UNASSIGNED: Hip fractures in older adults often lead to adverse health outcomes, which may be related to time to surgery and longer hospital stays. The experience of older adults with hip fractures in New Brunswick is not known.
UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective observational study. All hip fracture patients 65 years of age and older admitted to one hospital designated as a Level One Trauma Centre between April 1, 2015 and March 31, 2019 comprised the sample.
UNASSIGNED: The majority (86.5%) received surgery within 48 hours and those who had surgery beyond this time frame had a significantly longer stay in acute care (OR: 3.79, 95% CI: 2.05-7.15). The mean total length of stay (Total-LOS) for patients discharged after their acute care needs were met was 9.8 days (SD=8.1) compared to patients experiencing delays in discharge for nonmedical reasons which was 26.3 days (SD=33.7). An extended stay in acute care (OR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.09-3.43) and increasing age (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.001-1.06) were associated with a higher likelihood of death at one year post-discharge. Time to surgery beyond 24 hours (OR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.13-7.38) was associated with a higher likelihood of death 30 days post-discharge.
UNASSIGNED: Most patients had surgery within the national benchmark of less than 48 hours. The Total-LOS increased 2.5-fold in patients who remained in hospital after their acute care needs were met. A better understanding of patient characteristics, such as frailty, may better predict patients at risk for longer hospital stays and adverse health outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are becoming more common in youth athletes. Time-to-surgery has been shown to significantly affect the rates of concurrent injuries at the time of ACL reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate if time-to-surgery in ACLR impacts observances of intra-articular injuries and to categorize injury profile in relation to time.
METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective cohort study was conducted. Included subjects were aged 21 and below and underwent primary ACLR within 6 months of injury between January 2012 and April 2020. Skeletal maturity was determined via imaging. Laterality, location and severity/pattern of meniscal and chondral injuries were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to identify risk factors for intra-articular pathology. Cut-off analyses were added to regression models to identify trends of concurrent injuries.
RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifty patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients with observed articular cartilage injuries had a significantly longer time-to-surgery of 66 days (p = 0.01). Risk factors for chondral injury were time-to-surgery (p = 0.01) and skeletal maturity (p = 0.01), while medial meniscal tears were prognosticated by time-to-surgery (p = 0.03), skeletal maturity (p = 0.01) and body mass index (p = 0.00). Cut-off analysis showed that after 40 days the proportion of patients with observed chondral injury increased with time to surgery and that there were significantly different observances of chondral (p = 0.00) and medial meniscal (p = 0.03) injuries in the 6-week model, as compared to the continuous time model.
CONCLUSIONS: Longer time-to-surgery in ACLR is associated with higher rates of concomitant intra-articular pathology, especially chondral injuries. After 40 days, the observed rates of intra-articular injury increase proportionately with time from injury. A 6-week categorical model best stratifies intra-articular injury risk profile. Risk factor analysis identified skeletally mature patients with delayed surgery of >12 weeks to be at the highest risk for both chondral and medial meniscal injuries after an ACLR.
METHODS: Level III.

BACKGROUND: Delayed time to surgery, in the case of orthopedic trauma, is well known to be associated with higher morbidity and mortality, an extended duration of hospitalization, and an associated rise in overall cost. Delayed time to surgery of at least 3 days following hospital admission is associated with elevated risk of complications following surgery for a standard, non-pathologic, humeral shaft fracture. To our knowledge, it is unknown whether the same association is present for pathologic humerus fractures. The primary objective of this study was to identify risk factors, including patient characteristics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications, that are associated with delayed time to surgery following pathologic humeral fracture.
METHODS: All patients undergoing surgical management of pathologic humerus fractures across a 6-year period from 2015 to 2021 were queried using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Postoperative complications were reported within 30 days of procedure. Delayed time to surgery was defined by ≥ 2 days from hospital admission to surgery. We identified a total of 248 patients, and 39.9% (n = 99) of patients had delayed time to surgery. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for all significantly associated variables was employed to identify predictors of delayed time to surgery for pathologic humerus fractures.
RESULTS: The characteristics of patients significantly associated with delayed time to surgery were ASA classification ≥ 3 (p = 0.016), dependent functional status (p = 0.041), and congestive heart failure (p = 0.008). After adjusting for all significantly associated patient variables, the characteristics of patients independently associated with delayed time to surgery were non-home discharge (OR: 2.93, 95% CI 1.53-5.63; p = 0.001) and extended length of stay (OR: 2.00, 95% CI 1.06-3.77; p = 0.033).
CONCLUSIONS: Delayed time to surgery of at least 2 days was independently associated with non-home discharge and extended postoperative length of stay. After controlling for baseline patient characteristics and comorbidities, delayed time to surgery was not independently associated with increased 30-day complications after surgical treatment of pathologic humeral fractures. This is in contrast to standard, non-pathologic humerus fractures in which delayed time to surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications.
METHODS: Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Prognosis Study.

(1) Background: Hip fractures are currently recognized as major public health problems, raising many issues in terms of both patients\' quality of life and the cost associated with caring for this type of fracture. Many authors debate whether to operate as soon as possible or to postpone surgery until the patient is stable. The purpose of this review was to review the literature and obtain additional information about the moment of surgery, the time to surgery, length of hospital stay, and how all of these factors influence patient mortality and complications. (2) Methods: The systematic search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and PICO guidelines, using the Google Scholar platform, for articles published between 2015 and 2023. Quality assessment was performed. (3) Results: After applying the inclusion criteria, 20 articles were included in the final list. Those who had surgery within 48 h had lower in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates than those who operated within 24 h. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score is an important predictive factor for surgical delay, length of hospital stay (LOS), complications, and mortality. (4) Conclusions: Performing surgery in the first 48 h after admission is beneficial to patients after medical stabilization. Avoidance of delayed surgery will improve postoperative complications, LOS, and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Longer time to surgery (TTS) is associated with worse survival in patients with breast cancer. Whether this association has encouraged more prompt care delivery remains unknown.
METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients ≥18 years of age diagnosed with clinical stage 0-III breast cancer between 2006 and 2019 for whom surgery was the first mode of treatment. A linear-by-linear test for trend assessed median TTS across the interval. Adjusted linear regression modeling was used to examine TTS trends across patient subgroups.
RESULTS: Overall, 1,435,584 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR] 53-72), 84.3% of patients were White, 91.1% were non-Hispanic, and 99.2% were female. The median TTS in 2006 was 26 days (IQR 16-39) versus 39 days in 2019 (IQR 27-56) [p < 0.001]. In a multivariable linear regression model, TTS increased significantly, with an annual increase of 0.83 days (95% confidence interval 0.82-0.85; p < 0.001). A consistent, significant increase in TTS was observed on subgroup analyses by surgery type, reconstruction, patient race, hospital type, and disease stage. Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, and having either Medicaid or being uninsured were significantly associated with prolonged TTS, as were mastectomy and reconstructive surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite evidence that longer TTS is associated with poorer outcomes in patients with breast cancer, TTS has steadily increased, which may be particularly detrimental to marginalized patients. Further studies are needed to ensure the delivery of timely care to all patients.

OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis was conducted to compare: 1) time from traumatic brain injury (TBI) to the hospital, and 2) time within the hospital to intervention or surgery, by country-level income, World Health Organization region, and healthcare payment system.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted and followed by a meta-analysis comparing duration of delays (prehospital and intrahospital) in TBI management. Means and standard deviations were pooled using a random effects model and subgroup analysis was performed using R software.
RESULTS: Our analysis comprised 95,554 TBI patients from 45 countries.
UNASSIGNED: From 23 low- and middle-income countries, a longer mean time from injury to surgery (862.53 minutes, confidence interval [CI]: 107.42-1617.63), prehospital (217.46 minutes, CI: -27.34-462.25), and intrahospital (166.36 minutes, 95% CI: 96.12-236.60) durations were found compared to 22 high-income countries.
UNASSIGNED: African Region had the greatest total (1062.3 minutes, CI: -1072.23-3196.62), prehospital (256.57 minutes [CI: -202.36-715.51]), and intrahospital durations (593.22 minutes, CI: -3546.45-4732.89).
UNASSIGNED: Multiple-Payer Health Systems had a greater prehospital duration (132.62 minutes, CI: 54.55-210.68) but greater intrahospital delays were found in Single-Payer Health Systems (309.37 minutes, CI: -21.95-640.69).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study concludes that TBI patients in low- and middle-income countries within African Region countries face prolonged delays in both prehospital and intrahospital management compared to high-income countries. Additionally, patients within Single-Payer Health System experienced prolonged intrahospital delays. An urgent need to address global disparities in neurotrauma care has been highlighted.

UNASSIGNED: Preoperative frailty and surgical waiting times are associated with the occurrence of adverse outcomes in patients with hip fractures. Specifically, we aimed to investigate the influence of frailty status and surgical timing on the risk of serious adverse events during hospitalization.
UNASSIGNED: This study utilized an observational single cohort design and included patients aged ≥60 years with a primary diagnosis of hip fracture. Frailty was assessed using the chart-derived frailty index (CFI), which was calculated based on demographic and routine laboratory variables. The primary outcome of interest was the occurrence of in-hospital serious adverse events. A multivariate logistic regression model was utilized to examine the risk factors influencing outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: The study included 427 participants, with a mean age of 80.28 ± 8.13 years and 64.2% of whom were female. Patients with high CFI have more comorbidities (P < .001), lower surgical rates (P = .002), and delayed surgical times (P = .033). A total of 239 patients (56.0%) experienced serious adverse events. The high CFI group had a significantly higher occurrence of serious adverse events compared to the low CFI group (73.4% vs 48.5%, P < .001). After adjusting for surgical timing and covariates, the multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that high frailty significantly increased the risk for serious adverse events (OR = 2.47, 95% CI 1.398-4.412), infection (OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.146-3.446), acute heart failure (OR = 3.37, 95% CI 1.607-7.045). However, the timing of surgery did not demonstrate any association with these outcomes. In addition, after adjusting for surgical factors, high CFI remains an independent risk factor for these complications.
UNASSIGNED: Frailty serves as a reliable predictor of the probability of encountering severe adverse events while hospitalized for elderly individuals with hip fractures. This method has the potential to pinpoint particular modifiable factors that necessitate intervention, whereas the impact of surgical timing remains uncertain and necessitates additional research.

OBJECTIVE: There is a global trend of increased periprosthetic fractures due to the growing number of arthroplasty procedures. The present study assessed the impact of factors such as time to surgery and type of surgery on the outcomes, which have been seldom evaluated for periprosthetic fractures.
METHODS: An observational study was conducted on consecutive 87 patients within an NHS district hospital trust in the UK. Patients who underwent a complete hip replacement prior to the fracture, received fixation therapy, or underwent revision surgery within the specified time were screened. Patients were grouped in two ways: based on time to surgery and based on surgery type. Logistic regression models were performed to assess for statistically significant differences in post-operative complication, 30-day, and 1-year mortality rates between groups, whilst adjusting for age, gender, and ASA grade.
RESULTS: Forty-one patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), 29 patients underwent revision arthroplasty, and 17 patients were subjected to both, ORIF and revision arthroplasty. Sixty of the 87 patients were operated on > 48 h of injury. The median hospital stay was significantly lower in the ORIF plus revision arthroplasty group, versus other surgical groups (p < 0.05) whilst it was significantly higher in the group of patients who underwent surgery after 48 h of injury (p < 0.05). Numerically higher mortality was noted in the revision arthroplasty group (31.03%, p > 0.05). The group that was operated after 48 h of injury showed greater mortality but was comparable to the other group (25% vs. 14.81%, p > 0.05). For post-operative complications, none of the variables were significantly predictive (p > 0.05). However, for 30-day mortality, ASA grade (p = 0.04) and intra-operative complications (p = 0.0001) were significantly predictive. Additionally, for 1-year mortality, ASA grade (p = 0.004) was noted to be significantly predictive.
CONCLUSIONS: Revision and delayed periprosthetic fracture management (> 48 h after injury) group showed a numerically greater mortality risk; however, this finding was not statistically significant. ASA grading at baseline is predictive of mortality for periprosthetic fractures.

BACKGROUND: The length of time from diagnosis of breast cancer to surgery has steadily increased. Consultations and tests, in addition to a lack of available counseling programs, contribute to delays. Evidence suggests that delays between diagnosis and surgery may adversely affect patients.
OBJECTIVE: This article examines the effect of time from diagnosis of breast cancer to surgery by requiring nurse navigators to contact the genetic counseling office within 48 hours of the diagnosis to schedule an appointment for the patient as soon as possible.
METHODS: Using a quasiexperimental design, data of time from diagnosis to surgery among patients with breast cancer were collected retrospectively preintervention (N = 30) and prospectively postintervention (N = 30).
RESULTS: Time from diagnosis to surgery decreased significantly from pre- (mean = 50.3 days, SD = 22 days) to postintervention (mean = 39 days, SD = 16 days) (t = 2.25, p = 0.03).

BACKGROUND: In patients who have hip fractures, treatment within 24 hours reduces mortality and complication rates. A similar relationship can be assumed for patients who have hip periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFs) owing to the similar baseline characteristics of the patient populations. This monocentric retrospective study aimed to compare the complication and mortality rates in patients who had hip PPF treated within and after 24 hours.
METHODS: In total, 350 consecutive patients who had hip PPF in a maximum-care arthroplasty and trauma center between 2006 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. The cases were divided into 2 groups using a time to surgery (TTS) of 24 hours as the cutoff value. The primary outcome variables were operative and general complications as well as mortalities within 1 year.
RESULTS: Overall, the mean TTS was 1.4 days, and the 1-year mortality was 14.6%. The TTS ≤ 24 hours (n = 166) and TTS > 24 hours (n = 184) groups were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics and comorbidities. Surgical complications were equally frequent in the 2 groups (16.3 versus 15.2%, P = .883). General complications occurred significantly more often in the late patient care group (11.4 versus 28.3%, P < .001). In addition, the 30-day mortality (0.6 versus 5.5%, P = .012), and 1-year mortality (8.3 versus 20.5%, P = .003) rates significantly increased in patients who had TTS > 24 hours. Cox regression analysis yielded a hazard ratio of 4.385 (P < .001) for the TTS > 24 hours group.
CONCLUSIONS: Prompt treatment is required for patients who have hip PPF to reduce mortality and overall complications.