regarding the clinical utility of tourniquets in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), specifically in regards to perioperative blood loss. In this meta-analysis and systematic review, we aim to evaluate the clinical advantages and disadvantages associated with tourniquet use in the setting of TKA.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic review was conducted through April 2017 using keywords: \"tourniquet\" and \"total knee arthroplasty\" or \"total knee replacement\". Perioperative variables including TXA use, blood loss, incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and wound complications were either extracted from the studies or corresponding authors were contacted. A sub-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of TXA on intraoperative and total blood loss (TBL), and VTE incidence.
UNASSIGNED: After review of 558 articles, 19 studies reporting outcomes in 1094 patients were analyzed. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the tourniquet cohorts compared to non-tourniquet (p < 0.01). TBL was reduced in tourniquet groups but not significantly (p = 0.08). In contrast, calculated blood loss was greater in tourniquet groups, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.43). There was a greater likelihood for wound complications and VTE among tourniquet assisted TKA, albeit only significant for the former (p = 0.01). TXA sub-analysis demonstrated intraoperative blood loss was significantly reduced with tourniquet use regardless of TXA implementation (p < 0.01). In studies without TXA, tourniquet patients were at greater risk of developing VTE (p = 0.08). These risks decreased with TXA administration.
UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis demonstrates that tourniquets prevent intraoperative blood loss, yet within the postoperative period, there is no significant difference in TBL between tourniquet and non-tourniquet assisted TKA.
UNASSIGNED: Level II; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This study addresses the challenges faced by diabetic patients undergoing lower extremity amputation due to diabetic foot, particularly focusing on the implications for wound healing and early mortality. The wounds at the amputation stump may necessitate multiple surgical interventions. The aim is to identify prognostic factors associated with these outcomes, shedding light on the complexities surrounding the postamputation phase. A prospective study was conducted on 39 diabetic patients who underwent lower extremity amputation due to diabetic foot between 2021 and 2022. Comprehensive preoperative data, encompassing parameters such as blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, hemoglobin A1c, albumin, protein, transferrin, ferritin levels, age, gender, body mass index, smoking habits, dialysis, revascularization, duration of surgery, and the use of tourniquet during the procedure were meticulously recorded. Additionally, cognitive performance and depression status were assessed preoperatively using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), respectively. A follow-up period of 3 months postsurgery allowed for the comparison of patients who developed infections at the amputation stump with those who did not, as well as the distinction between patients who survived and those who succumbed to mortality. The study revealed that the use of a tourniquet during surgery significantly increased the risk of infection (p = .027), and higher BDI scores were associated with increased risks of both infection (AUC = 0.814) and mortality (AUC = 0.769), with cut-off scores of 24.0 and 23.5 predicting these outcomes with high sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Additionally, lower MMSE scores were associated with increased short-term postoperative mortality. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in parameters such as complete blood count, ESR, CRP, procalcitonin, HbA1c, albumin, total protein, transferrin, ferritin levels, age, gender, BMI, smoking, dialysis, revascularization, and surgery duration. This investigation highlights the significance of considering tourniquet usage during amputation, preoperative depression status, and cognitive function in patients who undergo amputation due to diabetic foot. The use of a tourniquet during surgery is a significant risk factor for infection, and elevated BDI scores are strong predictors of both infection and mortality in patients undergoing amputations. The findings underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary neuropsychiatric evaluation preoperatively to enhance patient care and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The widespread pre-hospital use of tourniquets, particularly in the upper limb, raises questions about associated morbidity, which has been little studied and may have serious consequences for functional prognosis.
METHODS: A review of 9 patients was carried out, analyzing pre-hospital tourniquet use in terms of complications affecting recovery.
RESULTS: There were serious complications: musculocutaneous nerve palsy in 1 patient, and compartment syndrome, rhabdomyolysis and ischemia-reperfusion syndrome in another. A role of prolonged pre-hospital tourniquet application in postoperative infection was also suspected in 2 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk-benefit ratio and indications for using a tourniquet on the upper limb in the pre-hospital setting need to be reconsidered.

Human hands have a complex anatomical structure. The thumb, being an integral part of the hand, has an essential function in gripping. In this sense, thumb fractures account for 4% of all hand fractures (it may occur in association with fractures of the trapezium). The majority of hand fractures should be treated non-surgically and surgeons must avoid unnecessary surgery. Historically, hand surgery has used a combination of local/regional/general anaesthesia and a tourniquet. This study aims to carry out a systematic review to determine whether the WALANT technique is an advantageous alternative to conventional anaesthesia for surgical procedures on thumb injuries, in terms of patient function and pain.
METHODS: We conducted a search in the following databases: Pubmed/Medline, EBSCOhost, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar, using the equation \"WALANT\" OR \"Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet\" AND \"thumb pathology\".
RESULTS: In five of the 584 articles included, two studied trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis, one De Quervain\'s disease and the remaining two flexor injuries. WALANT showed good results in active movements, but with similar levels of pain between anaesthetics. Patients were more anxious during general anaesthesia, plus the fact that they were fasting and suspending medication.
CONCLUSIONS: WALANT is a convenient and favourable option in several studies. It has been demonstrated the benefits in terms of return to function and pain.